Slashdot Mirror

I think Larry Flint had it right with his satire of this politician years ago in Hustler. Away from ability to google the following "hustler santorum" but I'm sure it will index the proper links.

If I'm not mistaken, you'd need to search more specifically than that. You might need "Asshole of the month" in your search as well as the terms "Rick Santorum" and "Larry Flynt".

BTW, the link above for Rick Santorum contains material which would appall any normal human, but which Santorum himself is probably proud of, in his own morally-twisted way. The other links are to material he would be less enthusiastic about. The Asshole of the month page is from 2007, but Santorum was behaving like an asshole long before that.

"Using a legal loophole is NOT against the law"

Would you kindly try to think independently for once in your life, FooRat???? This legislation - not LOOPHOLE - has been purposely written into law by the same corrupt corporations/foundations/banksters, etc., which bought and paid for it.

Which was why Teddy Roosevelt made it agains the law for corporations to donate to congressional critters to begin with - I realize FoosRat is repeated the same tired mantra or talking points she/he/it has heard on countless foundation-sponsored TV, or foundation-sponsored "news" shows, or foundation-sponsored "journalists," or foundation-sponsored articles, ad nauseum, an infinitum, but this crapola goes back to the '60s, when Marshall Langer, tax attorney, first structured the original tax havens in Bermuda, then in the Caymans.

It's time to read Jeff Faux's Global Class War, dood.

If youre new to John Titor, heres the complete archive of his texts:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/the_john_titor _project.html

An interesting interview with Larry Flynt:
http://www.larryflynt.com/notebook.php?id=95

I have my fair deal of scepticism against John Titor and the claims he has traveled from the future to fetch an old IBM machine besides testing the time-machine, but so much that he wrote about in 2000-2001 thereabouts, has in fact come true. These are just the broad ones:
http://johntitor.strategicbrains.com/

This is yet another drop in this mans pretty hefty prediction bucket. At the time of this link, there were no mentions of black holes being generated in the new smasher, but now it seems that this too will come true (if possible), and very much in the same timeframe as predicted too!
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread124980/p g1

This is the person who even told Hawking was wrong, and later Hawkin conceded he was wrong on the subject!
http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum. cgi?noframes;read=165532

Time Traveller The Movie. John Titor doesnt HAVE to be proven correct. WE can DO something about it, starting with ourselves!
http://www.fasttrackproductions.biz/TimeTravel_0.h tml

A site that is covering news in the media and corelating it with Titors predictions:
http://www.johntitor.com/

I dont claim any of this is true, in whatever what you regard as truth, but when reading this, it is startling how accurate the person who wrote those messages in 2000-2001, is describing the trends of our society, problems of the US, Mac Cow Disease, CERN beginning to experiment with mini-black holes, and much more.. For the sake of our planet, and our future, it is worth considering living as THOUGH weve already been through this, than not. He describes a more primitive, but also a more enlightened society if you read the archives from the first link.

Actually it was the Bush Jr. Whitehouse that started pushing for nuclear powered spaceflight again.

And just how often do you get to use Larry Flint as a source of reference material to back up your /. post?

I can guarantee Larry Flynt will provide the answer in an exlusive photo spread. ;-)

Seriously though, it will behave the same as any other object.

" but in a vacuum, presumably explosion would be quite a difficult problem."

Not with the proper materials and a good compartmentalized design. Try not to think of it like a birthday balloon. Completely different stuff.

Riverside's systems have been running for four years now nearly without a hitch.
How do you know there was no hitch? For instance, in this Spring's recall vote in Riverside, Larry Flynt beat Gary Coleman 540 to 593 - less than 50 votes. How do you know some pr0n loving programmer with an lingering childhood crush on Dana Plato didn't rig those results? No paper trail to prove it either way. And why so many candidates in the last election with 100%? How do you do write-ins on a touch screen? Do you really claim that there was not one single vote for Arhnold for prez?

My god, NO! They're worse than these voting machines, I afraid you're living in a fools paradise :-

- GTech must prove its fitness to keep running lottery
- Just one of the concerns raised in the British Parliament over the years (Hansard).
- Watchdog investigates lottery company's ethics

etc, etc. Not so long ago there was technical problems with their kit resulting in tickets not being centrally registered, they tried to cover it up but an employee resigned an blew the gaff, he was subsequently threatened in various ways.

Mind you, that's nothing compared to the various political mud pools they find themselves in.

This parody of a Diebold ad explains the whole situation quite lucidly.

Larry Flynt says perople think changing it is OK, and I think we can all agree he's the final authority on this sort of thing.

There's a lot wrong with the pledge. First, pledging allegience to the country, flag, president, whatever is slightly off from what our goal ought to be here. You hit it exactly. Pride in America is fine, allegience isn't. Allegience is dangerous. It encourages trust and complicity and all that other shit we're not supposed to have on this side of the Atlantic.

You can proclaim that America is the domain of God all you want, but when the government writes that proclaimation for you, even if you claim to agree with them, I get the heebie-motherfucking-jeebies something awful. And it sure as hell doesn't help when "you" are a minor that's not even old enough to really fully understand the concept of either a god or a country.

And where the hell is this anti-Americanism anyway? I suppose it's just my anti-fucking-American attitude that makes me annoyed that some pathetic, attention-starved whores decided to anally rape both my country and my religion to promote themselves to the death-fearing majority that wouldn't know faith if God shoved it up their asses. I must apoligize that my anti-American attitude forces me to grasp at this little light in the dank cave that my religion's become in the past 20 years.

Honestly, I think the US can survive a badly written meme, but I doubt my religion will, at least not for much longer. Have you been to church recently? I've been. Religion's good for more than deluding yourself into thinking you're not going to die. Or used to be. There's good shit in the Bible, stuff that's worthwhile. Mostly the stuff that's vaguely close to something Jesus actually said. You know, the communist parts. That's what I remember getting when I went to church as a kid. Now, though, I go in and all I get is 2000 year-old food-poisoning hallucinations. Giant fucking sheep in the sky? You can't run a religion on giant fucking sheep. Nobody wants giant fucking sheep. Nobody except people who can't find it in themselves to pay attention without giant fucking sheep. If that's your attitude, why bother? Way too many people have a terminal inability to accept that they just don't fucking believe. Deal with it and move on. Don't try and trick yourself into believing in shit just because you're afraid to think.

Sorry. Luckily I probably won't be going to church again for another decade, so you don't need to worry about another of these rants coming up.

Most definitely the RIAA. The porn industry is mostly run by the maffia, so if you lose all your money, consider yourself lucky.

Oh, and where exactly do you get this kind of information? I'ld really like to know...

It might seem glamourous to think this, but it's simply not true. The industry runs off of money and profit just like any other industry. The larger magazines/sites/filmmakers can afford to get better models and can also afford to treat their models/photographers/employees better. In actuality, the porn industry co-exists with hollywood/mainstream media...they use similar distribution channels and similar business models.

If you look at the history of Playboy Enterprises, Larry Flynt Publications (Hustler)...who might I add runs his own Linux-based weblog, and General Media Communications, Inc. (Penthouse). You will find that they are all owned and operated by corporations/individuals and follow the letter of the law...they have to, because they are watched closely by special interest groups.

And at least in the instance of Hustler, their website is running off of Linux.