Slashdot Mirror


Apple CEO Tim Cook Apologizes For Maps App, Recommends Alternatives

TheBoat writes "Tim Cook has apologized for the company's Maps app in iOS 6. 'We are extremely sorry for the frustration this has caused our customers and we are doing everything we can to make Maps better.' Cook said the company is continuing to work on the app, but recommended several alternatives in the meantime: apps from Bing, MapQuest, and Waze, or the map websites of Google and Nokia." This is unusual for Apple, but not unprecedented. Steve Jobs acknowledged reception issues with the iPhone 4 in 2010, but he wasn't quite so contrite about it.

451 comments

  1. Bye Apple by heptapod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Jobs would have never apologized. He woudl've given it just the right spin that everyone would feel contrite over making jokes at Apple's expense. The next release would be perfect, as Steve would have demanded, and the kerfuffle would be consigned to largely forgotten history.

    Tim Cook goofed.

    1. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Steve Jobs would have never apologized. He woudl've given it just the right spin that everyone would feel contrite over making jokes at Apple's expense. The next release would be perfect, as Steve would have demanded, and the kerfuffle would be consigned to largely forgotten history.

      Tim Cook goofed.

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      Disclaimer: I am an Android user and by no means an Apple fanboi. Frankly, I despise the company for abusing the court system for their anticompetitive practices. However, you have to give Apple credit here for admitting flaws. It's not something the company often does and they should get credit for it.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont think steve would have allowed such as shitty product to completely replace something so so the opposite.

    3. Re:Bye Apple by clonehappy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tim Cook goofed.

      Because he's not a lying egomaniac? I hope you were being sarcastic, but you can never be too sure.

      I appreciate his honesty and willingness to be forthcoming about a flaw in their product.

    4. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      as someone who bought apple shares before 2007 - i can only hope that fucking up then throwing money at problems to fix them carelessly is not the long term post steve jobs plan.

    5. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know about it being fixed in "short order". Think of how long it took and how many people it took to get Google Maps to the level it's at. Even if Apple spends enough to cut that time in half we're still looking at a decent wait.

    6. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test. This is what Q/A teams are for. Apple can afford them.

      The point here is that Apple decided to create their own because Google wanted to run more ads and generally improve the branding on the maps app that Apple had been licensing from them in order to renew the agreement with the addition of turn by turn navigation.

      Normally I refuse to give Apple the benefit of the doubt, and in this case it was most likely a stupid decision to rush this app, but let's face it folks. Google's been mapping for years. They have a tremendous amount of money and resources invested in it. There's no way Apple could possibly catch up this fast. Though I wouldn't be surprised if they do eventually. They have enough money to pour into it.

    7. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      absolutely true. google maps is no simple project - took all kinds of engineers working for years. and if apple isn't going to do it better - why waste user's time like this?

    8. Re:Bye Apple by am+2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      The problem is, this is iOS version 6, not version 1. The customers don't care about inter-company politics. If they would, they wouldn't buy Apple products in the first place, being the kind of company it is.

    9. Re:Bye Apple by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      So you're saying they've adopted the Microsoft way: release software which is horribly bug infested, let the user's who've paid for the product tell you what's wrong, then go about fixing the problems you either knew about or were too lazy to fix in the first place because you saved a few bucks by not doing testing.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    10. Re:Bye Apple by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      as someone who bought apple shares before 2007 - i can only hope that fucking up then throwing money at problems to fix them carelessly is not the long term post steve jobs plan.

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move; but the 'throwing money at the problem' part is simply an inevitability if they want to get into mapping.

      As they've learned(and any GIS people could have told them ahead of time...) the state of computerized mapping is such that you can't just throw a small number of talented programmers at the problem and expect it to work. Apple can do UIs, and the math behind various projections and coordinate systems and other cartographic stuff is available; but the underlying data about the real world are absolutely filthy and often patchy, outdated, scattered between multiple entities, etc, etc. They can either drop the product, or commit themselves to a long string of purchases of existing datasets and talent, and quite possibly a bunch of sheer slogging. Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value, or because they have some moral objection to developing software to grovel through 3rd-party datasets...

      You can debate whether it is a problem worth throwing money at; but it is a problem that you either don't touch, approach cautiously and with a willingness to take it slowly(ie. openstreetmap), or go in with checkbook blazing.

    11. Re:Bye Apple by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      Admitting flaws is all well and good, but the fact is that a very good map app has been replaced by a laughably bad one, and the solutions are inadequate.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we know for a fact that Google refused to negotiate better terms with Apple? Surely for whatever money Apple is investing in re-inventing the wheel they could have offered a fraction of that to obtain a more favorable agreement.

    13. Re:Bye Apple by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up! Apple may have money to throw at this issue, but they do NOT have the time. They might have if they have developed this for a few more years in secret, but now that it's out, they're boned.

    14. Re:Bye Apple by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To paraphrase the AC.

      I don't think Steve would have allowed such as shitty product to completely be release.

      This is probably the beginning of many such goofs as Apple ceases to be Apple and becomes just another giant technology company.

      Steve was the nuclear fire that drove Apple. With the fire out, like a White Dwarf star, Apple will now simply fade away in the coming decades.

      Sad.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    15. Re:Bye Apple by sycodon · · Score: 1

      To correctly paraphrase the AC.

      I don't think Steve would have allowed such as shitty product to be released.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    16. Re:Bye Apple by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. He'll be lucky if Jobs isn't haunting his ass next week...

    17. Re:Bye Apple by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      That's acceptable if you're doing something really new and innovative that no one has done before – like the original iPhone itself, or the first release of Siri. On the other hand, if you're entering an existing marketplace, your first release had better be at least as good as the entrenched players, preferably better, or at least offer some substantial other benefit to offset that. (This is why I think Windows Phone 8 is going to be a massive flop.)

      This goes double if you're replacing functionality in an existing product. You can't replace a fully-working utility with a buggy beta and expect users not to complain loudly.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      Using customers as beta testers is a sadly common practice in the IT industry, but one reason why Apple has been so popular with users is that they've avoided doing this – up until now.

    18. Re:Bye Apple by yotto · · Score: 1

      Came here to say exactly this. No, seriously. I had that entire first sentence in my head, word for word, when I clicked the article.

      Though I was going to say something about how people were just using the app wrong :)

    19. Re:Bye Apple by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

    20. Re:Bye Apple by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 2

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      The only reason why I use Apple is because they have well finished, polished software that are reliable and very pleasant to use. If I wanted beta apps I wouldn't pay that much on an iPhone or iPad.

      --
      -- --
    21. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      as someone who bought apple shares before 2007 - i can only hope that fucking up then throwing money at problems to fix them carelessly is not the long term post steve jobs plan.

      Good, fast and cheap; pick two! Fast was a necessity and they obviously didn't spend enough money to make it good. Now they have to. They went for what their executives called "good enough" knowing that it certainly wouldn't hamper sales, and it hasn't. Apple has never had free navigation so even a crappy app is better than what they had before. They are receiving negative press over this but I don't see a whole lot of Apple users jumping ship. Like the Samsung commercial, Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    22. Re:Bye Apple by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it funny how the public will equally go nuts over a small problem vs a large one.
      My Maps are not as good as the last time. Vs. Company has been embezling and misusing our tax money. Same amount of anger and fustration. Why do you think companies are staying corrupt. Because if they try to be the good guys whatever minor mistake they will get the same slack is if they make a major problem.

      Can't be the good guy, so let just be the bad guy.

      We should save our bickering for the big stuff, and let the little stuff slide a litte bit. Sure in this case report the problem. OK the CEO appologizes. No that isn't good enough we want Blood because we were 10 minutes lake to that party.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    23. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

      Google is not the only company that offers maps with turn by turn directions. I'm actually surprised that Apple simply didn't buy a company that already has things up and running like they did with Siri. They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately. All they would have needed to do is write the app. I can't see how that would have been that much more expensive that starting from scratch and eating all the negative press.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    24. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the coming DECADES you say?
      In the coming years I say.

    25. Re:Bye Apple by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      So you're saying they've adopted the Microsoft way: release software which is horribly bug infested, let the user's who've paid for the product tell you what's wrong, then go about fixing the problems you either knew about or were too lazy to fix in the first place because you saved a few bucks by not doing testing.

      Pretty much, yeah! The difference is that Apple users are not paying for this app. It comes with the new iPhone. I don't think there were many in line waiting overnight to purchase the new iPhone5 simply because it had a map app. They were there to get the latest and greatest that Apple has to offer.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    26. Re:Bye Apple by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      The only reason why I use Apple is because they have well finished, polished software that are reliable and very pleasant to use. If I wanted beta apps I wouldn't pay that much on an iPhone or iPad.

      It's been a while since "It Just Works" was true.
      Furthermore, Windows 7 (and Ubuntu, to a certain extent) has delivered an experience that could be described as "It Just Works", especially when it comes to drivers. Improved competitors tend to highlight one's flaws.

    27. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The customers don't care about inter-company politics. If they would, they wouldn't buy Apple products in the first place

      ?! I suspect customers' passion for inter-company politics is one of the biggest causes of Apple sales. Apple's defining property is "they're not Microsoft."

      In the 1990s they had other admirable attributes, but nowdays, their products' ease-of-use, elegance, thoughtful GUI, etc are average or in some cases below-average.

      If you're buying Apple products in 2012, then inter-company politics is probably the only thing you do care about. It sure as hell ain't the products themselves.

