Slashdot Mirror

See, the problem is you only accept data that you BELIEVE is correct, and ignore all other.

Mirror, mirror, Is LynnwoodRooster talking about himself again? Why, yes, ironically he is.

You're the one who produced a report that you accepted with blind faith and devotion since it suited your agenda.

When has that happened before?

A real scientist, a true skeptic (which is the foundation of science) would look at conflicting data and say "more research needed, we cannot draw conclusions". FAITH would demand you adhere to your position. That is religion...

Yes, you are preaching your religion, but if you were a true believer, you'd follow its tenets, however being a disingenuous fraud and con-artist, you simply use them as a club to attack others, as you consistently have.

For you, it is not a teaching, it is a weapon used for assault. You fling it against any who disagree with you, but never apply the learning to yourself.

Hence, I preach unto you, and say "Physician, heal thyself!" as I call upon you, and your multitude of sins to be cured of what clearly ails you, and thus make right thine own entry into Heaven.

Really, you know your history, you should know you are tainted yourself. You should reflect on your errors and come clean. It'd be less of a farce if you did.

Funny how all of the "evidence" you cited comes from ultra-left-wing sources.

You think a right-wing news source is going to report on the utter failure of right-wing policies?

How about the Topeka Sentinal-Journal? http://cjonline.com/news/state...

How about KSN.TV out of Wichita? http://ksn.com/2015/10/26/surv...

By the way, those are both conservative outlets. And that second story? It shows that Republican Governor Sam Brownback's approval ratings are lower than Barack Obama's...in Kansas. You have to be seriously hated to have lower approval ratings than Obama in Kansas.

So do it anyway. Why do you assume it's totally ineffective? A form letter of any kind doesn't mean anything. They count the number of people who contact them about an issue: it's a good indication of whether it could hurt their chances of getting re-elected.

Also, as far as senators go, Moran didn't go raving about terrorists and security. That statement sounds like as of the 4th of july, he hadn't decided which way his voters were leaning.

Your other senator, Pat Roberts, doesn't appear to have made any comments on the NSA or Snowden recently, though I didn't dig too deep. He did defend the program under Bush, but no one is going to call him out on it if he flip flops on it.

Anyway, if enough people call, any representative interested in staying in office (all of them) will at least not vote to preserve the NSA. It's a long shot, but it's slightly longer if you decide you'd rather spend the 5 minutes it would take to call picking your nose instead.

ORLY? I already bought the rights.. see you in court.

http://www.ksn.com/mostpopular/story/Man-forced-to-eat-beard-during-fight/pow5UlsDDk6NQddMbS8dvw.cspx

"Troy offered to buy it from me for $250. I paid $20 for it. He thought I was trying to cheat him," Westmoreland said. "One thing led to another, and before I knew it, there were knives and guns and everything just went haywire."

He says his brother had a mark on his neck, where a knife was held, but Harvey Westmoreland's loss was more permanent.

"They cut my beard and forced me to eat it," he said.

No, more like this man.

To be fair it's apparently NOT hurting the kiddies that much. They're using the sound as a cell phone ring tone their parents/teachers can't hear!