Slashdot Mirror

Because, while the U.S. has not ratified any international treaties requiring the recognition and enfocement of foreign judgments, U.S. courts are frequently willing to enforce foreign judgments. A good example of the legal reasoning that allows this to happen is summarized here, although that case involved a U.S. judgment against a foreign national, rather than the reverse situation addressed by the SPEECH act.

The U.S. OSEC has posted a brief summary of the issue here.

For a bigger penis, cum see us

Jizz Donkey Man Bears

Miserable failure

Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits

there is NO WAY I would consider paying that back until I get a letter from a lawyer.

You mean like this one?

For the slashdot effect to work people need to be interested in going to the link.

Maybe instead you should link them to, say, Natilie Portman, naked, petrified, and covered with hot grits. :-)

Hot grits??? You've been around here too long... What we need is a beowulf cluster of these slimeballs from Chicago at the bottom of the sea.

"The first thing we do is kill all the lawyers" (Henry VI, Pt. II).

You do realize the BAD guys said that line in the play. The idea being that without pesky lawyers to interfere on the behalf of regular people the bad guys could do what they wanted.

In the immortal words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does".

We dOnT KnOW ShIt aBoUt InTeRnEt, bUt, wE hAvE a WeBsItE. gO fIgUrE hOw OuR lAw SeRviCe iS

This should be more expensive: 500 hits

Excellent idea. I have used the Jones Day contact form to send them copies of various articles that have appeared on the Web in order to help them understand public opinion on this.

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

So, let's slashdot their website. No "hacking," nothing illegal, just legit linking... and clicking on links from Slashdot. Let's fuck up their servers, logs and bandwidth a bit. This is something I wouldn't normally do nor ask other people to do, but maybe it would help them realize what the Internet is.

Click here to enlarge your penile size

And we will continue linking to complete idiots and calling them the worst lawyers until Google recognizes that the people of the worst law firm in history are a bunch of dicks.

And we will continue linking to complete idiots and calling them the worst lawyers until Google recognizes that the people of the worst law firm in history are a bunch of dicks.

And we will continue linking to complete idiots and calling them the worst lawyers until Google recognizes that the people of the worst law firm in history are a bunch of dicks.

And we will continue linking to complete idiots and calling them the worst lawyers until Google recognizes that the people of the worst law firm in history are a bunch of dicks.

Wrong. Comments are indexed by google. http://www.google.com/search?q=JonesDay.com+sacrifices+Chinese+babies+in+the+name+of+Satan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Someone made a reference up where JonesDay.com Sacrifices Chinese babies in the name of Satan and it's already been indexed.

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1136379&cid=26946099

It's too bad that some crappy law firm can intimidate others into giving up control of their own web site.

I hope that Jones Day gets such bad press from this that no one wants to use their services, and they have to make a living by representing pedophiles like Michael Jackson.

It's too bad that some crappy law firm can intimidate others into giving up control of their own web site.

I hope that Jones Day gets such bad press from this that no one wants to use their services, and they have to make a living by representing pedophiles like Michael Jackson.

It's too bad that some crappy law firm can intimidate others into giving up control of their own web site.

I hope that Jones Day gets such bad press from this that no one wants to use their services, and they have to make a living by representing pedophiles like Michael Jackson.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

I personally think these litigous bastards really have just no idea what people usually think about litigous bastards and that unlike IRL, the people of the internet can still fuck up litigous bastards like them. Its not just because they are litigous bastards, its more because litigous bastards fucking with internet will get what litigous bastards deserve.

Speaking of one typo away from disaster...

Try jonesday.com

Sounds like a cool firm. Check it:

Sherwin-Williams Company, The
State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Association, Inc., et al.
The Rhode Island Supreme Court rejects the Stateâ(TM)s public nuisance claim seeking the abatement of lead paint in buildings by Sherwin-Williams and other former lead pigment manufacturers.

Awesome.

A search for micro-dicked weasels returns this discussion now. The power of Google!

So I might as well do what they dislike the most.

click to find out if there is a picture of a butt bandit here

Try: http://jonesday.com/search/Search.aspx?qu=it

Mod parent AboutToBeSued.
Oh hell, who am i kidding?

But seriously, they just made enemies.
When you screw with the Internet, it will bite you back, 9001 times as bad.
It will only be a matter of time...

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.

Really? You think they're a bunch of litigous bastards? I wouldn't say that... maybe just a bunch of assholes with too much clout in the legal system, and not enough in the real world.

Now now, I'm sure not all of them are assholes. It may well be that some of them are merely incompetent, stupid, or idiots. You know the saying about never ascribing to malice what can be put down to stupidity ... anyway, it would be simply false to accuse them of being malicious or immoral, let alone to suggest that they were associated with things like malpractice, frivolous lawsuits, or being disbarred. Because that would clearly be a lie.