    28. Re:Bye Apple by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook goofed.

      Because he's not a lying egomaniac? I hope you were being sarcastic, but you can never be too sure.

      I appreciate his honesty and willingness to be forthcoming about a flaw in their product.

      Yeah, when running Apple that is goofing.
      true things which sound sarcastic are the worst, eh?

      the correct way would have been to blame copyright on accurate maps and cry for an exception for mapping facts to them.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    29. Re:Bye Apple by interval1066 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. Apple is so keen to cut their tether to Google they cut the customer's throats, "Kudos" to Apple for admitting they're wrong? Please...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    30. Re:Bye Apple by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      When everyone knows there is a problem and is wondering why youre not doing anything about a problem, you get minimal credit for finally saying "yea, there might be a problem."

      Will give them some kudos for having the guts to suggest maps.google.com.

    31. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Do we know for a fact that Google refused to negotiate better terms with Apple? Surely for whatever money Apple is investing in re-inventing the wheel they could have offered a fraction of that to obtain a more favorable agreement.

      Paying money to a direct competitor to use their products is not always the best plan, even if it makes sense when looking only at dollars.

    32. Re:Bye Apple by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is. I have no doubt that this will be fixed in short order as Apple has gobs of money to throw at the problem and knowledge of where the problems are.

      The thing is, you're looking at a short term one time fix.. but this isn't a bug in the OS where you can through money and coders at it and then throw a party when they problem is fixed. This isn't a flawed antenna design where you can throw engineers at the problem an offer free bumpers as an interim fix. It's an entirely different class of problem because maps are representative of the real world, and the real world isn't static. They not only have to fix the current snafu, but build an organization and processes that can take a fire hose of incoming changes and gracefully integrate them into the existing data. (And even with gobs of money and years of experience, Google hasn't got that quite right yet.)
       

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      That's a developer bromide, end users take a rather different view of being used as unpaid beta testers. Especially when the product being beta tested not only doesn't work, but it's feature set is inferior to what it replaced and they don't have an easy way to revert to an earlier version.
       
      Not to mention, if you want a public beta of your product, it should be *ready* for public beta - not barely capable of alpha.

    33. Re:Bye Apple by pr0nbot · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're probably sitting on enough cash to move towns and rivers to match their maps.

    34. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      So you're saying they've adopted the Microsoft way: release software which is horribly bug infested, let the user's who've paid for the product tell you what's wrong, then go about fixing the problems you either knew about or were too lazy to fix in the first place because you saved a few bucks by not doing testing.

      Pretty much, yeah! The difference is that Apple users are not paying for this app. It comes with the new iPhone. I don't think there were many in line waiting overnight to purchase the new iPhone5 simply because it had a map app. They were there to get the latest and greatest that Apple has to offer.

      Kind of the same way that people don't pay for Windows since it comes free with a new computer?

      Saying that people don't purchase the phone to get the map app is the same as saying that people don't purchase the phone for Siri, or the high res screen, or the fast CPU, or the LTE connection - they buy the phone for the "whole package", and for many people, maps is part of that package.

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping. The Blackberry was great for emails and for making phone calls and txts (my primary use of a smartphone), but the mapping app sucks, so even though the BB was completely free for me through work, I paid my own money for a better smartphone.

    35. Re:Bye Apple by slim · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The difference is that Apple users are not paying for this app. It comes with the new iPhone.

      With Apple, you're paying for a hardware/software package. It's nuts to talk about it as if you're paying for the hardware and the software is free. You've paid for the software, and you have an expectation that it will be of a certain standard.

      Not everyone makes heavy use of maps, so this might not be a big deal for them. For me (on Android) maps is a huge proportion of what I use my phone for.

    36. Re:Bye Apple by voidptr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They didn't start from scratch. There's plenty of press that they acquired at least 2 GIS companies since 2009, and it's fairly evident that they licensed data from TomTom as well.

      --
      This .sig for unofficial government use only. Official use subject to $500 fine.
    37. Re:Bye Apple by Bongo · · Score: 2

      But aren't they now using Tom Tom? Map techs say the problems are amalgamating all the data they've gathered from different sources, including Tom Tom.

    38. Re:Bye Apple by tknd · · Score: 0

      Version 1, version 2, version N. It doesn't matter. If you release crap, it should be treated as crap. This is how a market is supposed to work.

    39. Re:Bye Apple by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple's been doing this with (some of) their software titles for years. This is nothing new to them at all. The only thing that's new is that expectations are higher for Apple now, and they can't release a product without the eyes of the world scrutinizing every tiny thing they do.

      Everyone's making a big deal about Apple Map software, but nobody seems to remember that Safari, iTunes, and a half-dozen other Apple applications are steaming piles of shit, and that to make a proper operating system, they had to buy one that was based on BSD. This isn't about Apple adopting a bad software dev strategy, it's about Apple's bad software dev strategy biting them in the ass for the first time.*

      *Disclosure and notice to the flame-warriors: I say these terrible things about Apple not because I'm an Apple hater, but because I've been using Apple products almost exclusively for many years now, and have much experience with Apple's flaws as well as its finer qualities.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    40. Re:Bye Apple by Hatta · · Score: 0

      Good riddance to a company that hasn't had a single positive influence on the computer industry since the Apple II.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    41. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ah ha, another ESRI user trying to blame the data instead of the fucking horrible hack job coding behind the application.

    42. Re:Bye Apple by rhsanborn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is absolutely not true. Jobs released a lot of dogs, and a lot of dogs that weren't ready. iCloud? Ping? iPhone 4 antenna? Please take off the rose colored glasses. This was a failure by Apple, absolutely. But let's not hearken to the good old days where no wrongs were made. They never existed.

    43. Re:Bye Apple by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      It's now become "It Just Sues!".

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    44. Re:Bye Apple by Glendale2x · · Score: 2

      They actually are using data from TomTom, but apparently it isn't as easy as "just writing the app".

      http://gspa21.ls.apple.com/html/attribution.html

      --
      this is my sig
    45. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am assuming this is ignorance (I'm sure if you didn't use maps at all you'd not care if it sucked, and say IOS6 was just fine) but Steve Jobs put his stamp on some seriously buggy shit.

    46. Re:Bye Apple by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Well, a near one trillion dollar market cap company has a lot of momentum.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    47. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More to the point, Steve would have fired everyone responsible for letting it get to release.

    48. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TomTom is a clusterfuck. They already pull data from there, which explains half the problems. When I saw that apple would be pulling data from DumDum, I immediately thought "oh great, we're fucked" and sure enough...

    49. Re:Bye Apple by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value,"

      And now they can even run them driverless 24/7.

    50. Re:Bye Apple by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2

      They bought the data from different sources, but apparently messed up merging it. E.g. in Japan a slightly different GPS standard is used - which can shift your location by 250m or so if you get it wrong. They apparently also used data from openstreetmaps, which doesn't seem to be quite as good as they hoped for. Still considering all the data they bought, it's surprising the result is so bad.

    51. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to "It Just Works"?

      It's now become "It Just Sues!".
      ------------

      It's dead, Jim.

    52. Re:Bye Apple by jkiller · · Score: 0

      Tim Cook goofed.

      Actually, he didn't. You're listening to him wrong.

    53. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      Right on. I liked Nokia N900 very much. But it was completely useless with whatever map application that came with it. That was the only reason I moved to Android.

      And BTW, to all the fanbois who says "Oh, but you can always use Safari on iphone and go to maps.google.com" - it's not the same, you assholes, and you know it. There are few cases where you actually need a dedicated native application on your phone, and map/navigation is right at the top of that list. (And besides, whatever happen to "There is an app for that?" mantra that your master Steve Jobs taught you to repeat?)

    54. Re:Bye Apple by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Ah, so that's it! Might take a while...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    55. Re:Bye Apple by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0

      They licensed TomTom data. Making fun of the apple maps database is actually making fun of TomTom.

    56. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You FAILED & RAN, troll (3x in a row this week) -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3149609&cid=41488325 (rotflmao @ Ash-Fox the troll).

    57. Re:Bye Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      He would not have allowed a shitty product to go out.

      The problem for you is that Apple Maps is not a "shitty product". It's actually a really good mapping app, that currently has SOME data issues.

      But for many users it works most of the time, close enough to replace Google Maps which ALSO works most of the time.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    58. Re:Bye Apple by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I can't say it's all software. I would say a large part of it is the data. The app displays information perfectly fine; the information is incorrect.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    59. Re:Bye Apple by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      They've had a lot of negative influences but saying they haven't had any positive influences is a bit biased, aren't we?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    60. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The point here is that Apple decided to create their own because Google wanted to run more ads and generally improve the branding on the maps app that Apple had been licensing from them in order to renew the agreement with the addition of turn by turn navigation.

      Yes, keep repeating it until it becomes a 'fact' so that you can blame Google for all Apple shortcomings.

      Fuck you fanboys.

    61. Re:Bye Apple by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      A lot of momentum, sure, but also a lot of inertia...when things start going wrong, it can be hard to change course.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    62. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs was an arrogant douche bag (though very successful and innovative) and would have blamed the end user for wanting to go somewhere their app SHOUDLN'T have had it in its daabase.

    63. Re:Bye Apple by ilsaloving · · Score: 0

      Please define "For a while now".

      While I've had the occasional goof up now and then (which is to be expected from anything that isn't a basic appliance), my Macbook Pro has been performing flawlessly. When I was using windows, I measured my uptime in days. On my MBP, I measure it in weeks.

