Domain: halos.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to halos.com.
Comments · 41
-
Re:First
Just a note, he was published 20 times on this particular topic. Go here for details. http://www.halos.com/reports/index.htm
-
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
Re:wtf is pollonium?
Sure, why not.
I'd like to see the talkorigin flimsy responses enter into something peer review, but they know better.
Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report,
February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union60, 474. PDF
RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML
PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89.HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints -
wtf is pollonium?
i might be missing something, but ive never heard of pollonium.
i know of polonium, so it looks like an apparent typo.
speaking of polonium, you should see something thats passed peer review for decades that will no doubt ruffle some feathers. its sad how few people know of this, thats our 'education' system at work for ya. and yes, im sure someone will link also to the talkorigins page on this, or something of the like -- which is why ill restate now that this has passed peer review, the alternate explanations/theories on sites like talkorigins have not.
polonium-218 radiohalos in granite found around the world
http://www.halos.com/
long story short, its clear evidence that the igneous foundation granites were not formed over millions of years of cooling, but rather they (the rocks) themselves materialized almost instantly. -
Re:And in related news...
Ummm, I believe that your "fact of the matter" is WRONG. For one example, take the world of Robert V. Gentry on polonium microspheres found in granite. An overview of this peer-reviewed work is availabe at http://www.halos.com/
Here's a quote from the site:
Did you know that scientific evidence abounds to support the biblical accounts of creation and the flood? Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature? Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?
I suspect that your answer to all of these questions is "no." I advise you to put serious study into Dr. Gentry's work and find any published evidence in a peer-reviewed journal that refutes his findings and the resulting conclusions that the earth's granite was formed in a very short period of time and could NOT possibly have taken "billions of years" to cool from an early, molten state. -
Re:Why this is important
Ah, I see their 2 videos are now available in DVD and free downloads: http://www.halos.com/videos.htm
-
Re:Why this is important
-
Re:Odd.
Had you bothered to review any of the links yourself, rather than going against it simply because it is against what you were taught at school by the mislead, you would have discovered that it isn't, as you put it, 'one wacko', but the entire scientific community through their inability to disprove it for the last several years (read, decades.).
Robert Gentry's has worked for years at the Oak Ridge National Lab and has had much scientific data published in magazines and reports such as:
Science, Nature, Geophysical Research Letters
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Physical Review Letters,
Annual Reviews of Nuclear Science
All of which are publications that are printed for peer review, so other scientists can hold the data to scrutiny and try to recreate the project given the provided data.
Why is it that the 'open minded' are open minded to anything so long as it doesn't deal with them having to be heald accountable for their actions? -
Re:Odd.
In a broader meaning, science can be taken to be the search for the workings of nature, and that would probably include certain religions. The fact that many people view any religion as a bunch of unfulfilled promises is telling. As is the fact that I see people who have "lost faith" in science and turned to some other framework to explain the world to them.
Science really is just another belief system, which has enough things reasonably explained so people think it's going to lead them to the whole truth. It isn't.
I agree with you on most everything except some of the above, I believe that Science and Religion can totally coexist and back eachother up on many many levels.
Example: Scientist Robert V. Gentry, in the 60's or 70's, completely invalidated the 'Billion year earth' and Evolution theory with the shocking discovery that Granite had to be created instantly, as opposed to being created over the course of billions of years cooling down from lava. You might be thinking "Oh BS, if that were the case, we wouldn't be teaching evolution in school as the primary theory." Thats what I thought too. See for yourself.
Some of his other more recent, and shocking, work was censored (more like deleted off a gov funded public website, twice, then his password changed) by fellow 'open minded scientists' because they knew it would turn the scientific world completely upside down.
You should watch his videos, they are from like the 70s or 80s, and ittl make your head spin when you see what kind of evidence they have to show, considering after that sort of groundbreaking research we should have never been teaching this totally bunk theory of evolution. -
Re:Odd.
