Slashdot Mirror

And if you want to get down to the molecular nitty gritty: then this is the graph to check out. Interaction with the cytoskeleton seems to be key for Ebola... (I never knew that.)

This graph may or may not help in your search for the answer. It points to tropical climate. Presumably they are not called "tropical diseases" for no reason at all...

Also see this graph (by continent) or this graph (just for fun) or whatever takes your fancy really.

This graph may or may not help in your search for the answer. It points to tropical climate. Presumably they are not called "tropical diseases" for no reason at all...

Also see this graph (by continent) or this graph (just for fun) or whatever takes your fancy really.

This graph may or may not help in your search for the answer. It points to tropical climate. Presumably they are not called "tropical diseases" for no reason at all...

Also see this graph (by continent) or this graph (just for fun) or whatever takes your fancy really.

Talking of meaningless statistics, how about this weekday/weekend analysis? (Is the blip on Fridays due to the alliteration?)

Or perhaps more interesting/informative is the trend in recent years...

Or the slightly bizarre, but believable trend for conservative US Presidential 2008 candidates to use IE... (although the reverse is not true for Democrats and FF)

Talking of meaningless statistics, how about this weekday/weekend analysis? (Is the blip on Fridays due to the alliteration?)

Or perhaps more interesting/informative is the trend in recent years...

Or the slightly bizarre, but believable trend for conservative US Presidential 2008 candidates to use IE... (although the reverse is not true for Democrats and FF)

Talking of meaningless statistics, how about this weekday/weekend analysis? (Is the blip on Fridays due to the alliteration?)

Or perhaps more interesting/informative is the trend in recent years...

Or the slightly bizarre, but believable trend for conservative US Presidential 2008 candidates to use IE... (although the reverse is not true for Democrats and FF)

Indeed... the general crapness of websites and emergence of web 2.0 seem to be anti-correlated in recent years...

[plug]
Well, your mileage may vary, but you could try compare-stuff:

KDE vs Gnome

Fedora vs openSUSE

You get the idea... (I hope!)
[/plug]

[plug]
Well, your mileage may vary, but you could try compare-stuff:

KDE vs Gnome

Fedora vs openSUSE

You get the idea... (I hope!)
[/plug]

• lines 1
• lines 2
• bars 1
• bars 2

They're quite pretty in my opinion, but having read this thread, I realised they are not anti-aliased and that's not easy to do in GD::Graph at the moment (while drawing the lines, at least - I just read there is a trick one can do with resampling a 4x image).

Also, there's a problem with the lines not really being the desired thickness perpendicular to the direction of the line...

It was dead easy to get working though!

• lines 1
• lines 2
• bars 1
• bars 2

They're quite pretty in my opinion, but having read this thread, I realised they are not anti-aliased and that's not easy to do in GD::Graph at the moment (while drawing the lines, at least - I just read there is a trick one can do with resampling a 4x image).

Also, there's a problem with the lines not really being the desired thickness perpendicular to the direction of the line...

It was dead easy to get working though!

• lines 1
• lines 2
• bars 1
• bars 2

They're quite pretty in my opinion, but having read this thread, I realised they are not anti-aliased and that's not easy to do in GD::Graph at the moment (while drawing the lines, at least - I just read there is a trick one can do with resampling a 4x image).

Also, there's a problem with the lines not really being the desired thickness perpendicular to the direction of the line...

It was dead easy to get working though!

• lines 1
• lines 2
• bars 1
• bars 2

They're quite pretty in my opinion, but having read this thread, I realised they are not anti-aliased and that's not easy to do in GD::Graph at the moment (while drawing the lines, at least - I just read there is a trick one can do with resampling a 4x image).

Also, there's a problem with the lines not really being the desired thickness perpendicular to the direction of the line...

It was dead easy to get working though!

You can change "insecure" any other word/phrase (and probably get completely contradictory results).

For example you can get an idea which of several shows is innovative (as opposed to formulaic), hilarious (not serious), entertaining (not boring), never missed (as opposed to missed), and so on.

Of course this is all very approximate, and a lot of the text on the web is written by the TV networks themselves, but at least you can ask any question you like (which program to people watch in bed, or watch eating pizza, etc).

For example you can get an idea which of several shows is innovative (as opposed to formulaic), hilarious (not serious), entertaining (not boring), never missed (as opposed to missed), and so on.

Of course this is all very approximate, and a lot of the text on the web is written by the TV networks themselves, but at least you can ask any question you like (which program to people watch in bed, or watch eating pizza, etc).

For example you can get an idea which of several shows is innovative (as opposed to formulaic), hilarious (not serious), entertaining (not boring), never missed (as opposed to missed), and so on.

Of course this is all very approximate, and a lot of the text on the web is written by the TV networks themselves, but at least you can ask any question you like (which program to people watch in bed, or watch eating pizza, etc).