      Admittedly, I haven't used Windows on a laptop since Windows XP, so Windows 7 may be improved, but I really don't care at this point. Microsoft pissed me off hard enough and often enough that I've jumped ship and, so far, I've been very satisfied with my Apple 'experience'. Apple would have to screw up WAY worse than they have for me to jump again.

    64. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that the maps app is a step backwards. But calling it "cutting customers' throats" is, you have to admit, a bit of hyperbole. I live in a mid-sized city, I've used iOS6 maps a half-dozen times in the last week, and it's been perfectly fine every time. I know anecdotes are not data, but I'd be willing to wager that for most people, in most areas, doing most searches, it's acceptable.

      Best ever? No. Flawless? Certainly not. As good as we've come to expect from iOS? Nope. But it's not cutting anyone's throat by any stretch of a sane imagination.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    65. Re:Bye Apple by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      It is a fact. However, that doesn't mean we need to "blame" Google. Google has every right to demand whatever they wanted for the technology, just as Apple has every right to show them the door. A poor map solution was inevitable--the old Maps app was already bad.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    66. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Apple maps data is, in fact, provided by TomTom. Now Apple may have butchered it. TomTom is not on top of Points of Interest and it will never be at Google's level unless it's crowd-sourced but it does get streets right most of the time.

    67. Re:Bye Apple by beelsebob · · Score: 0

      They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately.

      You realise that their maps app is based off TomTom's data, right? The problem is TomTom, not the solution.

    68. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually just read Apple's Map acknowledgements, Some data is provided by Waze, TomTom, and many others. I think most of it comes from TomTom though.

    69. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      First, since you say "smartphone" instead of "iPhone", shall we assume that you're an Android user, that this issue doesn't affect you and your comment about the mapping app sucks is based entirely on anecdotal data?

      The next question is, if you are indeed an iPhone user, then is your experience with the new maps app--as bad as it may be--better than or worse than the Blackberry experience you were trying to get away from? As a former Blackberry user myself, I'm going to guess it's still way way way better. iOS 6 maps are certainly a step backwards, so it's worth complaining about. But don't add to the argument that this application was the very reason you moved away from another platform that was and probably still is several orders of magnitude worse.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    70. Re:Bye Apple by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Informative

      They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately.

      I think it's a bit more complicated than that. From Apple's mapping attribution page:

      © 2006-2012 TomTom
      Business listings data © Acxiom, 2012.
      Map data © AND.
      Property parcel data for USA. © CoreLogic Inc., 2012.
      Satellite imagery data © DigitalGlobe, 2012.
      Map and postal data © DMTI, 2012. This software contains Postal Code OM Data copied by Apple under a sub-license from DMTI Spatial Inc., a party directly licensed by Canada Post Corporation. The Canada Post Corporation file from which this data was copied is dated 2012.
      Business listings data © Factual 2012.
      Map data © Getchee, 2012.
      © INCREMENT P CORP., 2012, http://www.incrementp.co.jp/gc01info/e/legal01.html.
      Map data © Intermap, 2012.
      Map data © LeadDog, 2012.
      Business listings data © Localeze, 2012.
      Mapping data for Australia and New Zealand. © MapData Services Pty Ltd., 2012, PSMA http://www.nowwhere.com.au/lic/NowWhereLic.htm.
      Map data © MDA Information Systems, Inc., 2012.
      Neighborhood data © Urban Mapping, 2012.
      Map data © 2012 Waze.
      âoeReviews from Yelpâ Yelp, 2012.
      (CanVec)
      © Department of Natural Resources Canada. All rights reserved.
      http://www.geogratis.gc.ca/geogratis/en/index.html
      (CGIAR-CSI SRTM)
      CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/
      Flickr Shapefiles Public Dataset, Version 1.0, http://www.flickr.com/
      (GeoNames)
      GeoNames and contributors, http://www.geonames.org.
      (GlobCover)
      © ESA 2010 and UCLouvain, http://www.esa.int/esaEO/index.html

      National Aeronautics and Space Administration, http://www.nasa.gov

      Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2012. Contains Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2012. http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/

      (OSDM)
      © Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. This data has been used with the permission of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth has not evaluated the data as altered and incorporated within this software, and therefore gives no warranty regarding its accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose. http://spatial.gov.au

      (OSM)
      OpenStreetMap contributors, http://www.openstreetmap.org/
      (StatCan)
      Statistics Canada, http://www.statcan.gc.ca
      (TIGER/Line® fi

    71. Re:Bye Apple by danomac · · Score: 1

      Steve let the iPhone be released with a shitty antenna design.

      Given his history we would just tell everyone "You're using it wrong." Then silently post job positions to fix it.

    72. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the credits on the Apple Maps app, there are tens of companies that they licensed different stuff from. It must be a nightmare to patch together such technology. Could it be that Apple ran into their own medicine and had to license every little bit of obvious functionality?

    73. Re:Bye Apple by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Paying money to a direct competitor to use their products is not always the best plan, even if it makes sense when looking only at dollars.

      Neither is replacing a data supplier on an established product (for which updates will be pushed out to existing customers) without assuring that what you are getting from a replacement supplier at least matches the features and quality from the supplier you are replacing, even if it makes sense when looking only at your late founders stated intent to wage nuclear war against the existing data supplier.

    74. Re:Bye Apple by flatrock · · Score: 2

      They didn't start from scratch, but their replacement simply isn't of the kind of quality Apple customers have come to expect. Apple has always demanded a bit of a premium price for a premium product. Maps are a critical app on a smartphone. I can understand that continuing to lack turn by turn navigation wasn't a viable choice for Apple. It's something they really should have had before now. However substituting their own solution that simply wasn't ready yet was a foolish choice. They should have either been investing more on a better solution of their own, or provided an alternative from another company until theirs was ready.

    75. Re:Bye Apple by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

      Google is not responsible for Apple's poor planning.

    76. Re:Bye Apple by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move

      John Gruber at Daring Fireball makes the best case I've seen for explaining the timing; that their contract would expire mid-way through the iOS6 cycle and Apple would be forced to re-negotiate "with their backs against the wall". Or in other words, the contract would not have lasted until iOS7 comes out, so it made more sense to push out a major change like this in iOS6 instead of cramming it into a point release like 6.1 or 6.2 (can you imagine the outcry if THAT happened? At least people expect x.0 releases to have some teething problems... point releases are expected to refine, polish, and bugfix)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    77. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joking aside, no, what Apple would normally have done is never comment or even acknowledge there is a problem. Which is the same thing they do with anything short of exploding batteries. Then, if we're lucky, as you said, they might quietly fix it in the next OS version. Lion's iCal is the perfect example, and to this day, I'm pretty sure they've not said a word about it--though I did hear they quietly fixed a few of its issues in Mountain Lion (I wisened up and won't take the leap until I have to this time).

      It's much easier to maintain a "can do no wrong" image when you ignore everyone who points out what's wrong.

    78. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could just license Garmin or something. If they want to throw enough $$. Then make turn-by-turn a $2 unlock or whatever.

    79. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test. This is what Q/A teams are for. Apple can afford them.

      Wait, you're complaining about releasing betas into production, while implying that Apple should have stuck with Google, a company whose turn-by-turn directions are also a production release beta test—a company that almost invariably ships nearly every technology as beta? Did I miss something, or is the pot calling the kettle black?

    80. Re:Bye Apple by pod · · Score: 1

      Well, it has been a while since we heard of something new and exciting cooking in the Apple oven.

      This map situation kinda hilites it. To be honest, nothing has really changed at Apple. They've always been doing something like this. It's just that the competition has changed. Apple has been standing still. MacBook: nothing. iMac: nothing. iPods: nothing. iPhone: nothing. iPad: nothing. Just incremental improvements. Which is fine, but there's nothing _new_ on the horizon. Where's the next big thing? Aside from "it's Apple", what is the incentive to buy an Apple product these days over the competition?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    81. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move>

      No. They have less than another year, and this expiry would have forced them to do an early release of the next generation iPhone and/or iOS. Worse, delays in the release of either would have royally screwed them.

    82. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dot-Mac, the removal of the floppy drive, suddenly ditching ADB for USB in one fell swoop while shipping their flagship machine with a hockey puck... the list is pretty long. Anybody who thinks Steve would not have done the same thing is nuts.

      Think about it this way: assuming AppleInsider is correct, Apple had a year left on the contract. So Apple had a choice: release now or have the release date of whatever OS it ships next summer locked in by contract. That's a much more dangerous position to be in than merely having a few bugs in your mapping data.

    83. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say they chose the Linux style: release early, release often!

      *rimshot* Thank you, but why are you throwing tomatos at me? I'm not a vegetarian!

    84. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      First, since you say "smartphone" instead of "iPhone", shall we assume that you're an Android user, that this issue doesn't affect you and your comment about the mapping app sucks is based entirely on anecdotal data?

      When the CEO of Apple apologizes for the poor quality of their mapping app and recommends that dissapointed users download a different app, it's no longer "anecdotal data". This isn't a case of one guy saying "omg, I can't map my street! Apple maps suck!"

      The next question is, if you are indeed an iPhone user, then is your experience with the new maps app--as bad as it may be--better than or worse than the Blackberry experience you were trying to get away from? As a former Blackberry user myself, I'm going to guess it's still way way way better. iOS 6 maps are certainly a step backwards, so it's worth complaining about. But don't add to the argument that this application was the very reason you moved away from another platform that was and probably still is several orders of magnitude worse.

