Slashdot Mirror

Exactly... and here is why:
http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

This is my city. This is where I live.

Look at the first graph. Notice how the climate is basically identical to the second graph.

I'm not questioning that there is warming. I'm just not seeing it whenever I look at individual stations that I'm aware of. You tell me "well this station in Siberia has really changed"... I don't know anything about that station. All I can audit is what I am aware of in my area. And every time I've checked any of them the return is always a fat load of nothing.

To make the kind of analysis you're trying to do it's not enough to just eyeball some graphs. You have to go download the actual numbers, correct any biases introduced by things such as station moves, instrument changes, changes in time of observation and the build up of the urban area. Then you can make a useful comparison of of the data for climate purposes.

Exactly... and here is why:
http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

This is my city. This is where I live.

Look at the first graph. Notice how the climate is basically identical to the second graph.

I'm not questioning that there is warming. I'm just not seeing it whenever I look at individual stations that I'm aware of. You tell me "well this station in Siberia has really changed"... I don't know anything about that station. All I can audit is what I am aware of in my area. And every time I've checked any of them the return is always a fat load of nothing.

To make the kind of analysis you're trying to do it's not enough to just eyeball some graphs. You have to go download the actual numbers, correct any biases introduced by things such as station moves, instrument changes, changes in time of observation and the build up of the urban area. Then you can make a useful comparison of of the data for climate purposes.

Exactly... and here is why: http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

Jesus Christ. "That station"? The one and only Downtown LA station that quite obviously moved from "WBO" to USC Campus? With all your acute recognitional skills that tell you the climate was "the same", yet you didn't see that? [facepalm]

Ohh, and is there a special reason why you used 2013 data when 2015 is available?

Last but not least, look at the second graph on each page.

The second chart down shows the day-to-day mean temperature anomalies (daily mean temperature less the corresponding long-term climatological mean). Vertical lines extending upward from the zero line indicate above average means for the day (colored red), those extending downward indicate below average daily means (colored blue). In general, the most extreme departures for Downtown Los Angeles are positive, reflecting to a large extent the occurrence of warming offshore flow episodes.

They sure noticed something. You didn't.

Exactly... and here is why: http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

Jesus Christ. "That station"? The one and only Downtown LA station that quite obviously moved from "WBO" to USC Campus? With all your acute recognitional skills that tell you the climate was "the same", yet you didn't see that? [facepalm]

Ohh, and is there a special reason why you used 2013 data when 2015 is available?

Last but not least, look at the second graph on each page.

The second chart down shows the day-to-day mean temperature anomalies (daily mean temperature less the corresponding long-term climatological mean). Vertical lines extending upward from the zero line indicate above average means for the day (colored red), those extending downward indicate below average daily means (colored blue). In general, the most extreme departures for Downtown Los Angeles are positive, reflecting to a large extent the occurrence of warming offshore flow episodes.

They sure noticed something. You didn't.

Exactly... and here is why:
http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

This is my city. This is where I live.

Look at the first graph. Notice how the climate is basically identical to the second graph.

I'm not questioning that there is warming. I'm just not seeing it whenever I look at individual stations that I'm aware of. You tell me "well this station in Siberia has really changed"... I don't know anything about that station. All I can audit is what I am aware of in my area. And every time I've checked any of them the return is always a fat load of nothing.

And really, lets not pretend this isn't a shill post for the AGW debate. What would it take for you people to shut up? Seriously?

Show me the papers I need to sign to make the people that keep harping on about this stuff murder suicide each other. They appear to want total dictatorial control over the economy? Funding possibly in the two trillion a year range? Am I missing something?

And when whomever clarifies what they want, I'm going to just point out how it doesn't matter to the issue because the Chinese and the Indians etc aren't doing it. And for every bit of CO2 they cause to be outsourced by making doing anything in the west too obnoxious to bother with... places it is outsourced to are going to burn twice as much to do the same thing. This tactic is a net negative to your stated objectives.

Enough. Every summer is the hottest, every winter the coldest... Enough.

Exactly... and here is why:
http://www.climatestations.com...

https://www.climatestations.co...

I'm not cherry picking these... that is the oldest temp from that station and the most recent temp posted into the website from that station.

This is my city. This is where I live.

Look at the first graph. Notice how the climate is basically identical to the second graph.

I'm not questioning that there is warming. I'm just not seeing it whenever I look at individual stations that I'm aware of. You tell me "well this station in Siberia has really changed"... I don't know anything about that station. All I can audit is what I am aware of in my area. And every time I've checked any of them the return is always a fat load of nothing.

And really, lets not pretend this isn't a shill post for the AGW debate. What would it take for you people to shut up? Seriously?

Show me the papers I need to sign to make the people that keep harping on about this stuff murder suicide each other. They appear to want total dictatorial control over the economy? Funding possibly in the two trillion a year range? Am I missing something?

And when whomever clarifies what they want, I'm going to just point out how it doesn't matter to the issue because the Chinese and the Indians etc aren't doing it. And for every bit of CO2 they cause to be outsourced by making doing anything in the west too obnoxious to bother with... places it is outsourced to are going to burn twice as much to do the same thing. This tactic is a net negative to your stated objectives.

Enough. Every summer is the hottest, every winter the coldest... Enough.