Slashdot Mirror


Sony-Ericsson Starts US$5M Astroturf Campaign

lairdb writes "The WSJ reports today (31Jul02) that Sony Ericsson will be marketing their new T68i cellphone/camera combo unit via "shills" to create a grassroots buzz. Specific tactics will include fake tourist couples at popular attractions asking bystanders to take their picture, and "leaners": pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars playing interactive Battleship with each other from opposite ends of the bar. "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]""

452 comments

  1. Say what ? by tiwason · · Score: 5, Funny

    "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]"

    Never mind telling the world via WSJ

    1. Re:Say what ? by OutsideBoston · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Never mind telling the world via WSJ"

      Doesn't matter - the kind of guy that could pick up a model or actress at a bar doesn't read WSJ or /.

      ~N

    2. Re:Say what ? by hagar� · · Score: 1

      The kind of guy who can pick up a model or an actress at a bar, OWNS that bar, and several more like it across the Country, is 95 years old, has several major diseases and drags an oxygen tent around with him.

      --
      Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    3. Re:Say what ? by Flakeloaf · · Score: 3, Funny

      What does Michael Jackson have to do with this?

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    4. Re:Say what ? by hagar� · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      --
      Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    5. Re:Say what ? by mosch · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And then never mind overreacting for no apparent reason on slashdot.

      This advertising technique only works if the phones are cool. If the phones don't have new features to show off, or they don't work well, all you've done is convince somebody that they don't want to upgrade from their current phone.

      Perhaps I'm missing something, but what's the problem with spending $5 million on the roll-out of a new luxury product? What's next, outrage that TiVo often gives free units to stars, in the hopes that they'll like it enough that they'll end up saying TiVo during interviews?

    6. Re:Say what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never mind telling the world via WSJ
      Doh, no no no, releasing this information, and the resulting publicity it would cause (especially on web sites such as Slashdot), is PART of the marketing campaign. And getting lots of people to try to spot the shill is part of the "buzz".

      Marketing 101, boys... always make the customer think they're smart...

    7. Re:Say what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phones are shaped like beer glasses.

      Enough said.

    8. Re:Say what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget everyone's favourite Linux desktop monopoly wannabe, TrollTech. They do plenty of astroturfing around here.

    9. Re:Say what ? by killthiskid · · Score: 2

      My .sig says it all...

  2. I want this phone so bad by Maquis196 · · Score: 0

    THis phone has just come out on Orange here in the UK, only £150!! its a shame that sending pics costs a fortune as the GPRS market is still young! soon soon Maquis196

  3. How long... by The+Raven · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... before the pick-pocket crowd notice these shills... With their neverending supply of cameras provided by the company... Being paid to hand them over to other people they don't know... cameras that are new and thus expensive and in high demand...

    This should be amusing.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:How long... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > .. before the pick-pocket crowd notice these shills... With their neverending supply of cameras provided by the company... Being paid to hand them over to other people they don't know... cameras that are new and thus expensive and in high demand...

      Screw pickpockets. Enterprising Slashdotters.

      "Hi, glad you made it out here tonight. Ya look great. OK, here's the deal. The guy at headquarters says I'm supposed to pretend to steal the camera from you - you run after me for about half a block. Then when you're convincingly out of breath, you can tell everyone who's followed you or gathered around you what a wonderful brand-new camera you just had stolen from you..."

    2. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's the IMEI number that can be used to block GSMs. I figure they won't forget to write that down?!

    3. Re:How long... by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      But it's still a nice camera, even if you no longer can use it as a phone...

    4. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then they block that phone from ever being used on any network, and it's pretty much useless...

    5. Re:How long... by j2gEEk · · Score: 1

      Yeah... they can't call anybody... but it still takes pictures!

    6. Re:How long... by buzy+buzy · · Score: 1

      Forget that!
      Girl walks over to you
      girl> could you take...
      you> Your from E/// and Sony right?
      girl> uhm yes!
      you> Sure I'd love to take that cool new phone. Thanks.
      Girl> uhh, what am I going to say to the boss? All the /.ers of the world are scamming us!!! :-)

      --
      If you get modded down for a first post... What do you get for a last post?
    7. Re:How long... by buzy+buzy · · Score: 1

      Not every network uses an EIR

      "Equipment Identity Register"

      Networks that do not have these can't block handsets based on IMEI.

      For those interested in the procedures for this check out the ETSI GSM 09.02 http://www.etsi.org or the 3G standard for UMTS which is numbered 29.002

      There is nothing to see in this .sig! Please move along.

      --
      If you get modded down for a first post... What do you get for a last post?
    8. Re:How long... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would go more like this.

      Girl walks over to you

      Girl> Could you take...
      You> Wait a second... are you talking to me?
      Girl> Ummm...
      You> Hey guys! There is a -girl- talking to me!
      Guys> Yeah right.
      You> No seriously!
      Girl> I don't get paid enough for this.

      Girl walks out.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    9. Re:How long... by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      heh - this could work... The camera gets "stolen", but because it can take photographs, you tell the assembled crowds that it's OK, you can ID exactly who did it. Phone the friend, and minutes later, they arrive with another Ericcson containing a picture of the thief. Show the picture of the thief to the "policeman" who turns up at the right time, identify the perp, send in a fake call, and the whole world suddenly thinks your product is marvelous. Now, where's the number of that advertising agency again...

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    10. Re:How long... by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      "cameras that are new and thus expensive"

      Please, they can be purchased for about $150 on eBay and they only work with the T68i phone. Not exactly a natural target for lowlifes.

    11. Re:How long... by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      If this happens, there's a move to counter it.

      Have the next generation of camera require some kind of proprietary consumable thing that only Sony makes. I guess film doesn't make sense for a digital camera, and memory sticks are reusable (unless they switch to swom kind of WORM?). Perhaps non-rechargable batteries in a proprietary form factor? Let people have cameras for free, and charge $30 for replacement batteries.

      Hmm.. WORM memory sticks.... "Your photographs are too precious for you to allow them to be accidently deleted. Sony memories are forever." Yeah, there could be an angle there.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  4. I'd like to make a recommendation by Raul654 · · Score: 2
    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  5. oh man by australopithecus · · Score: 2, Funny
    great...so not only can the hot chick whos being affectionate be a hooker, she can now also be a sony ericsson spokesperson?
    damn these foul charades.

    eat people not animals

    1. Re:oh man by X · · Score: 1

      You say thatlike there's a difference....

      --Chris

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
    2. Re:oh man by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing the ladies from Ericsson don't swallow.

    3. Re:oh man by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to own an Ericsson. They definitely suck.

    4. Re:oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a significant difference - prostitution is an honest profession...

  6. Damn ... by Greedo · · Score: 2, Funny

    "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]"

    And I just stole one of those babies from these old tourists today so I could go play Battleship with these hot chicks I met at the bar last night.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:Damn ... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      "pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars playing interactive Battleship"

      I think this is calls for a DoS attack.
      A dozen people at the bar, or standing around the shills, playing Doom against each other.
      Is there a version with an oceanic map, and we're PT boats buzzing around blasting...um.. battleships?

  7. Forget Ericcson by sn00perz · · Score: 1

    Ericcson has gone down hill since their alliance with Sony, their phones are a joke and poor quality.
    My current phone is Eric T10 which I cant wait to dump in favopur of Nokia 7210 with color screen and j2me support.
    Nokia is the way to go.

    --

    Down with Crapitali$m. Anarchy NOW!
    1. Re:Forget Ericcson by Maquis196 · · Score: 0

      Its well unfair to compare your VERY old T10 (not a flame as it is still a not bad phone) to a brand new nokia. I use the Ericson R320 which is a super fone but i want this t68i and have done for about 4 months now but having used it I must say it is a very good quality phone! Most of all i love its battery life as its around 9hrs talktime fully charged! Maquis196

    2. Re:Forget Ericcson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *clue stick*
      Ericsson phones have always sucked -- it has nothing to do with their alliance with Sony

    3. Re:Forget Ericcson by DamnYankee · · Score: 1

      The T68i absolutely rocks. This phone is so good I couldn't believe it came out of Ericsson. It smokes anything Nokia has or is going to have in the next six months.

      The Sony Ericsson P800 will be out soon and it also rocks (saw a prototype). It kicks butt over the Nokia 7650 colorphone.

      (Nope, I don't and never have worked at Ericsson)

      --

      Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
      William Shakespeare

    4. Re:Forget Ericcson by Dominic · · Score: 1

      I've had my T68 for a while now (6 months?). I have to say that its much more nicely put together than the T68i (which feels all plastic-y). The only 'improvement' made for the T68i is the software upgrade, but you can flash your T68 anyway.

      In a nutshell then - go for the T68 and flash the ROM.

    5. Re:Forget Ericcson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in mobile telecomms for a large European Operator. I'm usually excited at the prospect of gaining another flash bit of kit for testing purposes. But not this phone....

      T68i is shit. It looks girly.
      The software is bugged. The phone feels cheap. The image refresh on the camera when taking pictures is awful. Most of our engineers hate them. Some don't even bother to use it even though they got given free ones for supporting MMS.

      On the other hand....

      The Nokia is slightly better as you can download small java games to it and not be stuck with the ones that come on the phone. The camera refresh when taking a picture is much faster. Overall better features, better software. Come on we got dope wars on the damn thing :)

      Save yer money and avoid the T68i. And why did they remove tetris from it? A friend wont upgrade his T68 for this reason!

  8. Secret Advertising by smiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't we have laws requiring advertisments to be obvious? If an ad is not obvious, isn't it required to specifically state "paid advertisement"? This certainly takes the role of a paid advertisement.

    1. Re:Secret Advertising by Helter · · Score: 1

      Would this be considered to be advertising" under law?

    2. Re:Secret Advertising by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People think that advertising has to be labelled, but that's only in certain places. Like most respectable newspapers require it, and the FCC sort of requires it for TV content. But those TV news shows they hit you with on airplanes are full of paid plugs that aren't disclosed. Perfectly legal but sorry. There's also something that looks like a scientific medical journal that gets sent to a million or three people in America that's full of articles plugging worthless products from an operator whose record is so bad that the Bush Brothers gave back his contributions when they found out about him.

    3. Re:Secret Advertising by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Or how about when Larry King interviews the star of AOL-Time Warner's latest movie? Does the fact that they don't interview stars of movies from competing studios mean it's "advertising". I'm not defending it, but how do you determing what advertising is anyway. This is the problem with monopolies.

    4. Re:Secret Advertising by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      no no... thats called "synergistic leveraging"... its a really neaty concept....

      kindof like when zdnet whores for MS ... MS has a nice hunk of ziff-davis, and they kindof fellate MS every now and again...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    5. Re:Secret Advertising by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Really? I did not know that...learn something new everyday.

    6. Re:Secret Advertising by xoff00 · · Score: 1

      I personally volunteer to check each one of these models to make sure they're wearing their "Paid Spokesmodel" underroos...

      --
      ...Xoff
      Phineas J. Whoopie, you're the greatest!
  9. Deceptive, but they won't lie by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Supposedly the actors/models hired for this won't lie when asked if they work for Sony/Ericson, but I wonder how specific the line of questioning has to be? These people are going to waste other peoples' time asking for photos to be taken of them. Ordinarily I'd gladly take a photo of a couple, but these photos are meaningless.

    1. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by capologist · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. I'm probably just ridiculously naive, but how can it be good marketing to show the world that you feel a need to resort to deception to market your product?

    2. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any publicitiy is good publicity" or so the saying goes.

    3. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because their target demographic is so hopelessly ignorant and naive that they can't even be considered part of "the world".
      The'll fall for it and never know the ad campaign existed.

    4. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by platypus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ordinarily I'd gladly take a photo of a couple, but these photos are meaningless.

      Muahaha, I see something coming.
      "Hello Mister Miller, you bought the Sony Ericsson's T68i last week, how are your first impressions?"
      "Bad, really bad. I just returned it to the shop. Everywhere I went to with the phone, people were mad at me for being a "Sony con".
      One man even threatened to knock me up, just because I wanted him to take a picture from my wife and me."

    5. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking their picture would probably take less time than acting like a whiny ass on /. about it, like you're doing right now.

      Just something to think about. It's never too late to start.

    6. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1
      Ordinarily I'd gladly take a photo of a couple, but these photos are meaningless.

      ME: OK, that's it, work with me Babe...now, open a button or two...there we go...now about about a few with the top off ...

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    7. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly "knock me up" means something different over the pond!

    8. Re:Deceptive, but they won't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really see much problem here... deception to get people to try out the product for themselves, seems better than doing so by being deceptive about the product itself which is the basis of a lot of advertising (just as long as you can reasonably justify what you say).

  10. T68 vs. T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the T68, aside from the color of the casing, are there any real differences between the T68 and the T68i?

    1. Re:T68 vs. T68i by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

      I believe the t68 will not support the camera, but the t68i will.

      --
      Lousy facepalm.
    2. Re:T68 vs. T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope the T68 supports the camera, please try again

  11. Speaking of the T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got one, and it's great. You can even take pictures with it! Or play wireless games with other T68i owners. I wouldn't want to be the last person to get one of these...

    1. Re:Speaking of the T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is one of those shills now!

    2. Re:Speaking of the T68i by nicke999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK great.. one of the actors have joined slashdot!

      --
      Thanks for browsing at -1
      Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
    3. Re:Speaking of the T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look up, you might see the original joke somewhere over your head

    4. Re:Speaking of the T68i by cafination · · Score: 2, Informative

      All jokes aside, the T68I is basically the same phone I have (T68M)... I just don't have the camera module. (and mine's sort of metalic looking, not baby blue)

      So here's the basic breakdown on what I've found it capable of, and what it costs...

      Bare Handset: $600 (well 599.xx)
      phone with (new _grumble_) number and 1yr contract: $250 (hey I'm a cheap bastard)

      what it can do...
      TriBand GSM, IR, blue tooth, WAP, SMS, POP mail, basic web browsing, and some other stuff that I can't remember off the top of my head (and, a butt load of games and all the other glitzy crap, that's the scientific term.), I'm not going to crack open the spec sheet or the manual... sorry it's bed time

      though this "marketing" technique is somewhat slimey, it's still an absolutely awesome phone, my lightest and smallest yet, with great battery life... I don't know why they're bothering with such questionable techniques, just put it in a few cell shops under a sign that says "Look!!!! it's shiny! with a color screen!!!"... It should sell like crack-rock

      and those of that actually look at specs before hand, could read about it on a few websites and already have one ;-)

      -cafination

    5. Re:Speaking of the T68i by DamnYankee · · Score: 1

      The T68M is missing a *lot* of stuff compared to the T68i, though you can have it upgraded for free with a new flash burn.

      The T68i/upgrade has MMS, more games, a picture album, and a bunch of new menu items and functions.

      --

      Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
      William Shakespeare

    6. Re:Speaking of the T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And NO Defender game.. a reason not to upgrade? ;)

    7. Re:Speaking of the T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look up, you might see that TROLL somewhere over your head

    8. Re:Speaking of the T68i by alienmole · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoa! They have trained you guys well...

    9. Re:Speaking of the T68i by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      It would sell around here, or so it seems, if it had a multi-colored face plate or a picture of hello kitty and a million flashing lights all over it.

  12. At least they're being up-front about it by Komodo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Astroturf isn't nearly so offensive when they're admitting to it up front. In fact, it's more like the Turing Test - can you tell the real technophile barfly from the fake one? Of course, I think the odds of running into two women playing wireless Battleship in a bar are pretty low, so the test would be biased in favor of 'shill' - but for other tests it would be kinda fun.

    1. Re:At least they're being up-front about it by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Astroturf isn't nearly so offensive when they're admitting to it up front. In fact, it's more like the Turing Test - can you tell the real technophile barfly from the fake one? Of course, I think the odds of running into two women playing wireless Battleship in a bar are pretty low, so the test would be biased in favor of 'shill' - but for other tests it would be kinda fun.

      Great. Now when we go to DEFCON we're gonna be surrounded by lamers with T-shirts saying "I spotted the Sony/Ericsson Shill!".

      (Or worse, if you're female and attend DEFCON with another female and just wanna play one lousy game of Corewars on your cellphones, your table will be covered in dozens of T-shirts saying "I am the Sony/Ericsson Shill!" :)

    2. Re:At least they're being up-front about it by nr · · Score: 1

      Personaly I would not mind playing with two goodlooking models, erm. up my hotelroom.

  13. Tourists, eh? by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...specific tactics will include fake tourist couples at popular attractions asking bystanders to take their picture...

    Me: "Sure, folks, I'll take your picture. Move back towards the fountain."
    Tourists (moving back): "How's this?"
    Me: "No, no, a little farther back."
    Tourists (moving back again): "Better?"
    Me: "Hey, I know! Why don't you take off your shoes and stand *in* the fountain?"
    Tourists: "Umm.... okay."
    (Tourists take off shoes and socks and wade into fountain.)
    Tourists: "Okay, how's this?"
    /me runs off with the phone.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Tourists, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      original....