      I was careful to not say whether I moved to Android or iPhone, you made the (correct) assumption that it was Android, even if I moved to an iPhone 2 years ago, that doesn't change my basic point that maps are important to many people so a bad map implementation is worse than, say, not enough Fart applications.

      I chose Android for reasons other than mapping (at the time, IOS was using Google Maps), but if I were going to buy a Smartphone today, I'd rule out iPhone based on the mapping problems alone. The iPhone is a good phone and until the Android ICS release, I'd say that most consumers would be more satisfied with iPhone than Android, but now I see little overall usability difference.

    85. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can count me as one user who thinks it is the "best ever."

      Ideal? No.
      Best it can be? No.

      But "best ever", abso-fucking-lytely: YES

      I like it better than Google maps on my desktop, in fact:

      It's issues, as I understand it, can be itemized very simply: (1) some satellite images are warped; (2) searching for locations by name is flawed and risks taking you to the wrong place. No one actually cares about item 1, so woop-di-doo to everyone with their panties in a bunch over that. Yes, satellite view is very useful on occasion (as a mountain biker I depend on it often), but it's hardly used as much as map view and the few that critically rely on perfect satellite imagery probably have a preferred dedicated solution. For item 2, yes, everyone cares about this. But for me at least, maybe half of the critical navigation use cases for maps on the iPhone consist of entering an address, not searching. For the situations where I have to search, the workaround is simple: lookup the address elsewhere first and then ask Siri to take me there. Boom. Apple will straighten this issue out over time, and as we all know, the sooner they get the app in the wild being used by millions of people, the sooner they can do that.

      But the ADVANTAGES are HUGE.

      Do you remember zooming in on Google maps and waiting for the tiles to load? Do you remember zooming in and out and seeing blurry pixelated stand-ins while you waited for discrete zoom steps? Or worse, how about those awkward in-between zoom levels where you were stuck with fuzzy-looking maps? Wait, it got worse: how about tiles that never refreshed at all and you were left with a map that was part zoomed in and part zoomed out? Or even tiles that never loaded at all so all you get is a gray square?

      With Apple Maps, this is all a thing of the past. The maps are INSANELY responsive. Zooming in and out is seamless and smooth. Panning is seamless and smooth. No more stutters, no delays, no dropped tiles. No fragmented imagery. No more waiting for something that eventually times out and then your connection sucks and you can't get it back and you're suddenly stuck with no map. And it wasn't just iOS: I suffer the same some-tiles-that-never-load on my desktop computer when using Google maps even over a high bandwidth cable modem.

      How about walking around downtown somewhere, trying to find that bar five blocks over, and being lost... so you pull out your iPhone, but north is on top and you're walking south-east so you get confused about turning left or right at certain intersections. What did you do? You enabled compass mode so you could tell which way you were going to see if you were headed there. But now you need to zoom in or out again to see things better. Bam! compass mode would disengage and you'd lose your orientation again. It was impossible to keep both. Now that's a thing of the past, just rotate freely and pinch to zoom in or out without losing your rotation.

      And turn by turn? We got it now. Wait, even better: turn by turn that takes traffic into account and gives you the optimal route, updating live? We got that now. And 3D view (not talking the flyover stuff here, just basic 3D view) kicks butt and pans really intuitively and helps give you a feel for the layout.

      In short, usability -- Apple's hallmark -- has increased a hundred-fold. Google maps was practically useless for me. Really, it was. Apple maps on the other hand, is everything I ever expected from a mapping app and it's obviously only going to get better.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    86. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Paying money to a direct competitor to use their products is not always the best plan, even if it makes sense when looking only at dollars.

      Neither is replacing a data supplier on an established product (for which updates will be pushed out to existing customers) without assuring that what you are getting from a replacement supplier at least matches the features and quality from the supplier you are replacing, even if it makes sense when looking only at your late founders stated intent to wage nuclear war against the existing data supplier.

      Granted, a shoddy software implementation is almost always the wrong thing to do, but it's possible that they made a conscious decision to burn up some of their seemingly bottomless goodwill with consumers and spend it on releasing a sub-par mapping app with the belief that they'll be able to quickly address the problems.

      But my point was that more than dollars factor into the decision. Even if it costs 10x more to develop their own mapping App, that may still be the better decision despite the extra cost.

    87. Re:Bye Apple by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

      It might be hurting prospective users. I am in between the Galaxy S3 and the iphone 5, upgrading from a non smartphone. The battery issues and map problems are both making me lean towards Samsung.

    88. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 1

      Allow me to qualify one statement: google maps was not totally useless. Just as a mapping app. As a way to find locations near me or near something else, it was excellent. But I switched to Bing for that purpose now. It seems equally good and I don't have to worry about them tracking all my map searches and indexing them against my gmail and youtube usage.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    89. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's acceptable if you're doing something really new and innovative that no one has done before – like the original iPhone itself

      The only innovative thing with the first iPhone was that it was a phone that you couldn't use for phone calls. The RDF made sure that phone calls wasn't a critical thing for a phone anyway and most people didn't need it.

    90. Re:Bye Apple by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The information coming out of some countries, like Europe and Australia, is that Apple's maps are obnoxiously wrong. So while perhaps for some areas everything is reasonably good, clearly there are countries where it is bad, and countries where it is very very bad.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    91. Re:Bye Apple by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I haven't quite decided whether you're an Apple shill, a Microsoft shill, or just a paranoid schizophrenic.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    92. Re:Bye Apple by RubberDuckie · · Score: 0

      That makes a lot of sense. Too bad Apple couldn't renew ahead of time, and avoid some of this pain. I'm deliberately not upgrading to iOS6 until they get Apple maps fixed, or Google ports their map app to iOS6. In the mean time, Ill give Waze a try.

    93. Re:Bye Apple by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      There is a TomTom logo right in the damn application. The turn-by-turn is from them. However, the straight up search and POI database is their own, or licensed from someone with a less complete dataset than Google.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    94. Re:Bye Apple by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      Because if you want Google's data you play by Google's rules, and Google has things they want that Apple didn't want to give them.

      Google is not the only company that offers maps with turn by turn directions. I'm actually surprised that Apple simply didn't buy a company that already has things up and running like they did with Siri. They could have purchased TomTom, for example and had everything up and running immediately. All they would have needed to do is write the app. I can't see how that would have been that much more expensive that starting from scratch and eating all the negative press.

      They certainly partnered with TomTom. The TomTom logo is/was present in the new Maps app.

    95. Re:Bye Apple by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I agree that that map app is flawed, but first releases of anything usually is.

      The stupidity was in cutting over to the new maps before it was ready.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    96. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next step is to simplify. Limit navigation to one button, that routes you to the nearest Apple store.

    97. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I do like the vector maps. That's an improvement for sure.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    98. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      True, but still, it's not "cutting customer throats".

      Additionally, there are reports that in some areas, like China, it's apparently much better than Google's maps were.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    99. Re:Bye Apple by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      For mapping the data IS the product. If your data sucks, your product sucks. Regardless of how nicely it's presented.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    100. Re:Bye Apple by jmerlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Android's mapping/navigation is so superior to the native stuff on iOS and even the paid store products it's not funny. The choice is clear. Though you should definitely get a car charger and dock if you plan on using it as a navigator. Active GPS + screen on = huge power drain.

    101. Re:Bye Apple by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Google gets data from automated analysis of Street View photos. Road markings, building numbers and the location of entrances, street signs, barriers that prevent you walking a certain way, areas lacking pavements (side walks in US English), parking spaces etc.

      Google doesn't just map the world, it understands it. It can provide walking directions that include navigation within buildings, telling which escalator to take or where the toilets are. It knows where the entrance to a building is rather than just where the post code says it approximately is. The latest version of Maps for Android includes navigation aids for blind people based on this data, which while still beta shows just how powerful it is.

      Since no other company has sent cars round to gather that data no-one else has it, and at best it will take Apple years to duplicate the effort.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    102. Re:Bye Apple by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      But calling it "cutting customers' throats" is, you have to admit, a bit of hyperbole.

      Your phone telling you to drive down train tracks isn't far off though, you have to admit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    103. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      First, since you say "smartphone" instead of "iPhone", shall we assume that you're an Android user, that this issue doesn't affect you and your comment about the mapping app sucks is based entirely on anecdotal data?

      When the CEO of Apple apologizes for the poor quality of their mapping app and recommends that dissapointed users download a different app, it's no longer "anecdotal data". This isn't a case of one guy saying "omg, I can't map my street! Apple maps suck!"

      Fair enough, although I'd suggest that the biggest factor in his deciding to apologize is not the objective quality of the maps app (or lack thereof), but rather quality in the context of the demo that was done and the expectations that were set. They portrayed it as best in class and it's obviously not. If they had been a little more humble in advance, we might not be seeing an apology today.

      The next question is, if you are indeed an iPhone user, then is your experience with the new maps app--as bad as it may be--better than or worse than the Blackberry experience you were trying to get away from? As a former Blackberry user myself, I'm going to guess it's still way way way better. iOS 6 maps are certainly a step backwards, so it's worth complaining about. But don't add to the argument that this application was the very reason you moved away from another platform that was and probably still is several orders of magnitude worse.

      I was careful to not say whether I moved to Android or iPhone, you made the (correct) assumption that it was Android, even if I moved to an iPhone 2 years ago, that doesn't change my basic point that maps are important to many people so a bad map implementation is worse than, say, not enough Fart applications.

