Domain: linuxgram.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to linuxgram.com.
Comments · 22
-
Written by Maureen O'Gara!
It should be noted, since Sys-Con is hiding it as "by Linux News Desk", all articles with that by-line are written by none other than PJ-stalker Maureen O'Gara.
The proof? It's currently the free article on Maureen's poorly-named LinuxGram website: http://www.linuxgram.com/
That's all her.
(For those who live in a cave, only surf for porn, etc., Maureen O'Gara wrote a slanderous piece about Groklaw's PJ, wherein she literally tried to stalk PJ, peeking in windows, generally making an ass of herself.)
Sys-Con swore they'd never publish an O'Gara piece again. Good thing noone believed them, since they just hid her behind a "Linux News Desk". -
Re:Original O'Gara Story
I found the article on O'Gara's site: linuxgram.com but without the pictures (which I did not care about anyway.)
-
Re:Where will she go?
It's not a question of if she'll show up again, but when. There's too much at stake for the other side to allow such a willing tool to go unused.
Her willingness isn't the problem, her usefulness is. Her last article was so clearly over the top -- both in terms of journalistic integrity and good taste -- that she's probably too much of a liability for any major publication.That doesn't mean she's been silenced. She owns G2 News and, presumably, hasn't fired herself. So you can still get her viewpoint if you are inclined to pay the $595 a year for her LinuxGram or the amusingly named ePostalNews. I'm sure she'll find a few folk with the spare cash spend so they can read her version of the news.
-
She's not gone for good.
I think you're overstating things. She'll still be around, shilling at linuxgram, and I'm sure we'll see her at SCOForum 2005 if there is one, holding what I can only presume will be an absolutely worthless keynote speech. And just when you thought nothing could top The Endrool...
-
Maureen O'Gara.This is called "grandstanding". It has nothing to do with public rights, but with O'Gara's trying to sell more of her LinuxGram at $195 a pop.
Linuxgram part of G2News and claims to "broken most of the key stories in Linux since it was started several years ago." Her version of "news" includes stuff like this tidbit where she breathlessly reports that some guy -- shown two pieces of code with no background or research (and under a non-disclosure agreement no reputable journalist would sign) -- declares them to be the same. That and numerous similar examples show that her "inside information" is obvious; she's sucking up to SCO by spinning the story their way. In return, they give her "inside information" -- which amounts to trivia like this; who they hired for a lawyer or how much they plan to charge for SCOSource -- so she can claim an exclusive story. This isn't journalism, it's pandering.
Kind of reminds me of the old Daily Show slogan, "When news breaks, we fix it."
Except for O'Gara it's more like, "When no news breaks, we invent some." -
A little background information
Check out the source of the article. I'm not quite convinced yet.
:)From the LinuxGram website ( http://www.linuxgram.com/ ):
"Copyright Notice: While we are flattered that some of our readers may want to pass along copies of our stories to customers, clients, associates, friends, family and co-workers, please know that this practice is illegal, violates our intellectual property rights and undermines our efforts to bring you the kind of reporting you've come to expect..
And, so the legalese: It is illegal to reproduce, copy, photocopy, forward, e-mail, publish, broadcast, post on an Internet/Intranet site, rewrite, store in a retrieval system or otherwise distribute this publication or any portion of this publication or any article in whole or in part by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of G2 Computer Intelligence. -
Turbolinux is dying!
Yet another beleagured bombshell hit the slashdot community today when it was revealed that Turbolinux may be dying. Linuxgram sent this weeniegram purporting the apparent demise.
And it doesn't stop there! Linuxgram hits home with the realization that all the commercial distros are facing problems, and that's why they were banding together to form UnitedLinux. But a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Now it shows that TurboLinux may destroy the whole UnitedLinux project!
-
Correct URL
-
Correct Link
The correct link is Here
-
Correct link
-
I love broke links
-
CORRECT Link
The correct link is located right here at linuxgram.
Also, IGN has measurements of the new device as compared to the old ones here. -
Re:1 quick word:Penguin has jumped back into profitability.
Ummmm... it doesn't appear that Penguin will be around for much longer...
-
Re:Implications for alpha?
If you didn't already know, but Compaq has already dumped Alpha and now Intel has taken over control. And what that means you can surely imagine. With the IA64 coming up they surely don't need another 64bit platform! And probably not a better one...
;-)
-
sadly this happens more often then you�d think.
