Slashdot Mirror
Domain: glf.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to glf.org.
Comments · 8
-
Gates due to his charity
According to this site, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates has donated $7.3 billion dollars. I despise microsoft as much as the next slashdotter but seriously, the guy has given away $7 billion dollars to people in need of help. I wish Linus and Jobs were more successful than Gates however there are more important things than technology.
-
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
Re:Well, here's a thought.
That's a stock laundering scheme? 3% of it in stocks, and that's a stock scheme? Give me a break. What the forbes article implies is that they have a very low amount of stock.
the Gates Foundation held only $728 million of stocks, a mere 3% of its $21.6 billion in net assets (emphasis mine)
The forbes article implies absolutely no wrong-doing. So now I've learned that they have "an investment valued at $226 million (in) Cox Communications" and that the author of the forbes article believes their total stock investment to be lower than expected.
And now we read the excellent business journal DSLReports who we've all come to rely on for hard hitting business news and insight. Like their latest article:
Old Trojan, New Twist
Usenet groups flooded with claims of 'Bin Laden' suicide photos
Look for more analysis of evil charities next week!
How about you learn something?
2004 Grants
2003 Grants
2002 Grants
2001 Grants
2000 Grants
1994-1999 Grants
Here's one for you to chew on:
12.7.1999 The Vaccine Fund
$750,000,000 over 5 years to support the immunization of children in 74 countries through the purchase of new vaccines -
foundation galore!
Anonymity is just a myth.