Domain: bailoutsleuth.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to bailoutsleuth.com.
Comments · 9
-
Re:But he is still our ruler
Instead of creating a website to show where the money is going
they could just link to this site instead
http://bailoutsleuth.com/
to find out where the money is going . . . -
Well he did decide to finance BailoutSleuth
Bit of a coincidence that this comes about just after he started and funded http://www.bailoutsleuth.com/ even though it was four years ago...
-
Re:Wrong, He Has a Blog Post On It
Whatever happened happened in 2004, but he's being charged only in the last few weeks Bush can direct the SEC.
Funny how the other thing that happened recently was that Cuban just launched a website, BailoutSleuth">BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com] looking into and organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.
BTW, in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when Bush has a political crusade at stake. Even if Cuban is guilty, it's pretty "coincidental" timing to start prosecuting him.
Interesting how Cuban suddenly gets prosecuted right after he launches a website [texasbudgetsource.com] organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout called BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com], in the final weeks of Bush's power to direct the SEC, even though Cuban's transactions happened in 2004.
And by "interesting", I mean "suspiciously consistent with Bush's treatment of the Justice Department as a political asset for selective prosecution".
Because Cuban is a billionaire Net entrepreneur [wikipedia.org]. Including harnessing P2P for infrastructure, while publicly championing the technique's place on the Internet despite network operator and copyright holder intererence. He's also spoken influentially for realistic revisions to copyright, contrary to some of his obvious interests as a major copyright holder, as an informed Internet business guru.
He just got hit with an SEC suit by the outgoing Bush on 4 year old charges, right after he launched a website investigating and organizing against Bush's Wall Street bailout [bailoutsleuth.com].
Those topics are all often popular on Slashdot.
FWIW, what little you heard is just the initial press response repeating the SEC's charges. If that were enough to decide guilt, Bush would have had all 60M people who vote Democratic behind bars over the past 8 years. In fact, we might even have, say, invaded Iraq amidst fanfare and WMD hysteria if we all just believed whatever the press initially reported when a Bush agency told us one of its enemies was guilty of something.
That's how many times you posted the same damned regurgitated idea (and I'm sure you're not done for the day).
Shut up.
Shut up.
Shut up.
Seriously, learn to articulate yourself once. Post once, then you're done. This ping pong shit you and I are doing? That's called childish. There's no room for that here. If someone thought about something you should have thought of it before you posted, bow out. Be a man. Construct an argument or idea. Deliver it once and deliver it well. If you fail, better luck next time.
Samuel L. Jackson: "Post that link again. Post it again, motherfucker, post it one more Goddamn time!" -
Re:Wrong, He Has a Blog Post On It
Whatever happened happened in 2004, but he's being charged only in the last few weeks Bush can direct the SEC.
Funny how the other thing that happened recently was that Cuban just launched a website, BailoutSleuth">BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com] looking into and organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.
BTW, in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when Bush has a political crusade at stake. Even if Cuban is guilty, it's pretty "coincidental" timing to start prosecuting him.
Interesting how Cuban suddenly gets prosecuted right after he launches a website [texasbudgetsource.com] organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout called BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com], in the final weeks of Bush's power to direct the SEC, even though Cuban's transactions happened in 2004.
And by "interesting", I mean "suspiciously consistent with Bush's treatment of the Justice Department as a political asset for selective prosecution".
Because Cuban is a billionaire Net entrepreneur [wikipedia.org]. Including harnessing P2P for infrastructure, while publicly championing the technique's place on the Internet despite network operator and copyright holder intererence. He's also spoken influentially for realistic revisions to copyright, contrary to some of his obvious interests as a major copyright holder, as an informed Internet business guru.
He just got hit with an SEC suit by the outgoing Bush on 4 year old charges, right after he launched a website investigating and organizing against Bush's Wall Street bailout [bailoutsleuth.com].
Those topics are all often popular on Slashdot.
FWIW, what little you heard is just the initial press response repeating the SEC's charges. If that were enough to decide guilt, Bush would have had all 60M people who vote Democratic behind bars over the past 8 years. In fact, we might even have, say, invaded Iraq amidst fanfare and WMD hysteria if we all just believed whatever the press initially reported when a Bush agency told us one of its enemies was guilty of something.
That's how many times you posted the same damned regurgitated idea (and I'm sure you're not done for the day).
Shut up.
Shut up.
Shut up.
Seriously, learn to articulate yourself once. Post once, then you're done. This ping pong shit you and I are doing? That's called childish. There's no room for that here. If someone thought about something you should have thought of it before you posted, bow out. Be a man. Construct an argument or idea. Deliver it once and deliver it well. If you fail, better luck next time.
