Slashdot Mirror

WASP? Musk exposed jews (rothchild bankers/media) "he said the Jewish media was slimy\dishonest" https://dailystormer.name/eter... and Jew history does the rest with their beliefs all non jews are nothing but cattle to be robbed, raped and killed https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

WASP? Musk exposed jews (rothchild bankers and media) "he said the Jewish media was slimy\dishonest" https://dailystormer.name/eter... and Jew history does the rest with their beliefs all non jews are nothing but cattle to be robbed, raped and killed https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

Musk's expertly correct on jew media "he said the Jewish media was slimy\dishonest" https://dailystormer.name/eter... and Jew history does the rest with their beliefs all non jews are nothing but cattle to be robbed, killed and raped https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

Musk's expertly correct on jew media "he said the Jewish media was slimy\dishonest" https://dailystormer.name/eter... and Jew history does the rest with their beliefs all non jews are nothing but cattle to be robbed, killed and raped https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

WASP? Musk exposed jews (rothchild bankers and media) "he said the Jewish media was slimy\dishonest" https://dailystormer.name/eter... and Jew history does the rest with their beliefs all non jews are nothing but cattle to be robbed and raped https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

1. Decentralised DNS. The DNS crew have shown they cannot be trusted to 100%, which is a really bad thing when it comes to free speech online. Perhaps a bitcoin style ledger could be of help here.

2. A decentralised social network solution with monetisation options. Think about it, Youtube and Facebook rolled into one for all sorts of content imaginable, a pay-as-you-go buffet where you can choose whether to pay with your eyeballs, your time, or your money. Awesome stuff if it ever get started.

3. The realisation that the web of the nineties, where everyone and their grandma could make a website, is pretty much dead. And no, I do not mourn those Geocities webpages, I rather mourn the fact that it is way too hard to get stuff online without selling your firstborn son to one of the big dragons (Google, Facebook etc).

Guess I'll keep dreaming of these things forever though...

All fine and good.

In an attempt to start a meaningful dialogue, how do you feel about The Daily Stormer having a website available on the internet, having a site name entry in the distributed DNS system, and having a home page and videos on your decentralized social network?(*)

This is the choice you will have to make when implementing the next internet: in order to make it truly open for everyone, you will have to accept that there are people whose opinion you don't agree to and who have just as much right to free speech. Management of such a system has to be completely decoupled from mob rule, else we'll be back to where we are now.

A completely open internet would allow distasteful speech and people you don't agree with to have a voice.

Are you willing to take the bad with the good?

(*) For those who don't know, Daily Stormer is an actual nazi website that lost their original website name after registrars dropped them as customers while keeping the original name, disallowing them from using the name at another registrar.

2012 called. It wants its "last mile monopolies" rant back.

Ajit Pai is on point that CDNs and walled gardens are a bigger threat. Google kicked all the gun videos off Youtube as part of their consensus pogrom against the NRA, and continues to put videos they don't have sufficient excuse to censor but whose views they don't like in "Youtube Jail," something they invented to thwart as many as possible of the political goals of free speech without technically censoring the video. Twitter is outsourcing censorship to (((SPLC and ADL))). Die Luegenpresse is constantly talking about "the line between free speech and hate speech," a nonsense excuse for demanding "evil" tech monopolies do more to shut down non-Luegenpresse news. Edgy bloggers are worried they will be banned from registering domain names, renting housing, hiring taxis, and buying food as retaliation for their political speech. At the same moment publishing is more democratized than it's ever been in the history of the world, free speech is in worse shape than it's ever been in the United States's history.

The Chinese idea of censorship for social harmony, decided by the "consensus" of a thin, elite, isolated caste of party insiders, is now mainstream within the tech monopsonies that are the gatekeepers of political discourse, and they relentlessly pursue anyone who slips through their fingers once they start to get an audience through DDoS, registrar fuckery, BGP tricks, recursive DNS poisoning, any means at their disposal regardless of mandate or due process. Look at their actions, not their words, and when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.

What happened to the Daily Stormer shows you can knock a site off the internet if you're persistent enough :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

The Stormer is up now, but will probably get kicked off .name in a few days

https://dailystormer.name/