    2. Re:Tourists, eh? by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
      RING RING... RING RING
      You: Uh, hello?
      Caller: We forgot to tell you about...
      BEEP (you hit END to hang up)

      Later, as you're sitting at home telling Slashdot about the two idiots you stole a camera from
      Ding Dong!
      Barefoot Tourists: Hi there! We forgot to tell you about the great built-in GPS module that allows the phone to determine its location and send that data back to a central server in case it's ever stolen. We'd still like you to take our picture so you can see how easy to use it is.

    3. Re:Tourists, eh? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Or it could be considered an "in-joke".

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    4. Re:Tourists, eh? by sporktoast · · Score: 2
      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    5. Re:Tourists, eh? by guttentag · · Score: 2

      Unless you just happened to be carrying one on the street, they could have tracked you (via one of the other dozen phones they're probably carrying -- if they're handing expensive new consumer devices to complete strangers, they've got to expect that some are going to break/get stolen) back to your house while you are en route. In that case, hiding the phone in a Faraday cage once you get home won't do much good because they already know where you live.

    6. Re:Tourists, eh? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I want a cell phone that I have to keep in a Faraday cage, too. If I build a big enough Faraday cage I am sure I'll figure out something I can use it for in there.

    7. Re:Tourists, eh? by qwerpoiu · · Score: 1
      Barefoot Tourists: Hi there! We forgot to tell you about the great built-in GPS module that allows the phone to determine its location and send that data back to a central server in case it's ever stolen. We'd still like you to take our picture so you can see how easy to use it is.

      Uh... sure! Say, the resolution on this phone isn't too good. Maybe I should try that expensive Sony camera you're carrying...

    8. Re:Tourists, eh? by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's easier to just remove the battery....

    9. Re:Tourists, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give National Lampoon's European Vacation its props, you plagerizer. I hope the MPAA comes and opens up a can of whoop-DMCA on you!

    10. Re:Tourists, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, okay. And how good will your signal strength be on a cell phone inside an RF-proof Faraday cage?

    11. Re:Tourists, eh? by asn · · Score: 1

      No one who has seen European Vacation will make that mistake... :)

    12. Re:Tourists, eh? by austad · · Score: 2

      Barefoot Tourists: Hi there! We forgot to tell you about the great built-in GPS module

      Actually, with ATT Wireless, you can locate other GSM phone users. It's accurate to within a block or so. I have a T68i and a few people I work with have them. The locate feature is sweet. Just go under mMode -> Location Services. You need to "ask permission" to the people you want to locate before it will let you.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    13. Re:Tourists, eh? by hawk · · Score: 2
      >I want a cell phone that I have to keep in a Faraday cage, too.

      If it came with a faraday cage, I just *might* consider one. Of course, simply removing the batteries would be an easier way to meet my needs . . .

      hawk

    14. Re:Tourists, eh? by hawk · · Score: 2
      You're forgetting that tourists start with a big pile of +2 darts . . . of course, if you (a)pply the camera to them once you have it, and run a zig-zaggy course, they'll have a hard time aiming at you . . .

      hawk, who is disgusted to point out to uneducated moderators who fancy tehmselves gamers that this is a nethack joke

    15. Re:Tourists, eh? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      With the batteries removed, it makes a pretty spiffy looking paperweight....

  14. nothing new .. by jest3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in the day when the shopping cart was invented (were talking 1937 - not amazon.com) the first stores to offer these contraptions noticed that they were not catching on at all .. so what did they do?

    They resorted to hiring models to shop with grocery carts as to "model" the behavior desired for customers.

    Needless to say it worked like a charm ...

    1. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when did it become associated with bums and other assorted pieces of street trash?

    2. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that was the Calvin Klein advertising campaign.

    3. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of the story about when they introduced escalators in the London Underground in the early 20th century. After installing the escalators, nobody used them as people were skeptical about their safety. Someone was hired to convince people that the escalators were safe by riding up and down on them all day. However this caused people to be more scared of the escalators as the person they hired happened to be missing a leg or something. People figured that he injured his leg in an escalator accident.

      Don't know if that is a true story, but I have heard it from more than one source.

    4. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow
      laughing at the expense of a homeless person. how noble of you

    5. Re:nothing new .. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Fuck the homeless. They are smelly, dirty, scary, weird, perverted people. They are usually drug addicts and/or alcoholics. They go to the shelters for the free food, but they hardly ever take advantage of the services offered to help them clean themselves up and get a job. The single mother who lost her job and lives on the street for two nights before getting helped by one of the public service groups is a tiny tiny minority of the homeless population.

      Most homeless people aren't interested in getting themselves cleaned up, getting jobs, and joining the blue-collar lower-middle-class. They think, "why work hard and live a poor life when I can do nothing and be handed a poor life for free?"

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    6. Re:nothing new .. by zapfie · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in knowing how you arrived at the conclusion you did. You include a lot of opinion but you don't really say what experiences you've had that led you to that view.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    7. Re:nothing new .. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Fuck you. You're a bigoted, stereotypical asshole. You think you can sit in your parents house in suburbia driving a $15,000 car your parents bought for you and pass judgment on people who you only see through the tinted windows of your import sedan. I live in Austin, TX and the homeless there are actually very nice, personable people. Yes, they're a bit odd, but we all have our quirks. Most homeless people aren't there because they want a "free ride." They often have mental conditions which prevent them from living amongst society (advanced schizophrenia is very common amongst the homeless.)

      Get off your high horse and out of your parents basement and see what the real world is like before you start passing your holy word off on others. You pass stereotypical assumptions off as fact, when your assumptions are very far from it.

    8. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh shut it fucknugget. They're fucking smelly bums who would have anything they desided if they got off their flea ridden asses.

    9. Re:nothing new .. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      I agree with you that the state government should again take up its responsibility to the general population and treat the mental health of the impoverished as well as other kinds of disease and health problems. A bum is treated for free if he has a broken leg or pneumonia, but not if he has schizophrenia or manic depression. It is terrible that these diseases are ignored when amazingly good treatments exist for them and would be relatively inexpensive.

      You are a stereotypical tree-hugging homeless-hugging hippe loser who doesn't actually do anything with these people.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    10. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mostly correct. In my experience most homeless people are mostly homeless because they want to be. A smaller percentage is obviously mentally ill. Those that don't want to be homeless will have the initiative to look for programs to get them back on their feet. If you think otherwise, you have a distorted view of reality or have watched too many after school specials and warm and fuzzy Disney movies.

    11. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schizophrenia? Good treatments for schizophrenia? Like what, killing them? Believe me, I know a few people are genuinely diagnosed schizophrenics and it is like they died inside. All they do is hurt the people who care about them after that. There are no treatments to get them back together. If you think so, you are confusing it with a different disorder. No treatments have helped the schizophrenics I know. It is sad, but that is how it is. That doesn't mean they should be treated like crap, though. All you can do is keep their empty shells going.

      Manic depression is a different story. At least there are medicines for chemical imbalances for depression.

    12. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clozeril and Zyprexa are both surprisingly effective, even for those who don't respond to 'traditional' therapies (read: 'enough Thorazine and/or Haldol to kill a fucking elephant'), and unlike 'traditional' therapies, people on the new drugs are capable of living real lives rather than smoking cigarettes and drooling. Big Pharma is a lot of evil, I'll grant you, but they're managing to do some things right for the schizophrenics among us.

    13. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a stereotypical tree-hugging homeless-hugging hippe loser who doesn't actually do anything with these people.

      As opposed to you - a stereotypical unsympathetic right-wing fuck-the-poor conservative asshole loser who wouldn't know empathy if it smacked you in the face, which I would like to do by the way.

    14. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a stereotypical tree-hugging homeless-hugging hippe loser

      And that's what makes Austin such a cool place to live in. What's wrecking the place is fools like yourself moving to town, turning the place into Republican-land. You remind me of those people who show up at Hippie Hollow and are completely shocked. OH MY GOD THOSE PEOPLE ARE NAKED! Somebody call the police while I pray for them!

    15. Re:nothing new .. by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other."--Eric Hoffer

      Conformity is a powerful magnet, even if you're aware of it and actively trying to be different (which itself can be a kind of conformity).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    16. Re:nothing new .. by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

      I patrol downtown Indianapolis for a private security firm. A lot of our partrol hits are parking garages. The goal is to flush out the bums because the only thing their presence causes is problems. In the process, I have gotten to know a lot of them well, and the ratio of scumbags to decent people down on their luck is about 20:1. Thats my experience. Hell, there's one that I only see about once a month, because he moves around, and every time I see him, he tries to hit me with the same old scam because he doesn't recognize me.

    17. Re:nothing new .. by mpe · · Score: 2

      Back in the day when the shopping cart was invented (were talking 1937 - not amazon.com) the first stores to offer these contraptions noticed that they were not catching on at all .. so what did they do?
      They resorted to hiring models to shop with grocery carts as to "model" the behavior desired for customers.


      That certainly wasn't the first. London Underground hired a one legged man to prove their new fangled "moving stairways" were safe.

    18. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a stereotypical tree-hugging homeless-hugging hippe loser who doesn't actually do anything with these people.

      That reminds me of that city in California where the liberals got together to help the homeless by buying them their own brand new shopping carts. Talk about compassion. :-) How about buying them a shower, clean suit, and a job interview with the county or something for a nice minimum wage blue collar job that earns an honest day's pay? Get them on their feet with SOMETHING instead of the continual handouts that end up going into drugs or booze.

    19. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conformity [despair.com] is a powerful magnet, even if you're aware of it and actively trying to be different (which itself can be a kind of conformity).

      You don't have to look any further than this very site for an example of this. Conformity is mandatory on Slashdot. If your views stray away from the accepted views of the "community" then you are punished and shunned. It's really rather entertaining to see people moderated down as trolls or flamebait when they attempt to voice a dissenting opinion on something. This same community then flaunts that they are some kind of free speech advocates and pat themselves on the back all day about how open minded they are about the world. Slashdot revolves around a few basic things:

      Liberalism is a VERY big part of this site. Those voicing conservative opinions are generally moderated into oblivion.. Republicans are evil afterall.

      Open Source software and Linux are good. OSS can do no wrong and is the cure to the world's problems.

      Microsoft is universally bad. They could cure cancer, solve world hunger problems, and build a giant asteroid deflection shield around the earth and we'd STILL bitch at them for being a greedy monopoly.

      Sony and other major companies are cool when they are creating dancing robots and mp3 players for your car but are bad when they are selling copy protected CDs and putting out movies and complaining about people pirating their intellectual property. Some days Slashdot seems to have a split personality by taunting some "cool new gadget" by Sony and then telling people to boycott them because they're selling some other gadget with DRM features. Another one I love is we're supposed to boycott CD companies and the evil MPAA... until Spider-Man or Lord of the Rings or Star Wars comes out.. then they're cool and we should all go rush to see those movies. That's hypocrisy to the fullest.

      I could go on and on and on about these and you guys know in your hearts that I speak the truth. Slashdot plays this game that they're some kind of open minded weblog but they're nothing but another site that has grown out of control and thinks they are more important than the ideals that they started with. I've been on this site since it opened and I hope to read it on the last day it exists before the VA Software servers that host it are shutdown and shipped off to some bankruptcy holding facility. There have been ups and downs to this site but I pray daily that it dies so I have incentive to move to something new.

      PS: Don't forget SlashSheep moderators, mod me down to troll!!! I DON'T CARE!

    20. Re:nothing new .. by volsung · · Score: 2
      Actually, I read "anti-Slashthink" posts nearly as frequently as I read the "Slashthink" posts you are blasting.

      The readership of this site (at least those who speak up) is not nearly so biased as you portray. You are raging against a demographic that is several years out of date. It's time to move on...

      P.S. Please don't use the reverse psychology moderation trick anymore. It's become very trite. Take you negative mods like a man.

    21. Re:nothing new .. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they weren't trying to sell the shopping carts TO you, were they?

    22. Re:nothing new .. by ronfar · · Score: 1
      [I] was watching a show on food the other day. [The show] mentioned that when Nathan's started out people were afraid that their hot dogs were low quality because they were cheaper than the competition. [Nathan's] succeeded by offering free hot dogs to doctors if they would come to eat them in their medical garb.

      Now that's marketing!

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    23. Re:nothing new .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One counterexample to the "homeless are lazy" argument: An acquaintance of my partner developed serious schizophrenia and, without anyone knowing where he was, spent months walking the streets randomly, intensely paranoid. He is now in an institution, heavily drugged and mentally slightly more stable, and made to build kids' toys during the day, for which he is paid around $50/month. (I say "made" because there is the threat of being thrown out if he does not do it.)

      Another: When my partner was 16 (we're talking decades ago..) her family gave her a $20 note and left her for a few weeks on her own [they're an immigrant family and for some reason I've never quite understood, they went back to their home country for a bit]. She chose to sleep rough as an alternative to any arranged accommodation. Having just left an environment of abuse from stepfather and brothers, I gather she was far too scared to go on the hunt for a new strange set of people to be with.

      To cut a long story short, she is now self-employed, working hard, earning hard, and happily donating to those who are as unfortunate as she once was. No sob story, see? Some people genuinely have troubles, work through them, and get on their own two feet. Something attitudes like yours do nothing to help.

      (Of course, I will accept that sometimes it's the person's own fault; a neighbour's brother had a high flying job in the music industry, took a little too much of the nice stuff, and his brains have.. well.. turned to mush. He has a place to stay, courtesy I believe of his kind brother, but a few times has wandered aimlessly and cluelessly into the streets in the night to sleep..)

      why work hard and live a poor life when I can do nothing and be handed a poor life for free
      My philosophical response to this question is as follows: Why work hard to be treated like shit? Is it really worth it? Sure, if you have a fair play and fair prospects, you have no excuse to slack off, but why otherwise?

      Now, reality: I would conjecture from experience that very few homeless people see it as an "easy option". The frequency of attacks on the homeless, the unhealthy conditions in which they live, etc., does not make for an enjoyable lifestyle.

    24. Re:nothing new .. by Fjord · · Score: 1

      A broken leg and pneumonia are immediately life threatening and only have to be treated once. Surely you can't think that is in they are in the same class as a nondirectly life threatening, chronic medical problems such as schizophrenia and manic depression.

      However, I do agree that it makes sense to try to treat these problems so that the people with them can become self sufficient. In Ontario this is the case. It doesn't really help the problem because schizophrenics rarely actually want to get better and lapse unless they have close friends or family pushing them (and if that's the case they don't require assistance). But it is humane to offer help.

      --
      -no broken link
    25. Re:nothing new .. by Fjord · · Score: 1

      This guy has a shitty disposition, but he partly right. The truth is that no one in our society has to be homeless. There are many programs that make this the case. Where the guy take an odd turn is feeling like the homeless that choose that life (whether it's because their mental disorder doesn't let them see how they are living or they truly do know what life they lead) are bad people because of their choice. I say let them choose that life and I'll choose mine. People who say that these people are getting a "free ride" should try the ride to see how free it is. If they really feel they aren't getting anything more than a nonworking person through their work life, then logically they should choose not to work.

      --
      -no broken link
  15. -1 Shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Shill

    Shut up you nokia sponsored ass bandito.

  16. From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by tealover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of you people will dismiss this because it's coming from Sony, but were it Microsoft doing something similar you'd be raising all kind of hell.

    I'm more worried about Sony that I've been about Microsoft. Sony has its hands on too many things and has shown a willingness to use any means to abuse its position.

    --
    -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    1. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by ottffssent · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...were it Microsoft doing something similar you'd be raising all kind of hell.

      Nah. We'd just beat to a bloody pulp anyone in Fry's or CompUSA holding a boxed copy of winXP.

    2. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL worries me more. They own the content makers and they own the content distribution channels. Sony owns content too, and their playback devices, but you can buy anything you want. AOL has most if not all of Joe six-pack. Microsoft owns content too, and the playback software, but to a lesser extent than either Sony or AOL. AOL scares me. I hope their stock drops so low that they are bought by Microsoft, and then buried.

    3. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooo, itz noot coming from Sony.. Itz comeing fram Eriksson - Sveeden! Bork bork bork!

      Zis taip ov markeeting iz a svedish tradition- ve call it "Lura främlingen".

    4. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      When I was in Costa Rica this summer they actually had someone doing something similar for another (non-tech) product. There was a woman holding a loaf of Bimbo bread (I'm not kidding about the brand name) in the aisle waiting for people to buy some.

      At least she was labeled... The English equivalent to the Spanish text on her shirt was "Walking Billboard" (I don't recall the Spanish, but that's the general idea of it).

