Warrants sealed, how would you know what is in it unless you are involved on the federal side?
>very unlikely that the FBI could expect any cooperation from the company
Except for the fact that Paul had cooperated with any requests the feds have made of him in the past that would make sense heh.
>the corporation itself is already under criminal investigation
This isn't even a fact those that run/work for Foonet know bright boy.
>The "datacenter" was in dude's BASEMENT
First off, wtf does it matter WHERE it is? The house was purchased because it could contain the datacenter and continue to give the customers prompt service when something went down. How would i know that? I would call Paul when something went down so he could fix it. He would get up at 3am to fix a problem for a customer, yeah he must be a REALLY bad guy right to care about his customers and take care of them that way right?
According to what one customer was told in his conversations with the FBI agent, the agent made the comment that they were thinking of returning all of the boxes they knew were not involved or named on the warrant. So that tells me the agent knew damn good and well what boxes they wanted, and that they took non involved boxes either to harrass Foonet or to spy on everyone hosted there.
Your crack about kiddie porn tells me you are the yahoo we banned in the channel the other day. Sounds to me like you are more interested in slurring Foonet/Paul than speaking the truth.
1.) Foonet/CIT did cooperate.
2.) Warrant was sealed.
3.) Not many, if any, got "free" accounts there.
4.) 300 or so servers were taken.
5.) Agent responsible to contact hasn't been returning calls/emails.
6.) Only a couple of machines have been returned, some should be sent out today.
7.) Warrant was served on a house which contained foonet/cit, Paul, his very pregnant wife, and two small children.
8.) Paul has always cooperated with the FBI.
9.) A 200K botnet would have clogged the lines Foonet/CIT was on, get real for pitys sake, 200K? lol
10.) Those crying DDos kiddies being freely housed are mostly terminated customers.
11.) The ownership of Foonet/CIT had recently changed, some guy named Jay owns it now.
12.) Nobody directly working for/owning Foonet/CIT knows why this raid was done, why do kiddies claim they do?
I'm going to work now, feel free to flame.
Sincerely,
Kelly
Slashdot Mirror
>I have detailed inside information. The warrants very specifically listed the hosting company as well as as-of-yet-undetermined customers.
THAT detailed info could ONLY come directly from the FBI. Sounds like you aren't a user but a narc.
>"John Does" were specified in the warrant,
Warrants sealed, how would you know what is in it unless you are involved on the federal side?
>very unlikely that the FBI could expect any cooperation from the company
Except for the fact that Paul had cooperated with any requests the feds have made of him in the past that would make sense heh.
>the corporation itself is already under criminal investigation
This isn't even a fact those that run/work for Foonet know bright boy.
>The "datacenter" was in dude's BASEMENT
First off, wtf does it matter WHERE it is? The house was purchased because it could contain the datacenter and continue to give the customers prompt service when something went down. How would i know that? I would call Paul when something went down so he could fix it. He would get up at 3am to fix a problem for a customer, yeah he must be a REALLY bad guy right to care about his customers and take care of them that way right?
According to what one customer was told in his conversations with the FBI agent, the agent made the comment that they were thinking of returning all of the boxes they knew were not involved or named on the warrant. So that tells me the agent knew damn good and well what boxes they wanted, and that they took non involved boxes either to harrass Foonet or to spy on everyone hosted there.
Your crack about kiddie porn tells me you are the yahoo we banned in the channel the other day. Sounds to me like you are more interested in slurring Foonet/Paul than speaking the truth.
Kelly
300 or so machines were taken.
>the presence of children doesn't matter.
Yeah what the hell is wrong with me? I shouldn't be upset because they busted into a 3 year olds room with guns.
Silly me.
Its a sealed warrant, can not be gotten by any mortal soul I know of.
Kelly
1.) Foonet/CIT did cooperate. 2.) Warrant was sealed. 3.) Not many, if any, got "free" accounts there. 4.) 300 or so servers were taken. 5.) Agent responsible to contact hasn't been returning calls/emails. 6.) Only a couple of machines have been returned, some should be sent out today. 7.) Warrant was served on a house which contained foonet/cit, Paul, his very pregnant wife, and two small children. 8.) Paul has always cooperated with the FBI. 9.) A 200K botnet would have clogged the lines Foonet/CIT was on, get real for pitys sake, 200K? lol 10.) Those crying DDos kiddies being freely housed are mostly terminated customers. 11.) The ownership of Foonet/CIT had recently changed, some guy named Jay owns it now. 12.) Nobody directly working for/owning Foonet/CIT knows why this raid was done, why do kiddies claim they do? I'm going to work now, feel free to flame. Sincerely, Kelly