Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: goatse.cx

Stories and comments across the archive that link to goatse.cx.

Comments · 12,559

  1. And don't forget to sign the petition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1 · on Phantom Menace Pre-Orders Available

    At the official Boycott Amazon site

  2. too late, d00d (mitnick homepage@2600) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Phantom Menace Pre-Orders Available

    (FrEE KEVIN NITMACK!)

    He's already free. Check out his updated homepage at 2600, moron.

  3. linux-india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Why Linux Makes Sense for India

    Viva la revolution at http://linux-india.com/!!!

  4. i agree. check out my anti-troll club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on PET Computer Article, Circa 1978

    check it out if you hate trolls like that.

  5. PET picture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on PET Computer Article, Circa 1978
    If you are be looking for picture of VERY OLD Comodor PET computer than try here .

    VERY old...

  6. Re:His identity revealed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on NSA Spy Computer Crashes

    Damn it! Alright, you have Found me out. Here is the real story . Please, I must leave now.

  7. Re:I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on NSA Spy Computer Crashes

    Yeah, about 50% of the time.

    Then I get sick of Netscape crashing or want to play Quake 3 without it running / looking like a goat's ass.

  8. Re:Nothing wrong with "illegal mp3's" by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2 · on Phish Offers Archive Concert in MP3
    I think that the "rationalization" is at least in part valid. Theft has two components to it: the thief causing herself to have something that belongs to someone else, and the thief depriving the owner of something they rightfully own.

    In the case of data theft (in this case, the taking of music created by someone else), although the first component clearly exists (thereby making it something a lawyer can call theft), the second may or may not. Ater does raise an interesting point: if you are not depriving the original owner of anything, have you stolen from them? Lawyers representing the interests of IP publishers say yes, of course, and for the most part case law supports them. However, if you are depriving the IP's creator of nothing other than a payment, and if given the choice between paying for the IP and completely doing without the IP, you'd do without it, I think things get a bit more nebulous from an ethical perspective, though not a legal one.

    And don't go saying things like "if it weren't for the money, nobody would create art." I'm sure Linus Torvalds etc. would disagree.

    --

  9. Re:Where's my sweet 666? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on AMD Planning 1GHz CPUs

    Well, by that rationale it would have been pentium 67, pentium 167, p2-267, etc, and it's not. I can't really see what an Athlon at 1 Ghz could possibly do for my ircin' tho, my 504 mhz K6-2 seems to handle it nicely ;)

    /Helge

    Lookie! Be sure to check the giver too!