In a broader meaning, science can be taken to be the search for the workings of nature, and that would probably include certain religions. The fact that many people view any religion as a bunch of unfulfilled promises is telling. As is the fact that I see people who have "lost faith" in science and turned to some other framework to explain the world to them.
Science really is just another belief system, which has enough things reasonably explained so people think it's going to lead them to the whole truth. It isn't.
I agree with you on most everything except some of the above, I believe that Science and Religion can totally coexist and back eachother up on many many levels.
Example: Scientist Robert V. Gentry, in the 60's or 70's, completely invalidated the 'Billion year earth' and Evolution theory with the shocking discovery that Granite had to be created instantly, as opposed to being created over the course of billions of years cooling down from lava. You might be thinking "Oh BS, if that were the case, we wouldn't be teaching evolution in school as the primary theory." Thats what I thought too. See for yourself.
Some of his other more recent, and shocking, work was censored (more like deleted off a gov funded public website, twice, then his password changed) by fellow 'open minded scientists' because they knew it would turn the scientific world completely upside down.
You should watch his videos, they are from like the 70s or 80s, and ittl make your head spin when you see what kind of evidence they have to show, considering after that sort of groundbreaking research we should have never been teaching this totally bunk theory of evolution. -
Re:God and science
I love your points, and I'd like to add a few more to the collection.
First is Robert Gentry's pleochroic halos research in granites with Po-218. These papers, published in Science and in Nature in the 60's and 70's, show that the foundation rocks (granites) of our continents were formed in seconds, not m|billions of years. Basically it shows there to be halos which could only exist from an isotope with about a three minute half-life as the initial phase. If the rocks were molten, the halos would not form with Po-218 as the parent. Only by either radically changing the radioactive decay rate, or by solidifying rapidly could they contain these halos. For details, see his book or summaries at his web site. Note that his research was never refuted in peer-reviewed journals equivalent to the ones his work was published in. There's a really weak attack on him at talkorigins, and if someone wants to try to defend Brawley's post there, go right ahead.
Next I'd like to highly recommend Russ Humphrey's paper on the decline in total energy in the earth's magnetic fields. The traditional response by evolutionists and old-earth advocates has been that the magnetic field energy is shifting from the dipole to nondipole moments (quadrapoles, octapoles, etc.) in preparation for an eventual field reversal. However Humphreys shows from detailed data that both the dipole and non-dipole moments are decreasing (non-dipole is slower but definitely decreasing). See his paper at CRSQ.
Further work by Gentry is about helium retention in deep rocks. Basically this comes down to two points: helium in deep rocks has not escaped, although it should have if they were the billion-year old strata they are claimed to be. Second, the amount of He in the atmosphere is 0.05% of what would be expected over 5 billion years (including the rate of He escape from the atmosphere over that time). Gentry's paper is: Gentry, R.V. et al., "Differential helium retention in zircons: implications for nuclear waste management", Geophys. Res. Lett. Vol 9, Oct 1982, 1129-1130. It's also in his book.
Further examples are salinity of the ocean, mud in the sea, comet deterioration rates, and too few "stone age" skeletons. -
Re:I don't have the book but...
Thanks for the reply.
In my opinion, having read and listened to Behe a fair bit, is that his fundamental point about ID is that the initial steps, like the flagellum motor or the eye could not possibly have arisen without divine intervention. That's his area of expertise, and he accepts without criticism what most of his colleagues in other branches of bio say. But again, the original poster made a statement which was overly broad which I was trying to correct.
And you're quite right that Ms. Scott is far from the only one to call Behe (mistakenly) a creationist in the YEC camp. Having read his book and some of his other works, I do not classify him as such. However neither is he a pure neo-Darwinist as the initial poster claimed.
And you're quite right about knee-jerk jerks on all sides of this issue. I admit I flip the bozo bit on some evolutionists when they start citing Miller-Urey or Haeckel as being great proofs of Darwin.