    5. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I enjoy sneaking stickers with the Cheapbytes URL on them into CompUSA. I put them on all the various Linux box sets in the store.

      One of the sales clerks, who for some reason has a vendetta against Linux*, once saw me doing it and now helps me by 'covering' when I do it.

      (* I think he has a vendetta because usually the Linux customer never comes in and buys a piece of software at the store again.)

    6. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      We get this in the grocer's all the time, and funny but almost all of the 'sales' people are little old lady looking people, " Here sonny try a bit of this processed crap...."

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    7. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by The+Grey+Eminence · · Score: 1

      :D

      If the moderators knew some swedish, this would have been modded up already...

    8. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by archen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most of you people will dismiss this because it's coming from Sony, but were it Microsoft doing something similar you'd be raising all kind of hell.

      Probably because whem Microsoft tries to stick models with their software, it tends to look really stupid. (as shown here)

    9. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd just beat to a bloody pulp anyone in Fry's or CompUSA holding a boxed copy of winXP

      Heh. I don't envision a bunch of extremely over/underweight, uncoodrinated slashdorks beating anyone to a bloody pulp.

    10. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      Nah. We'd just beat to a bloody pulp anyone in Fry's or CompUSA holding a boxed copy of winXP.

      What? You mean we're not supposed to be doing that already? Oops...uh....CLEANUP ON AILSE 5!

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
    11. Re:From The Same Company That Faked Movie Reviews by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Sony has it's hands in a lot of things, some virtual, but a lot brick and mortar. It has a market capitalization of 40.974B

      Microsoft has it's hand in relatively few things, but has a near monopoly in two virtual markets, one which it has been repeatedly convicted of exerting anticonsumer powers, and has little brick and mortar. It has a market capitalization of 247.8B

      We're talking apples and apple seeds.

      --
      -no broken link
  17. Empire State Building, eh? by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    I start working a couple blocks away in two weeks..

    on another note, who's going to be the first in the US to do 3G with a bluetooth phone? how about stapling together a 3G palm phone with bluetooth connection sharing? can you do it today?

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  18. HI!!! by seanw · · Score: 5, Funny

    HAHA! Ignore all the claims to the contrary...I have this phone and it's GREAT! it has totally fulfilled all my cellular phone expectations...not to mention that I am now a funnier and more popular person. also I am better looking.

    you should TOTALLY try out this phone. I mean, yeah, you could listen to the "marketroids" (haha!!! lingo!) or you could just take the word of regular /. "joes" like myself...and believe me, you might even just want to send some extra free money to ericsson after you see how good it is.

    your average slashdotter,
    sean

    ps I CERTAINLY don't work for ericsson...haha!

    pps did you notice I wrote "/." instead of "slashdot"? I am SO clearly one of you guys

    1. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of an IRC quote:
      * ab is away - gone, if anyone talks in the next 25 minutes as me it's bm
      being an asshole -
      HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS
    2. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh, good one.

    3. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brilliant. In order to make us believe that their corporate shill is a real slashdotter, Sony has used the gambit of having their shill pose as a slashdotter ironically posing (as a joke) as a shill for Ericcson. Everyone will assume that becuase the shill is being way too obvious about being a shill, that he is just trying to make a joke, and "must" be a real slashdot reader!

      And it's so well done, too-- Forumulaic, obvious humor, implemented in such an over the top way ("I CERTAINLY don't work for ericson.. haha") as to lack any subtletly whatsoever. "Only" a real slashdotter would make a post like that! They sure do know the community they're targeting well.

    4. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone will assume that becuase the shill is being way too obvious about being a shill, that he is just trying to make a joke, and "must" be a real slashdot reader!

      Actually that is an effective and old technique, during world war two there was a spy (i forget for which side) who was kind of obvious about the fact he had no clear source of income, then when anyone would ask him "what do you do for a living" he'd say, don't you know, i'm a spy!! but of course no one believed him, he was too obvious about it, they just thought he was a mysterious man with a tasteless joke

      Then after the war ended he revealed he really had been a spy, and wrote a book about it

      I can't remember what this man's name was, i originally read about this a long time ago in this book, but i don't have that book anymore

    5. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or like the cheating husbands that tell their wives they're going out with their girlfriends (in a joking way) and then really do. I have a coworker who does this....

    6. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Brilliant! A shill for amazon tricking slashdotters into thinking that they are a "real" slashdotter by posting gratuitous ads to random books on amazon.com in seemingly "relevant" places in slashdot stories!

      Adding to this brilliance is the fact that they are responding to a comment commenting on the irony of someone claiming to be a shill in a story about shills as a way of keeping the slashdot populace from realizing they are a shill, the last place that it would occur to a slashdotter that an Amazon shill would be posting links to amazon.com!

      Amazon.com, i salute you. Your mastery of fourth-order irony is even greater than mine.

    7. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! A shill for anonymous cowards tricking slashdotters into thinking that they are a "real" anonymous coward by posting anonymous posts to random threads on slashdot in seemingly "relevant" places in slashdot stories on slashdot and then posting it on slashdot's message board on slashdot!

      Er... wait. Something like that.

      Not a shill-ingly yours,
      Anonymous Coward

    8. Re:HI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..a battlefield of Sicilian logic, apparently.

    9. Re:HI!!! by Fastball · · Score: 1

      The Anonymous Coward responsible for sacking this poster has been sacked.

    10. Re:HI!!! by mobets · · Score: 1

      And they have amazing forsite. With a UID like 45548, they must have made the account years ago.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    11. Re:HI!!! by hajibaba · · Score: 1

      Inconceivable!!

  19. FANTASTIC! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1, Funny
    Best way to deal with this... when you see a cutie with a Sony phone, grab her a$$ and say, "Hey there, t!ts, wanna take my picture?"

    Sony will stop their shills campain faster than you can say, "DRM can suck my n\/ts cause I'm running Linux".

  20. The next geek sport by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now... www.LeanerSpotting.com

    1. Re:The next geek sport by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has anybody grabbed www.LeanerChalking.org yet?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:The next geek sport by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I don't understand--what's a "leaner"? Is there and everything2 entry or something that I don't know about?

    3. Re:The next geek sport by akruppa · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I can see it now... www.LeanerSpotting.com

      If you pull it off nicely, you might ask the leaner to borrow the phone to take a picture of her and use the email function to submit it.

      Alex

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here
    4. Re:The next geek sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RTFNI! (NI: News Item)
      "leaners": pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars playing interactive Battleship with each other from opposite ends of the bar.
  21. Phonies by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    America is an entire country of phonies. We have a war on terror, which we win by putting flags on our cars. We have a President who was a phony 'successful' businessman. We have people who call me just about every day who say they are calling for AT&T but who really work for AT&T competitors who are trying to mislead me into giving them my phone business. And now we've got this, walking adverts who deny it. We deserve Enron, Global Crossing, Worldcom and all the rest of that crap. We deserve to not know what's what, who's who, or who's screwing us without benefit of intercourse until it's too late. We deserve a stock market that eats our savings. Don't ask Congress to fix it. They are just as phony as the people who elected them. We've got what we deserve. Now we suffer. Enjoy it.

    1. Re:Phonies by elefantstn · · Score: 2

      Whereas, in the rest of the world and in all history prior to the current era, people were honest.

      Grow up and read some history. People don't change.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    2. Re:Phonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awn, has somebody been reading Catcher in the Rye one too many times? ;-)

    3. Re:Phonies by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1
      When you lived in the rest of the world in all history, mobility was lower and cities were smaller, and you lived by your reputation. A known phony didn't have much future.

      Today, we've got a scandal that a big brokerage firm touted junky stocks because of a conflict of interest and everyone wonders what the government should do about. No one expects that the public should simply stop patronizing Merrill Lynch until the SOB's starve to death. WTH not?

    4. Re:Phonies by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1
      "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our Number one priority and we will not rest until we find him!" -- Former Governor Bush, September 13, 2001

      "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." -- Former Governor Bush, March 13, 2002

      You're right. We can win. But we'll either have to stop being phonies or keep moving the goalposts.

  22. Hey I'm replying to this post on my new T68i by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I was just sitting at the bar, surfing when I stumbled across this thread. I'm doing all this on my new Sony/Ericsson T68i, it's really cool and I love it, I'd post a picture that I took with it, yup, I said that I took a picture with my cell phone, but /. won't let me. If you all have a minute, I'd love to tell you about it and let you check it out .....

    1. Re:Hey I'm replying to this post on my new T68i by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      For certain, uhh, "favors", I'll buy a dozen of those phones. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  23. Sony phones by tps12 · · Score: 0, Troll

    As a reliable member of the Slash-Dot community, with my "karma points" well into the "Positive" range, I would like to express my complete satisfaction with my new Sony-Ericsson TI-85 phone.

    This baby is "phat." It does voicemail, email, plays online games, and even takes pictures! I have a blast hanging out with my "elite" friends talking about Linux and snapping shots of good times.

    I would definitely recommend this product to any of my fellow Slash-Dot enthusiasts. For more information, check out their slick URL at http://www.sony.com. You will be hard pressed to find a better phone for your money. Take it from me, a supporter of Linux and Free Source.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  24. WTF? by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]"

    Just look for the totally lame assholes at the bar. On second thought, think of the potential for false positives. Damn...back to the drawing board.

    While this is kind of underhanded, it's an interesting idea -- I guess the suits are beginning to realize that glittery (but really lame) advertising campaigns don't penetrate our bullshit detectors.

    Steve

    1. Re:WTF? by man_ls · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This type of advertising campaign, for me, is more of a 'turn on' to the product than a commercial. It's a real life demonstration of the product's capabilities in a setting you'd use them...think infomercial cept live.

      Plus, because you don't know you're being targetedly-advertised to, you're more receptive to the idea. Adds have the problem of overcoming the psycological barrier of "being sold", whereas a tourist who needs his picture taken, and also happens to have an elite new digital camera/cell phone that you want to know more about, is more effective. It leaves more of an impression.

      Impression is what advertisers are after, at the bottom line.

    2. Re:WTF? by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Whenever i talk with someone about their cool new toy, one of the first things i ask is "what DON'T you like about it." These "fake" people probably aren't going to tell me.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're delicious cookies!...of DOOM!

    4. Re:WTF? by zapfie · · Score: 1

      For some reason that cracked me up laughing. :)

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    5. Re:WTF? by Kredal · · Score: 2
      If you liked that, you'll LOVE 8-Bit Theater... Here's the Cookies of DOOM comic:

      Episode 174

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon it's something to do with the phones being shaped like beer glass profiles now....

  25. I need my thneeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The western world's economy is based on selling thneeds. After all, everybody needs a thneed, right? If nobody needed a thneed, then the western economy will collapse. So be patriotic-- buy every thneed you can get your hands on. You'll wonder how you ever lived your life without them.

  26. Nader? by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1

    Nader complains. More justice. IIRC, he was the first junk mailer targeting me to send junk mail with a computer font that resembled handwriting, trying to fool me into thinking I was getting a hand-addressed envelope from a grass-roots operation when he was laser-printing the spiel by the millions just like everyone else.

  27. 2 women playing battleships in a bar... by jonr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2 women (supposedly gorgeous) playing battleships in a bar... Riiight. EricSony marketoids needs to get out more.

    1. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Baby, you can quit right now. You've sunk me already."

    2. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better game would be strip pokers - even if simulated.

    3. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol good one!

    4. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Idou · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that your post was rated "insightful" instead "funny" says a lot about the moderators, as well.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    5. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Of course. And she plays XBox every day.

      Good-looking women will sell stuff, no matter what it is. Be it neat cell phone-camera combos, or the latest games that require you to blow up monsters.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    6. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by shri · · Score: 1

      Battleships?

      Wait .. new pickup line.

      "Hey Baby .. wanna see my torpedo?"

    7. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIRE ONE!
      FIRE ONE!
      FIRE ONE!
      FIRE ONE!
      FIRE ONE!

      Ah fuck it. One's not working.

      FIRE TWO!
      FIRE TWO!
      FIRE TWO!

    8. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • 2 women (supposedly gorgeous) playing battleships in a bar... Riiight. EricSony marketoids needs to get out more.

      Heck, knowing this might make me get out more, to try and find some. They're getting paid to talk to me, right? This could do wonders for the bar industry.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by grrlygeeky · · Score: 0

      I was about to remind you /. guys that there *are* female technophiles out there, cause I'm one... but then I remembered I'm a lesbian so that doesn't help you much :o)

      Sorry boys.

      I can't account for why girls don't get into geek stuff more often... maybe if the 12 year old boys weren't so scared of us and *invited* us over to play dungeons and dragons every once in a while....

      But to remain on topic, even if I had the money for it right now I would rather spend my money on 1) a good phone and 2) a good camera than a lame combination of the two.

    10. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I read that as stimulated. I need to get out more.

    11. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh.. uhh... How often do you go to a bar *without* getting come-ons?

    12. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. I was gonna go with, "Baby, can I sink /my/ battleship?"

    13. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is with the message "Please enjoy this site responsibly." posted at the bottom of your website?

      I'm guessing don't drive after visiting it because you'll be brain-dead from the pretentious poetry.

    14. Re:2 women playing battleships in a bar... by natet · · Score: 1

      Do models know how to play battleship?

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
  28. Brilliant secrecy techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    [T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]""

    For example, they explained their marketing campaign to the Wall Street Journal, an internationally distributed newspaper with a daily circulation of 1,943,601, and gave said paper specific examples of the kinds of things that their actors will be doing. Then, once this paper prints an article on it, it gets posted to slashdot.org, a heavily accessed website frequented by virtually everyone in the target group of wierdass technology toys like a digital camera/cellphone allinone.

    Sony, you are brilliant. No one will ever suspect the details of your devious plan. They will think all those shills are real people. Sony: international troll of mystery! If only Microsoft were this good at keeping its secrets from the public, Security though Obscurity might actually work.

    ---
    Now that i have the blatant, boring cynical sarcasm over with, i have to say this for them: well, their campaign sure worked! In that, it was successful in one thing: i heard about it. So did you. So did everyone in this forum. Everyone here may know Sony was using dubious marketing practices, but they also know that Sony is selling a cell phone that doubles as a digital camera. Which, now that i think about it, is fucking cool. I want one. :)

    1. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Likely the total cost to Sony for this ad "campaign" will be a fax to the Wall Street Journal. As you mention, it looks like it worked brilliantly.

      BTW: I'm going advertise my products by hiring midgets to dive off of the tallest building in every city, saving themselves by bouncing on a giant rubber mat that has my logo. This will be right after I launch satellites that are so large that they block out the sun, but show my logo to humanity all day long.

    2. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2

      You are probably working for SonyEricsson. Nice try.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by KyleCordes · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Perhaps the ad campgaign is not the people in the bars; perhaps the actual ad campaign is the free publicity in the WSJ, on Slashdot, and hundreds of other places.

    4. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by PastorOfMuppets · · Score: 1
      " Perhaps the ad campgaign is not the people in the bars; perhaps the actual ad campaign is the free publicity in the WSJ, on Slashdot, and hundreds of other places."

      Or maybe that's what they want us to think. If we all belive that this article is nothing more than an attempt at free publicity, we'll all be fooled by the real campaign.

      Very clever Sony/Ericson, but not clever enough.

      --
      If you don't have anything nice to say, shut up you stupid prick.
    5. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe that's what they want us to think. If we all belive that this article is nothing more than an attempt at free publicity, we'll all be fooled by the real campaign.

      Maybe the entire point is to get all the "people who think too much" too tied up in self-referential irony loops related to the mobile phone campaign to be paying attention to stuff, while Sony builds up their army of cyborg zombies.

      They figure the only people who will notice something like that is the crazy free-thinkers who read Hofstadter and such, so they had to do something to keep us all distracted.. so they came up with the idea of a recursively ironic marketing campaign, so that we would all be so busy debating ourselves over how we're *really* getting played in the mobile-phone-shill thing that we will not notice the itermittant high-level bursts of dark psychic energy constantly emitting from the experiments on the undead in Sony's secret sub-terranean lair in the Yucca Mountains for a couple months at least.. By which time the 90,000-year old Egg of Elder Chaos will have hatched, and it will be too late for us to stop what has been begun.

      Judging from this slashdot discussion, their plan seems to be working.

    6. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by robbieg · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The people who read the Wall Street Journal (or Slashdot) aren't going to be visiting the space needle or hanging out in the "fashionable bars" the campaign is likely to target.

      Running the story in the WSJ just gets news about Ericsson's new product out to another group of potential purchasers.

    7. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding, the target group is now going to be looking for the plants. And when you see a plant you will run up to them to see how much they are making, at which point they demo the phone to you, and convince you to buy it. Sounds like it should work perfectly. I know that I have a perfectly good cell phone right now, and I see no reason to replace (and I'm out of work so I really have to be careful what I spend money on...). However I'll be looking for plants on the rare times I get out, and I will look for an opertunity to use the phone.

