Domain: fradical.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to fradical.com.
Comments · 6
-
Blacks have opposed degrading lyrics for years
So, black rappers, black people, and other such and such groups are going to use some offensive slang ant it wont be counted as offensive, but when a white person uses them it will be SO bad an offense that it will cause them to be fired.
"Black people"? I'm black. My family and friends are black. We will not tolerate the use of those words in out presence. I think you meant to say "some black people."
Rappers? Yep, many do use those words. And believe it or not, both Al and Jesse, as well as many other influential blacks like Oprah, Rosa Parks, Bill Cosby and Chuck D have been been going after misogynistic and violent lyrics for some time
So why is this stuff so pervasive in rap music? This movie address the question, and the answer is simple: because it sells. Kirk Franklin and Yolanda Adams can produce all kinds of uplifting music, but as long as Eminem and 50 Cent sell 10 million albums, people are going to make music in that vein - and by the way, once a rap album crosses the 750,000 sales mark, it's not just black people buying it.
Just like in the Imus case: follow the money. The same people who are suing grandmothers are also the ones facilitating the production, marketing and distribution.
-
Re:In other news...
Actually, the decline in murder rates corresponds to increased economic performance under Clinton.
You can't really prove anything by correlation. Quite a few things changed over that tiime period. Levitt and Dubner, in "Freakonomics" make a pretty persuasive case that the decline in crime is due to easier access to abortion.
What we can say, however, is that if violent TV, movies, and videogames do not actually reduce real-world violence, then any pro-violence effect of these influences must be small relative to other social, economic, and demographic factors
Mixing violent TV shows with a culture of guns is dangerous. The stats show it - 3x the murder rate.
So are you claiming that the US did not have a higher murder rate than Canada prior to violent US TV shows? It's a bit risky to compare statistics collected with different methodology, but this chart doesn't seem to support the notion that a greater crime rate in the US than Canada is a particularly modern phenomenon. Looking at these data, one would tend to ascribe the difference in crime rates to long-standing cultural differences rather than to modern entertainments. -
Re:Their lives are too stressful to pay attention!
But video games are to violent!
The Inter-net says so so it must me true! -
Video Game ratings exist!
A search on google finds: ESRB Game Ratings - Game Rating & Descriptor Guide
But what happens are these ratings aren't enforced during purchase. I have here an article: Minors Buying M-Rated Games
Just like if the theaters don't enforce the rating, children can sneak in or in this case purchase video games that weren't intended for their age. -
sue Courts/Lawyer?Isn't this really the fault of the lawyers and the courts?
Think about it: one of these lawsuits come out every year. Whether it's a band being sued, a movie, or a video game, these lawsuits NEVER win.
So if the lawsuits never win why are they filed? Because it's usually easier and cheaper for the game manufacture, movie studio or band to just pay out a million to settle the case, and that's why they file, in the hopes the defendant will just settle and they'll become instant millionaires.
I think that's crap, and the lawyers and courts should be held responsible for their negligence, otherwise we're just going to hear more of these frivolous lawsuits.
-
Re:Canada's Great eh?> Fucking monkey
... rights without responsibility is like a gun without a trigger. Useless!
So, let's see, my responsibility is to keep my country from being invaded by American ideals? Sounds a lot like the CCCP.
Those sorts of ideals belong in soviet Russia, not in a free country.
>It's not communism - read a little history - these are the founding principles of Canada.
No, you read your history. These are Canada's founding principles. You have a choice, believe in those, or get down on your knees like the peasant scum you (and technically myself) are and lick the Queen's boots like the one would under British rule, as the Dominion of Canada always was.
Let me quote the section of the charter of my Canadian rights and freedoms I hold most dear:
I associate with Americans. I am Canadian. I exercise my right to do so under the law. People like you would take the basic freedoms of this country and grind them down to the point where we would put up a great wall of Canada to keep us from understanding the opinions of America. People like you are nothing but bigots, and damn me under the hate speech laws people like you have created, but I hate people who would destroy my basic rights to support ideals considered foreign, but not illegal, under the law.
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
I simply will not supplant myself to xenophobia.
And if you think my preference to American ideals makes me a traitor to Canada (as you clearly infer), then you had better lock me up in jail because I would rather die before I give up my right to associate with any group I want.
I hope you don't take that too personally (I guess it would be hard not to) but honestly, can't people such as yourself see that by _forcing_ me to _not_ associate with America that you are violating my most basic Canadian rights?
I have the right to have a 100% American show under the Charter of Rights and the only thing in my way is an institution so full of itself it feels it should have the right to tell me what to say and hear.
You do know it follows that if you control what one can say and hear, that you must control what they think and do? Does that not seem fundamentally wrong to you? I will not be controlled by you. I will not be silenced by you. I will convince others to believe in our fundamental freedoms, no matter what Sheila Copps would want.
It seems I've already had some effect.
I just wish we could have all the intolerant people who would rather silence than listen experience what it's like on the other side, to be told that for the solidarity of your country you can't do something you fundamentally believe in. Something that harms nobody. Something classified today as a crime. A crime without a victim, apart from the traditional British roots this country would often do better without.
Is it your opinion that rather than the elected government make laws, that unelected institutions like the CRTC and the Supreme Court define them?
If not, explain why it was wrong of the Supreme Court to make it illegal for me to watch American TV?
And if you suggest that it was always illegal, just not clear that it was, and so therefore no new laws were made, why don't they arrest all the people who have been violating the law for all these years by contaminating Canada with American television?
And, last, but not least, what, exactly, do you fear of American ideals contaminating Canada? If it's terrorism, I think you'll see that really isn't the American way if you read their history.