Domain: babynames.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to babynames.com.
Comments · 7
-
ok whimps - you need your baby bottles
To make downmodders "less scared" (either suppressing what they don't want seen, or since the topic is spooky to a degree) since downmods with no debate obviously project that much?
Barack = http://www.babynames.com/name/Barack - Baruch = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch (both = blessed) and Bama = son of prophecy http://babynames.allparenting.com/list/hebrew_baby_names/bama/details/ (which prophecy though? The earlier above stuff or what's here now? That's been my point here!)
(See how easy it is to twist things both ways? Kind of like Secret Courts reinterpeting laws!)
Boy - I'll tell you all 1 thing: When the President changed his name from Barry Soetoro, http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/07/barry-soetoro-aka-barack-obama-disappears-from-dc-voter-registration-site-following-exposure-by-bloggers/ he really messed up because his name can go "either way". That or the jews did in their language and the dude had no clue! I doubt that. He's a constitutional lawyer. Their JOB is to play with words and legal interpretations. Maybe he was out to play with everyone's head? Dangerous IF so.
The only things leaning the "other way" per the earlier posts is what the Illuminati/Masons data showed along with Albert Pike here http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/symbology/1o5.htm . However, that too can go "the other way" as well (at least for lower order masons during initiation and what they loiok for in potential members).
Then again, Satan is the King of Liars too. Al Taqiyya is a Muslim belief that also says it's ok to lie http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/011-taqiyya.htm, and iirc, Obama claims to be Muslim in faith Didn't he take the Presidential oath on a Qu'ran? It's ok to lie though. Considering campaign promises broken left and right.
No one can tell me muslims are a religion of peace when you start to look at them saying 'cut off the heads of non-believers' and such) and yet Lucifer is the Light Bringer (who like Masons 'wants to better you'). Then Christianity had the Crusades too. Jews and their Talmud saying we're cattle and far worse is yet another.
However beliefs of Luciferianism are a lot like Masonic ideals on self improvement/becoming God-Like etc. - is that bad? Depends on who's looking (like most things, everything is a dichotomy and a matter of perception and Lord knows the Jews and Arabs, though related/same family tree in antiquity are polar opposites hating one another (dumb imo, they're relatives)). Christian counterpoint is that God loves us, and is a good Dad: warning against things veiled that look good up front and screw you in the end... ala you "sold your soul for rock-n-roll" for a lifetime, only to burn in hell forever.
What to believe, right?
Well, quoting the tune the last time now from its 1st lyric: "If there isn't LIGHT" (light bringer lucifer?) "when no one sees" (which downmods hide things here right (wrong)), "then how can I know what you might believe? A story told that can't be real" (or is it Luke 10:18 ) "somehow must reflect the truth we feel" (nobody likes the NSA prism (rainbow))?
However, I'm not asking anyone to believe one way, or another. Lmao, don't know what to believe either on many things in a world of "spin" and presses owned by biased parties (but biased journalism sells more magazines!)
For me, this was simply just an exercise in some pretty strangely coincidental material too, 1st presenting 1 persective and now another. You know: To 'enlighten' you, lol!
Just to see how you'd react (with musica
-
Re:Naming convention...get it right!
I don't have to. someone already did.
http://www.babynames.com/Names/X/ -
Re:It's just because they're unimaginative.
They need look no farther than here:
http://www.babynames.com/Names/X/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Y/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Z/ -
Re:It's just because they're unimaginative.
They need look no farther than here:
http://www.babynames.com/Names/X/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Y/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Z/ -
Re:It's just because they're unimaginative.
They need look no farther than here:
http://www.babynames.com/Names/X/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Y/
http://www.babynames.com/Names/Z/ -
Re:LaShawn
I was floored when I looked at the (supposedly) most popular baby names of 2003. Number 1, 2, and 3 for boys were Aiden, Jayden, and Caden, respectively, with Hayden at #10. Real imaginative there, folks. Some of the more "traditional" bible-based names like Matthew, Jacob, and Joshua were still in there, but the list looked nothing like the relatively normal 2002 list.
Girls names were a little more normal, but the top 20 still includes such standouts as Aaliyah, Ava, Faith, and Grace.
I'm still suspicious that stupid people have been loaded the voting/polling for the latest list on purpose... but who knows. -
Re:LaShawn
I was floored when I looked at the (supposedly) most popular baby names of 2003. Number 1, 2, and 3 for boys were Aiden, Jayden, and Caden, respectively, with Hayden at #10. Real imaginative there, folks. Some of the more "traditional" bible-based names like Matthew, Jacob, and Joshua were still in there, but the list looked nothing like the relatively normal 2002 list.
Girls names were a little more normal, but the top 20 still includes such standouts as Aaliyah, Ava, Faith, and Grace.
I'm still suspicious that stupid people have been loaded the voting/polling for the latest list on purpose... but who knows.