BTW if you want to stretch your mind, try Gentry's book. It's far afield of Darwin, but very interesting. -
Re: transposons
You and I have had previous discussions on this, but for those who have an open mind and who are willing to consider facts and not dogma, read Robert Gentry's book (get it from a library if you don't want to spend on it) "Creation's Tiny Mystery" about Polonium halos, and why they disprove much of the underlying concepts of ancient-world geology.
If you're going to respond with a "refutation web site", please don't bother with the one on talkorigins by Brawley, it's been discredited so many times they should really remove it. Same goes for any site that tries to use Odom and Rink as being against Gentry; their letter after their paper clearly shows attempts to use them as refutation is pointless. -
Re:the bible was right...You said
I think there is reasonable doubt about the possibility of a flood that covers ALL mountains
So why are there fossillized sea creatures on top of Mt. Everest?
Just from the earth's magnetic field rate of decrease alone, there is ample evidence for a very young (~6000 years) earth indeed. Why object to something that has hard scientific evidence like Po halos? -
Re:Creationism?
I beg to differ with your cavalier dismissal of creation science - it is not as you characterize it. Of course there are charlatans in all areas of science, and creation science is sadly not free of them either. But then again neither is evolution science (can you say Piltdown Man?).
How about science based on articles published in Science and Nature - would that qualify as main-line enough for you? One now-revealed creation scientist did so for about twenty years or so; and his experimental results showed that the earth was formed very rapidly, not over (m|b)illions of years.
Check it out here if you are willing to open your mind and see that there is something to investigate and learn from. -
Re:I've read this book as wellPoint of order here, you said
the Christian Scientists who continue to claim to have scientific proof showing the flood and the Genesis creation story.
The problem with your statement is that "Christian Science" is a cult that claims to be Christian, and has even less to do with science.
Creation Science, probably what you intended to disparage, on the other hand is using solid scientific methods (repeatable, verifiable experiments) to show harmony with God's word in how this world and we got to be here. For example, Polonium Halos.
The difference may mean little to you, but it is quite significant. -
Re:The above posts defense of Gentry in a nutshell
Gentry has published in Science, in Nature, in Geophysical Research Letters, in Physics Today, and other presitigious, evolutionist first-tier publications on the subject of pleochroic halos. Only when his non-establishment views were widely publicized did he get shut out by closed-minded editors. His papers were peer reviewed and accepted for decades. He was a scientist at Oak Ridge National Labs.
What further qualifications are you suggesting he should have? -
Re:Yet another sorry day for creationists.
The testing of the Mt. St. Helens lava dome rocks was done using the exact same labs as other scientists use; please don't suggest that the labs knew the philosophy of the submitters of the rocks and altered data based on that... The fact that orthodox publications wouldn't accept it for publication tells more about their prejudice than the veracity of the facts.
But let's look at other problems with age issues: pleochroic halos of Polonium in granite. Don't bother trying to cite Brawley's weak counter to it on talkorigins, that is so full of already experimentally closed holes that it isn't worth the bandwidth to send people to look at it. Gentry experimentally proved, in a set of peer reviewed publications (Science, Nature, Geophysical Letters) that the halos could only have come from primordial Po.
And that means that the bedrock granite of the continents formed in seconds or minutes, not in millions of years. Gentry has repeatedly issued a challenge, a way to falsify his model, but no one has been willing to publish results of trying.
And then let's consider the issue of Helium; if the world were as old as evolutionists need it to be in order to believe in abiogenesis and "goo to you" evolution, then the amount of Helium in the atmosphere would be way higher than it is. And the amount of He in bedrock deposits would be a lot less, it would have diffused out millions or billions of years ago. But it hasn't, it's still in the rocks.
Radiometric dating, whenever an object of known age (Hawaiian volcanoes, Mt. Etna, Mt. St. Helens) is tested, comes up with big errors. By any reasonable standard, that shows that method is broken or falsified. Certainly not that it's reliable enough to base your belief system on, unless you are willing to make a leap of faith much greater than I would be willing to make. -
Re:Micro-evolution = yes, Macro = no
Speciation as far as loss of genetic information due to damaging mutatations is indeed common, and does lead to non-interfertile sub-populations. For example, in the London subway, after one hundred years the mosquitos could no longer interbreed with surface mosquitos. But you know what - they were still mosquitos. No new genetic information had been created, they had just mutated in a way to lose the ability to interbreed with the surface mosquitos.
