Slashdot Mirror

What do you have against discussing a problem

The lack of any evidence that said problem actually exists. Start with a survey of what jobs women and men actually prefer doing. That's the first step in empirically proving that sexism exists, but feminists refuse to do such research because it will debunk their anecdotal claims. Norway knows what's up. The most equal countries in the world have greater gender differences, esp. in job selection. What you're calling a "problem" is the fact that women have more freedom to express their choice in job preference. I suppose your "solution" would be less choice, maybe forcing women and men into jobs they do not want? Something akin to Communism? (indeed, here we reveal the true nature of the social justice warrior beast) Behavioural differences between men and women are cross-cultural (meaning: not socialized).

In short: There is no evidence a problem exists. Should we be hemming and hawing over the alleged existence of a teapot orbiting between here and Mars? Never mind that there is no evidence for its existence, let's waste time discussing the question of who could have put it there? Just because SJW whines about something that allegedly affects women doesn't mean we should engage our gynocentric bias and suddenly declare that correlation is suddenly causation. Hint: The SJW does not want to admit that any "issues facing women" have been addressed, as this means their job is over. For instance, see how SJW "rape culture" hysteria has removed an alarming amount of due process. According to SJWs none of the drastic changes we have made has done anything to cure the problem they claim still exists -- they seek MORE erosion of rights to address their baseless accusations.

In other words: Once you pay the Danegeld, you will never be rid of the Dane.

P.S. The wage gap hasn't existed in over half a decade.

There are countless accounts of women facing gender related problems studying CS. What is your argument against those accounts? Are they lying? Perhaps you dismiss their problems, or claim that men face equal problems. I'm interested to know your position.

There are countless accounts of men facing gender related problems in all fields due to discrimination labelled Affirmative Action. What is your argument? That we should treat anecdotal tales as indicative of the whole? That would be bullshit. That we should create even more anti-male slant in the workplace via baseless accusation of sexism simply because equal opportunity never yields equal outcomes? Are some lying? YES, of course. When has there been a drought of liars? False accusations are at an all time high now that due process has been replaced by the social shaming scheme. I don't dismiss the legitimate problems, but I would like to point out you're concern trolling over a very insignificant percentage of people. Even if all the accusations you've failed to cite are true it doesn't represent the majority of womens' or mens' experiences in the workplace, so addressing those issues will not fix the problem you're attacking using said anecdotes.

E.g., there is a dearth of male romance novelists. Is the romance novel industry sexist? No. No one can keep a man from writing romance novels. You can not say that there is sexism simply because men and women make different life choices. Even though men and women have the same opportunities this does not mean they will make the same life choices. People like you have priorities out of whack, they try to shame male populated industries for the actions of women by trying to present rarely occurring grievances as the norm. Forty years of feminism and there's no survey of women and men as to what work they actually prefer doing, even though this would be the first step in empirically proving sexism exists. The reason why such studies aren't present is that it will blow your allegations of sexism right out of the water.

That's my position: Professional Complainers never fix anything because then they'd have nothing to complain about and be out of a job; Fostering a "permanent revolution" is the modus operandi of these Critical Theorists. For instance: Take the removal of due process over the past few decades in rape allegations by social justice warriors. Nothing we can do keeps them from lying about the prevalence of the issue (citing anecdotal claims and bogus factoids instead) or gets them to do anything to actually fix the problem (other than blaming all men men for the actions of a few [typical identity politics]).

This makes it seem like they wish there were more female serial killers.

Well.. as long as they were killing men, of course.

History repeats itself once again. Not so long ago it was difficult to convict female serial killers due to the all-male jurors. One of the primary arguments for initial Women's Rights supporters was that unless women were judges and jurors other women wouldn't be held accountable. (See section #6: Chivalry Justice) Unfortunately, after feminists hijacked the women's rights movement they renounced accountability in favor of no-due process or accountability.

It's not that we with there were more serial killers (female or male), it's just that we wish killers were recognized as such.

It's dangerous to date since due process has been removed and you have to prove you're not guilty in the face of rape allegations.

Being guilty until proven innocent... Having your entire life destroyed due to one horrible lying person who can report you anonymously on most college campuses. Yeah, there's a reason that some men are more than just bitter. Avoiding women is the smart thing to do when it becomes so dangerous to be around them.

You've railed on and on, but you're just a clueless simpleton who doesn't know the reality of the situation.

Ah yes, because the boogie man is important, according to "progressive" Social Justice Weenies, that's why we need the oh-so-progressive anti-first-amendment laws, which deem to classify things like "anti-feminism" (disagreeing with unevidenced ideology) as illegal hate speech. If you think I'm joking, I'm not. That's the sort of shit that "progressives" will try as your country gets more progressive. Forcing women away from jobs involving social activity and into STEM is also oh so importantly progressive.

The term "progressive" has no meaning anymore. The "conservatives" and "progressives" that are representatives only vote the way big businesses' lobbyists tell them to. Thus there is only pro-Oligopolistic and everyone else (who always loses).

I'll just leave this here: College has become a toxic and dangerous place for men, thanks to feminists removing due process of law.

Er, you're quite wrong. In fact, there is some evidence that viewing child porn reduces related crimes. Here's a couple of sources for you: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v046j3g178147772/fulltext.pdf http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/legal-child-pornography-reduces-child-sex-crimes-milton-diamond-hawaii