      Who knows, I might even meet a good looking model too. Nahh, geeks aren't allowed to meet girls.

    8. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by Lonath · · Score: 2

      No I think you're the shill who keeps mentioning the Sony/Ericsson T68i Cellphone/Digital Camera by name thereby increasing its brand recognition. Perhaps if everyone here would stop talking about the Sony/Ericsson T68i Cellphone/Digital Camera then these companies wouldn't get so much free press about the Sony/Ericsson T68i Cellphone/Digital Camera.

      And btw, this is a neat marketing campaign. I usually don't like marketing drones but getting /.ers all riled up rocks... :) I wouldn't buy it myself since I've never had a cellphone and don't plan on getting one anytime soon, but it's still a neat marketing idea.

    9. Re:Brilliant secrecy techniques by klparrot · · Score: 1
      Blocking out the sun? You're not by any chance selling Burns brand electricity, are you?

      Hello, lamppost. Whatcha knowin'? I've come to watch your... power flowin'.

      Is there anything left that doesn't have a relevant Simpsons quote? ;)

  29. ... and "flashers" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... pairs of men sticking them under baggy overcoats and sending the resulting image to each other across the bar.

  30. Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before a certain incident which messed up the airline industry pretty bad, my brother held a similar job for one of the major commercial airlines. He was an internet shill for this company. His job was to visit travel websites, message boards, newsgroups, and even AOL travel forums and basically promote his employer as subtlely as possible. The idea was to create a good image of the airline without making it obvious that he worked for them.

    He'd make posts under fake names telling stories of how he just used the airline and had a great experience. If he found someone railing on the airline for a particular issue ("my inflight meal was dry") he'd counter it with a positive example ("I flew from LA to Miami last week and the food was great"). Same thing if people were complaining about fares, being bumped, or whatever. He was like an anonymous and multi-faceted PR guy, doing his best to influence peoples opinions of his airline.

    I wouldn't doubt that other industries are doing the exact same thing.

    1. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do. All the time.
      Especially here.

    2. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't be suprised if that happens here on slashdot. everytime there's a particularly nasty slashdot story about microsoft, there's one or two really well informed, positive, almost unnatural, posts for microsoft's latest DRM or whatever idea. i wouldn't be suprised if nvidia and ati have 2 or 3 people apiece who troll the overclocker forums and whatnot.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Funny


      Right! I'm a shill for porn companies! I don't actually like downloading the .jpgs, I'm just demonstrating how much fun it can be!

      Just as long as my wife doesn't catch me demonstrating...

      On a related tangent, who did this first? I'm an Apple guy, so I'd like to think that Guy Kawasaki innovated the form, but maybe Apple just stole the concept from someplace?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Jeffv323 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I heard most airlines do that, but not United. I know for a fact that most airlines try to mislead their customers by putting a forged "good word" out about how good their food is or how comfortable their seats are but definately not United. United Airlines has a rich history of community support that goes back nearly 70 years. Would you really expect a company with a 70 year history of rich community support to try to mislead their customers? Absolutely not.

      --
      I'm a minister!
    5. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientologists do this. A woman named Tori Bezazian (ex-scieno) gave a talk at our school about Scientology, and she said she was in charge of most of their PR in situations like this. She actually had the Battlefield Earth messageboard shut down because so many anti-Scientologists on it.

      It's good to see our communications companies taking after insane, deadly cults.

    6. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Hmm, if you work for an airline (say United), and you post on a message board that you just flew from LA to Miami on United and the food was great, when in fact you have NOT recently flown from LA to Miami on United, isn't that fraud? Certainly it's not the most egregious form of fraud, because individual experiences certainly can differ, but still, it's rather illegal.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    7. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Luxury+P.+Yacht · · Score: 1
      Just as long as my wife doesn't catch me demonstrating...
      Well, I've never heard it called that before!
      --
      Bush should have died, not Reagan -- Morrissey
      Morrissey rides a cockhorse -- The Warlock Pinchers
    8. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was like an anonymous and multi-faceted PR guy, doing his best to influence peoples opinions of his airline.

      So essentially he was hired to be a professional liar and shill for the company? Brilliant. How does he sleep at night knowing he was paid to be a professional liar? People looking to get actual real-world advice about a product before they spend their hard earned money are being lied to by a PR guy in disguise... that just reaks of immorality.

    9. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, man, right on. I fly on United all the time and the food's always great. The seats are comfortable, too. United's the best. Would I lie to you?

    10. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Unlikely, airlines give employees a excellent discount. Northwest for instance it is $20 to get on any not full plane. I have a friend who flys to Sweden (from the US) to visit is brother often because it is so cheap to do so.

      I'm sure that the guy who flew from LA to Miami actually did that, and likely out of his own pocket. Of course he is presumibly paid to go to parties and tell good stories about the airline, but if you like to travel it is a good deal. Though I suppose finding someone who would be comfortable in an iron maiden, with a mother who can't cook is tough. Still if you meet those requirements, and are socal enough to speak up the airlines want you.

    11. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by caveat · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think that Guy Kawasaki innovated the form
      heh. i was an evangelista for a few years back in the day, and there didn't seem to be much underhandedness or trickiness about it. we were always clearly self-marked 'mac zealots', making no secret of why we were what we were up to. fun, though...

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    12. Re:Airlines did a similar thing by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      ("I flew from LA to Miami last week and the food was great")

      You'd think that someone claiming to like airline food would immediately flag them as a paid rep of an airline. That, or a raving loony :-)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  31. Not really needed... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    I have a T68 and I get people asking me "Hey, that's COOL! Where'd you get that phone? What else can it do?" all the time.

    I wish Ericsson would pay *ME* for such encounters. :P

    I don't think this would really create a "fake buzz" because the T68 really is a pretty cool phone. The accessories (like the camera or the mp3 player) are a bit pricey, though.

    1. Re:Not really needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah-hah! You're one of Ericsson's people, aren't you!

    2. Re:Not really needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have a T68... it's my 9th cell phone. I've seen just about everything there is to see in the North American mobile market over the years.
      I can definatively say that this phone is average in terms of usability and gets C+ average at best in this category. The software is slow and counter-intuitive. There is nothing more aggrevating than trying to scroll through your phonebook and having to wait for the software to catch-up with your key presses.
      The hardware, however, is top of the line. Maybe some slashdotters can offer to do a rewrite for SonyEriccson.
      If you're planning to buy a new phone, I highly recommend that you look at Nokia.

  32. sig by Webmonger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    sh00perz, it's "sentences", not "sentances"

    1. Re:sig by zapfie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You forgot the period on your sentence.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sentance ia masculing ant therefore doesn't have a perios

  33. If they'll talk to me about the phones... by ColGraff · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...then I don't care if they're shills or not. Attractive women who "like" discussing technology - even the illusion would be damn cool. Now if only I were old enough to visit bars - wait! Canada! Woohoo!

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:If they'll talk to me about the phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want you here. Stay home and post to slashdot instead.

    2. Re:If they'll talk to me about the phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahhaaha

      EXACTLY :)

    3. Re:If they'll talk to me about the phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only I were old enough to visit bars - wait! Canada! Woohoo!

      You mean "Wait! anywhere in the world except certain states of the US! Woohoo!

      What is up with that, anyway ?

    4. Re:If they'll talk to me about the phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christians. Good, god fearing christians.

  34. Not particularly effective by InnovATIONS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean how may people can these folks contact in an hour? If they are trying to make it look like a chance encounter then they can't be doing it to every person that passes by. And what does a pair of actresses cost per hour? Unless it generates a lot of follow on word of mouth my guess that what is going on here is a bunch of ad execs trying to show off how 'outside the box' they can think.

    1. Re:Not particularly effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did say it cost 5 million dollars. Money well wasted in my humble opinion.

    2. Re:Not particularly effective by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The idea is that you can trust people you actually meet and talk to, in normal society, to not secretly be actors or actresses behaving like regular people while secretly trying to sell you consumer products.

      It's called 'society'. At one time it was considered rather important.

    3. Re:Not particularly effective by pediddle · · Score: 0

      how may people can these folks contact in an hour?

      They just contacted 500,000 on Slashdot in less than that... and another 2,000,000 in the Wall Street Journal. I'd say it's working fine.

    4. Re:Not particularly effective by Warmth+Is+Life · · Score: 1

      Think 'exponential'. One memorable encounter and the victim will tell all their friends, who could pass it on to a couple more friends... who pass it on to a couple more... who pass it on to someone who reads Slashdot, who then destroys everyone. Of course, most Slashdotters don't have stories told to them "IRL" much.

    5. Re:Not particularly effective by zenyu · · Score: 2

      I mean how may people can these folks contact in an hour? If they are trying to make it look like a chance encounter then they can't be doing it to every person that passes by.

      My guess is that if the product is any good it could work really well. I've been approached when using WiFi in a coffee shop by total strangers that then went out and got a wireless modem. Then I've seen total strangers approach them, etc. It's an exponential growth curve until the market gets saturated.

      I'm not too bothered by this ether. A couple years ago I saw someone playing doom on his cell phone a and it didn't take long to discover he worked for Nokia. As long as it they don't actively conceal who they work for it's ok. I remember when PC sellers told you the technical specs of their computers down to the brand name of their components. They were a lot more useful than the "$599! Runs the internet!" ads now a days. This is effectively a product demonstration at my conveniance.

      And they might even discover I'll tell more friends about it if I actually get the "ho7 g3ek gURL's" number ;)

    6. Re:Not particularly effective by klparrot · · Score: 1
      And what does a pair of actresses cost per hour?

      If they're geek girls, maybe they'd just do it to get the cool phone. :)

  35. deception? by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    "It's deceptive," says Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization founded by consumer activist Ralph Nader, when told about the campaign. "People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz."

    Bullshit. Television ads are deceptive. Radio ads are deceptive. Print ads are deceptive. Internet ads are deceptive. They only provide a flashy glimpse of the product in question.

    These "ads" are live demonstrations of a working product. Whether or not the person doing the demonstration is honest is largely irrelevant. The consumer should focus on the product and it's merits.

    1. Re:deception? by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Actually, I agree with you. How many times does someone try to sell you something by handing it to you and saying "Here, use this"? It's about time we started selling the actual product again, and not some largely false image of it.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:deception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Television ads are deceptive. Radio ads are deceptive. Print ads are deceptive. Internet ads are deceptive. They only provide a flashy glimpse of the product in question.

      These "ads" are live demonstrations of a working product. Whether or not the person doing the demonstration is honest is largely irrelevant. The consumer should focus on the product and it's merits.

      I disagree.

      If the consumer is expected to "focus on the product, and it's merits", then why isn't the vendor held to the same standard?

      The product itself doesn't change by placing attractive models in a bar, now does it? Strange that they choose to sell it on that basis, then. Hmm.. might it be that by misrepresenting the ease of use and popularity of their devices, they hope to artifically boost sales?

      Popularity actually does provide a reasonable first-order approximation of whether a product is a reasonable value. If a lot of other people have bought something, and are happy, then chances are you won't feel ripped off if you buy the same thing.

      By planting fake "happy consumers" of the devices, Ericcson is deliberately providing false value metrics to the real consumers. It's a form of misrepresentation just shy of fraud, IMHO, but probably doesn't veer over the line. Then again, I'm not a lawyer.

      The vendor here is clearly abusing people's good nature -- I'm willing, as a gesture of goodwill towards those in my society, to help a couple out by taking their picture, even if it takes time out of my day, but I'm not willing to invest the same amount of time to listen to a product placement for a product that I don't want. For instance, I don't want an Ericcson cell phone.

      Furthermore, there's a question of trust. If I can't trust the person doing the demonstration not to misrepresent themself and their purposes, how can I trust them not to misrepresent their products? If a vendor isn't honest, why buy from them?!!

      I don't think this company is doing themselves any favours. I'm certainly not buying this product from them, and probably not any others, as well. Who knows what else they're not telling me?

    3. Re:deception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree.

      This isn't a straightforward demo of a real product. When you get such a demonstration, you're aware that the person showing it to you is paid to say good things about the product.

      With fake tourists and 'leaners', you're getting the appearance of another person's objective opinion. I've had friends at the office who've recently bought cars tell me all about their cars, both the good and the bad. These people are going to tell you just the good.

      The deception lies not in telling you how cool the product is, it lies in the fact that you think the presenter has made up their own mind about the product when in fact they're giving you a scripted opinon.

    4. Re:deception? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      Eh? Do you think they'll tell you if the buttons are too small, or (as posted above) the accessories are a bit pricey? No way. It's totally just a flashy glimpse of the product. Do you really think they'll let you borrow it for half an hour to play with?

  36. Well... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    The FTC has been warning search engines that try to pass off sponsored results as real, so you would think they would warn Sony about trying to pass off sponsored consumers as real.

  37. Did I read this correctly? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 2

    "pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars"

    Hells yeah, actresses and models come round to the lower man's arena! To hell with the cell phones, I want the chicks! Go Sony/Erickson

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Did I read this correctly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would probably be too "into" their game to talk to you(or anyone else).

  38. Old Tactic by Triv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tommy Hillfiger did this to promote their clothes in poor black areas of NYC.

    Triv

    1. Re:Old Tactic by Jacer · · Score: 1

      not to be racist or anything like that, there are lots of poor people any race, but i wouldn't want to wear tommy clothes whilst walking throughy the "ghetto"

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:Old Tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Fubu/Fila/whatever gang will ambush you and beat you to death for invading their turf.

    3. Re:Old Tactic by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      al gore, too, during the recout. They paid people to claim they accidently voted for the wrong candidate.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Old Tactic by Peyna · · Score: 2

      On top of that, Tommy Hilfiger pretty much came out and said he was racist on TV.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Old Tactic by Peyna · · Score: 1

      okay, i did a little research, and I guess that's not true. I think I first heard that like 6 years ago too. Hmm

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Old Tactic by Peyna · · Score: 2

      If you knew you voted for the wrong candidate, why did you do it?

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Old Tactic by ProfKyne · · Score: 2

      ...and everyone also knows that women were hired (and sometimes still are I think) to go out into public places and smoke cigarettes, offering cigarettes and a light to men.

      What some might not know is that DeBeers paid actresses to wear diamond jewelry during the 1930s, and allowed them to keep the jewels, as diamonds were not as desirable then as they are now. (Similarly, DeBeers' marketroids also crafted the association between diamonds and engagement, forever changing the ritual of courtship in the U.S.)

      --
      "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
    8. Re:Old Tactic by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      If you knew you voted for the wrong candidate, why did you do it?

      You knew it only after the fact. "Oh, you mean the second hole was for Pat Buchanan? And I thought it was for Gore!"

    9. Re:Old Tactic by Triv · · Score: 2

      Well, I got modded as a troll for the above (I really SHOULD have referenced that, I admit) but the analysis of Tommy's marketing techniques comes from Naomi Klein's No Logo. I highly recommend it.

      Triv

    10. Re:Old Tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit US-centric. Europe had been using diamonds for centuries for engagement.

    11. Re:Old Tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definitely worth reading if you want to learn where all these slashbots get their paranoid rantings from. They're practically plagiarized from this worthless piece of shit book.

    12. Re:Old Tactic by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting way to leverage someone else's marketing. Find a section of the population that is pre-selected for sheepishness, and put another shepherd in front of them. It's sort of like selling things to people who use MS Windows. You get to avoid the expense of having to identify your market, on your own.

      So to get rich, all I have to do is get a list of recently-engaged couples, intersect with a list of AOL users or church members or people who get in line to see Star Wars movies on opening midnight, and pick out the ones who wear clothing that contains prominantly-displayed trademarks (Hilfiger, Fubu, etc). Then invent some plausible-sounding tradition for them to follow, and pay the writers of "Friends" to include a reference to it on their show.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    13. Re:Old Tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link or stfu.

      Here's a link showing Jeb Bush and Catherine Harris conspired to deny black voters:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/newsnight/117411 5.stm

      another one showing the Judge refused Harris'es request to have the charges against her dismissed:

      http://www.click10.com/mia/news/stories/news-12370 9220020215-110206.html

      Have fun.

    14. Re:Old Tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kidding, this is way older than that.

      In the 50's/60's, companies would pay models to wear pre-selected clothes at their high school.

      Probably pre-dates the 50's, who knows when this type of marketing was started.

    15. Re:Old Tactic by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I heard that one too

      --
      -no broken link
  39. If I saw anyone doing this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it would take a lot to resist the impulse to punch them in the face and destroy the phone, no matter how attractive they might be.

    I'd feel the urge to go and burn down Sony & Ericsson's marketing HQ as well, but that's a little easier to resist. Well... so far.

