Slashdot Mirror

"[...] the kind of evolution and survival of the fittest that animals go through [...]"

Quoting Darwin ( Descent of Man , page 77):

Many animals, however, certainly sympathise with each other's distress or danger. This is the case even with birds; Capt. Stansbury11 found on a salt lake in Utah an old and completely blind pelican, which was very fat, and must have been long and well fed by his companions. Mr. Blyth, as he informs me, saw Indian crows feeding two or three of their companions which were blind; and I have heard of an analogous case with the domestic cock.

A more recent example contradicting "survival of the fittest" among animals:

Orca Whales Take Care of a Permanently Disabled Individual – For Years:

Stumpy was cared for by these whales – on at least two occasions other orcas brought him fish, and often they shielded him from passing boats.

He who believes that each equine species was independently created, will, I presume, assert that each species has been created with a tendency to vary, both under nature and under domestication, in this particular manner, so as often to become striped like other species of the genus; and that each has been created with a strong tendency, when crossed with species inhabiting distant quarters of the world, to produce hybrids resembling in their stripes, not their own parents, but other species of the genus. To admit this view is, as it seems to me, to reject a real for an unreal, or at least for an unknown, cause. It makes the works of God a mere mockery and deception; I would almost as soon believe with the old and ignorant cosmogonists, that fossil shells had never lived, but had been created in stone so as to mock the shells now living on the sea-shore.

... which is not exactly an expression of faith.
Darwin did have deist beliefs at the time of the writing, which is reflected by his frequent references to a Creator, but that Creator is not necessarily theistic God.

My wife wants my 8 year old daughter to be a writer. (She is an English major who works at a hedge fund). I want my daughter to be scientist. (I am a psychology major, now building web apps).

Finally I realized: why not both?

In my opinion 2 of the top 10 most important books (in any field) written in the last 500 years are science books:

Newton's Principia Mathematica

and

Darwin's On the Origin of Species

The works published are all long out of UK copyright, but Cambridge University asserts :-

" Permission is hereby granted, without agreement and without licence or royalty fees, to use and to download and print a single copy of the Materials for private study and research, provided that such usage and copying is for non-commercial purposes only and not for any commercial advantage and that any copyright notice within the Materials and these Terms of Use appear in any copy of the Materials.

Except as permitted above and use or copying under statutory allowances as permitted in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 as amended, the User undertakes not to copy, reproduce, publish, store in any medium (including extraction into any other website, database, compilation, or computer programme), generate collections, distribute, transmit, retransmit, modify, manipulate, alter, rent, lease or lend, or broadcast or show any part of the Website without the prior written permission of the University.

To use and copy the Materials otherwise requires specific written permission from the University and the original copyright holder(s) as identified and the User undertakes to contact the University and the copyright holder(s) to obtain permission to do so.

Any further use may infringe copyright and moral rights and may attract civil remedies and criminal penalties. The University regularly monitors access to the Website, other websites and publications in all media and utilizes digital watermarking to assist in the tracing of illegal use and will take action for infringement of copyright and breach of these Terms of Use.

The User warrants to the University that the User will not infringe the University's intellectual property rights herein nor will the User breach the intellectual property rights of any third party herein."

This is their legal right, but it means, for example, that if Project Gutenberg wanted to mount these works, they would need to scan them proofread them and do all the work again. This seems to miss the point.

Anthony Staines