Samuel L. Jackson: "Post that link again. Post it again, motherfucker, post it one more Goddamn time!" -
Re:Wrong, He Has a Blog Post On It
Whatever happened happened in 2004, but he's being charged only in the last few weeks Bush can direct the SEC.
Funny how the other thing that happened recently was that Cuban just launched a website, BailoutSleuth">BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com] looking into and organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.
BTW, in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when Bush has a political crusade at stake. Even if Cuban is guilty, it's pretty "coincidental" timing to start prosecuting him.
Interesting how Cuban suddenly gets prosecuted right after he launches a website [texasbudgetsource.com] organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout called BailoutSleuth [bailoutsleuth.com], in the final weeks of Bush's power to direct the SEC, even though Cuban's transactions happened in 2004.
And by "interesting", I mean "suspiciously consistent with Bush's treatment of the Justice Department as a political asset for selective prosecution".
Because Cuban is a billionaire Net entrepreneur [wikipedia.org]. Including harnessing P2P for infrastructure, while publicly championing the technique's place on the Internet despite network operator and copyright holder intererence. He's also spoken influentially for realistic revisions to copyright, contrary to some of his obvious interests as a major copyright holder, as an informed Internet business guru.
He just got hit with an SEC suit by the outgoing Bush on 4 year old charges, right after he launched a website investigating and organizing against Bush's Wall Street bailout [bailoutsleuth.com].
Those topics are all often popular on Slashdot.
FWIW, what little you heard is just the initial press response repeating the SEC's charges. If that were enough to decide guilt, Bush would have had all 60M people who vote Democratic behind bars over the past 8 years. In fact, we might even have, say, invaded Iraq amidst fanfare and WMD hysteria if we all just believed whatever the press initially reported when a Bush agency told us one of its enemies was guilty of something.
That's how many times you posted the same damned regurgitated idea (and I'm sure you're not done for the day).
Shut up.
Shut up.
Shut up.
Seriously, learn to articulate yourself once. Post once, then you're done. This ping pong shit you and I are doing? That's called childish. There's no room for that here. If someone thought about something you should have thought of it before you posted, bow out. Be a man. Construct an argument or idea. Deliver it once and deliver it well. If you fail, better luck next time.
Samuel L. Jackson: "Post that link again. Post it again, motherfucker, post it one more Goddamn time!" -
Re:Wrong, He Has a Blog Post On It
The fact that this occurred in June of '04 and he's being charged for it now implies that either it takes that long to build up evidence for a case or you don't hear about this until someone slips up.
Whatever happened happened in 2004, but he's being charged only in the last few weeks Bush can direct the SEC.
Funny how the other thing that happened recently was that Cuban just launched a website, BailoutSleuth looking into and organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.
BTW, in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when Bush has a political crusade at stake. Even if Cuban is guilty, it's pretty "coincidental" timing to start prosecuting him.
No, if that were the case, they would have gone after Cuban after he funded Redacted, or any of the other stupid stuff Cuban is guilty of.
-
Re:why should we care?
Because Cuban is a billionaire Net entrepreneur. Including harnessing P2P for infrastructure, while publicly championing the technique's place on the Internet despite network operator and copyright holder intererence. He's also spoken influentially for realistic revisions to copyright, contrary to some of his obvious interests as a major copyright holder, as an informed Internet business guru.
He just got hit with an SEC suit by the outgoing Bush on 4 year old charges, right after he launched a website investigating and organizing against Bush's Wall Street bailout.
Those topics are all often popular on Slashdot.
-
Re:Wrong, He Has a Blog Post On It
The fact that this occurred in June of '04 and he's being charged for it now implies that either it takes that long to build up evidence for a case or you don't hear about this until someone slips up.
Whatever happened happened in 2004, but he's being charged only in the last few weeks Bush can direct the SEC.
Funny how the other thing that happened recently was that Cuban just launched a website, BailoutSleuth looking into and organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout.
BTW, in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, especially when Bush has a political crusade at stake. Even if Cuban is guilty, it's pretty "coincidental" timing to start prosecuting him.
-
Retaliation for Cuban's Anti-Bailout Website?
Interesting how Cuban suddenly gets prosecuted right after he launches a website organizing against the Bush/Paulson Wall Street bailout called BailoutSleuth, in the final weeks of Bush's power to direct the SEC, even though Cuban's transactions happened in 2004.
And by "interesting", I mean "suspiciously consistent with Bush's treatment of the Justice Department as a political asset for selective prosecution".