Domain: dit.ie
Stories and comments across the archive that link to dit.ie.
Comments · 7
-
Re:how does Apple encode a unique device ID on chi
The Apple docs use the word "fused" so I think they're using the same technique as PROM circuits, except they're not directly readable. Essentially every bit is wired to a circuit breaker, you start with all 1s and intentionally trip some to burn in a fixed patterns of zeros and ones the first time you power it up. If they use the on-chip RNG to initialize it it's possible that not even the manufacturing facility knows what value it has encoded, only the chip itself. Looks like a real tin foil hatter designed this system and did it well.
-
Re:Awesome post
Quite - the scenarios described barely seem to hang together.
"[Tech that] slows down your speech or turns up the volume for an elderly person with hearing loss"
One of these problems we already resolve using wearable devices called 'hearing aids'. As for slowing down speech, there's a PhD thesis on this, see p177 for the technical details."That enables a stroke victim to use the clarity of speech he had previously?"
OK, that one is faintly interesting but has it much to do with machine translation? As with transformation into a preferred accent it presumably has two basic problems, input of desired communication into device by whatever mechanism is most convenient, perhaps speech recognition, and output of desired communication in preferred format, which is to say speech synthesis. By and large the original utterance remains intact."One implication might be a technology that can translate from one generation to another. That can convert academic jargon to local slang"
Oversimplification (silly oversimplification in the case of the 'generation gap' cliche). First build a machine that understands either (a good way of approaching this would be to come up with an impressive automatic document summarisation function that does anything more fundamental than sentence extraction). Then prove that there's even a pathway to mapping between them since academic jargon and local slang are specific to different domains."It's transformative."
This line of research will certainly produce some interesting outputs, but primarily it will transform money into less money. That said, Google can afford it, so in point of fact -- why not? -
555 timer, not hot tub Eloi and hot tub Morlocks
Got nothing more to do with a time machine than your average lump of matter
Yeah, it has a lot more to do with the 555 timer, which was called "The IC Time Machine" when first sold, than it does with hot tub Eloi and hot tub Morlocks.
block dropping mini-game
Mr. Rogers is coming to get you.
-
Re:Huh?
...They obviously did not see Swordfish or Hackers as they would understand what REAL hackers are.
And you obviously didn't see the list of films. they studied.
-
Steorn Around The Web...
There's plenty more of this kind of stuff to be found, but here are a couple of quick links related to Steorn. The Steorn video can be seen on Google, where it's filed under hoax, snake oil and scam. Wikipedia already has an article on them. Oddly, the site makes mention of the "Bolton Trust, DIT, Steorn Student Enterprise Competition 2006, which I actually found record of on the Dublin Institute of Technology website. Here is Steorn ad. I don't think the DIT competition adds any credibility, though. I'm done even wondering if there's a chance this is real.
-
Re:don't think so...
Check out the "news" page : http://www.steorn.net/en/news.aspx?p=2 Posted on 17th of August 2006 http://www.steorn.net/en/news.aspx?p=2&id=31 "The winning team will be presented with a cheque for 5000 on the night of the final - March 29th 2006 - by DIT President Professor Brian Norton." and on the 17th of August 2006 "Congratulations to Blackhawk, winners of the 2006 Steorn/Bolton Trust/DIT Student Enterprise Competition. 17 August 2006" But from http://www.dit.ie/studententerprise "Results: 1st Prize: Nighthawk 2nd Prize: Snacks on Tracks" Just a typo, I suppose
-
HFS+ versus UFSFirst let see the state of UFS in Darwin:
When Darwin was built, Apple used FreeBSD 3.2 has its core BSD os, since then many changes where applied in the UFS code in FreeBSD (softupdates are the ones comes to mind). Since then Apple's version of UFS has not change too much.
HFS+ is Apple's MacOS native enhanced file system. So if you need to run Classic, if you need to run carbonised application that do have a resource fork then you need an HFS+ partition (see Mozilla's readme).
If you're more a unix guy like and want to compile OSS, host some CVS reposiroty then you 'll need UFS.
UFS is case sensitive. HFS+ is not (it might seems to be but is not). I'de say for all macos Apps use HFS+ an create a second UFS partition where you'd put all your unix apps and other unix related stuff (CVS etc ...).
Other references can be found :