Slashdot Mirror

At least you didn't link to gay porn or child porn or beastiality or golden showers or shit-eaters or goatse.cx or any crude stuff like that...

At least you didn't link to gay porn or child porn or beastiality or golden showers or shit-eaters or goatse.cx or any crude stuff like that...

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

..

I wanted to do this one letter at a time but decided all the link marks would make it impossible to read..

You know, it's where you fuck up on the Internet and the entire fucking Internet takes a moment to let you know about it.... lol

I think you're getting the effect mixed up with every South Park episode (the whole town comes to a halt, etc.), because I always thought the streisand effect (also a SP episode) was where either an event would snowball as other catch on, or if after one entity does it then others catch on and it starts to mess things up.

Then again, we could be saying the same thing, and in a way I think we are.

You know, it's where you fuck up on the Internet and the entire fucking Internet takes a moment to let you know about it.... lol

I think you're getting the effect mixed up with every South Park episode (the whole town comes to a halt, etc.), because I always thought the streisand effect (also a SP episode) was where either an event would snowball as other catch on, or if after one entity does it then others catch on and it starts to mess things up.

Then again, we could be saying the same thing, and in a way I think we are.

You know, it's where you fuck up on the Internet and the entire fucking Internet takes a moment to let you know about it.... lol

I think you're getting the effect mixed up with every South Park episode (the whole town comes to a halt, etc.), because I always thought the streisand effect (also a SP episode) was where either an event would snowball as other catch on, or if after one entity does it then others catch on and it starts to mess things up.

Then again, we could be saying the same thing, and in a way I think we are.

Asshats. They are asshats.

Asshats. They are asshats.

This is just another example of a true-life story that is so mind-numbingly stupid that you would almost think it came from the front page of The Onion. These tools can suck one.

This is just another example of a true-life story that is so mind-numbingly stupid that you would almost think it came from the front page of The Onion. These tools can suck one.

Remember, when you think of jonesday.com, think goatse.cx.

What a bunch of shysters, eh. Fuckin' dumb ass turtles, wasting everyone's tax dollars, time and shit.

Remember, when you think of jonesday.com, think goatse.cx.

What a bunch of shysters, eh. Fuckin' dumb ass turtles, wasting everyone's tax dollars, time and shit.

Remember, when you think of jonesday.com, think goatse.cx.

What a bunch of shysters, eh. Fuckin' dumb ass turtles, wasting everyone's tax dollars, time and shit.

Remember, when you think of jonesday.com, think goatse.cx.

What a bunch of shysters, eh. Fuckin' dumb ass turtles, wasting everyone's tax dollars, time and shit.

According to this blog and many other sources, the lawyers in question were Dan Malone and Jacob Tiedt, who do indeed work at Jones Day according to their own web site. It's not clear to me what, exactly the issue is there. The names involved in sales of a property are ordinarily recorded as public information (unless it's done through an agent or something). The information about these gentlemen's employment is right on their employer's web site. Is Jones Day claiming that putting this information together is illegal?

The blog cites another article in a law journal about supposed concerns about privacy. Fair enough. But if that's the case then these guys have probably gone out of their way to keep all personal information private.

Wait, what's this? Jacob Tiedt is a pretty distinctive name. There can't be too many of those in Chicago. And, wow, that's strange. Why the heck does the guy's name appear all over the place in a Google search that simply uses "Jacob Tiedt" and "Chicago"? Heck, one of the web pages registers his political donations which ALSO indicates that his employer/occupation is "Jones Day/Attorney" and gives his ZIP code. Lexis Nexis gives all sorts of details too, and (gasp) links directly to the jonesday.com web site. Horrors. And, strange, apparently he doesn't have an unlisted number, because his name is easy to find in the various on-line white pages. It's almost as if he hasn't made the slightest effort to remain incognito.

It looks like Jones Day is going to spend a lot of time in litigation if they want to expunge the web of any links to Jones Day and these guy's personal information, and half of the web pages are as a result of their initial attempts with Blockshopper. Hello? Streisand effect?

The apparent remedy in the settlement was to prohibit links like this: Daniel P. Malone Jr., while links like this: www.jonesday.com/dpmalone are acceptable. Huh? I don't get it.

What a farce.

According to this blog and many other sources, the lawyers in question were Dan Malone and Jacob Tiedt, who do indeed work at Jones Day according to their own web site. It's not clear to me what, exactly the issue is there. The names involved in sales of a property are ordinarily recorded as public information (unless it's done through an agent or something). The information about these gentlemen's employment is right on their employer's web site. Is Jones Day claiming that putting this information together is illegal?

