Perhaps read some other threats in this post. There are plenty of us. It is not really a surprise that some random internet forum, one that tends to attract wantabe CS "experts", have no fucking idea about physics. Not only that, but won't even bother to read up on it at all.
What do you think is more likely. Everyone for the last 400 years made consistent repeatable mistakes thousands and thousands of times. Or perhaps these 3 "reports" and 2 groups have maybe made the mistake?
I read them. Yea its really sloppy. Credentials don't give you a free pass. Measuring forces that small without a proper vacuum or proper controls or just plain ignoring the results of the controls. Even this one has the *same* force for the control where there should be none and yet won't conclude no detectable force. And also the german "team" have a patented anti gravity device.
There is a reason almost none of the this gets published properly in science journals (hint newscientist is not a science journal, its a magazine and a shit one at that.), not such good credentials. It is plain sloppy.
For the device to work, it must violate conservation of momentum, Maxwell's equations, Quantum physics, relativity and conservation of energy. Oh and somehow 400 years of experiments are wrong.
I bet one years salary that this doesn't work as advertised. (I earn about 120k pa)
I was about to post exactly that. In fact we have a small handful of algorithms where QC *may* be faster in practice, but none of these problems have been shown to be NP-hard/complete. And well i just don't see it really. Factorization takes a huge number of operations on the n-qbit register to factor a nbit number. Nosie etc is not a mear engineering problem. Its a fundamental problem. And even then such a computer can't help at all for a n+1 bit number.
There really are no theories at all. There is one unpublish tripe from the original ideas guys that is so bad its hard to read past the first page. It just made up stuff.
This is grad level physics. It is not hard. I had to solve such a problem during my finals. No force is generated.
ANY reactionless drive is a over unity device. That is it can also create free energy.
The power p out of a device giving a force of f at Velocity v is simply p=fv. Let k be the power force coefficient, so that f=kP where P is the input power. As soon as the device is moving faster than p/(kP) then the device is outputting more energy than its putting in.
You wouldn't know physics if it bit your head off. You actually think solar panels work at night your so crazy. And my god your "germans can do no wrong" is up there with americans pledging allegiance to the flag. Batshit insane.
We are way beyond extraordinary claims. Closer to batshit insane claims. I mean there is *no* working theory at all. It is literally some guy who can't calculate sheer forces from a microwave on a conductor claiming hay... it pushes this way. Right up there with about 80% of all perpetual motion machines.
Oh i read them. The NASA ones. And quite frankly they are shit. And rightly didn't get properly published.
You do know that a reactionless drive means not only that momentum is not conserved. But that the laws of physics are different in different places. Also that energy is not conserved. A reactionless drive is always a over unity device. Or are you just batting for your beloved germans. Perhaps if this was done properly i would take them more seriously. But a magazine and a talk (not peer reviewed) don't count.
Also you really don't know your physics all that well.
No it has not been repeatedly validated. It has not been peer reviewed even once. It has not been properly published because like this. They report findings in a magazine. Experiments soo sloppy you should ignore them even if they were testing credible science. They are not, so the standards should be much much much higher.
I mean do you really think the laws of physics are different in different places? Cus that has to be true for this to be true.
Conservation of energy? This is a over unity device if it works?
Seriously it doesn't work. Which is why they are not publishing in proper place but rather giving a talk. It won't stand up to even basic scrutiny.
There is ZERO science behind this. NONE. They have no viable working theory as to why it would even work. EM theory is very well tested and developed. It predicts no thrust. Momentum is conserved, relativity is fine and energy is conserved (all 3 must be false if this works). The last 400 years of experiments were not accidents.
Don't hold your breath. Just like the nasa guys, even they way they publicise this should put your hinky meter all the way to red. This is not just a violation of momentum, but of relativity and energy conservation. And its is yet another sloppy experiment with sloppy reporting. And like many cases like this before, it will turn out to be nothing. I bet you 1 years salary.
I have no idea what your saying. But photons do exist in the waveguide. A perfect metal, and indeed many real metal will prevent almost all photons from escaping in many cases. But not all.
Lets get one thing clear. They have shown no such thing. This is the 3rd non peer reviewed "look at my microwaves" report on this device. The link is to some internet magazine. This will turn out to be just like every other perpetual motion device. Experimental error, and mistakes and just straight out sloppy experimental work like the last 2. We know EM theory and practice very well and right now we have fans of result finding what they want to find.
Also any zero propellent drive is also an over unity device. Easy to prove.
The most common improvement is to bundle vaccines together. Since the leading cause of unvaccination? is in fact the dozen or so doctors visits in many places. In fact that is also one of the leading costs. Combining 3 into 1 is pretty close to 3 times cheaper.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps read some other threats in this post. There are plenty of us. It is not really a surprise that some random internet forum, one that tends to attract wantabe CS "experts", have no fucking idea about physics. Not only that, but won't even bother to read up on it at all.
What do you think is more likely. Everyone for the last 400 years made consistent repeatable mistakes thousands and thousands of times. Or perhaps these 3 "reports" and 2 groups have maybe made the mistake?
