Domain: linuxsampler.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to linuxsampler.org.
Comments · 8
-
Re:Not really open source if the source isn't open
'..e.g. LinuxSampler still defiantly claims to be Open Source a decade or so after after being dropped from major Linux distributions because it clearly isn't (and has a contradictory licence that doesn't make it properly non-free either).'
I refer you to here and here where there are links to the source code..the various components being covered by GPL, GPLv2, GPLv2, GPL, LGPL, GPL, and GPL with the following exception
'..[*] LinuxSampler is licensed under the GNU GPL with the exception that USAGE of the source code, libraries and applications FOR COMMERCIAL HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS IS NOT ALLOWED without prior written permission by the LinuxSampler authors. If you have questions on the subject, that are not yet covered by the FAQ, please contact us.'
So, not open source, eh? -
Re:Not really open source if the source isn't open
'..e.g. LinuxSampler still defiantly claims to be Open Source a decade or so after after being dropped from major Linux distributions because it clearly isn't (and has a contradictory licence that doesn't make it properly non-free either).'
I refer you to here and here where there are links to the source code..the various components being covered by GPL, GPLv2, GPLv2, GPL, LGPL, GPL, and GPL with the following exception
'..[*] LinuxSampler is licensed under the GNU GPL with the exception that USAGE of the source code, libraries and applications FOR COMMERCIAL HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS IS NOT ALLOWED without prior written permission by the LinuxSampler authors. If you have questions on the subject, that are not yet covered by the FAQ, please contact us.'
So, not open source, eh? -
linuxsampler dropped the ball
The centerpiece of any hip hop studio is the sampler. There exists a very high quality open source sampler called linuxsampler but they are not included in any mainstream linux repos because of their bone-headed, legally invalid licence. So you have to build it from source, a painful process that I've never been able to do in under 2 hours. There is a lot of high quality foss studio software out there, but as long as developers keep dropping the ball like this we're going to see more reinventing of the wheel like this and not a lot of progress. An excellent foss program for beat-making I would recommend is qtractor, but it does not come with a sampler.
-
Re:One word rebuttel to TFA
So the GPL software clause in this software is null and void
-
Linux Music at the brink of "plausible promise"One of the marvelous things about most Linux based music apps is that they run on any architecture. This might seem like a no brainer to some, but as someone that has struggled with 64 bit issues on another (to be unnammed) platform, Linux+Music on x86_64 is pretty impressive. What's even more impressive, to me, is how Ingo's RT patch is working on x86_64 these days. I've had a week of solid uptime since the 2.6.21-rt1 patch.
Rosegarden: Pretty good.
Ardour: The 2.0 release (just out last week) is AWESOME! Get it!
CSound: I like to leave my programming mind behind when I'm working on music.
Sooperlooper: very cool
Freewheeling: also cool
Music distros this summer ought to be pretty good - with new releases scheduled for many of the music distributions.
What bothers me the most these days is plugins and soft synths. There are not enough plugins, the ones we have (like swh-plugins, tap-plugins, caps-plugins, and cmt) aren't heavily optimized for modern architectures (I just spent a weekend working on that) and not enough people out there do dsp programming (myself included) to really gain critical mass for the "perfect EQ" or the "perfect reverb". Still, the plugin solutions are adaquate, just not generally something to rave about. If you know a dsp programmer bored in his day job, show him 64 studio or Studio to go and try to enlist his/her help!
Soft Synths are coming along. Linuxsampler is very nice. Bristol is coming along. There are quite a few more.
I think Linux music is on the brink of plausible promise. I've got 16 tracks of live audio working almost flawlessly right now.
-
Re:Nice interview
I know, that nothing comes close to Ableton Live, but I like the combination of seq24, ZynAddSubFX and LinuxSampler. I haven't tried FreeWheeling so far, but it looks very interesting. Absolutely not comparable to Live, but a very interesting approach.
-
I think we agree
I never claimed that Ardour was a sampler; just that it was a DAW (digital audio workstation).
That being said, thank you for the link. Another up-and-coming project to watch is the Linux Sampler Project. They don't seem to have any major releases yet, but it looks promising (also built on Jack). -
LinuxSampler plays your Organ samples for free
FYI: LinuxSampler is under heavy development and you can already stream multi Gigabyte
.GIG samples (in GigaStudio/Gigasampler format) directly from disk (without evenveloping yet but that will be added soon).
If you can please join their mailinglist / development group.