      I chose Android for reasons other than mapping (at the time, IOS was using Google Maps), but if I were going to buy a Smartphone today, I'd rule out iPhone based on the mapping problems alone. The iPhone is a good phone and until the Android ICS release, I'd say that most consumers would be more satisfied with iPhone than Android, but now I see little overall usability difference.

      Fair enough; you're free to make your own decisions and even broadcast them. What I take exception to is the attempt to imply that you personally have been affected and that you're speaking from personal experience.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    104. Re:Bye Apple by sys_mast · · Score: 1

      If they purchased TomTom, They wouldn't need to write an app, TomTom already has an iOS app.

      http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/tomtom-u.s.a./id343289842

      Must not be to many iOS users here...(saying that with an Android device in hand)

      --
      Those who can, do.
    105. Re:Bye Apple by trimpnick · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Microsoft and Bing have a consumer friendly/privacy friendly non track policy. They have such an astonishing track record!

    106. Re:Bye Apple by keytoe · · Score: 1

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test. This is what Q/A teams are for. Apple can afford them.

      Wait, you're complaining about releasing betas into production, while implying that Apple should have stuck with Google, a company whose turn-by-turn directions are also a production release beta testâ"a company that almost invariably ships nearly every technology as beta? Did I miss something, or is the pot calling the kettle black?

      I'm still trying to picture the Q/A process that would enable them to be sure every data point in their GIS DB was accurate.

    107. Re:Bye Apple by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure that in their own minds, they needed to break dependence on Google. Will they start offering broad-based search next? How about real mail? Maybe something else that they believe that Google uses to encroach upon their user turf that Microsoft doesn't already have sewn-up?

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    108. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 1

      They can't cross-reference it with my email or youtube usage.

      Besides, their map search results are better than Google's.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    109. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 1

      Obviously I'm a raving lunatic.

      However, I have no love for MS, but I I do prefer google not have my search data and bing is easier to incorporate into my workflow than duckduckgo... (and I generally prefer Bing maps to most other in-browser desktop providers)

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    110. Re:Bye Apple by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      Please define "For a while now".

      I'd say around the Snow Leopard / Lion transition on OS X, every iPod, iPhone and iPad, if used in a way that's just slightly different from the Apple way (like avoiding iTunes, wanting to use microUSB instead of the dock connector and so on).

      On my Windows 7 desktop, uptime is ~1 month, usually being shut down for updates only. For battery reasons, my laptop's uptime is much lower.

      These days, Windows even downloads pretty much every driver required for your typical device automagically. Even printers, the most evil peripheral known to Man.

    111. Re:Bye Apple by jest3r · · Score: 0

      How can you jump ship when:
      1. Apple states all over their marketing that the new Maps App is a huge upgrade. Average consumers wouldn't think twice after all these years of upgrading iOS that suddenly the map app would suck it big time ?
      2. You are locked into a contract for 2-3 years?

      This is a great example of false advertising connected to a contract lock. Consumers get shafted any way you look at it.

    112. Re:Bye Apple by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Apple may have money to throw at this issue, but they do NOT have the time. They might have if they have developed this for a few more years in secret, but now that it's out, they're boned.

      That's the most ridiculous thing I've read today. The issues present in the maps app are hyped up only in a very small community - and given the alternative apps, the "time" issue is irrelevant. Apple isn't in any danger over their flawed maps app.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    113. Re:Bye Apple by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's suspiciously un-Apple.

      Tim Cook came up in Apple, right? He wasn't a plant from a competitor, like has happened for other companies in the mobile space?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    114. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to comprehend under what justification my comment would be modded down. I can see someone thinking it wasn't insightful enough to mod up (it's just an opinion after all, although I think it expresses a valid alternative viewpoint and carefully explains and justifies such a position ). Perhaps it's not interesting (again, opinions are like assholes, but when I moderate, I think when someone bucks the trend and goes against the "herd mentality" (hmmm... is that inflammatory, well isn't iSheep inflammatory then?) and clearly defends their position with logical rhetoric it's always interesting, even if I don't happen to agree). And it certainly wasn't funny. But maybe it's informative in some way? I guess that's open to interpretation.
      All of those are great reasons for NOT modding me up. But I don't see the justification for modding me down. If someone else thinks it's interesting or informative or whatever, why would you think they are wrong? And even if you do think that, why would you then further seek to mod me down past my base karma?
      Seems like politically motivated moderating to me. And frankly, I've seen a lot more of that in recent months on other's posts. I've spent a lot of time undoing political moderation lately, even for posts I personally disagree with.

      What happened to Slashdot? I know moderation used to be a lot fairer and impartial than it's become. I sense the digg-ification of Slashdot is upon us.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    115. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes. They bought the full rights to TomTom's maps along with about 20 other mapping company's data.

    116. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, although I'd suggest that the biggest factor in his deciding to apologize is not the objective quality of the maps app (or lack thereof), but rather quality in the context of the demo that was done and the expectations that were set. They portrayed it as best in class and it's obviously not. If they had been a little more humble in advance, we might not be seeing an apology today.

      Are you serious? Do you really think Apple would go to a product launch and say "one more thing: We've taken away the Google Maps app that you all know and love and replaced it with our own product. Our product doesn't work as well, we're missing some entire towns from our database, but hey, we created it, so it's going to be spectacular! Except that it's not. So you should probably download some other mapping app, just use google maps in your web browser since even that is better than our app"

      That sounds much worse than launching a bad product and saying "Oh oops, sorry, we didn't know it was that bad, we'll improve it"

    117. Re:Bye Apple by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test.

      Tell that to Blizzard, Bethesda, Rockstar, Google, Microsoft (all OS versions before first or second svc pack), Apple...

      Sure, it's ideal to catch everything, but it's ultimately unrealistic. There's also the issue of software vs. data. In Apple's maps' case, it's the data that's problematic. The software implementation seems to be solid.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    118. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Adopted? What do you think happened with the OSX 10.0. What do you think the first version of iTunes or Keynote was like? Apple can't do magic, first versions of massive complex applications are buggy.

    119. Re:Bye Apple by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Given how shitty and out of date TomTom maps are (with false turns that get me lost all the time, just for the purposes of 'protecting copyright') making fun of them is quite acceptable to me.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    120. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There are a huge number of apps for dedicated mapping, navigation. There were in OS5 and there are in OS6.

    121. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The solution will be a gradual fix and alternative applications appearing on iOS. Maps will be ported likely with turn by turn within 6 months. Waze will get more popular. Garmin... apps will take off.

      And Apple will have a mapping solution they own outright they can include in their iOS and OSX api. Which means by 2014 or so Apple will have some cool features. The maps may never be as good as Google's but the ease of use and integration will be much higher.

    122. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      but one reason why Apple has been so popular with users is that they've avoided doing this – up until now.

      You are not an Apple customer. Apple most certainly has done this many times./

    123. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, if you want a public beta of your product, it should be *ready* for public beta - not barely capable of alpha

      alpha = major features missing.
      beta = mostly feature complete but buggy

      It was beta.

      As for the rest. Yeah it is going to require the creation of a permanent mapping group within Apple. Say $100m per year in ongoing expenses forever.

    124. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Well, it has been a while since we heard of something new and exciting cooking in the Apple oven.

      Well lets take what caused this. Creating a vector mapping geocoding api for all applications. I'd say that's rather new.

      MacBook: nothing.

      Retina display. Complete ultrabook style. Move to all SSD. Move to 16g ram (i.e. break with OS 10.5 compatibility).

      but there's nothing _new_ on the horizon

      Core Data / iCloud and complex internet based application data sharing. Essentially what J2EE meant to achieve but across the entire OS? That's rather new.

      what is the incentive to buy an Apple product these days over the competition?

      Fantastic creative applications that are now quite inexpensive and integrated with their amateur product lines.
      Quality of manufacture.
      Unix features with good support for productivity applications

      etc...

    125. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. Interface matters. And you will see this when Apple catches up a bit on the data side and more applications are taking advantage of the integrated API. Google's maps will be "better" in some data sense for a long time, but maps is likely to be a feature over Android by 2014.

    126. Re:Bye Apple by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      You can only interpolate and run global models so much. Eventually you have to go to smaller and smaller regions. Then at a certain point you just have crappy data, which means someone needs to collect it. Other people need to correct all the above. That usually means lots of people, and lots of time. Something Google has had a lot of for a long time.

      However Apple does have a ton of cash. They could throw a LOT of money at it and make a big difference in a few years. It would be like organizing a large army however. Even then, they would be into their next product cycle however.

      As for the artard that responded about ESRI below, I don't care how good a system or software you have, if you have crappy data, nothing will save you.

      Another option of course is buying mapping products from other big guns. However A) unless the money is REALLY good why would they? I mean they would be helping another company compete against them and put them out of buisness or at least less potential profits, and B) even IF that is possible, all the data would have to be reconciled with each other with is still a crazy hugh job, and again there is only so much automation you can do, and it will demand a lot of physical eyeballs.

    127. Re:Bye Apple by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple has never had free navigation so even a crappy app is better than what they had before.

      No, it isn't.

      Look, you can throw in all the 3D spinny effects/voice activation/turn-by-turn/traffic you want. If I say I want to go from point A to point B and the app comes back and says, "Sorry, I can't find point B," it is not better than what I had before.

      Like the Samsung commercial, Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

      The fanbois will always say that. These are people that you will not get, no matter what. 5% of the world are Apple lovers. 5% of the world are Apple haters. The other 90% fall somewhere in-between.

