Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: ipv6-test.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to ipv6-test.com.

Comments · 14

  1. Re:Come on slashdot ... by Kergan · · Score: 1 · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    Note that Slashdot is in no way exceptional here:

    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=apple.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=microsoft.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=yahoo.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=oracle.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=twitter.com

    In light of the above bad examples, I was actually surprised that Internic, ICANN and the White House were IPv6-ready...

  2. Re:Come on slashdot ... by Kergan · · Score: 1 · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    Note that Slashdot is in no way exceptional here:

    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=apple.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=microsoft.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=yahoo.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=oracle.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=twitter.com

    In light of the above bad examples, I was actually surprised that Internic, ICANN and the White House were IPv6-ready...

  3. Re:Come on slashdot ... by Kergan · · Score: 1 · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    Note that Slashdot is in no way exceptional here:

    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=apple.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=microsoft.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=yahoo.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=oracle.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=twitter.com

    In light of the above bad examples, I was actually surprised that Internic, ICANN and the White House were IPv6-ready...

  4. Re:Come on slashdot ... by Kergan · · Score: 1 · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    Note that Slashdot is in no way exceptional here:

    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=apple.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=microsoft.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=yahoo.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=oracle.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=twitter.com

    In light of the above bad examples, I was actually surprised that Internic, ICANN and the White House were IPv6-ready...

  5. Re:Come on slashdot ... by Kergan · · Score: 1 · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    Note that Slashdot is in no way exceptional here:

    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=apple.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=microsoft.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=yahoo.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=oracle.com
    http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php?url=twitter.com

    In light of the above bad examples, I was actually surprised that Internic, ICANN and the White House were IPv6-ready...

  6. Come on slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful · on IPv6 Deployment Picking Up Speed

    This is not what I expected from you when facebook and google enabled it long ago ...

  7. Re:slashdot? by six · · Score: 1 · on World IPv6 Launch Day Underway

    Apparently not today.

    Checking for AAAA DNS record
    no AAAA record

  8. Come on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1 · on World IPv6 Launch Day Underway

    Why isn't /. participating ?

  9. Re:On the other hand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on IPv6-only Hosting Won't Make Sense For Years

    Also, what is Elastic Hosts waiting for? Even a pro, IPv6-aware hosting company doesn't have dual-stack? Even after they wrote this article saying it's sad that a market for IPv4 addresses will arise?

    Easy for me to be critical, but isn't this exactly the sort of behaviour that causes the situation they lament, that IPv6-only hosts are severely disadvantaged? We need people who run services on the net (hosting companies) to run IPv6-enabled sites, so we don't have to pay the IPv4 hogs--the old, established internet players, who don't innovate on the internet.

    Slashdot is looking extremely lame now. This is worse than no unicode support, which was just lame, this is actually holding back the internet, and ensuring the brain-damage called NAT stays with us.

  10. Re:On the other hand ... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1 · on IPv6-only Hosting Won't Make Sense For Years

    Because the W3C is the one who standardized IPv6... oh, wait they have fuck all to do with the Internet Protocol standards. On the other hand, the real people behind the IPv6 standard, the IETF, does have a website that is IPv6 ready.

  11. Re:On the other hand ... by somersault · · Score: 1 · on IPv6-only Hosting Won't Make Sense For Years

    Yeah, they should get up to date like the W3C have.. oh, wait.

  12. Re:On the other hand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on IPv6-only Hosting Won't Make Sense For Years

    Dual stack hosting does make sense right now, what is slashdot waiting for ?

    Getting their IPv4 codebase to work properly...

  13. On the other hand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful · on IPv6-only Hosting Won't Make Sense For Years

    Dual stack hosting does make sense right now, what is slashdot waiting for ?

  14. Re:Mac Issue Or IPv6 Issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative · on Mac OS X Problem Puts Up a Block To IPv6

    The issue doesn't show up on Windows 7 at least. I have both v4 and 6to4 connectivity, and tests like this one show that my default protocol is still IPv4.