    Sigh. Calm again. Actually, I'd try to get the barkeep to throw them out for trying to sell products on their premises without permission.

    Advertising is bad enough already - spam in your email and mailbox, television is unwatchable, banners on web sites - without walking spam haunting my favorite hang outs.

  40. TI-85 is a calculator by yerricde · · Score: 1

    with my new Sony-Ericsson TI-85 phone

    Confused? The TI-85 is a graphing calculator, for Butcher's sake!

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:TI-85 is a calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your TI-85 is just a graphing calculator. Some of us, though, have modified ours slightly.

      All you need is a TI calc, an acoustic coupler, a modem, a cell phone, and one of these babies, and you're good to run lynx remotely from your TI!

      Join us, Damian. You cannot resist the l33tness of the cell phone terminal emulator. It draws your inherent geek-nature like a mighty electromagnet.

  41. Why must they BS us? by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, come on. How about a straightforward demo of the damn things?

    At MacWorld 2 weeks ago, these things were all over the place so people could demo Apple's new iSync software. There was no subterfuge, it was, "Here's the phone, try it out for yourself." And it worked. I want one.

    Why do they deem it necessary to stoop to all this sneaky shit? If the product is good, people will want it without some fucking Jedi Mind Trick-style advertising campaign.

    Ah, and the obligatory Simpsons quote:

    Moe: "Hi, uh, could I buy you a drink?"
    Cute Girl in Bar: "Sure! How about a Bacardi Cooler?"
    M: "Uh.. ok."
    CGiB: "Or even a Bacardi Rita? Because Bacardi makes the night come alive... with freshness!"
    M: "What, do you work for Bacardi?"
    CGiB: "No, I'm in love with you."
    CGiB slaps a "Drink Rum" sticker on Moe's forehead

    1. Re:Why must they BS us? by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
      At MacWorld 2 weeks ago, these things were all over the place so people could demo Apple's new iSync [apple.com] software. There was no subterfuge, it was, "Here's the phone, try it out for yourself." And it worked. I want one.

      Why do they deem it necessary to stoop to all this sneaky shit? If the product is good, people will want it without some fucking Jedi Mind Trick-style advertising campaign.

      That wasn't a Sony Ericsson rep; that was me.

      I've been posing as a Sony Ericsson rep for weeks to prove my salesmanship, but they won't give me a chance. They say I don't have enough sales experience. If you're serious about wanting to buy one, please call them at 555-1212 and let them know what a great salesman I am.

    2. Re:Why must they BS us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stuff like this doesn't work on everyone.

      For example, I believe Bacardi tastes of vomit, and I have drank with the Cap'n long before they ever insisted I know how to treat a lady, her cousin, her neighbor, and someone she sorta knows from the gym.

    3. Re:Why must they BS us? by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      I was handed a Bacardi[tm] miniature bottle keychain that also doubled as a bottle opener a few nights ago by 'BUD' girls that were hired off the street locally.

      My questions:

      a) Why give me a liquor advertisement keychain whoozits that has a bottle opener for beer?

      b) What kind of dumbass wants a liquor bottle dangling out of his car ignition when he gets pulled over by an officer?

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    4. Re:Why must they BS us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak of Sony, but as a former Ericsson employee I can say that BS is very important in the Ericsson tradition. Seeing how Ericsson functions, it is only logical that they BS their potential customers too.

      Throughout the entire organization, deception and BS is a major part of any type of communication. I was employed to use my hands and not my brain, so me and my colleagues were lied to by the techs when they wanted to introduce a certain procedure and did not feel like telling us the true (and probably longer) explanation.

      Then when everything did not work smoothly, we proceeded to lie to our supervisor. This usually involved casting blame on the other shifts, since the majority of my co-workers could not grasp any more complex lies. Then the supervisor would lie to her boss in such a way as not to offend her supervisor friends, her boss would would lie to his boss, who would lie to the head office, who would lie to the board, would lie to the shareholders and the media. Obviously my knowledge of the specifics fades when we move higher and higher above me in the chain of command, but I do watch TV and the higher executives say some outrageous shit sometimes. Also, some of the things that happened on the factory floor showed us pretty clearly that management had NO idea about what was really going on.

      Oh well, my point is: Ericsson is bleeding to death. Not because of rough times in the telecommunications business, but because of a dysfunctional corporate culture and poor management. The consumer products division was losing $30 for every phone they sold well before the IT bubble burst.

      Now the top executives are trying to carve what they can for themselves from the carcass of the company. Two years ago when profits turned to loss, they changed the executives' bonus program from being based on profit to being based on cash flow. That was easily improved by selling off all buildings and lots of hardware. The bonuses turned out pretty well.

      But now Ericsson does not own anything, it rents everything it needs to funtion. So, the "selling all assets"-strategy to improving cash flow has reached the end of the road. What to do? Change the bonus system, of course! The new bonus system is based on order value. So, can we expect LOTS of advertising and weird stunts to get people to buy Ericsson products? Yeah, probably. Can we expect profits? Hell no.

      I am so happy that I was downsized. It put me back in university where I belong.

    5. Re:Why must they BS us? by plaa · · Score: 2

      Why do they deem it necessary to stoop to all this sneaky shit? If the product is good, people will want it without some fucking Jedi Mind Trick-style advertising campaign.

      Simple. Because they want to sell the product regardless of whether it is good or not.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    6. Re:Why must they BS us? by yatest5 · · Score: 2

      Why give me a liquor advertisement keychain whoozits that has a bottle opener for beer?


      Bacardi Breezer comes in, er, bottles.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    7. Re:Why must they BS us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b) What kind of dumbass wants a liquor bottle dangling out of his car ignition when he gets pulled over by an officer?

      I have one one because if I crash it will good when zoomed into on the news.

    8. Re:Why must they BS us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hiring freeze on at the moment.

      (hmm... does that mean all these models currently work for ericsson? Must start wandering the upper floors more...)

  42. what a silly idea by lingqi · · Score: 2

    I mean -- for 5 million dollars. christ man... *GIVE AWAY SOME PHONES*. you don't have to hire actor/actresses, you sure as f*k don't have to train them, and you get the same publicity ANYWAY, and it's not limited to the 60 day period. they way every dollar you spend will be twice as effective because the money you would be otherwise spending on hot women would be actually converted into a dozen or so phones floating around in some chatty salesperson's hand, who would go and talk to strangers in a bar about nothing *anyway*.

    moreover, even if you get this advertised like so, and whatnot, and people want it -- how much are you willing to bet people will get a "free" motorola with reasonable features vs. paying 200 bux extra for one of these, when they set up a plan? here again, the 5 million should better go toward discounts and stuff.

    lastly, it's very annoying if you found out that you got dressed up on friday, invested a good hour on this chick and all she really wanted to talk to you for is to sell you a f*king phone. it's kinda cheap and i think morally it's wrong because you are talking to people under a false pretence, for blatent alterior motives. not to say that this sort of things don't happen -- but to encourage this breach of morality and mutual trust is quite low.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:what a silly idea by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      i always wonder why m$ didn't just give away 10,000 xboxes. there was so much free hype and press about it, it would have helped considerably. as it is nobody wants to buy one (still) because there aren't that many people who have friends who have one, or if they do they think they're idiots for wasting that much $$$ on a silly xbox.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:what a silly idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former worker att an Ericsson plant, I can say we did (and I suppose still do); Gave away phones that is. Mostly to journalists, actors and politicians. Lots of them. I got a few myself ("Hey, dude, try this prototype a few months and tell us what's wrong, BEFORE we start to sell'em, please").

      I guess it means it's my fault some of the phones suck :-)

    3. Re:what a silly idea by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      it's very annoying if you found out that you got dressed up on friday, invested a good hour on this chick and all she really wanted to talk to you for is to sell you a f*king phone.

      Hmmm....I wouldn't mind, at least a cute chick would have talked to me. Usually I just sit there and talk to my beer.

  43. well... by chronos2266 · · Score: 1

    Seems like sony really cashed in on this advertising deal already. They got a article in the wall street journal, slashdot, and probably some other major publications about their new product without even starting the advertising. Even if they never do actually put people on the streets, they got more than enough exposure from these articles alone. Think about it, we all know that the phones have cameras and can play wireless games already. the hardest part of advertising is letting the consumer know the product exists, Sony has already jumped that hurdle and then some.

  44. So... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2

    ...it's pretty much like the average user-submitted Slashdot product/book review, huh?

    1. Re:So... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much like all the new topic headings here at Slashdot that have to do with Apple.

      (it's common knowledge that OSDN may be purchased by Apple Computer near in the future)

  45. choices by niloroth · · Score: 1

    Okay, let me get this straight, my choices for advertising are:

    1)annoying and senseless feel good adds on TV about how if I buy this phone I will be popular with all my friends, and be able to take an easy and convenient picture of the girl i just met because my friends called me on the phone to tell me about a great party that was happening somewhere and had lots of hip techno music playing loudly in the background.

    2)I can go out to the local bar and there might be some attractive women there to serve as eye candy.

    Thank you I will take door number 2.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  46. No soliciting. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a restaurant, bar, or other private firm posts a "no soliciting" notice, the people engaged in this deceptive ploy might be hauled off for trespassing. Alternatively, the owner could take Sony/Ericsson to court and demand a fee for using his/her establishment to advertise their products.

    1. Re:No soliciting. by yatest5 · · Score: 2

      If a restaurant, bar, or other private firm posts a "no soliciting" notice, the people engaged in this deceptive ploy might be hauled off for trespassing. Alternatively, the owner could take Sony/Ericsson to court and demand a fee for using his/her establishment to advertise their products.


      Yes, no bar owner would want attractive girls in their bar enticing men in... ever heard of 'girls drink free' nights?

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:No soliciting. by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1

      If I put up such a sign at my house, can I sue telemarketers?

      --

      .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    3. Re:No soliciting. by hburch · · Score: 1

      The joy and pain of the US system is you can sue anyone for anything. Winning is, of course, is harder. To win, you must have more money than the other guy. That's why Justice keeps her scale around.

    4. Re:No soliciting. by fmaxwell · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, no bar owner would want attractive girls in their bar enticing men in... ever heard of 'girls drink free' nights?

      Many bars frown on prostitution and this is not a great leap from that. No bar wants their male patrons getting pissed off because the attractive women at the bar were just trying to hustle them. Nor does the bar want "normal" women deciding that the competition is too stiff -- when the "competition" is actually just hotties planted by Sony/Ericsson to sell phones.

    5. Re:No soliciting. by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      I actually like your rants thing, so I'm not going to bother arguing with you. But I still think you're tripping - they're not 'hustling'. And the bar manager couldn't give a flying fook about ugly chicks getting stroppy if there's a bunch of models making guys hang in their bar all night and get drunk in a failed attempt to pull women way out of their league.

      Men are sad bastards - I know, I an one :).

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    6. Re:No soliciting. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I actually like your rants thing, so I'm not going to bother arguing with you.

      Thank you for the compliment, but feel free to disagree -- loudly if you want.

      And the bar manager couldn't give a flying fook about ugly chicks getting stroppy if there's a bunch of models making guys hang in their bar all night and get drunk in a failed attempt to pull women way out of their league.

      It might go over great for a few days, but once the regulars realized that the paid models had driven out every woman with whom they ever had a chance to score, it would be a different story. If you are going to a bar to pick up women, will you go to one filled with paid, probably attached, actresses trying to sell phones or to one with available women looking for men?

      "Ugly" is all relative. A reasonably attractive woman in her mid 30's may decide that she doesn't want to compete with a bunch of 21-25 year old professional models.

  47. Didn't Sony create those fake movie reviews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the fake movie critic?

  48. Easy to spot by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Funny

    For your average /.'er, the girls at the bar should be easy to spot. General rule, if a good looking girl at a bar shows even the slightest bit of interest in you, then they MUST be getting paid (one way or another), and you'd be best to avoid them and go back to playing with your Palm in the back corner.

    1. Re:Easy to spot by Quixote · · Score: 2
      General rule, if a good looking girl at a bar shows even the slightest bit of interest in you, then they MUST be getting paid
      Spoken like a true geek.

      you'd be best to avoid them and go back to playing with your Palm in the back corner.
      No pun intended, I assume?

    2. Re:Easy to spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plating with your "Palm"? I've heard it called other things, too...

    3. Re:Easy to spot by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey babay, I'll give ya $50 more than Erickson if you come back to my place and we can take a few pictures with that phone!

    4. Re:Easy to spot by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1

      Followed by playing with your palm back at your place!

      --

      .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  49. Do Consumer Advocates Really Lack Common Sense? by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 1

    From the WSJ article:

    Consumer activists, though, aren't amused. "It's deceptive," says Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization founded by consumer activist Ralph Nader, when told about the campaign. "People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz."

    And you know how the general populace gets when they find out that they've been fed fake buzz....

    ~geogeek

  50. New pickup line! by Xeriar · · Score: 5, Funny

    'So, how much does Sony pay you for this?'

    1. Re:New pickup line! by Warmth+Is+Life · · Score: 1

      'I'll double it.'

  51. Buzz... by burnsy · · Score: 1
    This is old new on buzz marketing.

    Chrylser tried this buzz thing by stocking PT Cruisers at rental car locations in hip parts of Miami.

    Here is the definitive article on buzz marketing.

    1. Re:Buzz... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Chrylser tried this buzz thing by stocking PT Cruisers at rental car locations in hip parts of Miami.

      Isn't this kind of normal? Hertz is owned by Ford (GT350H, man was that a car) and rents Fords "and other fine cars". Lots of unsold and recently used cars (demos and such) cars go to the rental places. I'm not sure if this case is buzz marketing or S.O.P. Some criticize this because it inflates car sales - I think the Taurus sales figures when it was #1 sold car included "fleet sales" such as these.

    2. Re:Buzz... by burnsy · · Score: 1

      "When DaimlerChrysler wanted to generate some prelaunch buzz for its PT Cruiser, it seeded the striking-looking roadsters in rental-car fleets around trendy Miami Beach, then let the grapevine do its work."

    3. Re:Buzz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the reason that Chrysler stocked pt cruisers at rental car places was more to test them and gather reactions than as a form of buzz marketing. The locations were Dollar rent-a-cars, which were at the time owned by Chrysler. And if you want proof that BusinessWeek doesn't know what they are talking about, read their quote:

      When DaimlerChrysler wanted to generate some prelaunch buzz for its PT Cruiser, it seeded the striking-looking roadsters in rental-car fleets around trendy Miami Beach, then let the grapevine do its work

      . The PT Cruiser isn't a roadster, it's more a station wagon than anything else.

      And no, I don't work for Chrysler, although I do own a pt cruiser.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Offended? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Sony Ericsson responds that most consumers won't be offended. "How many times do people that you don't know come up to you and talk to you?"

    Uh, actually very rarely and I'd like to keep it that way. The ones that do are either lost and clueless or scam artists. I also would rather be referred to as a customer instead of a consumer. They can keep their ugly phone.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:Offended? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      The real question is, "how many times do you have to seriously consider that the person you just met who's being friendly and talking to you is an actor paid to do so?"

      This obnoxious campaign really ought to be nipped in the bud- it's bringing a social dynamic to paranoid reality that should be left as depicted fictionally in 'The Truman Show'.

      How much is it worth to you to be able to trust that the person you meet is not literally a trained actor befriending you only to sell a consumer product?

      Hey, wouldn't it be interesting if these people could hunt down your personal information online, and then seek you out specifically to leverage such information ("hey, you a Steelers fan?") in order to befriend you and sell you a consumer product?

  54. Imagine this for Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent marketing.

    Seriously. Now imagine Linux using something like this...but that would require people actually speaking with the women using Linux, which we all know most Linux users would never do.

    Oh well.

    1. Re:Imagine this for Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be a bit sexist, but here is one strategy:
      1) Find attractive female models and give them laptops running GNU/Linux. Sincerely teach them about the system.

      2) Pay them to ask out loud if anyone can help them with their laptops in a public place. If anyone comes over and asks them why they don't use Windows or Macs, have them say "Windows and MacOS are for losers." out loud. If some Windows knowing guy comes over and does not know about GNU/Linux, have them insult his intelligence for not knowing about the latest thing in OS. ("Windows is so, like, 90's.")
      Then have some paid GNU/Linux guy come over and help them out to visible thanks from the ladies. Have the guy visibly ask one of them out and have her accept.

      2) Pay them to be at some function. Have some paid male walk in and ask out loud how to get something working on his GNU/Linux laptop. Have the attractive women come over and help him out while admiring his new laptop. Have them talk about how GNU is so cool.
      If anyone walks in and asks them a question about their Windows or MacOS machine, have them say "If you're the kind of guy who pays for stuff that should be done out of love, don't talk to me. I am not *that* kind of girl." and then walk away in disgust.

