Slashdot Mirror


User: Feanturi

Feanturi's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,166
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,166

  1. Re:So? on Satellites Show That Earth Has a Fever · · Score: 1

    Here's where the troll part comes in. Do you actually believe the only consequence of global warming is rolling up our pants and walking inland a couple feet? The economy falls apart when the prices go up on oil. What do you think will happen when we are asked to MOVE LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK INLAND??? What happens when the phytoplankton are no longer able to survive in the ocean water with low salinity? Well, let me tell you that phytoplankton produce most of the oxygen you breath...

    Not trolling but, the process isn't going to happen overnight. People in LA on the coast aren't going to just wake up floating one morning. You say that a significant measure of our oxygen supply will be lost, but again this is a slow process and as such perhaps the global system will adapt along with it. At the very least, the opportunity for adaptation is there, as it's going to take quite a few years. Remember that Earth has been through this before, and life continued on.

  2. The heat wave image doesn't look population-based on Satellites Show That Earth Has a Fever · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I'm way off track or not, but I had a look at the map of the Europe heatwave and compared it to a night-time sattelite pic of the world. The lights and their concentration roughly equate to the population densities, and I can't find many similarities between the distribution of mankind and Earth heat. I don't know if that means anything, but it doesn't appear to me that we have much to do with this 'fever'.

  3. Re:100-year shelf life, but 3 year usage life?? on The Myth Of The 100-Year CD-Rom · · Score: 1

    my friend's rare Pearl Jam CD's are nearly scratched beyond playability,

    Scratches on CDs are a lesser problem, fortunately. I know a guy who runs a business repairing CDs by sanding and polishing the scratched surface down a tiny little bit. Obviously you can't do this more than a few times, but a disc presumed to be dead from scratches can apparently be brought back to full functionality, assuming there wasn't also damage to the foil.

  4. Re:Interesting....but leads to other questions! on New Polymer Ideal For Secure Data Storage · · Score: 1

    Finally, making a reader for the material is one thing, but I imagine making a writer is an altogether trickier process....how do add and remove all these dye-polymer shells, or is the whole point to have a static, WORM-style data store?

    I can imagine something like this: The dyes undergo some chemical change when a specific wavelength of laser light is applied to one of these 'onions'. Until activated in this way, the various shells in the onion don't react in the specific way needed to read any data from any of the shells. That would be state 0. Shine the correct light at the onion and (let's say) the third shell in changes somehow, and starts reflecting in the expected way, and you have just stored whatever state that would be, depending on how many shells you had. I have no idea if this could really work, and even less of an idea if something made that way could be re-writable, but it's fun to guess. :)

  5. Re:Really bad examples to pick... on Universal 3D File Format In The Works · · Score: 1

    Not only did they pick two lossy formats to use as examples,

    Well, what I got out of that was that those two formats are readily recognized by the public at large, and so made convenient examples. Patent-encumberance aside, those two formats really do dominate their fields after all, and that was the point being made.

    Anyway, I would think that a lossy 3D data format would just be silly, and is likely not being considered. The patent war will still be an issue probably, but a good 3D format standard would so totally rock, I hope it works out well.

  6. Re:Remote Controlled Device not robot on This Robot Collects Fingerprints · · Score: 1

    We call them
    Remote Controlled Cars
    Remote Controlled Planes
    these are clearly not "ROBOTS".


    This is because, clearly we have drifted away from the strict definition of a robot as an autonomous machine. Instead what we do, as soon as you've given a machine the facility to pick something up and manipulate that something, that defines it as a robot. Take an RC car for example, and mount a, um, robot arm (what else can we call it?) on top. Voila, you have a robot car. It's not technically correct, but this is normal practice for the bastardization of a language, it's been going on for millenia so we'd best get used to it.

  7. We already have an HDD assault cannon... on HDD Assault Cannon · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called Slashdot, and it worked again. ;)

  8. Re:Control of colours via USB on Seven Color LED Mousepad · · Score: 1

    With a simple API, it should be easy to change the colours on the fly, going from blue to red (or whatever) depending on different 'threat' conditions.

    I dunno, maybe I'm weird, but when I'm gaming I spend most of the time looking at the screen (ie: HUD) and not glancing over to see where my mouse is. I already know where my mouse is, I already know where the buttons are under my fingers. Doesn't a threat indicator belong right in front of your eyes on the screen, where no extra hardware is needed?

  9. Re:Mouse Pad? on Seven Color LED Mousepad · · Score: 1

    With optical mice why would anyone need a mouse pad? Back in the day with the old-style mice, I would occasionally move my mouse off the pad thus resulting my Rocket Launcher pointing in some odd direction. Once I switched to an optical mouse, that .99c IKEA mouse pad was thrown out the window.

    Amen to that. The day I got an optical mouse was the last time I ever used a mousepad. Well at home at least. Oh, the sweet freedom! Plus, a desk surface is far easier to keep clean than a (textured) mousepad. More to the point, a *textured* mousepad has to be the stupidest thing to use with an optical mouse. Sure, maybe you've got a really blank desk surface, it happens, but for Smith's sake, why do some people insist on dragging their poor mouse over all that bloody friction? Liberate your optical! Get a better desk and let it all hang loose baby, the ride just gets wilder from here...

