Domain: conservapedia.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to conservapedia.com.
Comments · 207
-
Re:Scientific name
Wow! They've discovered the species responsible for editing Conservapedia!
-
Quick!To the Conservapedia!
This article will be of great help in their noble quest to redefine reality to fit their cultural preferences!
-
Who cares?
This is not a problem when you can go to http://conservapedia.com/. Who needs credentials when you can have all of the content of wikipedia without those pesky facts that require checking etc.
-
Re:Oh no he didn't
Not at all. The fossils are real, but the dinosaurs co-existed with humans relatively recently, probably between the time when God created the Earth and the middle ages - and some dinosaurs probably still exist today. I can prove all of this because it's written in an old book. It's also written plainly in the Dinosaur article on Conservapedia.
(I'm thinking of signing up as a Conservapedia editor purely to expand on articles like these.)
-
Re:This is not news!Conservapedia is better?! WTF?! I just checked out that site, and sadly, I ain't impressed. I got a particular kick out of their article on the Law of Mass Conversation. The article on homeschooling is also a riot, particularly the list of 'High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.' (ironic how Jesus Christ is on that list, considering that at the time he would have been educated, he was actually Jewish,...
-
Re:This is not news!Conservapedia is better?! WTF?! I just checked out that site, and sadly, I ain't impressed. I got a particular kick out of their article on the Law of Mass Conversation. The article on homeschooling is also a riot, particularly the list of 'High-achieving Christians who were educated at home.' (ironic how Jesus Christ is on that list, considering that at the time he would have been educated, he was actually Jewish,...
-
This is not news!
Some of us have known for a long time that Wikipedia administrators are evil. See what the highly reliable Conservapedia has to say about them:
The administrators who monitor and control the content on Wikipedia do not represent the views of the majority of Americans, and many are in fact not American. For example, only 10% of Americans accept evolution as it is taught in public school, yet many Wikipedia administrators accept it as a sourced fact, and will censor material that contradicts evolution.
As everyone knows, Conservapedia editors are all, by any practical definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error.