  55. It's 50 bucks, grab one by ThoreauHD · · Score: 0

    Amazon has one on the cheap at the moment.

    http://www.bensbargains.net/ktalk/1028165439,255 14 ,.shtml

  56. Jobs at Ericsson by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    BEFORE everyone goes to the Ericsson job site and slashdots it, I'd like to take this opportunity to say that there are currently three jobs available: two in the Netherlands and one in Nigeria. Alas, I don't believe any of them involve walking around pretending to be tourists while getting paid.

    Sorry to burst your bubble.
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Jobs at Ericsson by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      BEFORE everyone goes to the Ericsson job site and slashdots it, I'd like to take this opportunity to say that there are currently three jobs available: two in the Netherlands and one in Nigeria. Alas, I don't believe any of them involve walking around pretending to be tourists while getting paid.

      But one of those jobs might involve posting around pretending to be businessmen trying to transfer huge sums of money out of the country, while getting paid ;-) (... and the other two involve barkeeping and pretending to sell coffee ...)

    2. Re:Jobs at Ericsson by yatest5 · · Score: 2

      BEFORE everyone goes to the Ericsson job site [ericsson.com] and slashdots it, I'd like to take this opportunity to say that there are currently three jobs available: two in the Netherlands and one in Nigeria. Alas, I don't believe any of them involve walking around pretending to be tourists while getting paid.

      Sorry to burst your bubble.


      I can just see all those glamourous female model /. readers seeing this and going to ericsson.com right now...

      Please, let me imagine it for a minute...

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:Jobs at Ericsson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But one of those jobs might involve posting around pretending to be businessmen trying to transfer huge sums of money out of the country, while getting paid ;-)

      Why that double crossing bastard. Have you been talking to the same Nigerian banker I have!? He promised to wire me $120 million but I haven't heard from him in 6 weeks.

  57. "honest buzz" by bolthole · · Score: 2
    [From the article]
    People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz

    Huh?

    if people see strangers using stuff, and think its cool, they'll use it; but if they see strangers using stuff, and those strangers are getting PAID for it... then people suddenly wont want to use it, even if they think it's cool?

    What was that guy smoking, anyway?

    1. Re:"honest buzz" by doob · · Score: 1
      What was that guy smoking, anyway?

      I assume you want some 'cos you saw him smoking it and thought it was cool, no? :)

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    2. Re:"honest buzz" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hash. He is smoking hash. Next question. Yes...you?

  58. "Honest Buzz" Rights? by GT_Alias · · Score: 1
    As someone has already quoted...

    "It's deceptive," says Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization founded by consumer activist Ralph Nader, when told about the campaign. "People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz."

    Since when did "thinking this is honest buzz" become an endangered consumer right? If these guys can pull it off for $60 mill, congrats, thats a pretty damned clever marketing campaign. I'm sure it will wear thin in due time as others try it and the consumers start seeing through it.

    1. Re:"Honest Buzz" Rights? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but reducing humanity to a state of 'you can't believe anything you see, anything you're told, or anybody you know' seems like a fucking high price to pay.

      I'd call this fraud, but that would imply there was some sort of even hypothetical dividing line between society and commerce. And gee, if human beings have no function other than to consume stuff, who gives a fuck whether they can trust the motives of their pathetic little personal interactions?

    2. Re:"Honest Buzz" Rights? by GT_Alias · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but reducing humanity to a state of 'you can't believe anything you see, anything you're told, or anybody you know' seems like a fucking high price to pay.

      You're right in what you say...but it seems to me that price was paid a long time ago.

  59. Street teams by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Bands do this all the time. So do clubs. Fashion designers and hairdressers sometimes do this, although usually only in LA or NY. And the art scene is awash in a sea of free booze.

    Sony-Ericsson is going much further with this, to actually train and pay the people. That's unusual. Those people who hand you invites in clubs seldom get more than free admission. Models who go out in designer outfits often get the outfit as a freebie, but no pay. Many of the wilder haircuts are freebies, too; stylists have to try out their exotic styles on somebody. Ask women with wild haircuts where they got them done; often it's a promotional deal. And almost everybody in the sales end of the rag trade gets promotional deals on clothing.

    1. Re:Street teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwaha. Only the good looking women with the funky haircuts. The ugly ones paid for it... And I know a couple girls who get all their haircuts free in different cities of around 30k, so perhaps it isn't restricted to NY/LA.

    2. Re:Street teams by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      in touristy places like 'Salou' in Spain, they use 'proppers' to lure women into bars, giving them a free admission and a booz voucher; only women though, the guys go to the bar with the most women..

    3. Re:Street teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      used to happen here too. too many girls were getting drunk though, so they stopped it... the bastards.

  60. Speaking of models... by Geccoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd prefer to see the new sexier than sexy models out in the bars demonstrating the latest in condoms...

    "Hey, sir... can you help me out with this whiz-bang new product? I really think you'd like it."

    Maybe it's just me.

    --
    I'm on a chair.
  61. A pickup line by inerte · · Score: 1

    Me: Hey, what's the number of your phone?

    She: 100 dollars!

    Me: BITCH!

  62. No Joke - I have one of these by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

    And it really is a nice piece of kit.

    It has basically everything that you will EVER need on it.

    GPRS and GSM so that you can get on the web - anyone thinking of writing a WAP page based SSH client - then I could manage my servers on the run

    IMAP4 and POP3 mail means that my email gets to me when I get it - and you can schedule it to check at various intervals.

    One or two problems with it, but those are service provider based.

    Sure MMS may be a fad, but hey its not like it was a main point in this phones favour anyway, just an interesting extra.

    For the record BTW my previous phone was a Sony Z5

    Main reason that this phone is so good tho is its long time between charges - currenly it says I got over 200 hours on standby, and that was 20 hours since I took it off charge.

    As for the Camera - well thats just a gimmick really - mind you, didnt stop gadget-boy here getting one, tho I cant report on the quality of the pix, I dont have any way of getting them off the phone yet as my Service Provider is having problems finding my email server.

    Anyway, I would have to recommend this phone.

    1. Re:No Joke - I have one of these by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      - www.wapsh.com (i think) - it's not SSH, but it uses apache to serve up a WML (WAP) and HTML interface to your shell. I use it - it's a bit clunky but it works.

  63. Nuclear power plant... by BMonger · · Score: 2

    Great... first it was radiation to my brain... now with this camera thing it'll be radiation straight into *my eye*.

    As if I don't get enough of that from staring at this monitor all day waiting for a new Slashdot story...

  64. Astroturf Jargon File Entry by gmanske · · Score: 1
    For those who didn't know or weren't sure what is meant by 'astroturfing', here's the jargon file entry.

    Gmanske.

  65. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should just start going around to bars with the appropriate equipment and saying to people 'hey, would you mind taking my picture with this sweet new operating system, Linux?'

  66. Why not? Double Double Cross for you. by Erris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's a scandal, worthy of the widest reporting right? Your going to look so clever when your recognize the BRAND-NAME pushers at a tourist attraction near you. You might even go out of your way but you will remember those two names togetether won't you? Oh my, they just built brand name recognition. I wonder if the WSJ charged them that blatant piece of product placeent.

    The net result of this kind of marketing will be to make people suspicious of each other. It is evil. As someone else pointed out, normal demos would do better, except they might be run off by park officials for soliciting.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:Why not? Double Double Cross for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its only cos the T68i is so bugged and generally cheap looking that they need to try and sell it this way.

      Avoid ti like the plague people. Yeah sure it look nice and small and cute. But the software running on the handset is shite.

    2. Re:Why not? Double Double Cross for you. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      You're damned if you report someone's press release as news, and you're damned if you don't report how slimey ad campaigns are getting. WSJ was fucked; they had no chance.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  67. It's a damn cool phone by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

    But the camera's not built in. You get the camera attachment as an additional accessory, for an extra cost of course.

    I have a T68i. It's damn cool. I'm sad that they're going to start selling them in the US because I like being one of the only people to have one. I got mine on the SAN FRANCISCO CELL PHONE BLACK MARKET.

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    1. Re:It's a damn cool phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately if you don't like getting it on the black market, you can now get lots of different coloured covers to stick over it.

  68. Extensive training by marcelkiel · · Score: 1
    ... 60 actresses and female models with extensive training in the phone's features. [...] The women are getting scripted scenarios designed to help them engage strangers in conversation. One involves having an actress's phone ring while she's in the bar -- and having the caller's picture pop up on the screen.
    Letting the caller's picture pop up sounds like a damn hard thing - does the phone include such an extensive training for the end users too?
  69. Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's an innovative way to market a product. Why on earth is this article so negative about it, almost like it's a morally reprehensible thing to do?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Because lying sales weasels infiltrating all of life can only lead to a catastrophic erosion of trust itself, and will cause all humanity to be cloistered in broadband-connected bunkers by 2100, refusing to interact at all with untrustable human beings, and instead sucking down gigabytes of virtual news and information while being able to believe none of it? :D


      Everything you know is wrong...

      :)

    2. Re:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      cloistered in broadband-connected bunkers by 2100, refusing to interact at all with untrustable human beings, and instead sucking down gigabytes of virtual news and information while being able to believe none of it? :D

      Sounds like IRC.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    3. Re:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by Goonie · · Score: 3, Insightful
      OK, it's hardly the most evil thing anyone's ever done in the name of capitalism, but it's still a little disquieting.

      For a start, it's a new realm for marketers to explore that's previously been mostly advertising-free. Marketing has been getting more and more pervasive lately, and the intellectual effort filtering it out becomes tiresome.

      It's dishonest, in that it's not disclosed that these people are advertising a product. Undisclosed advertising has gotten lots of people in trouble lately (merchant banks providing "investment advice", pseudo-payola on US commercial radio, and a case a couple of years ago in Australia where a talkback broadcaster basically shook down the major banks for several hundred thousand dollars to stop making negative comments about them and start shilling for them).

      If the product is really that good, why don't these people put Sony Ericsson T-shirts on and do the demos? If the product is actually some or all of cool, useful and good value, it will sell. If it's not, it won't, regardless of how much marketing effort is applied.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    4. Re:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by deek · · Score: 1


      It doesn't seem bad to me. Personally, I think it's a pretty funky way to advertise products.

      I agree with Goonie, in that it's slightly dishonest because they're not being upfront about the whole thing being advertising.

      Otherwise, I do NOT consider this anywhere near as bad as fake reviews, and blatant sales pitches about how wonderful their product is. All that's happening is they're posing as normal people, and they're getting you to use the product! As long as they DON'T bleat on about how it will change your life (blah, blah), then I'm fine with it all.

      DeeK

    5. Re:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Not that it's exactly "morally reprehensible" or even "wrong", but rather that it smells kinda like the audience shills for a snake-oil salesman -- that being the precedent for this style of product promotion. Thus it inspires automatic distrust, at least in people whose gullibility circuit has been disabled.

      Tho as others have pointed out, the whole thing (WSJ article and all) reeks of being a PR stunt from start to finish.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  70. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by sych · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to SonyEricsson filings to the FCC, the hardware of the T68i is identical to that of the T68 - it's just a new cover, new back, and different coloured LEDs behind the keypad.

    The rest of the differences are in the software. In most markets that T68i is available in, SonyEricsson have made a software update available for the T68 - effectively transforming it into a T68i. The software upgrade has been available in most of Europe and Asia for a few months now. Down here in Australia, we're still waiting for it and the T68i to be officially released.

    There are currently two different models of snap-on cameras ("CommuniCam") for these phones.

    The original CommuniCam is the MCA-10, which works with the original T68 and a few of Ericsson's older phones.

    The new model is the the MCA-20, which currently works only with the T68i, afaik.

    The older model has an inbuilt viewfinder, and most of the 'brains' are within the camera itself - the phone is little more than a data device. The newer model has no inbuilt viewfinder - you do the viewfinding on the phone screen itself. More of the processing has been moved into the phone; so the phone now stores the images internally, and can use them for MMS (multimedia messaging), screen backgrounds, caller number presentation, etc.

  71. Reminds me of XP over at the CompUSA by Radical+Rad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When XP and Redhat 7.(2 or 3) came out at about the same time, I went right over to CompUsa to get my copy and as I approached the checkout counter some guy who had been standing near the register with a box of XP excitedly asked the clerk if there was any software for XP, who pointed at the Office XP, etc. in the first rack behind the registers. He ran over and merrily grabbed one of everything that said XP on it and headed back to get in line behind me. The clerk virtually busted out laughing when he saw I was buying Redhat though I didn't get the feeling that he was laughing at me, and he said they had been selling a lot of it. The whole thing with the XP guy just seemed staged, especially after I looked back on my way out and they weren't even ringing up his "purchases". So I don't think using shills to generate fake excitement is anything new.

    1. Re:Reminds me of XP over at the CompUSA by zulux · · Score: 2

      Microsoft did this *heavly* for Win95 - they bussed in people to wait at the front door to be "first in line for the most adavnced os in the world!"

      Jeseus - I'm a nerd and I woulden't wait ten seconds in line for a new version of Windows, even if they gave me the source code and a copy of MS Bob.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Reminds me of XP over at the CompUSA by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Wow, what a great selling technique!

      "My god! XP retail is only $200, and look at all the things that aren't included that I can buy! It's only $400 for a copy of Office XP! How on earth can they make such a valuable product so cheaply? At these low, low prices, I can afford to buy another copy of everything for my laptop!"

      Still, I guess that tells us what sort of people actually buy Microsoft at retail. Those with poor arithmetic skills, and the easily influenced. Poor saps.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Reminds me of XP over at the CompUSA by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean people actually *BUY* Windows?

      Whoops, should have hit the "AC" checkbox.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  72. Next they kidnap up your mother by crovira · · Score: 2

    and hand you a phone. You can either buy it and sign up fort hree years serevice or she gets to take a "dirt nap" for eternity.

    I'm LMAO but I'm sure that any phone company shill would get a boner at that kind of sales tactic.

    Advertising is about dishonesty, lying, cheating prevaricating or even using statistics to extract money from you.

    If you see a product advertised, don't buy it, or the product. Send Madison Avenue to the poor house.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  73. Thing is by uberstool · · Score: 1

    The product seems cool enough to sell it's self. I mean it's not as complex as a freaking TiVo.

  74. News Flash by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Actually, no one likes anything. Anyone looking interested or nonlethargic is hired by someone!

  75. Sony did it for the walkman.... by shri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The company decided to make available hundreds of sets of the new portable cassette player, free of charge, to key persons prior the public launch. These key persons were carefully chosen and selected. Sets were given to magazine editors, and specially, touring musicians, they use to carry records and tapes of the music they are going to play and the directors comments and instructions of different aspects of the piece in order to be prepared for the concert."

    "A further promotional tactic involved the company paying couples to stroll through Tokyoís biggest and important shopping district whilst listening to their Walkmans. Several Vox Populi interviews. were conducted in collaboration with broadcasters, in the airports and train stations, to ask visitors to Japan about their opinion and their responses to the new portable cassette
    player. Their reactions were video - taped and featured in news broadcasts."

    Wait a second .. who owns the Ericsson phone business??? Sony!

    More on http://www.eafit.edu.co/revista/117/acosta.pdf

    1. Re:Sony did it for the walkman.... by ben_ · · Score: 1

      Wait a second .. who owns the Ericsson phone business??? Sony!
      Erm, no. Sony Ericsson is a joint venture that's supposed to combine Sony's expertise in product design with Ericsson's expertise in phone manufacture. And they're doing pretty well, even here in Europe where we're not that impressed with snazzy phones 'cos we've had them for a good while. The business next door to where I work sells phones and these S-E ones and the new Nokia with a built-in camera are just flying out of the door.

      ben_

      --
      ben_ the technologist and platform agnostic
  76. How it will end: by brad3378 · · Score: 2

    Oct 31, 12:56 ET

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP)
    Sony Ericsson announces the end of their shortlived advertising campaign. The new T68i, a mobile phone that can double as a digital camera had been advertised in a truely unconventional manner. Paid Actors pretended to be tourists who would ask unsuspecting passersby if they would take photos of the couple to expose them to their new product. Unfortunatly for Sony Ericsson, a higher than expected number of the passersby were camera thieves.

    In a related story,
    How did Sony rack up $2,000,000 in phone sex charges?

    --

  77. "Sony please?" by tamnir · · Score: 1

    Here is a story I heard a while ago that fits well here. I haven't been able to verify it yet, so any additional info would be appreciated. Here is how it goes:

    Back in the days when Sony was a no-name outside Japan, two Japanese guys were sent to Europe to prepare the market for the entry of their company's products. Not really knowing how to do, and maybe because they liked the fine german brews, they came up with the following plan: for 6 months, all they did was tour the bars of Germany asking for a "Sony please?".