And observe the fact that for many decades, fruit flies have been bombarded with gamma and other radiation in the lab. Tons of mutations have been observed. Every one was the result of a loss of information - as the four-winged one shows, it was a loss of three crucial genes that turned the counterbalance limbs into wings. No movement toward a new species has been seen yet. The number of generations and the amount of induced mutations indicate that evolution is not happening in situations where that was the goal. It's not possible to prove a negative, but the evidence is piling up on poor Darwin.
Remember that Darwin himself said that if the cell was found to be anything but a very simple object, his theory would be disproved. Every year we hear of more and more amazing complex things inside bacteria, from flaggela motors to ion pumps that it's very hard to look and and not see DESIGN stamped on them.
And please, don't bring up the peppered moths (faked by Kettlewell et al.), nor horse fossils (seeing as Hyrax is still alive, and that in places the "descendants" were found in layers below their "ancestors").
And since the earth has been shown to have formed rapidly, the evidence being published in several prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals and never refuted in the peer-reviewed journals (don't bother citing the talkorigins article by Brawley, Gentry disproved that objection experimentally many years ago), there wasn't time for macro-evolution anyway. -
Re:The earth changes..
Yes, radiocarbon dating is an awesome tool. It has shown that living molluscs are thousands of years old. And since it's been shown that C14 is not yet at an equilibrium point in the atmosphere, there's an argument to be made that C14 not a reliable tool across the board. And what about other radiometric dating tools? Well K-Ar dating has shown that 8 year old rocks formed in the dome at Mt. St. Helens were dated at a range of 350,000 to 3,500,000 years.
Hard facts show that radiometric dating is not a reliable tool. Polonium pleochroic halos show that the earth formed quickly, not slowly. Yes, I've read the talkorigins argument about pleochroic halos; unlike the original research, it is not peer reviewed and has many gaps. An open mind and the hard facts should make anyone willing to think and consider non-orthodox views realize that billions of years isn't any more scientific than when it was proposed in the early-mid 1800s. -
Re:Unsurprising
How about papers in Nature or in Science? There have been several from, for example, Robert Gentry here. He presents a very, very solid case for primordial granites being formed in a matter of seconds or minutes with the Polonium halos found in them only explainable that way. He has issued a very simple challenge to old-earthers, and no one has taken him up on it yet.
I for one (and far more capable people besides myself clearly) am not trying to quote about evolution breaking the second law; a much more cogent approach is to discuss information theory in relation to evolution than the oversimplified second law of thermo.
As for quoting out of context, that's a human failing that all sides of this have done; I don't see how that is strictly and only on one side. -
Re:Missing the point
Even more persuasive than the inaccurate radiometric dating is the polonium halos which show that the primordial rocks were made in minutes, not thousands or millions of years.
If you have a good lawyer, then showing that the particular radar gun used has misclocked trees as speeders introduces reasonable doubt, and you're off. Of course personaly testimony of someone who was injured by the sonic wave might be introduced as well :-)
Actually if you look at all the sources of He, the rate of escape, and the amount on the planet, it does work out to fitting well for thousands of years. Sure some He escapes, but the generation rate is higher currently than the escape rate. The equilibrium point is much, much higher than the current level. Since He is as inert as it gets, it isn't bound into compounds so it's a better measure than most. -
You do live a sheltered life, don't you?
The details might not be correct, but essentially, there is no known counter-evidence, and no reason to suggest it is incorrect.
Gentry's haloes are a good start; the absence of intermediate fossils launched Punctuated Equilibrium (which otherwise has no leg to stand on); simple maths shows that it's impossible anyway and the list of ``reasons to suggest it is incorrect'' rolls on towards the horizon.