Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: dhost.info

Stories and comments across the archive that link to dhost.info.

Comments · 7

  1. Re:Communist Mario by MilenCent · · Score: 1 · on Nintendo's Mario - 26 Years of History

    So you're saying the People's Mario (Flash animation) lied to me?

  2. IE works but no LAN - pffft by weighn · · Score: 2, Interesting · on Running Windows With No Services

    disable those services but keep it functional:
    Windows XP Home and Professional Service Pack 2 Service Configurations by Black Viper http://dhost.info/kyeu/mirror/blackviper/WinXP/ser vicecfg.htm

  3. Re:For services you actually should disable... by rdwald · · Score: 2, Informative · on Running Windows With No Services

    From the same site:
    Windows 2000 services

    He doesn't have a list for Windows 2003, however.

  4. I used to do it... by WRoach · · Score: 1 · on Running Windows With No Services

    ...back in 2001 when I was still squeezing every bit of ressources out of my 1996 P166, killing all unneeded services, but I hardly do it anymore.

    But with all the processing power we can get for pennies nowaday, who can say he really needs to do this when you have and A64 and a gig of RAM?

    TFA would have been insightfull 5 years ago. Luckly enough http://dhost.info/kyeu/mirror/blackviper/ was there when I needed it.

  5. For services you actually should disable... by rdwald · · Score: 5, Informative · on Running Windows With No Services

    Take a look at Black Viper's list of WinXP SP2 services.

  6. Re:if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on EA To Publish for Valve

    ummm actually you can play HL2 without steam however you lose all of the online options. i play it that way on my laptop the time

    http://dhost.info/bffelon/mods.html

  7. Good. by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative · on Michigan Diagnostic Software Case Big Win for GPL

    But remember, the GPL itself is not specifically "tested", per se, because GPL software developers assert them rights granted to them via copyright on an individual basis. This makes it a sometimes long and arduous process to assert rights and/or prove infringement, but hopefully more precedent will help.

    Since the provisions of the GPL have been upheld in a case in Germany as well, maybe PearPC will be able to more easily defend itself against CherryOS, which has blatantly taken GPL code, without release of source code or attribution, from PearPC and several other GPL projects:

    eWeek has a general overview of the situation:

    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1775386,00.as p

    Below is a comprehensive collection of evidence, which runs the gamut from CherryOS including original PearPC graphics, extremely unique strings and error messages, debug code from PearPC, the same unique MAC address as PearPC's default network adapter, shared specific functionality, including bugs, and so on:

    http://www.ht-technology.com/cherryos-pearpc/cherr yos-pearpc.html

    http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/00 0501.html
    http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/00 0503.html
    http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/00 0504.html
    http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/00 0507.html

    http://starport.dnsalias.net/index.php?show=articl e&id=348

    http://forums.pearpc.net/viewtopic.php?p=16178#161 78
    http://www.tliquest.net/ryan/cherryos/
    http://dhost.info/kourge/en/projects/frauds/cherry os.php

    Additionally, PearPC project authors are already asserting their rights under the GPL:

    http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg _id=11116974

    And a general compilation of some of the evidence so far against CherryOS:

    http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg _id=11125509