Domain: dotcomguy.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to dotcomguy.com.
Comments · 13
-
That reminds me of....
DotCom Guy, yet another fucked company.
-
Dotcomguy payment
According to the FAQ on their site he was getting paid throughout the year. In doubling incrementations, 24 dollars one month $48 the next, then $96, and in November alone, $24,576 and then finally in december the $49,152 balance. But then you could read it for yourself. I know a little about journalism, and I might make a suggestion that Slashdot try some basic fact checking before you run stories. For one thing it would make for better "articles" knowing how much of that money he may of actually gotten. Its obviously possible that they fled during a particular month, but to me it sounds very much like someone's trying to slander them to sensationalize the dotcom disaster.
-
Here's a Better Link...Someone was complaining that the posting on Slashdot was unfounded because the website didn't say anything about it; here's the link (entitled "Buh-Bye!", and the pasted text):
>It's been a great year everyone. Now it is
>time for DotComGuy to re-enter society. Can
>society handle it???>From all of us here at DotComGuy Inc., and
>from DotComGuy himself, thanks to all of you
>for your support and appreciation these past
>366 days.>Be on the lookout though...you never know
>what might happen next, or where DotComGuy
>will pop up!
-- -
Re:Smellshttp://127.0.0.1 Smell: Me. Eww?
http://www.DotComGuy.com
Smell: much like localhost, but couple of months older.--
-
Re:slashdot?then hire a security professional to come in and take a look
Yes.. but doesn't this sound like "then hire a Y2K expert to take a look"? Part of the problem is that developers say "I don't need a security expert" (ok, so some didn't need a Y2K expert..)
Anyway, I wonder what our friend DotComGuy has to say..
--
-
Year 19100
Before changing his name, he should have made sure we would not see things such as this. How lame can you be--starting your stunt in 2000 with a non-y2k compliant site? I get the feeling he's not about to become
/.'s favorite person of the year. -
DotComGuy Y2K'd
-
Y2k err hits DotCOMGay
Seems like DotComGuy is free to leave since its the year 19100 on their
page:
hmm could this guy be the real Y2K BUG.
Anyone know his Internet Provider so we can friggin Flood his net connection
day in day out doesn't look like a *nix geek to me, so him and his node ....... must ,mdfsdf ...
Request Timed Out -
DotComGuy is not Y2K compliant
Go take a look at his Schedule and check out the dodgy (perl?) scripting thats going on:
01:09 AM Invalid Date/Time object: 01/03/19100
01:09 AM Invalid Date/Time object: 01/03/19100
01:38 AM Invalid Date/Time Object: 01/03/19100
-
Livin La Vida Loca
Groceries from PeaPod: $80
Shampoo from DrugStore.com: $4
Call Girls from an Online Pimp: $800
Pulling off this lame Publicity Stunt: Priceless
-
Re:THIS IS NOT NEWS!
Suffice to say, my house has a 30' ham radio tower out back.hmmm. i can't help but think how a few thousand watts of RF beamed directly at his laptop would enhance dotcomguys connectivity...
:-)
======
"Rex unto my cleeb, and thou shalt have everlasting blort." - Zorp 3:16 -
Re:Sorry to anyone who finds this offensive.
I dunno, something about this enrages me. I can't put my finger on it. When I first heard about it I tried to go the guy's site and call him a loser (via a message board or something).me too. there is no message board. there is a spot you can give them a bunch of demographic info and become a dotcompartner or some such shit, and in return i guess you get to review e-commerce sites and get deals on various crapola. but no message board that i could find.
you can, however, follow my lead and email the schmuck at dcg@dotcomguy.com and tell him what a loser puppet of greedy commercial interests he is.
======
"Rex unto my cleeb, and thou shalt have everlasting blort." - Zorp 3:16 -
Re:Web Site Address
You can see them, according to the links at the end of the article (and not surprisingly) at http://www.dotcomguy.com, but it was down when I tried it...