Slashdot Mirror


User: GhostX9

GhostX9's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Re:Not sure if this patent is still applicable on US ITC May Reverse Judge's Ruling In Kodak vs. Apple · · Score: 1

    If you read the patent instead of skimming it, they talk about how the processors can be integrated into a single integrated circuit. The trick behind patent lawsuits is to wait long enough so that the infringing companies owe you a lot of money, but not so long that you lose your ability to successfully win the lawsuit.

  2. Re:Not sure if this patent is still applicable on US ITC May Reverse Judge's Ruling In Kodak vs. Apple · · Score: 1

    It doesn't apply to Foveon because the patent is about the way in which you take line skipped data from the CCD in a specific manner to maintain your Bayer-filter.

  3. Explanation of the patent on US ITC May Reverse Judge's Ruling In Kodak vs. Apple · · Score: 1

    Kodak hasn't patented the idea of a video preview for a still camera. They patented the idea of taking limited information for the sensor (i.e. skipping pixels) in a specific way to provide a faster, low-quality video preview instead of previewing the data off the entire sensor. Additionally, they talk about taking the data off the sensor in a specific way so that the pixels still maintain the Bayer-filter. When Kodak sold off their OLED technology, I thought they were screwed. With this patent, they may actually have a case...