    The story doesn't say if they were ever served a sony cocktail (a sunny maybe?), but their campaign worked beyond their expectations, with word-of-mouth spreading questions about these "Japanese dudes asking for a sonee... --A what? --A sonee... --Hmmm, a... sonee... Never heard of that one. I'll ask around."

    When Sony started selling their products their, everybody had heard the name, and noone had a clue about what it meant! I know many here will dislike this marketing technique, but the thing is: it works. And in marketing, it's all that counts.

    --
    I code, therefore I am.
  78. Only a few corporations have Enron/MS ethics? by Jerry · · Score: 1

    Seems like more than a few to me.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  79. The Bar of the Future by hagar� · · Score: 5, Funny

    Erricson Chick: Hi will you take a photo of me and my girlfriend with my new phone?
    Coors Guy: Sure! Here hold my refreshing coors lite while I do it!
    Miller guy: Hey watch the elbows buddy! I nearly dropped my Miller! Its full of beer goodness godamnit!
    GM Chick: Hey who's new Sierra is that out front?
    Coke Chick: Who cares, does this bikini make me look fat, I've been drinking diet coke all week!
    GM Chick: Shutup!
    Toshiba Guy: Girls dont fight! Here lets play some games on this NEW Toshiba laptop!
    Colt Guy: Everyone FREEZE! This is a stickup! Notice i'm holding the new Colt .45 pistol with tungsten slide........

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    1. Re:The Bar of the Future by ckedge · · Score: 1


      Meanwhile bar owner laughs all the way to the bank (unless of course the shills are prohibited from drinking while on the job, in which case bar owner throws *everyone* out and bans them for life from the bar.)

  80. Why not just,,,, by orthogonal · · Score: 2

    If they're going to all this trouble, why not just hire some sluts^H^H^H^H^H^H^H "actresses" to wear low cut blouses with the phone strategically stuffed into their cleavage? Displaying a photo of herself in the all-together?

    Pairs of "leaners" in bars! "If you were cool enough to buy this phone, you could get my number on the pretex of playing battleship while buyiing me drinks from across the bar!" Giggle, giggle. "And then you could use the phone to take pictures of me flashing my tits in forfeit for losing at battleship!" Giggle, giggle.

    I wonder how much Mr. Brillaint PR Man got paid for this stunning idea?

  81. Riiiiight.......... by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    Cuz we all know that when nuble young women go to bars, they go there to play Battleship.

  82. Mandatory CLUETRAIN link. by bons · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Conversations among human beings sound human. They are conducted in a human voice."

    "Whether delivering information, opinions, perspectives, dissenting arguments or humorous asides, the human voice is typically open, natural, uncontrived. "

    "Corporations do not speak in the same voice as these new networked conversations. To their intended online audiences, companies sound hollow, flat, literally inhuman."

    http://www.cluetrain.org/

  83. Start a new website by penginkun · · Score: 1
    When these shills start hitting the street, we should have a website set up to store these peoples' pictures. You know, the ones they ask you to take?

    Assuming they're going to be fully-enabled (for demo purposes, natch) we should be able to email or otherwise upload the pictures to a web site for display. People go to the web site, they see the actors' pictures, they learn who to avoid.

    Their own product used against them.

  84. So you mean I didn't have to? by plcurechax · · Score: 4, Funny
    pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars playing interactive Battleship with each other from opposite ends of the bar. "
    Hold it, you mean I didn't have to sleep with her just to play with the phone?
    1. Re:So you mean I didn't have to? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Silly Slashdotter, it said *pairs* of women. This is obviously a gay bar, so they ain't gonna sleep with you regardless! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:So you mean I didn't have to? by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      hmmmm threesomes

    3. Re:So you mean I didn't have to? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Hmmm.. that's a thought, all right :)

      So you finally get the pair of buxom babes in bed, and what happens? The damned phone rings!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  85. Seems like a successful campaign... by SourceVisigoth · · Score: 1

    Since thousands of /.'ers and WSJ'ers have now read about this phone. I wouldn't be surprised if this "60 day campaign" is over before the first "tourists" ask someone to take their picture.

  86. Sony Ericsson P800 -- isn't it much better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why the P800 isn't mentioned in this context.

    http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=P800

    Maybe the P800 will be more expensive, though.

  87. Ralph Nader is a few choice words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This man is exactly right. Maybe Ralph Nader should never give a live demonstration of himself but rather through out flashy buzz ideas to a californian-liberal croud.. oh wait he already does! Advertising at its best.

  88. Who's making a PR stunt ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fake tourists in the streets, fake drinkers in the bar, to create a "grassroot buzz"...

    Wait, isn't that just what this article is doing ? now thousands of Slashdotters are aware this phone exists, thinking they got the info from public buzz, not through an ad.

    Gosh...what if the whole bunch of you were Sony/Ericsson actors pulling a PR stunt on me ? What if all this whas just a setup ? What is real, what is conspiracy ?

    If I see my wife telling me she would like to play battleship with me, or or asking me to take pictures with a phone, I think I'll just open the door and run in the street screaming "The invasion has begun !! Ericsson PR are among us, they're replacing real people !!"

    Then, the aliens would get me and i'd end up in a bar playing battleship, or in a street, asking people to take pictures of me.

  89. hello hello... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

    "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]"

    Going as far as telling the "leaners" to sleep with the first drunken guy who hits on them in the bar.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  90. How about... by Goonie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Taking out the battery until you get home?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:How about... by drsoran · · Score: 1

      Taking out the battery until you get home?

      DAMNIT! You kids are getting more clever every day. Back to the drawing board. How about a phone with a battery you can't remove and that is always on?

    2. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's embedded in your body? That's implanted without your knowledge? Etc., etc.

  91. I don't see why everyone is freaking out by forkboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would you rather see a couple hot chicks in the bar playing battleship (and actually even be able to engage in a conversation with them, the fact they're selling you a phone aside) or would you rather see yet another fucking pop-up, banner ad, spam, billboard, or tv commercial?

    How is it any different from seeing a new toy that a friend, co-worker, or even complete stranger has and deciding you might want to buy one? Who was the first person you ever saw with a Palm Pilot? Did they tell you how much it costs and where you can get one? How's that any different?

    An old business partner and I used a similar tactic when we were running a small gunsmithing business....we put together a couple of really pimped out custom rifles (a couple AR-15s and an SKS) and hit the local firing ranges. When people would ask "wow, where the hell did you get that?" we'd hand them a business card and let 'em take a few shots. I don't see this phone tactic as much different....it's a non-intrusive way to get your product out there.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:I don't see why everyone is freaking out by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is it any different....we'd hand them a business card....

      That's precisely how it's different: you let them know it was your business (presumably; you didn't say you handed the onlookers a business card while claiming you'd gotten it as a customer), and that let them know that you were naturally biased in favor of your own product.

      It's pretending they're customers rather than shills that offends: if my friend buys product X, and tells me it's excellent, I assume my friend isn't being remunerated to do so, so I trust that's his real opinion. That's why we don't call acquaintances who sell Amway or Tupperware "friends".

    2. Re:I don't see why everyone is freaking out by osolemirnix · · Score: 2
      Since you asked:
      How is it any different from seeing a new toy that a friend, co-worker, or even complete stranger has and deciding you might want to buy one? Who was the first person you ever saw with a Palm Pilot? Did they tell you how much it costs and where you can get one? How's that any different?

      The difference is that these companies did not spend 5 million $ to promote their product. Consider they'll be selling 50000 of these phones. We'll each one of them just got 100$ more expensive just so they can break even with their marketing expense.

      I would rather have a real friend tell me about a product he likes or maybe a review on Toms hardware or Anandtech, for free. I would rather have a genuine free review like that, because the item is truly cool and 100 bucks cheaper. That's what I want. :-)

      --

      Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
    3. Re:I don't see why everyone is freaking out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really, there's zero chance of scoring with the beautiful models on TV. At least in person, given a loan of Dracula charisma, a slashdotter might be able to score with a battleship babe.

    4. Re:I don't see why everyone is freaking out by forkboy · · Score: 2

      They'd spend $5 on TV commercials anyway. Besides, they make all their money on service plans rather than the phone.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    5. Re:I don't see why everyone is freaking out by forkboy · · Score: 2

      er, make that $5 million

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  92. Ugh...Over-activism? by nlh · · Score: 2

    Did anyone else flinch at this line?

    "It's deceptive...People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz."

    Isn't this taking consumer activism a weeee bit far? I know Nader's trying to play the everything-companies-do-is-evil card as much as he can, but come on...this is absurd.

    1. Re:Ugh...Over-activism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Ever see the Truman Show? Think of it in reversed.

      The problem isn't one company doing it. The problem is all companies doing it.

      Think of the future. You are at Disneyland and this hot chick starts flirting with you. You respond. Then she tells you about a new car that Toyota is selling.

      This happens enough times, you stop trusting people. All people. Because now advertising is interacting with you at an emotional level.

      There are lines that need to be drawn. But we'll wait for it to become a problem first.

  93. Which piece of ZDNet do they have ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one that is floating or the big chunk that is rapidly sinking below the black line ?

  94. One Word by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

    Florida

  95. Expect to see a lot more of this kind of marketing by bp33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes it's been used before, but this grasroots buzz thang got into a lot of people's heads recently with the publication of the book _The Tipping Point_. The book described, in a number of ways, how big changes come from a series of small events. One of the examples was about buzz around shoes - the inner-city kids wanted 'em because they were cheap (because nobody else wanted them); because so many kidz bought 'em they became kinda hip; fashion designers saw them in clubs/bars and started dresing their models in them; magazine editors saw the models on runways and in ads, and started doing stories on them, etc.

    I'm giving the simplistic version. _The Tipping Point_ is not just about marketing buzz, but the book did well enough that I think a lot of marketers want to use the "tipping point" principles for their product -- and that starts with buzz creation. If it works, expect to see more of it.

  96. These are terrorist tactics by elronxenu · · Score: 1
    In one initiative, dubbed Fake Tourist, 60 trained actors and actresses will haunt tourist attractions such as the Empire State Building in New York and the Space Needle in Seattle.

    I can't imagine that an already-nervous USA is going to be too happy to have a lot of people behaving strangely around famous tourist attractions. The mind boggles at what might happen if the local security guards get nervous.

  97. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from the Church of Scientology, could I invest a few moments of your time? It's great.

  98. Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won the "You got the joke" award!

    Let's all give a big hand to nicke999!

    1. Re:Congratulations! by nicke999 · · Score: 1

      :(

      --
      Thanks for browsing at -1
      Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
  99. Bluetooth enabled camera by erixtark · · Score: 1

    I would much rather see a separate bluetooth enabled "real" camera.

  100. Reminds me of... by rneches · · Score: 2

    Soft, by Rupert Thompson (ISBN 0-7475-3670-8). A beverage company uses subliminal messages, and "embassadors" to pitch their product. Very creepy book. Then again, it's a creepy idea.

    --
    In spite of the suggestions and all the tests that I have made, I have not cavato a spider from the hole.
  101. This is also a common marketing ploy by Goonie · · Score: 2

    This story discusses an Australian shoe company putting up sexually provocative billboards in the expectation of provoking complaints from the various wowser groups and thus getting themselves a bunch of free publicity. Cheap and effective.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  102. Conversation would go like this... by gnovos · · Score: 3, Funny

    She: "Hi, I'm a cute girl who doesn't work for any major multinational corperation and I'm just playing around with my super cool camera phone!"

    Me: "Wow, that IS cool... Of course my year-old j-phone I got in osaka also takes digital pictures, sends email, plays games, and even can access the internet. Here want to look up the spec's on google? Use my phone. Oh, and it cost me about $50 when I got it new, and it's smaller and lighter than your phone by orders of magnitude and generally can run two or three weeks before it needs to be recharged (which takes about an hour)... Oh, wait, what were you saying again?"

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Conversation would go like this... by erixtark · · Score: 1

      Actually, the T68 can do right about everything you mentioned.
      And it's cheaper too.

  103. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by Android+robot+head · · Score: 0

    You're quite right that the software is the main difference.

    The big change that's not really shouted about is the memory allocation. MMS/images/contacts etc. are all stored in a pool of memory as opposed to seperate memory areas. This gives you a great deal more flexibility in how you use the phone.

    I've used a development t68i for many months now and I can tell you it is the best mobile on the market at the moment.
    (disclaimer: I do not work for SonyEricsson, but I do work *with* them)

  104. Sounds like my job.... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

    I work for Phillip Morris, they have me go to parties and bars and bum people cigarettes.

    Shit I just got fired...

  105. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by harvardian · · Score: 2
    Heh, if anything, this sounds like a shill.

    Notice the complete and accurate information, and the colloquial description of features followed by their branded name ("There are currently two different models of snap-on cameras ("CommuniCam") for these phones.). Not to mention the "informational" links and the subtle sense that the user is waiting impatiently for this service to come to his country. Hell, he even praises how owners of a current model can get a free upgrade!

  106. Not only the airlines by C0CT3AU · · Score: 1

    While working for a company that sold modems I was doing nearly the same thing. I visited many IT sites, argumented on discussions, helped with linux drivers for winmodems (there are still requests for them, after a year that I no more work for company, comming to my e-mail). And yes - it helped to build the image of brand between linux users here in Slovakia. And not - it was not my direct task, I just knew a lot of things, so why not help?

  107. RTFA NT by greenrd · · Score: 2
    Read The F***ing Article.

    Is that too much to ask?

  108. What a waste of money! by iamacat · · Score: 1

    If they can sell several hundred phones to the same geeks who by CLIEs and then all the things actors do will happen naturally for free and with less potential embarassment (what if real phone owners will be harassed in a bar because people think they are advertisers?). If they can not even sell a few by putting them in Fry's, ad campaign will not do much good either

    1. Re:What a waste of money! by nagora · · Score: 2
      If they can sell several hundred phones to the same geeks who by CLIEs and then all the things actors do will happen naturally for free

      I got the impression that they were hiring attractive people...

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  109. Good thing to reveal this secret! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, ruining your own company's marketing strategies isn't that intelligent, given how your employment at Ericsson these day is not really rock solid anyway.

  110. They posted on CraigsList by KFury · · Score: 2

    This sounds exaactly like a certain recruiting post on Craigslist about six weeks ago.

    God, having an eidetic memory comes in handy...

  111. Backfire? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    Any chance this will backfire? I mean, any time you see an attractive (i.e. living) woman using one of these things in the next six months, you're going to ask them if they're a whore, right?

    And if you do buy one, do you want people coming up to you every thirty seconds demanding to try it out?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  112. T68i processor is about 25% faster (nt) by DamnYankee · · Score: 1

    The T68i processor is about 25% faster than the T68's.

    --

    Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
    William Shakespeare

  113. Blatant MMS site plug by DamnYankee · · Score: 1

    For all you T68i owners that want to play with MMS but can't, check out www.zidango.com. They'll set up your phone remotely to run MMS and charge about $.40 a message.

    --

    Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
    William Shakespeare

  114. Most countries don't use them by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    For example, I know after many years those IMEI stolen phone blocking is only now being trialed in Oz..

    Gez, every GSM phone I've owned has been stolen (being an ex-junkie, well these days more of a once in a blue moon junkie, I know plenty of junkies), except for my current one, & all worked fine with pre-paid sim cards, whether in Oz, the Netherlands, France or the UK

  115. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by sych · · Score: 1

    *grins*

    nah. i'm just a genuine freak.

    i'm not really impatiently waiting for the 'service', i'm impatiently waiting for the upgrade. in fact i'm annoyed that they're not letting me upgrade... the software is ready and waiting (released to most of the rest of the world 4 months ago), the only reason they won't give it to me is cauz they don't want to hurt sales of the 'new model' once it comes out (and i'm suspecting they're holding off on that until they get rid of old stock ;)

  116. Free camera, whoo-hoo! by magicianuk · · Score: 1

    I already have a T68i, the cameras cost something like one hundred GBP (150 dollars) ... getting the camera for free would be great!

    Now I have to go hang around bars and wait to find a model/actress playing games ... it's a tough life!

  117. The unfortunate problem with Ericsson phones by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
    is that the interface is complete shit. Embarrassingly awful. Talk to an Ericsson UI designer some time and listen to them apologise because they're so embarrassed about the phones.

    In late 2000, two-thirds of Ericsson Australia employees used Nokias. It got to the point where the 'Christmas bonus' for employees in the development organisation was an R320s (the two years old model) with a free Vodafone contract (Vodafone being a complete joke for coverage in Australia).

    I just moved to the UK. First thing I did was buy a prepaid phone. (Vodafone, admittedly, but their coverage here is actually pretty good.) I went for the Sony. You wouldn't believe how pissed off I was when I found out it was really another bloody Ericsson.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:The unfortunate problem with Ericsson phones by erixtark · · Score: 1

      It has got way better with the T68 and the upcoming T300.