The blog cites another article in a law journal about supposed concerns about privacy. Fair enough. But if that's the case then these guys have probably gone out of their way to keep all personal information private.

Wait, what's this? Jacob Tiedt is a pretty distinctive name. There can't be too many of those in Chicago. And, wow, that's strange. Why the heck does the guy's name appear all over the place in a Google search that simply uses "Jacob Tiedt" and "Chicago"? Heck, one of the web pages registers his political donations which ALSO indicates that his employer/occupation is "Jones Day/Attorney" and gives his ZIP code. Lexis Nexis gives all sorts of details too, and (gasp) links directly to the jonesday.com web site. Horrors. And, strange, apparently he doesn't have an unlisted number, because his name is easy to find in the various on-line white pages. It's almost as if he hasn't made the slightest effort to remain incognito.

It looks like Jones Day is going to spend a lot of time in litigation if they want to expunge the web of any links to Jones Day and these guy's personal information, and half of the web pages are as a result of their initial attempts with Blockshopper. Hello? Streisand effect?

The apparent remedy in the settlement was to prohibit links like this: Daniel P. Malone Jr., while links like this: www.jonesday.com/dpmalone are acceptable. Huh? I don't get it.

What a farce.

According to this blog and many other sources, the lawyers in question were Dan Malone and Jacob Tiedt, who do indeed work at Jones Day according to their own web site. It's not clear to me what, exactly the issue is there. The names involved in sales of a property are ordinarily recorded as public information (unless it's done through an agent or something). The information about these gentlemen's employment is right on their employer's web site. Is Jones Day claiming that putting this information together is illegal?

The blog cites another article in a law journal about supposed concerns about privacy. Fair enough. But if that's the case then these guys have probably gone out of their way to keep all personal information private.

Wait, what's this? Jacob Tiedt is a pretty distinctive name. There can't be too many of those in Chicago. And, wow, that's strange. Why the heck does the guy's name appear all over the place in a Google search that simply uses "Jacob Tiedt" and "Chicago"? Heck, one of the web pages registers his political donations which ALSO indicates that his employer/occupation is "Jones Day/Attorney" and gives his ZIP code. Lexis Nexis gives all sorts of details too, and (gasp) links directly to the jonesday.com web site. Horrors. And, strange, apparently he doesn't have an unlisted number, because his name is easy to find in the various on-line white pages. It's almost as if he hasn't made the slightest effort to remain incognito.

It looks like Jones Day is going to spend a lot of time in litigation if they want to expunge the web of any links to Jones Day and these guy's personal information, and half of the web pages are as a result of their initial attempts with Blockshopper. Hello? Streisand effect?

The apparent remedy in the settlement was to prohibit links like this: Daniel P. Malone Jr., while links like this: www.jonesday.com/dpmalone are acceptable. Huh? I don't get it.

What a farce.

According to this blog and many other sources, the lawyers in question were Dan Malone and Jacob Tiedt, who do indeed work at Jones Day according to their own web site. It's not clear to me what, exactly the issue is there. The names involved in sales of a property are ordinarily recorded as public information (unless it's done through an agent or something). The information about these gentlemen's employment is right on their employer's web site. Is Jones Day claiming that putting this information together is illegal?

The blog cites another article in a law journal about supposed concerns about privacy. Fair enough. But if that's the case then these guys have probably gone out of their way to keep all personal information private.

Wait, what's this? Jacob Tiedt is a pretty distinctive name. There can't be too many of those in Chicago. And, wow, that's strange. Why the heck does the guy's name appear all over the place in a Google search that simply uses "Jacob Tiedt" and "Chicago"? Heck, one of the web pages registers his political donations which ALSO indicates that his employer/occupation is "Jones Day/Attorney" and gives his ZIP code. Lexis Nexis gives all sorts of details too, and (gasp) links directly to the jonesday.com web site. Horrors. And, strange, apparently he doesn't have an unlisted number, because his name is easy to find in the various on-line white pages. It's almost as if he hasn't made the slightest effort to remain incognito.

It looks like Jones Day is going to spend a lot of time in litigation if they want to expunge the web of any links to Jones Day and these guy's personal information, and half of the web pages are as a result of their initial attempts with Blockshopper. Hello? Streisand effect?

The apparent remedy in the settlement was to prohibit links like this: Daniel P. Malone Jr., while links like this: www.jonesday.com/dpmalone are acceptable. Huh? I don't get it.

What a farce.

I wonder if those litigous bastards at Jones Day could edge out SCO for the title of most litigous bastards on the Internet.