For example you can get an idea which of several shows is innovative (as opposed to formulaic), hilarious (not serious), entertaining (not boring), never missed (as opposed to missed), and so on.

Of course this is all very approximate, and a lot of the text on the web is written by the TV networks themselves, but at least you can ask any question you like (which program to people watch in bed, or watch eating pizza, etc).

While we're in the mood for statistics, here's what the web "thinks" on the subject.

You get the same result with damaged too.

While we're in the mood for statistics, here's what the web "thinks" on the subject.

You get the same result with damaged too.

What about Shocking Tanks? I've only read about them, but they look like lots of fun. Has anyone tried them?

And now for the plug... here's some advice for buying fun or useful stuff.

What about Shocking Tanks? I've only read about them, but they look like lots of fun. Has anyone tried them?

And now for the plug... here's some advice for buying fun or useful stuff.

This is a plug... but a useful one I hope. You can quickly get a handle on the "web's opinion" on things like this with compare-stuff, here's how:

Four micropayment systems compared with respect to the words/phrases:
excellent
no hassle
efficient
extremely helpful

As you'll see, I'm trying to claw back my hosting fees with Amazon product links... Hasn't worked yet ;)

This is a plug... but a useful one I hope. You can quickly get a handle on the "web's opinion" on things like this with compare-stuff, here's how:

Four micropayment systems compared with respect to the words/phrases:
excellent
no hassle
efficient
extremely helpful

As you'll see, I'm trying to claw back my hosting fees with Amazon product links... Hasn't worked yet ;)

This is a plug... but a useful one I hope. You can quickly get a handle on the "web's opinion" on things like this with compare-stuff, here's how:

Four micropayment systems compared with respect to the words/phrases:
excellent
no hassle
efficient
extremely helpful

As you'll see, I'm trying to claw back my hosting fees with Amazon product links... Hasn't worked yet ;)

This is a plug... but a useful one I hope. You can quickly get a handle on the "web's opinion" on things like this with compare-stuff, here's how:

Four micropayment systems compared with respect to the words/phrases:
excellent
no hassle
efficient
extremely helpful

As you'll see, I'm trying to claw back my hosting fees with Amazon product links... Hasn't worked yet ;)

This is a plug, but it might be useful to anyone making a non-critical decision (like cable purchases...)
Monster/Belkin/Radio Shack video cables compared in terms of: excellent
great value
overpriced
faulty
hope you get the idea...

This is a plug, but it might be useful to anyone making a non-critical decision (like cable purchases...)
Monster/Belkin/Radio Shack video cables compared in terms of: excellent
great value
overpriced
faulty
hope you get the idea...

This is a plug, but it might be useful to anyone making a non-critical decision (like cable purchases...)
Monster/Belkin/Radio Shack video cables compared in terms of: excellent
great value
overpriced
faulty
hope you get the idea...

This is a plug, but it might be useful to anyone making a non-critical decision (like cable purchases...)
Monster/Belkin/Radio Shack video cables compared in terms of: excellent
great value
overpriced
faulty
hope you get the idea...

I just saw this:
The Guardian newspaper has a short piece about Lucas defending Phantom Menace [also annoying popup].

Quick plug:
Why not compare all the Star Wars episodes in one swell foop! (You can also try terms like: lame, merchandise, thrilling, classic etc...)

Heres a better graph

Here's the graph, kind-of... CowboyNeal's balanced diet. But I guess it's really just another blatant plug... :-)

I don't claim this is the authoritative answer, or an in-depth study, but the raw data comes from Bill's very own MSN search: bill gates sucks, check it out...

Google SOAP thing for compare-stuff is in the pipeline...

ok, so I took some of the commonly occuring model names (not manufacturers) in this thread and plugged them into compare-stuff. follow this link to get the results from compare-stuff with a random choice of search engine (try the others to see what difference it makes) - of course it depends what words you choose but it seems to be in favour of the inspiron.

something like this, perhaps?

quick plug for compare-stuff.com/pubmed. see my other /. posts for more info.

here's the/an answer

check out compare-stuff.com/pubmed to analyse relative co-occurrence in PubMed articles.
you can compare more than just gene names too: disease/condition names, reagents, techniques, author's addresses, whatever...
reload the entry page to see different examples of what you can compare

or ask similar questions on the web at large with the vanilla version: compare-stuff.com

check out compare-stuff.com/pubmed to analyse relative co-occurrence in PubMed articles.
you can compare more than just gene names too: disease/condition names, reagents, techniques, author's addresses, whatever...
reload the entry page to see different examples of what you can compare

or ask similar questions on the web at large with the vanilla version: compare-stuff.com

I've found that the engines cover enough to make my new site work pretty well.
Not for everything, but enough to be getting along with...