Domain: mondaynote.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to mondaynote.com.
Comments · 15
-
Hah. Article's lead image screws up the concept
http://www.mondaynote.com/wp-c...
Nice job, dingbat. Your image shows an address collision within about 500 metres.
And you need to learn about drop shadows, or at the very least adding outlines to text.
-
Anyone remember Jean-Louis Gassée?
He tried Theranos blood analysis and is not impressed.
-
Re:Meh. Fuck emYes. Here is the angle this article is trying to spin:
Apple is trying to pull iPhone and iPad users off the web. It wants you to read, watch, search, and listen in its Apple-certified walled gardens known as apps. It makes apps, it approves apps, and it profits from apps. But, for its plan to work, the company will need those entertainers and publishers to funnel their content to where Apple wants it to be. As the company makes strategic moves to devalue the web in favor of apps, those content creators dependent on ads to stay afloat may be forced to play along with Apple.
That's one way to look at it. Here is another perspective:
The absence didn't last long. In two previous Monday Notes (News Sites Are Fatter and Slower Than Ever and 20 Home Pages, 500 Trackers Loaded: Media Succumbs to Monitoring Frenzy), my compadre Frederic Filloux cast a harsh light on bloated, prying pages. Web publishers insert gratuitous chunks of code that let advertisers vend their wares and track our every move, code that causes pages to stutter, juggle, and reload for no discernible reason. Even after the page has settled into seeming quiescence, it may keep loading unseen content in the background for minutes on end.
-
Re:Meh. Fuck emYes. Here is the angle this article is trying to spin:
Apple is trying to pull iPhone and iPad users off the web. It wants you to read, watch, search, and listen in its Apple-certified walled gardens known as apps. It makes apps, it approves apps, and it profits from apps. But, for its plan to work, the company will need those entertainers and publishers to funnel their content to where Apple wants it to be. As the company makes strategic moves to devalue the web in favor of apps, those content creators dependent on ads to stay afloat may be forced to play along with Apple.
That's one way to look at it. Here is another perspective:
The absence didn't last long. In two previous Monday Notes (News Sites Are Fatter and Slower Than Ever and 20 Home Pages, 500 Trackers Loaded: Media Succumbs to Monitoring Frenzy), my compadre Frederic Filloux cast a harsh light on bloated, prying pages. Web publishers insert gratuitous chunks of code that let advertisers vend their wares and track our every move, code that causes pages to stutter, juggle, and reload for no discernible reason. Even after the page has settled into seeming quiescence, it may keep loading unseen content in the background for minutes on end.
-
Re:Meh. Fuck emYes. Here is the angle this article is trying to spin:
Apple is trying to pull iPhone and iPad users off the web. It wants you to read, watch, search, and listen in its Apple-certified walled gardens known as apps. It makes apps, it approves apps, and it profits from apps. But, for its plan to work, the company will need those entertainers and publishers to funnel their content to where Apple wants it to be. As the company makes strategic moves to devalue the web in favor of apps, those content creators dependent on ads to stay afloat may be forced to play along with Apple.
That's one way to look at it. Here is another perspective:
The absence didn't last long. In two previous Monday Notes (News Sites Are Fatter and Slower Than Ever and 20 Home Pages, 500 Trackers Loaded: Media Succumbs to Monitoring Frenzy), my compadre Frederic Filloux cast a harsh light on bloated, prying pages. Web publishers insert gratuitous chunks of code that let advertisers vend their wares and track our every move, code that causes pages to stutter, juggle, and reload for no discernible reason. Even after the page has settled into seeming quiescence, it may keep loading unseen content in the background for minutes on end.
-
Re:ARM for desktop/laptop
That's probably not what he means. It's been hypothesized and rumored that Apple will eventually move all their laptops and desktops away from Intel and use ARM as the CPU. Intel has been behind schedule delivering next-generation chips, which leads to the conclusion that Apple would want to control its own destiny with its own CPUs.
They won't do that until Windows runs full-blown Windows (NOT RT) on ARM (and has some sort of JIT), which it does NOT seem that MS is particularly interested in making happen. RT was designed from the get-go to be a stepchild, at best, of "real Windows", and it looks like that's what it is going to stay.
Apple sells not an insignificant number of desktop and laptop machines because of being able to dual-boot (and do VM) for other OSes (primarily Windows and Linux), and to be frank, that requires Intel (and more importantly, x86) compatibility. And you can bet your bottom-dollar that Apple is VERY aware of that market-segment.
You can be sure that Apple would love to move to ARM, if only for its insanely-good performance/Watt (and to have a tool to pry-down Intel's stupidly-high prices. And people talk about the "Apple Tax"... Sheesh!). But, unless and until Windows either becomes insignificant (which may very well happen in about 10 years) or they develop "RT" into a non-joke OS, don't look for Apple to give up Intel anytime soon. -
ARM for desktop/laptop
That's probably not what he means. It's been hypothesized and rumored that Apple will eventually move all their laptops and desktops away from Intel and use ARM as the CPU. Intel has been behind schedule delivering next-generation chips, which leads to the conclusion that Apple would want to control its own destiny with its own CPUs.
-
Re:Why?
> Similarly, an Intel exec said a few weeks back that there's nothing technological holding Intel back from being able to scale down to where we see ARM's processors.
Yeah, we already had this discussion a few weeks ago
...* http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/10/22/2129217/apple-arm-and-intel
->
* http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/10/21/apple-arm-and-intel/ -
Re:Bye Apple
They could have said everything they said, and just added, "This service is in beta." Maybe a little more color, would have even helped more, but even some acknowledgement that it's still a work-in-progress could have been made. I'm not alone in thinking this.
-
Re:Here is more from John Gruber of Daring Firebal
Hence his not posting a link to http://www.mondaynote.com/2012/09/23/apple-maps/ and then saying: Under-promise, over-deliver. Apple usually does a good job at that, but I agree with Gassée: they did not set expectations properly for the new Maps app.
-
Re:What has /. come to?
Jean-Louis Gassee is a co-author of the blog "Monday Note" but not of this particular story which was written by Filloux. Both Gassee and Filloux contribute one story each week to "Monday Note" which appear, surprisingly enough, first thing on Monday morning.
Gassee's story this week was "iPad Mini: Wishful Thinking?"
Best Regards,
Hugh Pickens -
Re:Groan
Do you have proof that Samsung, Hyundai, and LG run the South Korean government? I supposed it's possible there is an influence; Samsung is the number one Android handset maker, selling 55% of Android phones and putting them in a position to twist Google's arm, perhaps even forking Android. With Google purchasing Motorola, Samsung will view Google as a direct competitor.
-
Re:Jean Louis Gassée, ex-employee and creator
Another "me too": Thank you! Some great articles there
e.g.
This one reveals some interesting history between True Type -- Apple licensed TrueType FREE to Microsoft!?
http://www.mondaynote.com/2010/04/11/the-adobe-apple-flame-war/ -
Jean Louis Gassée, ex-employee and creator of
Turning to HP, this week was their Board’s opportunity to solidify its reputation for incompetence and bad manners. They rose to the occasion.
http://www.mondaynote.com/2011/09/25/how-bad-boards-kill-companies-hp/
-
Re:A Microsoft Nokia bad-analogy award