      Apple will survive and do quite well with their 5%. The problem is that to thrive and grow, Apple needs those other 90%. These aren't the people who say, "Look at the shiny Apple!" They expect things to "just work." When they don't, they'll look for something that does.

    128. Re:Bye Apple by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      As I keep saying, it's not that the maps are wrong. It's that the world is positioned wrong. People keep naming cities the wrong thing.

    129. Re:Bye Apple by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Maps are a critical app on a smartphone

      Really? I guess google maps on my Droid III just suck horribly then for driving. Don't know if it's my phone or what, but my Garmin Nuvii 755 wins hands down for nav (for me anyway).

      I use Google occasionally to double check an address, but other than that, the garmin gets my location far faster, generates the route about 50 times faster, gives equally good or better routes, and doesn't end up fighting with my podcast app or phone calls.

      Oh, and the Garmin isn't eating my data allotment the whole time I'm using it.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    130. Re:Bye Apple by narcc · · Score: 1

      You could have installed the Google Maps app for BlackBerry -- even if they had issued you an antique OS4 phone.

    131. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why couldn't Apple renegotiate ahead of time? I don't buy the explanation.

    132. Re:Bye Apple by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      They tried to renegotiate with Google. Apple wanted a few new things like turn-by-turn, and Google was asking for some stuff in exchange, like increased branding, that Apple wasn't willing to do. Unfortunately, I can't remember where the article I read this was. Anyhow, even if the timing for the contract renewal had worked out, they may not have been able to come to terms on the missing features. Things like turn-by-turn weren't needed (or rather weren't expected) in a smartphone mapping app in 2007, but by 2012 they were expected, and their absence in iOS was notable.

    133. Re:Bye Apple by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      They could have said everything they said, and just added, "This service is in beta." Maybe a little more color, would have even helped more, but even some acknowledgement that it's still a work-in-progress could have been made. I'm not alone in thinking this.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    134. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and that's why everybody suggesting maps.google.com! Face it, Google has by far the best map/nav application out there. Nobody else comes close (and I have tried a few just to see).

      Two years back, while traveling with a bunch of apple fanbois (and I use this term very strictly - only for extreme nutjobs). One of them trumpeted his 30$ a year "awesome app" ("Dude, check this out!! It's the dope!!") to find us an alternate route when we were stuck in traffic. Guess what? Ultimately, I had to use my poor android that "nobody wants to use" and I only had it because "I could not afford an iphone".

      I laughed my ass off that day. Poor fucker.

    135. Re:Bye Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      What are you babbling about? Any iOS user can switch to Bing or Yahoo search, the mail app supports a shed load of mail services, and there are numerous alternatives to anything Google offers (except all that "have Google+ invitations show up in Google Calendar without your consent" stuff). It's in everybody's minds that are not Google to not give Google too much power. Especially if they compete with Google.

    136. Re:Bye Apple by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Google and Android is very very good. Google on iOS was OK.

      Most likely by 2014 we will have:

      Google / Android has better maps.
      Google maps is available for iOS.
      Apple has worse data but with terrific integration.

    137. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, it's good to see this happening. Apple has been screwing up the industry (as well as their users). It's time somebody asked Apple to loosen their arsehole a bit so that others can fuck them.

      I will bring popcorns.

    138. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: When you've dropped entire countries and you don't bother mentionng it before people buy the phones then you're either:

      1. Clueless, or
      2. A lying scumbag.

      But then again I've been down on apple since they insisted nobody needs 3g data (until they had one to sell of course, then it was essential).

    139. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do you remember zooming in on Google maps and waiting for the tiles to load? Do you remember zooming in and out and seeing blurry pixelated stand-ins while you waited for discrete zoom steps? Or worse, how about those awkward in-between zoom levels where you were stuck with fuzzy-looking maps? Wait, it got worse: how about tiles that never refreshed at all and you were left with a map that was part zoomed in and part zoomed out? Or even tiles that never loaded at all so all you get is a gray square?

      Nope. Never.

      Oh wait. You mean, on your Jesus PHone? May be. But then, I am so poor I could "only afford android" where it has run without any of this issue. But don't let this fact get in your apple-sucking activities.

    140. Re:Bye Apple by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I personally think Apple should use OpenStreetMap. I don't think there's any licensing issue as long as the app links back to the site. And, assuming the main reason of developing their own navigation app is to free them from Google, it's not like OpenStreetMap is a competitor to them. They can probably still put ads in it without violating the license.

    141. Re:Bye Apple by jmerlin · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's a lot of moderation. It appears the fanboys are out in force lately, armed with their "new" iPhone 5s, ready to defend their poor decision making skills and exorbitant purchases. Enjoy your last-gen phones, gentlemen.

    142. Re:Bye Apple by toriver · · Score: 2

      i paid $0 for iOS 6 on my iPhone 4S though. Unless you were on an iPhone 3G and nedded to upgrade since your phone would be left in the cold otherwise, you did not have to get an iPhone 5 to get the new OS.

    143. Re:Bye Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      ... and that includes the first versions of Google Maps, ironically enough.

    144. Re:Bye Apple by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Apple's defining property is "they're not Microsoft."

      That aspect has become less and less important over the last few years. Microsoft is now a blip on the radar of the multimedia product company. The Mac has become irrelevant, and Windows Phone is at around 2% market share in the mobile area, where Apple really matters now.

      If you're buying Apple products in 2012, then inter-company politics is probably the only thing you do care about. It sure as hell ain't the products themselves.

      I don't think so (it's definitely not true for me, and I have an MacBook, iMac, iPhone and iPad). It's more about the app infrastructure on the mobile devices. There's nothing where there is no app for that.

    145. Re:Bye Apple by Pieroxy · · Score: 0

      Believe me, I upgraded to iOS6 and never saw the difference to an App I very rarely used.

      Waze is phenomenal.

      Ah, and when you upgrade, take a look at that Panoramic option in the Camera. It is great.

    146. Re:Bye Apple by Pieroxy · · Score: 0

      And they call Apple zealots fanbois...

    147. Re:Bye Apple by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Very honestly, they get bad press, but the app is far away from being as bad as it is being depicted everywhere. It fucking works for god's sake!

      Of course, there are goofs and mistakes, but overall it's a pretty solid app that works.

    148. Re:Bye Apple by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you buy a standalone GPS?

    149. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 minutes lake to that party

      Not sure if you misspell 'late' or you new iPone made you drive through a lake to you party :-(

    150. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the reports that they still had another year worth of contractually available Google Maps, if they wanted it, the early switch does seem like a questionable move..

      ... until you read a little further and see that without turn-by-turn directions Apple was getting left behind.

    151. Re:Bye Apple by jmerlin · · Score: 2

      I'm no zealot. Does anyone deny that Chrome is significantly better than IE? So then why, when faced with a similar question, do so many Apple users deny that Apple Maps is similarly worse than Google Maps? I like Android, sure, but this is an obvious one. If advising someone who's looking to make a purchase on the basis of maps support that they should pick the phone (not *A* phone, but one of a huge range of phones, some with incredible battery like the Razr, phones with more power, or even budget phones) with the best maps application is enough to make one a "zealot," this community has completely failed.

      To help cool peoples' lids: this post was written on my Macbook Pro. Woah.

    152. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you buy a standalone GPS?

      Really? You have to ask that question?

      Why would I want to carry around a standalone GPS that is twice as big as my phone? My phone barely fits comfortably in my pocket, I don't want to have to stuff a GPS in my pocket. Are there any standalone GPS's that will do transit directions?

    153. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll with zero reading comprehension.

      The complaint was that the issue exists on desktops too and that he prefers the new app to either the old one or Google's browser map.

    154. Re:Bye Apple by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      In your pocket? Do you need maps to walk to the grocery store?

    155. Re:Bye Apple by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple users can easily find alternatives. But Apple didn't fire anyone but their map contract with Google, did they? Who is their greatest rival in phones? Ummm, let's see. Microsoft? No. RIM? No. Palm/WebOS? Nope.

      Ummm, let's see here. Could it be Google? With Android?

      It's true that Cook advised people to use an alternative in his apology to users: Bing.

      Personally, and IMHO, I don't want to have anything to do with Google, as their ToS suck, and they're as trustworthy as opposing counsel.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    156. Re:Bye Apple by hawguy · · Score: 1

      In your pocket? Do you need maps to walk to the grocery store?

      You don't travel much do you? When I'm in a new city and have 20 minutes to grab a coffee before a meeting, it's nice to have a directions that will guide me from the transit station to Starbucks, and then to the building where the meeting is. It's also not having to pack yet another device in my travel bag so I have a GPS in my rental car (even if I wanted to spend $15/day to rent a GPS with the car, they don't always have one available).

    157. Re:Bye Apple by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      I forgot this is Slashdot, sorry. Usually I ask people or I just look around.

    158. Re:Bye Apple by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      That's actually kind of interresting. Technically you cannot patent the accurate data in a map. You can however copyright its presentation, and if the presentation is all that is given, that requires reverse-engineering maps into data (which can be very difficult depending on the format). You also run into copyright issues on inaccurate data. If a road exists where a map says it does, they cannot copyright that fact, as it is a fact. The problem is that EVERY commercial map company intetionally includes mistakes in their maps (mostly to identitfy who is copying them). The really fun part is that since those phantom roads DON'T actually exist, they are NOT facts, and thus subject to copyright since the company actually "creatively created" them. If you can tell which roads are wrong, you'll be fine copying everything else, but cthulhu help you in court if you copy a phantom/milabeled/typo'd road!

