Domain: hoover.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to hoover.com.
Comments · 9
-
Re:seems to work
My hoovercraft is full of eels
But it seems to be financed through subconscious advertising.
-
Re:Is it cos I iz black?
That's because Hoover sucks
...Is that good or bad?
-
Re:Is it cos I iz black?
That's because Hoover sucks
-
Re:No there arn't
-
Any ant-theme works?
As an ant geek, I have to ask: Are there any ant-theme ones?
I already have:
1. Photograph: Ants carrying a float.
2. Photograph: A pick-up truck with ants: This picnic is suffering from a serious ant invasion. -
Re:WTF?
-
(OT) Hoover�
everytime my girlfriend unplugs it to hoover (vacuum for those in the USA).
Has Maytag really lost the trademark on Hoover® outside the United States? Or is it in the same limbo where Kleenex® and Xerox® seem to fit?
-
OT: Re:Companies take this stuff seriously.
They just didn't want MIPS to become another Hoover. People call vacuum cleaners hoovers and now hoover have lost their trade mark.
Discussions are so much more fun when you can just talk out of your ass, aren't they? From http://www.hoover.com/xq/asp/qx/docs/copyright.htm : "Some Of The Trademarks Of The Hoover Company: ...HOOVER®..."So what was that you were saying about "hoover have lost their trade mark"? Your general point is correct, though - in the US legal system, you must aggressively defend your trademarks.
-
Way to go with the smart tags!So, I have to say, I was surprised to see a story on Slashdot with so many damn hyperlinks in it. Not to mention that some of them were rather trollish.
But what really sucks is that Slashcode's inane
. link exposer for people who are too stupid to look at the bottom of their browser's window to see the URL that they're clicking on has basically ruined this joke.