Slashdot Mirror

Not for long. The ultimate goal is that the military will eventually be acclimated to homosexuals openly serving in their ranks. Kissing your homie would probably only lead to a PDA(public display of affection) slap on the wrist, if done in uniform, if even that. The logical extension of your suggestion would be to admit being a zoophile and have a small stash of bizarre but harmless cartoon furry porn in case they want proof.

There was a recent military poll across all branches that indicates that 59% of Marines who served in combat oppose homosexuals serving. The commandant has hinted that as much as 95% of marines either oppose or feel uncomfortable with homosexuals serving. So the Devil-Dogs are the toughest, craziest, most macho force on the face of the earth and they're skeered of OMG TEH GAY?!

FYI, heh, I know a guy who was married and wanted out so he told his commander that he was bisexual. Worked like a charm, no harm, no foul.

http://prolifeaction.org/about/closed81.php http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?Id=1965 http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/Catholic/2001/04/Priests-For-Life-Offers-50000-Reward-For-Clinic-Shooters.aspx http://www.all.org/article.php?id=10357

I think that this Baptist site nicely outlines many of the reasons I'm happy to have my daughters involved in the Girl Scouts:
http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=25503
I especially enjoyed how she contrasts the Girl Scouts' encouragement of "girl empowerment" with another group's "strong emphasis on servitude".

There are at least 2 sides to everything...http://www.bpnews.net/BPFirstPerson.a sp?ID=25812. While most non-creationist long for rights and equality in most things, when it comes to an argument like this they are quick to go on the offensive. The article above is merely from the one Baptist, I'm sure there are other Baptist views as well as other Christian views.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Artic les/000/000/004/616jszlg.asp

FIRST, Dutch euthanasia advocates said that patient killing will be limited to the competent, terminally ill who ask for it. Then, when doctors began euthanizing patients who clearly were not terminally ill, sweat not, they soothed: medicalized killing will be limited to competent people with incurable illnesses or disabilities......

And now they want to euthanize children.

and this
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=19295

real progressive
http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid =Mozilla-search&va=progress

progress

1 a (1) : a royal journey marked by pomp and pageant (2) : a state procession b : a tour or circuit made by an official (as a judge) c : an expedition, journey, or march through a region
2 : a forward or onward movement (as to an objective or to a goal) : ADVANCE
3 : gradual betterment; especially : the progressive development of mankind

to quote from above post
"Funny how their radical ideas don't seem to inflict great harm on their society though."

It's hardly as if 50 million of your neighbors are bible-thumping mindless bigots

I never claimed all 50 million of them were bigots but since you brought it up:

approximately "one-fifth of voters who pointed to 'moral values' as their prime concern, 79 percent of them voted for George Bush." - bpnews

That is at least 39 million of them.