  10. Re:That would be great on Money That Grows On Trees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if Gold was actually scarce, the reality is it is not uncommon at all, why go through a complicated refining process to extract grams when the same amount of extraction energy would be better put to extracting tonnes

    It's not so much about getting every last bit of gold through an involved process.. The process is there to clean up the ground from all the contaminants from the mining, so the land can eventually be used for food crops.

  11. Re:The important question is... on Money That Grows On Trees · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... how much do you spend to get a dollar-worth of gold/other metals to grow on a tree. The article does not say that.

    What the article does say is that he gets his money back. The harvested metals pay for the cleanup. It might not be a huge profit, the article doesn't mention anything about that, but at least it appears self-sustaining.

  12. Re:Gabriel's Horn on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 1

    Eventually the horn's diameter gets so small that atoms are too big to express the shape. What happens then?

  13. Re:Why Classify? on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 1

    Archimedes was outside the container. From 4 miles under the Earth's mantle, your ability to observe is extremely limited, that's what was being asked. When 4 miles down is all you've ever known, how can you measure the contents when you yourself are part of the contents? You can't see the boundaries, you don't know the planet is full, you don't know if it's inside a Dyson Sphere either, seismo-data be damned.

  14. Re:Why Classify? on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 1

    That's the first time I've ever seen "infinite space" and "no room [...] between things" used in conjunction.

    That's my point, I don't think you can have infinite space AND infinite matter. So if you don't have infinite matter, you're not going to have infinite copies of yourself living identical lives.

  15. Re:Why Classify? on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 1

    If the universe is infinite, you necessarily have an infinite number of identical copies of you, living exactly the same life you are.

    I disagree. If the Universe is infinite, that only implies to me that Space is infinite. It doesn't mean that Matter can't still be finite. If Matter was also infinite (that's the only way you could have infinite copies of yourself strewn about the cosmos), I would think there would be no room for Space between things.

  16. Re:Why Classify? on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 1

    As to your example about being 4 miles deep in the Earth, even though you may not be able to "see" the outer surface of the planet, you could still use seismic observation to map the size and shape of the earth from the inside. By observing radiation and light-shifts we now have the new and improved "shape of the Universe".

    But if you've always been 4 miles deep in the Earth, what frame of reference can you use to determine what your seismological data really means? Figuring out the Earth is round from being on the surface isn't nearly as difficult, as you can track the stars and the sun and stuff, that's what plants such notions of non-flatness. But from inside, with nothing to watch but some needles twitching on a graph, how would you ever know what you were really witnessing?

    If space is curved, and light travels along the curvature, then anything we see should appear 'normal' to us since we are within the same frame of reference. So our observations of the shape of space are tainted by the bias of our sensors (telescopes, eyes) being uniquely attuned to whatever shape it really is. It's like the perceptual separation between the brain and the mind.. Your brain creates and sustains a thinking awareness that can observe and comprehend all sorts of external stimuli, and yet this mind is completely unaware of the energy fluctuations within that are making it go. I will never be able to directly perceive my neurons interacting with their fellows, because I *AM* of them. Examination with equipment does not count, as that is using a frame of reference external to me. I am saying I will never be able to see it myself with my own brain as the sensor. As we are of the Universe, we can never really know it. We can make some really good guesses that I believe we shall never finally prove.

  17. Re:A funnel now? on Is the Universe Shaped Like a Funnel? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article made me think of this gem:

    'Alright,' said Ford, 'imagine this. Right. You get this bath. Right. A large round bath. And it's made of ebony.'
    'Where from?' said Arthur, 'Harrods was destroyed by the Vogons.'
    'Doesn't matter.'
    'So you keep saying.'
    'Listen.'
    'Alright.'
    'You get this bath, see? Imagine you've got this bath. And it's ebony. And it's conical.'
    'Conical?' said Arthur, 'What sort of...'
    'Shhh!' said Ford. 'It's conical. So what you do is, you see, you fill it with fine white sand, alright? Or sugar. Fine white sand, and/or sugar. Anything. Doesn't matter. Sugar's fine. And when it's full, you pull the plug out... are you listening?'
    'I'm listening.'
    'You pull the plug out, and it all just twirls away, twirls away you see, out of the plughole.'
    'I see.'
    'You don't see. You don't see at all. I haven't got to the clever bit yet. You want to hear the clever bit?'
    'Tell me the clever bit.'
    Ford thought for a moment, trying to remember what the clever bit was.
    'The clever bit,' he said, 'is this. You film it happening.'
    'Clever,' agreed Arthur.
    'You get a movie camera, and you film it happening.'
    'Clever.'
    'That's not the clever bit. This is the clever bit, I remember now that this is the clever bit. The clever bit is that you then thread the film in the projector... backwards!'
    'Backwards?'
    'Yes. Threading it backwards is definitely the clever bit. So then, you just sit and watch it, and everything just appears to spiral upwards out of the plughole and fill the bath. See?'
    'And that's how the Universe began is it?' said Arthur.
    'No,' said Ford, 'but it's a marvelous way to relax.'

