Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: dynarch.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to dynarch.com.

Comments · 10

  1. Re:The ONLY thing that is needed is... by zobier · · Score: 1 · on Vector Graphics Lead Wish List For Future Browsers
    I know what you're saying, however JSCalendar is a pretty cool if you don't mind JS.

    Also, vote++ for a combo box.

  2. Re:I had been following this.. by zobier · · Score: 1 · on ASP.NET Ajax Released
    I can't remember ever seeing a web calendar as sweet as this one...
    it's a pleasure to use the control.
    I'm sorry but I don't think that's a very good JS calendar, jscalendar is much better and it works everywhere I've tested it.
  3. Re:Thanks for Fixing the Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative · on Google Fixes IE Bug

    http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
    http://dynarch.com/projects/htmlarea/
    http://fckeditor.net/
    http://bnl.gov/itd/htmleditor/

  4. I do this now by Safety+Cap · · Score: 3, Insightful · on Making Money Using Open Source Software?
    I use OSS to augment and supplement my own code that I then sell to others.

    Recent examples include things like displaytag library, Hibernate and HTML Area.

    Of course, this means I must take a wide berth around GPL'd code, but there is enough stuff under BSD/Apache/whatever to get the job done.

  5. Re:Yuck by mcrbids · · Score: 1 · on Are we Headed for a Wiki World?

    There really should be a wiki with a decent front-end for generating the actual HTML. I know of two that could be part of the codebase...

    1) SPAW editor

    2) HTML Area

    Both are pretty decent, and available under free(ish) licenses. Spaw could use a security audit, but both are very nice and work well in popular browsers (IE & Moz, I don't know about others)

    Why hasn't anybody integrated this with a wiki?

  6. Re:Embedded ActiveX with IE... by acebone · · Score: 1 · on Mozilla Starts Work On XForms

    Click here

    Read here

    This CMS already uses it, I bet others do as well

  7. Re:Embedded ActiveX with IE... by acebone · · Score: 1 · on Mozilla Starts Work On XForms

    Click here

    Read here

    This CMS already uses it, I bet others do as well

  8. Re:Not cross platform by activewire · · Score: 1 · on Yahoo! Acquires Oddpost

    As usual the problem here is NOT that other browsers are incapable of WYSIWYG functionality. The problem is the developers have chosen to use non-standard (IE-specific) methods, even though other methods exist which ARE cross browser compatible. Here is an example of a WYSISYG cross-browser HTML editor: http://dynarch.com/htmlarea/examples/fully-loaded. html This is an extreme case of DHTML/javascript. And yet there are very very few if (isIE) then ... else ... branches in the source code.
    Here is clear proof that advanced cross-browser code is very possible without writing it all twice.

  9. Re:More opensource CMSs by lux55 · · Score: 3, Informative · on Plone 2.0: eWEEK Reviews, Raves About OS Software

    Ours does, and it's cross-platform too (based on Mozilla's Midas extension, available since Moz 1.3). You can check it out here:

    http://www.sitellite.org/

    In fact, we're not the only cross-browser WYSIWYG editor in town either (ours is already built into the CMS however). Another I know of is here:

    http://dynarch.com/mishoo/htmlarea.epl

    I'm sure there are others as well...

    The big benefit we've had so far with it is that a lot of our users come through web design shops, and design shops have traditionally been Mac shops. With Mozilla support, we can offer something our customers can use even on Macs.

    Cheers,

    Lux

  10. How about htmlarea by a.koepke · · Score: 1 · on Better Browsers for Text & Form Handling?

    There is a product called htmlarea which is fully cross browser compatible and doesn't write crap HTML code like all the IE only ones.

    The real funky thing about this one is that there are spell checker and tables modules available for it.