who has a better chance at getting a job, a middle class white guy, or a homeless white guy? i'm not even going to bother reading the rest of your response, because i really don't think you bothered to think it through. i don't pay for movies that assume i'm an idiot, why should i read the things people write that do for free?
and what's with your signature? are you a dualistic athiest? you choose to be stupid? there's something to be so proud of you just have to show it in a clever slashdot signature.
i don't know where you get your statistics, so i'm not even going to bother addressing them, but something tells me it starts with your and ends with ass. i just don't understand how you're trying to justify calling people who care about 'race relations' idiots. is it because there are other forms of discrimination? do you feel that a black man who cannot get a job because the person interviewing him is racist is an idiot because he is more interested in that aspect of his life than you having your backpack searched?
consumers can't figure out how to integrate it into their lives. hmm, maybe consumers want something they can easily integrate into their lives. do you honestly expect something revolutionary to not involve...revolution? maybe the problem has nothing to do with finding out what people want, because i just found out what i wanted and i didn't even have to ask anybody. maybe the problem is overly complicated phone systems designed exclusively to weed out telemarketers that don't seem to have the BASIC NATURE OF THEIR CONSUMERBASE FIGURED OUT ENOUGH TO RESPECT THE WAY THEY INTERPRET INFORMATION.
hmm, i really want to sell a bunch of people who don't need computers some computers that teach them how to use computers. instead of teaching them how to use the computers that teach them how to use computers i'm going to tell them that the computers teach them how to use computers, then i'm going to complain on slashdot about how everyday, ordinary consumers don't seem to understand REVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGY.
what are the most obvious benefits of ipv6? will it offer improvements on stuff like latency? is that even related to the protocol? is it even a protocol?!
i'm trying to understand what you're talking about. you're saying that giving customers what they want based on what you want is not what they want, but if you want what they want it is what you both want?
what's so 'hard' about figuring out what people want if you're a 'technical' person? looking out the window? sitting in a library for a while? talking to other people? watching television? being a consumer? using software? doing things other than congratulating yourself on knowing technical things?
the only delusion i see here is people believing that finding out what 'customers' want is somehow difficult. or are you so technical minded you can't understand the common-folk?
what is the issue here, that when people write a technical program non-technical people don't know what to do with it? maybe we should commision a private body to do a study on what people want. we'll have to call it something indistinct, but strong sounding. it has to give the person participating a sense of control and anonymity both at once. how about 'survey?' yes, i like that.
i really don't understand the lottery analogy. are there correct numbers in a lottery drawing? better yet, is there even a question? knowing what customers want is a lot more like standing in line to buy your lotto ticket and looking at what other people are buying.
Slashdot Mirror
who has a better chance at getting a job, a middle class white guy, or a homeless white guy? i'm not even going to bother reading the rest of your response, because i really don't think you bothered to think it through. i don't pay for movies that assume i'm an idiot, why should i read the things people write that do for free?
and what's with your signature? are you a dualistic athiest? you choose to be stupid? there's something to be so proud of you just have to show it in a clever slashdot signature.
i don't know where you get your statistics, so i'm not even going to bother addressing them, but something tells me it starts with your and ends with ass. i just don't understand how you're trying to justify calling people who care about 'race relations' idiots. is it because there are other forms of discrimination? do you feel that a black man who cannot get a job because the person interviewing him is racist is an idiot because he is more interested in that aspect of his life than you having your backpack searched?
the price of media goes up, but the protection stays the same?
if you would like to reply with a common internet phrase turn to page 206 if you think you should close the browser window turn to page 142
http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22us e+the+force%22&btnG=Search
consumers can't figure out how to integrate it into their lives. hmm, maybe consumers want something they can easily integrate into their lives. do you honestly expect something revolutionary to not involve...revolution? maybe the problem has nothing to do with finding out what people want, because i just found out what i wanted and i didn't even have to ask anybody. maybe the problem is overly complicated phone systems designed exclusively to weed out telemarketers that don't seem to have the BASIC NATURE OF THEIR CONSUMERBASE FIGURED OUT ENOUGH TO RESPECT THE WAY THEY INTERPRET INFORMATION. hmm, i really want to sell a bunch of people who don't need computers some computers that teach them how to use computers. instead of teaching them how to use the computers that teach them how to use computers i'm going to tell them that the computers teach them how to use computers, then i'm going to complain on slashdot about how everyday, ordinary consumers don't seem to understand REVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGY.
what are the most obvious benefits of ipv6? will it offer improvements on stuff like latency? is that even related to the protocol? is it even a protocol?!
i'm trying to understand what you're talking about. you're saying that giving customers what they want based on what you want is not what they want, but if you want what they want it is what you both want? what's so 'hard' about figuring out what people want if you're a 'technical' person? looking out the window? sitting in a library for a while? talking to other people? watching television? being a consumer? using software? doing things other than congratulating yourself on knowing technical things? the only delusion i see here is people believing that finding out what 'customers' want is somehow difficult. or are you so technical minded you can't understand the common-folk? what is the issue here, that when people write a technical program non-technical people don't know what to do with it? maybe we should commision a private body to do a study on what people want. we'll have to call it something indistinct, but strong sounding. it has to give the person participating a sense of control and anonymity both at once. how about 'survey?' yes, i like that. i really don't understand the lottery analogy. are there correct numbers in a lottery drawing? better yet, is there even a question? knowing what customers want is a lot more like standing in line to buy your lotto ticket and looking at what other people are buying.
wouldn't that make knowing what customers want a good idea?
stick it to the man using the man, that's what i say. force the world to regulate the internet! thanks google.
i'm starting to see a trend.
sounds like what you're really looking for is a man with tits.
i guess you missed the weblogs, forums, groups and music.
ok mYSTIC GOAT HAHAA