  18. Re:Futurama... on Sapphire: A Liquid That Won't Get Things Wet · · Score: 1

    Here is a possibility, we take celebrity heads, put them in saphire, so that in the future everyone can enjoy their wisdom, and entertaining abilities.

    Ok, that's just freaky.. As I got to this post I happened to be watching Futurama on TV, where Fry drinks the Emperor of the water people by accident.

  19. Re:Paid spam on Paid To Spam · · Score: 1

    I think step 4 is likely to be the extremely difficult part of this otherwise simple plan, regardless of how many CPU hours you can rack up. :)

  20. Re:Not the first spam, but a new level of chatter on Happy Spamiversary! · · Score: 1

    Late night MUDding, people get bored sometimes and start shouting favorite song lyrics or performing favorite sketches.. Inevitably someone would start that particular sketch..

    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Dufus says, 'So let's kill this thing...'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Filbert says, 'Ok'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Dufus says, 'Let's wait till the spamming stops.'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'Lovely SPAM! Wonderful SPAM!'
    Filbert shouts, 'Hey! Stop spamming!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Dufus says, 'What an asshole...'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAM!'
    Feanturi shouts, 'SPAMMITY SPAM!'
    etc...

    And LambdaMOO had a couple rooms where Monty Python characters (the Bruces and the Spam guys) performed their bits round the clock. Very hard to talk in either room, but amusing to hang out in sometimes.

  21. Re:I thought... on Happy Spamiversary! · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're not crazy, that's in the article. So the title is kind of misleading.. They're just focusing on the event 10 years ago that really pissed everybody off, with the Green Card Lottery. That one didn't piss me off as much as that stupid MAKE.MONEY.FAST and subsequent spam later claiming the guy had been caught, but the FBI agent named had already been dead for awhile..
    Anyone remember those good old days when you would get an unsolicited email, reply to postmaster@domain with a suitably indignant response, and actually get something back from the postmaster saying, "Thank you for bringing this to our attention, our policy blah blah, the user has been suspended permanently, blah blah" That was so cool.. They weren't doing much header-forging back then, it was easy and fun to have them yanked.

  22. Re:Carry a jammer on Why Mobile Phones Are Annoying · · Score: 1

    In the same sense, we can't just block all cell phones in a certain area just because of one or two inconsiderate users.

    Then we get the cellphone from them and beat them senseless with it. It's still rude, it's still illegal, and it's still dangerous, but much much more satisfying.

  23. Re:Personally on Why Mobile Phones Are Annoying · · Score: 1

    Take the vibrating alert.. Thats a good start. Why not improve on it? like make a little ring or bracelet or pen or whatever and make that vibrate too? Or maybe even a watch strap? It informs you of a call and is non annoying at the same time.

    Better still, I want a watch I can talk to, and get it to start my car for me and drive to where I'm making my speedy getaway from the badguys that had the stolen bomb plans.

  24. Re:Cute Girl + Dorky Outfit != Geek on The Geek Shall Inherit the Earth · · Score: 1

    It's Great to be a Nerd (the Arrogant Worms)

    It's great to be a nerd! It's great to be a nerd!
    The only light we ever see is from our monitors!

    We argue about comic books and internet connections,
    The biggest highlight of the year is a Star Trek convention.

    Our town wasn't big enough to sign up any stars,
    But we once met a red shirt who was phasered by a borg!

    Spoken: "Man! He knew Mr. Sulu!"
    "What?!"

    It's great to be a nerd! It's great to be a nerd!
    We wear our Star Trek uniforms and talk like Captain Kirk!

    We have our own heroes who we try to emulate,
    I dream of one day being as sexy as Bill Gates!

    We hate watching sports 'cuz we're reading Carl Sagan,
    But we'd watch the Olympics if they played Dungeons and Dragons!

    Spoken: "(excited) I'm a hobbit!!"
    (giggling)

    It's great to be a nerd! It's great to be a nerd!
    We think Tolkien was a genius and Shakespeare was a turd!

    We rarely get a date, or get talked to by a girl,
    Unless they're having trouble with their algebra homework!

    We're emotionally bereft and we're sexually frustrated,
    But we can download photographs of Agent Scully naked!

    It's great to be a nerd! It's great to be a nerd!
    We know the truth is out there, but we'd have to leave our room!

    We are the nerds in your neighborhood, polyester's a fashion statement.
    But there's more room on the beach for you 'cause we're locked in our basement.

    It's great to be a nerd! It's great to be a nerd!
    We like to wear colours that do not appear in nature!

    It's great to be a--

    --poorly dressed,
    --fashionless,
    --Star Trekking,
    --roleplaying,
    --90-pound,
    --when wet down,
    --pasty-skinned,
    --pop-drinking,
    --underfed genius yes-- it's-- great-- to be a nerrr-rrr-rr-rrrrd!

  25. Re:The problem is on The Trouble With Using D&D Rules In Videogames? · · Score: 1

    Huh? I didn't say I supported any sort of cheating or using impossible knowledge. Powergaming!=cheating, where did you get that from my post?