  118. Absolut Vodka did this as well by vinsci · · Score: 1
    As one part of the marketing campaign for Absolut Vodka, Peter Ekelund travelled across the USA to "every bar worth the name between New York and San Fransisco". "He sat down at the bar, looked around among stockbrokers, small time crooks and marketing people and with a loud voice ordered a whole bottle of Absolut Vodka and started. He drank himself down 42nd Street towards East River, across Wall Street, along Broadway and further [...]. He got drunk on duty more times than any liquor salesman ever before had."

    Above quotes from Carl Hamilton's interesting and witty book on the planning of the marketing campaign of Absolut Vodka. The quotes are my translation from the original swedish book: Absolut Historien om Flaskan [p. 221]. Also available in english: "Absolut: Biography of a Bottle".

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  119. You can tell the genuine from fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Sony-Ericsson is getting models and actors to demo the product, we ./'ers will definitely know they're fake: They will look TOO attractive, neat, etc.

  120. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    Ah, true, never though about that!
    Still though, good info, didn't know I could upgrade my t68 to a t68i.
    Funny got my t68 for 'free', left my t65 in the shop for repairs (it sucked big style - switched itself of several times a day) and got back a t68, oops, can't complain! ;-)

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  121. Big Deal. nice popup by mattr · · Score: 2

    Yar, we've had umpteen generations of camera in phone in Japan, what else is new. Don't suppose anybody cares about specs or anything. The phone's probably nice though I heard there was a big problem with the quality of all the phones the merged companies have made together up until the last one that was sold.

    Maybe this one will be the charm (or maybe not, in which case there's always battleship, right?) Not. Oh, nice popup ad for some sleek mobile phone slashdot. As long as we're in an irony mood you just take the cake as usual. (Spoken as someone who recently did a big event for *free* for the two then unmerged but in bed sponsors.

    Just make a good goddam cheap phone and it will sell in the U.S. too fer chrissakes! No frikkin magnesium shit but no piece of crap neither! --Yer local redneck.

  122. 2nd Half of article about Ad council by bareman · · Score: 1

    The commercials end with the president saying, "When you help your neighbors, you help your nation. Everyone can do something."

    For Operation TIPS then it goes like this

    "When you [spy on] your neighbors, you [spy on] your nation. Everyone can do something."

  123. 'Honest Buzz' by bcarlson · · Score: 1

    "People will be fooled into thinking this is honest buzz." - from the article

    Hmm, well I never! Honest buzz... wow, and I never would have guessed that an advertiser paying for a advertisement in a magazine/website/newpaper/billboard/etc. would be trying to pull one over on me. I'd like to think that people can look out for themselves, and realize that somethings are too good to be true (i.e. the attractive female model talking to me! :).

    On the other hand if an attractive model comes up to me, I don't think I'll turn away in revulsion! :)

    --

    "...I'll need guns" --Chow Yun-Fat in 'Replacement Killers'
    1. Re:'Honest Buzz' by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Moe: What do you work for Bacardi or something?

      Bacardi Girl: No, I'm talking to you because I'm in love with you.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  124. "It's" ?! by Teko · · Score: 1

    First off, it's "its". Not "it's". Please, folks.

    Secondly, I work at an ad agency, and this kind of stuff is proposed WAY more than you'd expect, but hardly ever actually occurs, due to the astounding costs. I was working on a national rum campaign recently, and the client proposed a shill campaign: fat guys in loud Hawaiian shirts sitting in bars all over the country with hidden cameras, ordering rum drinks for cute girls. The resulting videos would become TV commercials. The idea was dropped when they saw the pricetag.

  125. About time they did something like this by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm a T68 owner and work in the telecoms industry. My colleagues and I said months ago that the only way to sell these things is to go out there and show people what they can do. Admittedly, we meant doing it in a company t-shirt... :)

    MMS has launched here in .uk, and still I get a blank stare at the mention of it. There are probably more than a few people on here who haven't heard about it, and that in a community of geeks! Spend 30 seconds explaining what you can do with it, and that blank stare turns into uncontrollable drooling.

    We have all this great technology that nobody knows about. Anything that gets people informed about it and wanting it, gets average subscriber revenues up, and gets the network operators spending money, (and keeps me in a job), is a good thing in my book.

    I'd still rather they were being a bit more open about this though.

  126. Opposite of Astroturfing- Crabgrassing. by j2gEEk · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see the $5 million campaigns where shills and leaners are sent to bars and colleges to complain about how thier new Dell Dimension totally sucks, or their Tivo really bites.

    Jake

  127. similar experience with the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at ToysRus and there was this old bald guy standing between the PS2 and Xbox isles. He was making stupid comments like, "boy these Xbox games sure do look sweet", and "they look so much better than those games". He asked me if I was looking for anything. I was looking for 'Devil May Cry' and he pointed it out for me.

    The sad thing is, in my opinion, relative to the kind of games that I like to play, the Xbox still doesn't have a single title as good as 'Devil May Cry', and that isn't even my favorite game or anything.

  128. missing the point by archen · · Score: 1

    what sony wants me to think:
    hmm, interesting. I wonder what that lady is doing with that cellphone. Is that a digital camera as well? That's a pretty cool idea. Maybe I should look into getting one as too...

    what I'm really thinking:
    Man, look at that totally hot chick with that gizmo. I wonder if i could get her number.

  129. That won't work by CausticPuppy · · Score: 3, Funny

    How convincing would it really be to have an average slashdotter outrunning two or three physically fit supermodel actors/actresses?

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  130. And in other news... by McCart42 · · Score: 1

    C|Net features the new phone prominently on their homepage as their Editor's Choice! Those shills, they show up in the strangest places!

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  131. Deceptive, and they can lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Supposedly the actors/models hired for this won't lie when asked if they work for Sony/Ericson, but I wonder how specific the line of questioning has to be? These people are going to waste other peoples' time asking for photos to be taken of them. Ordinarily I'd gladly take a photo of a couple, but these photos are meaningless.

    Sorry but this isn't strictly true. People in advertising and usually big business too are not ethical types.. they'll usually only adhere to the law as far as they believe they can get away with it, hence the likes of Enron.
    For example, there was a story on 60 Minutes (I think it was) a year or two back about how companies were astroturfing with children. I noticed in the background of one quick filmed scene how an adult astroturf guy was on a computer using AOL Instant Messenger pretending to be a teenager in order to 'tell' them about whatever game/music/etc they were 'marketing'.
    They'll also say for example, that the kids chosen to go to a [marketing] competition have 'won', when infact they've been chosen for their looks and popularity.

    Don't put anything past these guys, remember what they said about Windows.
  132. I suggest a new mod by innerlimit · · Score: 1

    shill!

  133. Pot... Kettle... Oh Whatever. by seanyboy · · Score: 1

    I like this bit of the article... Even marketing executives disapprove. "It is reprehensible and desperate," says Paul MacFarlane, co-owner of the Experiment, a small ad firm in St. Louis, that has done work for Southwestern Bell ...

    I guess that should translate as ... "in separate news, competitors of Ericcson infiltrated other advertising firms with actors and actresses whose job it was to show a faux-genuine disapproval of a well known and much used advertising technique. 'We hope to implicate Ericsson in underhand practices at a grass-roots level' said one unnamed exectutive..."

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
  134. Slashdot & WSJ Start Free Astroturf Campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh. This is much better shilling than any models will ever do, & it's free! (or whatever it costs to start a big rumour nowadays)

  135. Woohoo! by KallNoJoy · · Score: 1

    Hurray for the "leaners"! Looks like the odds of a woman talking to me at the bar is getting better... She may be getting paid to do it, but for a change, I'm not the one paying her! ;-)

    --
    next($sig) unless($sig =~ /funny/);
  136. Didn't you hear? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    They put a camera in a phone. I can just see the patent now...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  137. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by Mr.Intel · · Score: 2

    Heh, if anything, this sounds like a shill.

    Big difference between a shill and a karma whore.

    --
    ASCII tastes bad dude.
    Binary it is then.
  138. two words for you... by GoNINzo · · Score: 2
    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:two words for you... by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      Line 709 - search for "representative"
      http://blake.prohosting.com/awsm/script/clerks.txt

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
  139. Paranoia... by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why am I now picturing a scene from 'John Carpenter's The Thing' but instead of grizzly scientists in arctic parkas I see a circle of cellphone wielding models suspiciously eyeing each other...
    "I don't know which of you to trust..."
    "I know *I* am not a leaner..."
    "I don't care what you say... any of you moves I shoot..."
    "I saw Tiffany go outside with Barbi alone. If Barbi is a leaner, then Tiffany might be one too now..."

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  140. They need the marketing... that phone sucks by nate.sammons · · Score: 1

    I just signed up for AT&T's GSM/GPRS service and got a T68i. Every single time I tried to use the GPRS data feed, the damn thing crashed. Yes, crashed. Whatever CPU they are using is way too slow for that phone, too -- try and type commands fast and it'll get royally confused.

    So I traded it for the Nokia 8390. No color screen and no bluetooth, but it doesn't crash either. I'm now more convinced than ever that Nokia is the only company that puts any time into designing cell phone hardware *and* software.

    Now if only Nokia sold that new 75xx phone with the camera in the US...

    NOTE: I don't work for Nokia and I don't get kickbacks from them... I just like their phones ;-)

    -nate

  141. Slash-verteisment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember those?

  142. Right.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1
    "leaners": pairs of women ("actresses and female models") at bars playing interactive Battleship with each other from opposite ends of the bar. "[T]he company has gone to considerable lengths to train it's actors to avoid detection [as Ericsson spokespeople.]""

    Right.. no one will ever suspect the models, because hot chicks are synonymous with video games..

    Or maybe part of the "training" was in the application of a moustache and a prosthetic beer gut.

  143. Been tried before by allanj · · Score: 2

    The Colt guy sounds a lot like Dirty Harry ("the most powerful handgun in the world" and so on). Scary.

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero
  144. and now it all makes sense by hawk · · Score: 2
    It is indeed an astroturf campaign, but *not* by Sony. It's the liquor industry, laughing their tails off . . .

    hawk

  145. Topless donut stores by hawk · · Score: 2
    These stupid things used to pop up every year or two in the Bay Area. Incredibly stupid idea, but they could count on the NOW pickets, and the resultant news coverage, and would make a killing selling crummy donuts for a few months . . .

    hawk

  146. Hehe, the "phone find" idea, yeah right by jaydho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Other components of the promotional campaign are more commonly used buzz initiatives. One involves "Phone Finds," in which the company will place dummy phones around cities so that consumers can accidentally stumble on them. The screen on the phone will direct the finders to a special Web site, where they will be able to enter a contest to win a free phone. The new phone with camera attachment, priced between $300 and $400, will hit stores next week." I can see these phone ending up a pawn shops or wherever, it seems like Sony could just scatter real phones instead of spending the moolah to build fakes ones. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I'd rather have folks "find" a free phone and sign up for a service plan (and don't you think everyone would tell their friends about the new phone they found) rather than putting out dummy phones that only advertise.

    1. Re:Hehe, the "phone find" idea, yeah right by klparrot · · Score: 1
      I can see these phone ending up a pawn shops or wherever, it seems like Sony could just scatter real phones instead of spending the moolah to build fakes ones. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I'd rather have folks "find" a free phone and sign up for a service plan (and don't you think everyone would tell their friends about the new phone they found) rather than putting out dummy phones that only advertise.

      I have to disagree with you for several reasons:

      Ericsson doesn't provide the service, they just make the phone. So it doesn't make them any more money when someone signs up on a plan.

      Re: scattering real phones, don't you think that the real ones would end up in pawn shops? Heck, you could just follow the Ericsson people as they dropped phones, and make a killing snatching them up before anyone else.

      I think you misunderstand the idea behind the dummy phones. They don't do anything besides advertise a contest; finding a dummy phone doesn't guarantee you'll win a real one. There's no point in hoarding them (as in your pawn shop scenario).

      Also, the cost of dummy phones is going to be a whole lot less than the real ones. Not to mention that these dummy phones won't have chargers, manuals, and the other things you'd expect to get when you buy a phone.

      Finally, the dummy phones don't have electronics inside, which means they can be left anywhere; no worries about rain, etc.

    2. Re:Hehe, the "phone find" idea, yeah right by jaydho · · Score: 2

      You're right. I misread the article, assuming the dummy phones had electronic advertising, versus a simple label.

      Good call, I stand corrected :-)

  147. Re:T68 vs. T68i - Software Upgradable by sben · · Score: 2
    There are currently two different models of snap-on cameras ("CommuniCam") for these phones. ...
    The new model is the the MCA-20, which currently works only with the T68i, afaik.
    So, I just bought a T68i last week, thinking that at some point I might want this, or some other (currently non-existent) cool device. How does the MCA-20 compare to a similarly-priced digital camera -- image quality, download-to-PC options & speed, etc.? (The download opt My hunch tells me that it's probably more than a comparable-quality standalone camera....

    (Jeez, this sounds like a shill, or a troll-for-a-shill. Apologies. But I do actually want to know.)
  148. P.S. by Pope · · Score: 2

    Vote Quimby!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  149. Kind of OT, but talking about cellphones... by WowTIP · · Score: 2

    Everybody are excited about Ericsson's and Nokia's new top-of-the-line models, but are there any alternatives? One that seems pretty cool to me in the previews is the Panasonic GD87, mainly because of the polyphonic ringtones, 65k colours display and digital camera. No JAVA tho, it seems. If it is cheap enough it will probably be one to consider anyway? Anyone know any more cool "underdog" alternatives?

    But given my not-too-good financial state at the moment I will probably have to set my aims lower. I have found two alternatives that seem pretty nice and good value for the money:

    Siemens M50 is cheap, has JAVA and GPRS, but two colour display and monophonic ringtones.

    Panasonic GD67 has got 256 colours display and polyphonic ringtones, but no JAVA there either. It will probably cost about the same as the Siemens M50.

    Are there any other cellphones among the cheaper ones that can beat those two that I should know about?

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  150. Confidence or conformity? by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    I'd say that the reluctance of shoppers to use the carts was due to a lack of confidence to "break the mould", leading to them conforming to the usual pattern of behaviour, i.e. using a basket. I've noticed that this is not a limitation that applies to many geeks, including myself. I'm happy to do things my way, to experiment, and make my own mistakes.

    As for the T68i, I strongly suspect many people will not bother with one simply because the don't fscking need one.

    There's only so many multimedia capabilities I need outside of my cosy little nerd-cave. If/when I get myself a digital camera, you can bet your arse it's gonna be better than SVGA.

    Ali

  151. Even if they're not "detected"... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    ...people will avoid them, thinking they're nerds.

    The "general public" simply does not realise the value of "non-conmformists" to society. Thanks to the mass-media.

    Ali

  152. Already happening? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
    Interesting this story should appear on /.

    While on holiday in Paris last month I was approached by a German couple asking me to take a photo of them with a Sony Digital Camera. They reciprocated and photograhed me using my Olympus Digital Cam. The gentleman suggested that when I replace my camera I should choose a Sony since they integrate very easily with Windows, and had a whole host of benefits. (I didn't mention I haven't played with any Microsoft products for the best part of 12 months). At the time, my dad actually wondered aloud whether he was sponsored by Sony.

    Of course it's possible he was simply impressed with his equipment, but maybe this article has some truth.

    Just my 0.02

    Tim

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  153. Camera Performance? by sych · · Score: 1

    i played with one at a trade fair 2 weeks ago. to be honest, i was disappointed with the image quality. it has no builtin flash, and it performs badly in low indoor lighting.

    max res is 640x480. basically expect not much more from it than you would from a webcam capable of that res. perhaps a little more clarity.

  154. A change for the better by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    So essentially he was hired to be a professional liar and shill for the company? Brilliant. How does he sleep at night knowing he was paid to be a professional liar? People looking to get actual real-world advice about a product before they spend their hard earned money are being lied to by a PR guy in disguise... that just reaks of immorality.

    Actually his spiritual director encouraged him. Since the shill was previously a lawyer, Father O'Connor thought that this job was not so sinful.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  155. How do they evaluate? by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    How can the companies evaluate that the promotion is not too blatant and not to ineffective?
    Do they run surveys asking "Did you know out product from a guy in an Internet forum named "Jack3"?

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  156. And other secrets... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    If these `hot bar chicks' are just a little careless about getting lubricated so they can better play their role, they might become `laid advertising'.

    He: `Why do your knickers have `ADVERTISEMENT' written across them?' She: `Hush, now. Keep your mind on your driving... ohhhhh... yes...' Would that count as `phone sex'?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  157. [OT] Me too dude! by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

    sig: Uh, whose car is that out front?
    Mine. 1970 Pontiac Firebird. The car I've always wanted and now I have it. I rule.

    Same deal here man! It's great, isn't it? How's yours treatin ya?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.