Slashdot Mirror

Curiously, many of the Google links display "story not available". Are six week old stories normally flushed from on-line archives? In such cases use Googles's "cached" link to see the story.

You can kill people with a gun, but I haven't seen any lawsuit against S&W for creating a tool that can be used to commit a crime.

http://www.click10.com/mia/news/stories/news-17868 8020021114-161135.html

http://www.fivecities.com/strider/commentary/strid er8.html

Tons more

I haven't heard yet of any paper company being sued

That's because most people understand how paper works.

Is Ford liable for you running your car against a 80 years old man crossing the street?

http://www.courier-journal.com/business/news2003/0 4/30/biz-front-Lease30-5051.html

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=71000001& sid=adxHkoFiaJ1o&refer=columnists

Tons more

Never underestimate the ability of our legal system to find fault in innocents.

(re post with formatting)

Are you fucking stupid? Read that again, it had nothing to do with the recounts, it had to do with disenfranchising black voters by publishing false lists of felons by Database Technology, disenfranchising black voters. DT created a list with felons which were not allowed to vote. Only problem is they didn't have SS#'s for them so they found close matches with last names / geographic area.. an "80% match" was sufficient to deny someone the right to vote.. only problem is as a %, there are more black felons, so this convieniently denied black voters who weren't felons the right to vote. A judge will rule on it this month, but the judge already said there's enough evidence to go to trial:

http://www.click10.com/mia/news/stories/news-12370 9220020215-110206.html

I love americans, you still think you live in a democracy lol

Are you fucking stupid? Read that again, it had nothing to do with the recounts, it had to do with disenfranchising black voters by publishing false lists of felons by Database Technology, disenfranchising black voters. DT created a list with felons which were not allowed to vote. Only problem is they didn't have SS#'s for them so they found close matches with last names / geographic area.. an "80% match" was sufficient to deny someone the right to vote.. only problem is as a %, there are more black felons, so this convieniently denied black voters who weren't felons the right to vote. A judge will rule on it this month, but the judge already said there's enough evidence to go to trial:



I love americans, you still think you live in a democracy lol

The NAACP is suing Catherine Harris and Database Technologies over conspiracy to disenfranchise black voters.. Read this article.

The judge thought there was enough evidence to bring her to trial this month

Here are the details.

Repubs are fucked.

link or stfu.

Here's a link showing Jeb Bush and Catherine Harris conspired to deny black voters:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/newsnight/117411 5.stm

another one showing the Judge refused Harris'es request to have the charges against her dismissed:

http://www.click10.com/mia/news/stories/news-12370 9220020215-110206.html

Have fun.