Uptime is a defining characteristic of OpenBSD - Netcraft will prove this. How often are OpenBSD machines rebooted to take advantage of this feature? It would be understandable on a Windows system.
Both this rant and the earlier one say one simple thing - this is how we do it, we give a a flying fuck for your opinion and we are going to continue doing things our way. The dislike of the word "editor" is a bit amusing - it appears to spring from a desire to avoid control. THis, when Malda's tone in both articles tells us one thing - he is also a little Hitler.
Isn't the story here the fact that Dell has been sued? the patent was granted in 1999 in the US; in 2002 in Singapore and in 2003 in Australia and New Zealand.
There is also no mention of the original point of entry - which was said to be a sniffed password. So which individual was sending passwords in the clear? And if it's a Debian developer who's done this shouldn't he/she be outed?
Slashdot Mirror
Uptime is a defining characteristic of OpenBSD - Netcraft will prove this. How often are OpenBSD machines rebooted to take advantage of this feature? It would be understandable on a Windows system.
Dan Tehan is one of many Australian government ministers who has no clue about technology. http://bit.ly/2pMtFlG
Why does ZDNet always hide the fact that Windows is the operating system involved when viruses, worms, malware, scumware, ransomware etc are involved?
Both this rant and the earlier one say one simple thing - this is how we do it, we give a a flying fuck for your opinion and we are going to continue doing things our way. The dislike of the word "editor" is a bit amusing - it appears to spring from a desire to avoid control. THis, when Malda's tone in both articles tells us one thing - he is also a little Hitler.
Isn't the story here the fact that Dell has been
sued? the patent was granted in 1999 in the US;
in 2002 in Singapore and in 2003 in Australia and
New Zealand.
There is also no mention of the original point
of entry - which was said to be a sniffed
password. So which individual was sending
passwords in the clear?
And if it's a Debian developer who's done this
shouldn't he/she be outed?