    159. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My problem with Apple's maps app isn't the accuracy or the mistakes, it's that Google has changed what a mapping application is in my mind. To give you an example:

      Last night I met some friends for dinner at a nice restaurant. One of my friends called me to say that he was going to be late and told me where he was on the road. I plugged that into Google Maps and it told me, down to the minute, how far away he was. Based on that information, we asked the hostess to push our reservation 30 minutes and had a couple drinks at the bar while we waited. Prior to Google Maps, I probably would have assumed that the ~6 miles he needed to drive would take ~10 minutes and that we should wait at our table.

      And that's the problem...Google has viewed maps as something that is integrated with everything else rather than a discreet application. Whether it's finding restaurants nearby, deciding when you should leave so that you can get somewhere on time or just taking a virtual stroll down a street, Google Maps does all those things and I don't want to give them up. You can compromise on interface...you just have to adapt to using something substandard. You can't compromise on features without depriving yourself of something.

      FWIW, I'm an iOS user who's waiting on upgrading to iOS 6 (most likely by purchasing an iPhone 5) until Google releases a decent mapping app.

    160. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no better beta test than a general release.

      Ask the KDE guys .

    161. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Team Google doesn't have all those wacky spy cars running around purely for their novelty value

      No indeed, they have them for their Street View feature. The confirmation of road data via GPS log came as a bonus extra. But Apple get that benefit and more from the fact that every iPhone that's using navigation is regularly pinging the GPS position back to Apple. This will give very clear heat-maps of where the navigable roads are, one way systems, and restricted turns. More accurate in fact than the single sample of a Google car driving down a road once.

    162. Re:Bye Apple by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      All along this has looked like a continuation of Steve Jobs' fury over Google's android challenging the iPhone, which he thought of as a betrayal. Being motivated by spite, it has backfired. As an Apple user and iPhone owner, I am disappointed. I don't think you can just throw money at this problem -- Google has been rolling out infrastructure for a long time and Google Maps is a great product. Why jettison it?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    163. Re:Bye Apple by Terrasque · · Score: 1

      Actually, at least here in Norway its'a huge deal. National TV, newspapers, and so on have had a field week of telling everyone just how terrible the new iOS maps have been.

      Of course, it does not exactly help that they kinda left out some of the larger cities, routed main roads through airports, moved some other cities to the bottom of the sea, and misplaced some places by around half a country.

      You also got this amusing image comparing iOS6 maps and Google maps for the center of Norway's 2nd largest city, Bergen.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    164. Re:Bye Apple by calzones · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

      That would be a good suggestion to make to Apple. They should integrate it into Find Friends especially.

      I've never faced that situation though, since the friend I speak with is normally giving me an ETA from their own GPS/nav solution and I trust what they say and don't bother looking in my map. The times when I do look in my map, if I want to know how far away in time something is, I just click on the pin and then select "get directions from/to" and then pick one of the routes it offers I like the best and see how much time it is.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    165. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Apple's data *IS* bought (licenced) from other big guns.

    166. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You can interpret it emotionally of you like and call it "spite". Of you can look at it as a rational company would and recognise that Google changed from being an Apple collaborator (different business fields, cooperating, Schmidt on the Apple board.) to being an apple competitor (competing smartphone). And that changed the rules on what they could reasonably cooperate on.

    167. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So then why, when faced with a similar question, do so many Apple users deny that Apple Maps is similarly worse than Google Maps?

      Google Maps on what? I haven't seen anyone say that Apple Maps is better than Google Maps on Android.

      But compared with Google Maps on iOS5, it's certainly arguable that it is. The App itself is vastly superior, with vector graphics rather than tiles allowing for proper rotation and scaling. With Flyover and with full turn by turn navigation.

      The data on the other hand is significantly worse than it was, right now. But that's only affecting some people, ad not others. For me for example, my area looks spot on - I can't find any errors.

      If advising someone who's looking to make a purchase on the basis of maps support

      If I was advising someone who's primary need was navigation, I'd tell them to buy a dedicated sat-nav. They are still far better than smartphone apps.

    168. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I remember much the same sorts of things being said about the lack of Flash on iPhones.

    169. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You should never, never, never, ever use a production release as a beta test. This is what Q/A teams are for. Apple can afford them.

      It is impossible for a Q/A team, however big, to find all the errors in a worldwide map. Every mapping company uses user feedback to get that final few percent of quality. Google Maps had more than it's fair share of errors when it launched.

    170. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It is nice to have maps when you're a pedestrian. But the major use case is driving in a car. And for that dedicated sat-navs are certainly better than smartphone nav apps. So it was a fair question.

    171. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple has always had free navigation that's what they paid Google for.

    172. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Google and Android is very very good.

      Having done a head to head comparison, I can state it's not a patch on a dedicated Garmin sat-nav. Neither for finding the best route, nor for accuracy in placing your current position on the map. So I think you overused the word "very" there.

    173. Re:Bye Apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The app isn't buggy. It's the online dataset that has errors in it.

    174. Re:Bye Apple by trdrstv · · Score: 2

      You can only interpolate and run global models so much. Eventually you have to go to smaller and smaller regions. Then at a certain point you just have crappy data, which means someone needs to collect it. Other people need to correct all the above. That usually means lots of people, and lots of time. Something Google has had a lot of for a long time.

      However Apple does have a ton of cash. They could throw a LOT of money at it and make a big difference in a few years. It would be like organizing a large army however.

      For perspective on that "large army". Despite being twice the size of Google (based on market capitalization) Apple has ~ 13,000 non-retail employees, TOTAL, and Google has ~7,100 people working on Google Maps.

    175. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is one article about that:
      http://allthingsd.com/?p=254565

    176. Re:Bye Apple by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's BILL GATES that would never have apologized. Steve Jobs would probably not let it out the door in the first place, but if he had, an apology is far better than the kind of spin Gates would have tried to give it, as if its flaws were actually "features.". Microsoft would then release something they just bought that's better, and then "deprecate" the old one, forcing developers to switch just as they've found workarounds and tied themselves to the now-obsolete codebase.

    177. Re:Bye Apple by Wheely · · Score: 1

      The whole reason I moved from my corporate issued Blackberry to my own personal smartphone was to get better mapping.

      but now I see little overall usability difference.

      I do. I have been an iPhone user since the first one and have all of them and an iPad and three Macs but when I looked at the feature list of IOS6 I realized for the second time Apple produced a major release that had nothing I particularly wanted. I saw that I would never want to uprade to IOS6 especially as I dont want Siri on my iPad. My devices became essentially unsupported.

      The day of the IOS6 release I went out and bought a Galaxy S3. It took a day or two to get used to but I am simply amazed how far ahead Android is. The thing that surprised me most is how far Android is ahead in simple usability features that individually dont mean much like displaying as entire incoming text on the status line or going straight from lock screen to the app you wanted, or even calling a number simply by puttting your phone to your ear but when taken together, these little features just make IOS look five years old.

    178. Re:Bye Apple by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      For the record, your counterclaim just ignores half of your original statement. How convenient.

      You didn't claim "Android's mapping/navigation is superior to iOS6 Maps", you claimed "Android's mapping/navigation is superior to iOS6 Maps AND THE PAID STORE PRODUCTS"

      So by your claim, Android's mapping/navigation is superior to pretty much everything, including Waze, Tomtom and others.

      That's a pretty broad statement to spit with absolutely no reference or other kind of explanation. Typical fanboi claims.

    179. Re:Bye Apple by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Yes. They bought the full rights to TomTom's maps along with about 20 other mapping company's data.

      Minor nitpick: to the mapping data, not the maps.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    180. Re:Bye Apple by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Google gets data from automated analysis of Street View photos. Road markings, building numbers and the location of entrances, street signs, barriers that prevent you walking a certain way, areas lacking pavements (side walks in US English), parking spaces etc.

      Google doesn't just map the world, it understands it. It can provide walking directions that include navigation within buildings, telling which escalator to take or where the toilets are. It knows where the entrance to a building is rather than just where the post code says it approximately is. The latest version of Maps for Android includes navigation aids for blind people based on this data, which while still beta shows just how powerful it is.

      Since no other company has sent cars round to gather that data no-one else has it, and at best it will take Apple years to duplicate the effort.

      So why is Google Maps so bad? It certainly isn't as perfect as you pretend it is; considering its age, it should be.

      Take this for example: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=from:Helvetiastra%C3%9Fe++to:Neuweg&saddr=Helvetiastra%C3%9Fe&daddr=Neuweg&hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=49.911426,8.495736&spn=0.007724,0.016587&sll=49.91143,8.49611&sspn=0.007724,0.016587&geocode=FXST-QIdJ6uBAClJx22sf529RzFg_u0nZPFRuA%3BFVyT-QIdTY6BACn9jIaseZ29RzFhgnF51UlmHA&t=m&z=16. In this tiny area, the routing first takes a long needless detour, then through a short stretch that can only be used by busses, and has been since it was finished. If I tell it to not go there, it sends me over factory property, with the far end usually closed by a gate. Google should know that. I can accept that it still doesn't know the underpass on the railroad station has been going through to the other side for almost a year. The placing of the stores is wildly off. And local transit information is non-existant.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    181. Re:Bye Apple by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I haven't quite decided whether you're an Apple shill, a Microsoft shill, or just a paranoid schizophrenic.