I read them. Yea its really sloppy. Credentials don't give you a free pass. Measuring forces that small without a proper vacuum or proper controls or just plain ignoring the results of the controls. Even this one has the *same* force for the control where there should be none and yet won't conclude no detectable force. And also the german "team" have a patented anti gravity device.
There is a reason almost none of the this gets published properly in science journals (hint newscientist is not a science journal, its a magazine and a shit one at that.), not such good credentials. It is plain sloppy.
For the device to work, it must violate conservation of momentum, Maxwell's equations, Quantum physics, relativity and conservation of energy. Oh and somehow 400 years of experiments are wrong.
I bet one years salary that this doesn't work as advertised. (I earn about 120k pa)
You also can't prove P!=NP........
Yet there are no problems in NP-hard/complete that a QC can solve in P time. So to claim they can solve NP-$WHATEVER in P time is just plain wrong.
I was about to post exactly that. In fact we have a small handful of algorithms where QC *may* be faster in practice, but none of these problems have been shown to be NP-hard/complete. And well i just don't see it really. Factorization takes a huge number of operations on the n-qbit register to factor a nbit number. Nosie etc is not a mear engineering problem. Its a fundamental problem. And even then such a computer can't help at all for a n+1 bit number.
Read the reports. There is no extra thrust. The null experiment got the same flipping results. AGAIN.
Exactly what i was going to say. I remember how easy it was to read the old CRT monitors remotely that you couldn't see.
Biological weapons don't work. That is why such a treaty was even signed. Both sides at the time worked out that a big bang just works better anyway.
Making it illegal does not make it go away. Governments have been mostly powerless to enforce their will on the internet for example.
Note the lack of proper scientific publications.
What i learn from each show, is that blowing shit up never gets old.
In fact that can't be the same from one side of earth to the other. If this works.
There really are no theories at all. There is one unpublish tripe from the original ideas guys that is so bad its hard to read past the first page. It just made up stuff.
This is grad level physics. It is not hard. I had to solve such a problem during my finals. No force is generated.
God your stupid. How you manage to feed yourself is a mystery.
ANY reactionless drive is a over unity device. That is it can also create free energy.
The power p out of a device giving a force of f at Velocity v is simply p=fv. Let k be the power force coefficient, so that f=kP where P is the input power. As soon as the device is moving faster than p/(kP) then the device is outputting more energy than its putting in.
You wouldn't know physics if it bit your head off. You actually think solar panels work at night your so crazy. And my god your "germans can do no wrong" is up there with americans pledging allegiance to the flag. Batshit insane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
We are way beyond extraordinary claims. Closer to batshit insane claims. I mean there is *no* working theory at all. It is literally some guy who can't calculate sheer forces from a microwave on a conductor claiming hay... it pushes this way. Right up there with about 80% of all perpetual motion machines.
Oh i read them. The NASA ones. And quite frankly they are shit. And rightly didn't get properly published.
You do know that a reactionless drive means not only that momentum is not conserved. But that the laws of physics are different in different places. Also that energy is not conserved. A reactionless drive is always a over unity device. Or are you just batting for your beloved germans. Perhaps if this was done properly i would take them more seriously. But a magazine and a talk (not peer reviewed) don't count.
Also you really don't know your physics all that well.
That is because they both explained previous results they already had. While this new thing violates 400 years of experiments and results.
No it has not been repeatedly validated. It has not been peer reviewed even once. It has not been properly published because like this. They report findings in a magazine. Experiments soo sloppy you should ignore them even if they were testing credible science. They are not, so the standards should be much much much higher.
I mean do you really think the laws of physics are different in different places? Cus that has to be true for this to be true.
Conservation of energy? This is a over unity device if it works?
Seriously it doesn't work. Which is why they are not publishing in proper place but rather giving a talk. It won't stand up to even basic scrutiny.
There is ZERO science behind this. NONE. They have no viable working theory as to why it would even work. EM theory is very well tested and developed. It predicts no thrust. Momentum is conserved, relativity is fine and energy is conserved (all 3 must be false if this works). The last 400 years of experiments were not accidents.
Don't hold your breath. Just like the nasa guys, even they way they publicise this should put your hinky meter all the way to red. This is not just a violation of momentum, but of relativity and energy conservation. And its is yet another sloppy experiment with sloppy reporting. And like many cases like this before, it will turn out to be nothing. I bet you 1 years salary.
I have no idea what your saying. But photons do exist in the waveguide. A perfect metal, and indeed many real metal will prevent almost all photons from escaping in many cases. But not all.
Lets get one thing clear. They have shown no such thing. This is the 3rd non peer reviewed "look at my microwaves" report on this device. The link is to some internet magazine. This will turn out to be just like every other perpetual motion device. Experimental error, and mistakes and just straight out sloppy experimental work like the last 2. We know EM theory and practice very well and right now we have fans of result finding what they want to find.
Also any zero propellent drive is also an over unity device. Easy to prove.
The most common improvement is to bundle vaccines together. Since the leading cause of unvaccination? is in fact the dozen or so doctors visits in many places. In fact that is also one of the leading costs. Combining 3 into 1 is pretty close to 3 times cheaper.