Domain: kevinboone.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to kevinboone.com.
Comments · 7
-
Re:This always happens....
-
Re:The Beeb
As I understand the UK licensing (licencing) law, you would not have to pay a licence fee if you do not have a device capable of receiving or recording TV programming. If you have a DVD player with no recording capability and a monitor without a tuner you may be exempt from licencing requirements.
See http://www.kevinboone.com/tv_licence.html for a but more information.
Also see http://www.tvlicensing.biz/info_on_tvlicensing/
IANAL. -
Re:proper definition...The problem though is defining a concept like consent without placing overreaching restrictions on software developer's freedoms. I mean, the majority of spyware currently obtains your consent in some way to install itself - buried in term number 11, section 3b of the click-through EULA, it is disclosed that you hereby give consent for Claria to install Gator, for example. Of course, they know nobody has enough hours in the day to read EVERY EULA put in front of them, so of course no real consent is ever formed.
This is hardly an excuse.
Let's imagine for a moment that EULAs are legally-enforceable contracts, which they are in Scotland.
Would you say the same thing about any other legally-enforceable contract such as a credit agreement or an employment contract?
When agreeing to a contract whether by signature of by electronic signature, you should always read all the terms of the contract you are agreeing to otherwise if/when things go "wrong" it is the person who agreed to the contract in the first instance who is at fault and no-one else.
Now, the only way I could theoretically see the inclusion of spyware by EULA being ruled illegal would be by something similar to the UK's Unfair Contract Terms Act - I'm not sure whether there is something similar in the US however it could potentially be argued in a court that the inclusion of such applications would be an unfair contract term, however there is no such rules set in stone as to what is and what isn't an unfair term.
-
Re:Before anyone says it...
No, according to Nyquist's theorem, a signal with a frequency LESS THAN 22050KHz sampled at 44.1KHz will be UNIQUELY REPRESENTED. As in, mathematically recoverable. It says nothing about whether a particular filter/DAC/signal processor will be able to perfectly reproduce it. If your frequency is high enough, then you will just end up with some weird beat pattern that may be unique, but in no way represents the original signal when filtered.
Here's a website that explains it in more detail: here. A quote: Myth 3: `sampling at twice the maximum bandwidth is enough: Nyquist's theorem says so.' Wrong! Nyquist's limit is a theoretical abstraction. In practice, experts recommend figures of 2.5 to 10 times the maximum bandwidth. -
Please don't forget the following...
- X10 controller
- GNU Automaton
- an established IPv6 tunnel with your own IPv6 address subnet (it's a whole new world out there)
- SMS server for your cell-phone (good with X10)
- Mobile IP server for your roving laptop
Coffee Maker (this one needs an Java-Dispenser SNMP agent badly)
We're almost there...
-
Re:A small clarification
If you use or install television receiving equipment to receive or record television programme services you are required by law to have a valid TV Licence.
The TV licenceing website is lying. Complaints have been made about it to the advertising standards authority, and an MP called Andrew Carey complained about it in the house of commons. This is easy to check, there are numerous websites with information about the TV licence.
Some links to get you started:
Abolish the TV licence
C.A.L.
Broadband and the TV licence -
Sun + Linux =javastationthis announcement makes this article all the more relevant: Javastation
P