I was once astroturfed by LinuxGram.
http://www.slashdot.org/articles/01/05/01/1936218. shtml
I was saying that LinuxGram sometimes posts a lot of Crap. Specifically an interview with Volker Wiegand by Maureen OGara where she took everything he said out of context and misquoted him in several places. I cant find the story on their site right now. But here is a summary from fairfax it.
http://it.mycareer.com.au/breaking/20010208/A20552 -2001Feb8.html
Here is a link with Volker Wiegands responce where he says that Maureen OGara deliberately misquoted him. http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-02 -08-002-20-NW-SS
When I posted the comment on Slashdot, two people created new Slashdot logins and replied. One was called SuSE_Rulez and the other was called ingenuity7. You can tell they were knew logins because they hadnt posted before or since. And Slashdot gives the UID numbers out consecutively and I checked to see what slashdot UID I would get on that day and it came right after theirs. Also look how ingenuity7 refers to LinuxGram as CSN which is its less well known parent company. To me he seems to know a lot more than normal people do about LinuxGram.
Of course, when I was astroturfed by LinuxGram I was hardly surprised but this story about LinuxToday is disapointing. Other journalists have replied to my face if I disagreed with them and thats the way it should be done.
-
Sun is Linux enemy #2
They have ALWAYS been an enemy of Linux. Sun exists to sell Sparc boxes and Solaris. They wanted to sort-of help Linux to keep it as a buffer against MS. They didn't perceive Linux as a threat and that was their mistake.
Keep in mind that only a few days ago Compaq announced two items of great importance to Sun.
1. The transfer of the Alpha to Intel. Not just the chip, but the entire development group. This will give Intel so badly-needed expertese in the 64-bit arena. While the UltraSPARC isn't a match for the Alpha, they had Intel beated hands-down. This also kills the Alpha -- leaving only the Sparc and PPC as competitors for Intel (AMD, etc.) Sun is feeling the heat.
2. The impending release of their Sun migration tools. These allow much easier conversion of Solaris programs using the Solaris threading model to the Linux threading model.
IBM has been going great guns for Sun -- remember the Telestra announcement? Replacing how many Sun servers with a single IBM Mainframe running Linux S/370?
Sun is in everyone's sights. Their problem is McNealy's ego only allows him to perceive Microsoft (Bill Gates, actually) as the only possible enemy. The rest are unworthy of his attention.
That cute little penguin is going to cause a serious eclipse in the near future. World Domination doesn't mean just Microsoft.
--
Charles E. Hill -
Some info at Linuxgram
not much but still:
http://www.linuxgram.com/newsitem.phtml?sid=108&ai d=12102 -
Alternate Headline
How about "SuSE layoffs less than 1% of planned Dell layoffs" - see this
-
Whatever happened to objective reporting?This is falling into a pattern that is being seen way too often on Linux news sites. From LinuxGram's "about" page:
What makes us unique is our intelligence, which comes from:
The article says that Intel is working with Linux ISV's to update their CPUID databases. Seems like they're doing the right thing. Is Intel really responsible to contact EVERY OS manufacturer for x86 and let them know that they are releasing a new CPU? I suppose that this is not a popular opinion on Slashdot, but maybe Intel does do some things right...- The best reporters in the industry. We get the story behind the story.
- The best reporters in the industry. We get the story behind the story. A perspective that comes from the years we've been in this industry. We don't just rewrite press releases.
- Contacts at the highest level of every company in the industry. We've even been accused of having bugs in their boardrooms.
- We work harder. We have a proven track record. No other newsweekly breaks more news. Every week. Week after week.
- A fierce dedication to reporting the facts. We get it right the first time - an accuracy rate that is unchallenged.
-
But will it run Linux?
Check this story out...
For those too lazy to read it, it basically says that the P4 will only run Redhat and TurboLinux. Kinda odd how the most commercialized distros work w/ the P4 :-/
-
Let's get this straight...So Sun released a kit that ports Linux kernel drivers to Solaris. The article (if you actually read it) says nothing about them shipping binaries of copylefted software without source.
In other words, Sun's kit assists you in a piece of free software to another platform. Call the cops! There's much sound and fury here, but no real substance. It sounds to me that it's more a matter of somebody getting their knickers twisted about their Free software being used on a closed platform than anything else.
I've decided that these folks at LinuxGram are officially clueless. Take this story (linked from the GPL article), for instance, about KDE and Debian. Among other things, it makes the rather dubious assertions that "[d]espite widespread pressure from the developer community, KDE was left out of... Debian... because of it [sic] wasn't GPL," and that "KDE finally agreed to dual-license Qt".
<trite>Move along, folks, nothing to see here.</trite>
--
-
Another article, less press-releasy ...
(Thanks to Jim)
Here's another, somewhat more informative story on this.
timothy