      It's clear that you are a Fandroid - the question is just if you also get paid for it.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    182. Re:Bye Apple by Dalar_ca · · Score: 1

      Yay another "Jobs wouldn't do this!" when clearly, he had done it several times. Remember the "sorry for reducing the iPhone by $200 two months after release" apology letter from Jobs? No? Or the mobile me fiasco? But never mind, they're only approaching a trillion dollar valuation, they're totally a dying company with no future, right? The whole evangelization of tech is sick. "My multi-billion dollar corporation is better than your multi-billion dollar corporation" and "WWSJD" are really getting tired, and starting to hurt society in the same way religious zealotry does.

    183. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The maps really really stink for a cyclist or someone on foot, I dont know about cars, being Tom-Tom it may be better for cars. I need good mapping to get around and i have no end of trouble with this crap, it does not find basic street names, I have been using Iphone for years and it has been great, one of the features that originally sold me was the maps since I travel a lot, but now am seriously looking at Samsung or Nexus. I need systems that actually work.

    184. Re:Bye Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, it's a good decision to use an invasive phone that will likely never get an update, where any developer can eavesdrop on where you are, what you looked at on the internet, who you're near, what you've bought, could easily seed you with a virus, could make you a botnet node to infect others, will use your data to blow advertising at you... all over a mapping app that will be fixed soon? That's a very poor decision and precisely why Android doesn't interest me in the least. Enjoy your 1990's style exploit riddled computing device.

    185. Re:Bye Apple by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I've got a friend with a Droid who uses the turn by turn for driving and it'll tell her to "turn around" "turn left" or do something else bizarre while sitting at a traffic light. She's ready to throw it out the window.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    186. Re:Bye Apple by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      Pretty much, yeah! The difference is that Apple users are not paying for this app. It comes with the new iPhone. I don't think there were many in line waiting overnight to purchase the new iPhone5 simply because it had a map app. They were there to get the latest and greatest that Apple has to offer.

      So, we're talking canonical/KDE/Gnome instead of Microsoft?

    187. Re:Bye Apple by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      For mapping the data IS the product. If your data sucks, your product sucks. Regardless of how nicely it's presented.

      Finally somebody who admits that Google Maps sucks.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He'd just say you were trying to navigate wrong.

    1. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by mrquagmire · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Our maps aren't inaccurate. Your towns are inaccurate."

      --
      giggity
    2. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      "We have given you a suggestion on how to improve your towns, so take it."

    3. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by aseth · · Score: 1

      And then he'd throw money at the problem to make the towns match the maps.

    4. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "We have revised the location of your town. Pray that we do not revise it any further."

    5. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Or "You're holding the map wrong".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Steve Jobs wouldn't apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In SJ words: "The Earth is wrong". What is real, IS NOT.

  3. He has shown weakness! by Culture20 · · Score: 0

    Pile on!

  4. Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    In an effort to figure out how innacurate the data in my area is I did the following:
    - Fired up Xcode
    - Determined that Apple Maps uses the CLGeocoder Class by peeking at the iPhone's debug console in Xcode while doing live searches in Apple Maps
    - Scraped an official list of towns and cities in the province of Ontario from the provincial governments website.
    - Coded up something quick in Xcode to get the results of a couple thousand searches. Searches always included the province name to be more specific.
    - Ran a quick analysis of the results - not perfect but enough to get a perspective on the matter.

    This is what I found:
    - 2028 cities and towns searched
    - 688 are not even on the map! Error Code 8
    - 551 are clearly incorrect (wrong country, street names that are similar to town names etc.)
    - 389 were close but not good enough (for example turn-by-turn might send you off a bridge but you'll get rescued close to where you want to be)
    - Only about 400 results were actually correct.

    Actual results data here and methodology here for those interested: http://www.mtonic.com/applemaps/
    (It's not perfect but gives you an idea of how bad it really is in Ontario Canada anyways)

    1. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honest Question: after perusing your site, the findings indicate that the underlying mapping data is seriously flawed. Apple gets its mapping data from third parties, primarily Tom Tom. I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist--they still need to take responsibility for the performance of the final product, data used and all--but wouldn't this suggest that Tom Tom's dataset is largely to blame? Or am I missing something deeper here?

    2. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are missing something. They used Tom Tom data and weren't bright enough to figure out it was crap.

    3. Re:Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At least 688 out of the 2000 towns are searched for on not even on the map ... you get the same CLGeocoder Error Code 8 whether you manually search for it through Apple Maps (watch the iPhones consol because it logs those errors) or whether you do it using your own code in an App.

      I agree they do not have good source data, however it's not hard to find good source data either. These missing towns for example are on every map I have ever seen.

    4. Re:Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree the actual map data they have is really lacking.

      However it's not hard to find good source data either. Almost 30% of my searches resulted int he location simply being "not found". These missing towns for example are on every map I have ever seen. It shouldn't be up to iPhone users to add towns onto a map - that is base location data that should be there from the start. Users can refine pin locations and add points of interests. But towns and cities should all be there as they have existed in real life since the 1800's or earlier.

      You would think Apple would have audited the map data from their suppliers and realized that the maps themselves are sub-par.

    5. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even if Tom Tom was "largely to blame" I wouldn't blame them, it wasn't them trying to sell me an iPhone, was Apple. It wasn't Tom Tom who tried to pitch the iOS6 maps as a great new feature, it was Apple. It isn't a Tom Tom product, it's Apples. Seriously, doesn't matter who's giving the data what matters is who is "selling" the product that shouldn't be in the first place.

    6. Re:Really bad in Canada by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      Is this the new then Apple, implement 3rd party products and then blame them when they are shit?

      Apple chose to use an inferior quality material for the iPhone 5 which cannot even leave the factory without scratches and marks. They also clearly choose an inferior source of mapping data.

      I mean why didn't Apple just use Google Maps data but build their own skin over it? Apple claimed yesterday they dropped Google Maps because Google didn't want to provide voice navigation, but Google is also simply a repository of a rich dataset of map data you can license sans UI.

      Apple made very clear and bad choices for the iPhone 5 and it has nothing to do with the 3rd parties they partnered with. They chose to cripple a product to separate ties with what they perceive as the enemy. No way I will defend a company that chose to cripple their product on purpose out of spite.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    7. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Tom Tom is one of the world's biggest GPS data/services/products companies in the entire world. If their data is that badly flawed, doesn't that necessarily imply that all Tom Tom products relying on the data would suck just as hard? If so, why haven't we heard more about how terrible and crappy Tom Tom products are?

      That's why I think I'm missing something. Should I toss my Tom Tom GPS into the dumpster or is Tom Tom's data actually sound and Apple just somehow really screwed up the algorithms that process it?

    8. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do have a point here. I can't imagine Tom Tom data could be that bad? Maybe Tom Tom provided crap data to make themselves look good !!!

    9. Re:Really bad in Canada by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I have a Tom Tom GPS and I live in Ontario.. I've been all over southern Ontario and found only 1 problem (it sent me over the US boarder on my way to from Toronto to Niagara Falls, Ontario -- somewhat inconvenient since I had out-of-country tourists with me). So something doesn't add up, it seems strange that Apple would be missing so much data. Mind you, I haven't driven around all the small towns up north, maybe that's where the data is thin.

    10. Re:Really bad in Canada by jest3r · · Score: 1

      Ya, I agree. For Canada at least I don't think they got all of the data from Tom Tom. Because a regular Tom Tom GPS doesn't have these issues from what I have seen. So the question is where did Apple get the map data for Canada? Anyway you look at it if they can't get the fundamental locations correct then it will all snowball from there.

    11. Re:Really bad in Canada by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now run a comparison to Google's maps so we can see side by side.

    12. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Garmin GPS in my car, an 8 year old model with current maps. My friend has a Tom Tom from 2 or 3 years ago. It DOES suck. The interface is retarded, the routing is strange.

      His has a few features that mine doesnt have, which frankly I don't think I, or he, need. So he thinks its better than my Garmin. But it isn't. Its crap. If anyone at Apple had ever picked up a Tom Tom and driven down the street with it, they would have known to stay away.

      tl;dr Tom Tom IS crap; its still Apples fault for not figuring it out at any point along the dev process.

    13. Re:Really bad in Canada by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Honest Question: after perusing your site, the findings indicate that the underlying mapping data is seriously flawed. Apple gets its mapping data from third parties, primarily Tom Tom. I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist--they still need to take responsibility for the performance of the final product, data used and all--but wouldn't this suggest that Tom Tom's dataset is largely to blame? Or am I missing something deeper here?

      Wouldn't the same apply if Apple had chosen to stop using Samsung to supply Flash RAM for the iPhone, so they found a different (but inferior) source, which sometimes has memory corruption problems. Apple doesn't make the Flash themselves, all they do is choose the manufacturer and integrate it into their phone. The did some testing, found a few faults but figured that it was "good enough" so they shipped it...or maybe Apple didn't even test it, they just assumed it would work. Would it be Apple's fault that the Flash sucks or is it the Flash manufacturer's?

    14. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And *that* is exactly the kind of thing I want to know. Is Tom Tom's data crap, or did Apple mishandle the data?

      Of course, I realize the two aren't mutually exclusive...

    15. Re:Really bad in Canada by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      Because Google basically told Apple they wanted more advertising within their maps program and Apple said no, it wasnt only the voice Nav issue

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    16. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've only seen one error using a TomTom device, you're a rounding error and not normal behavior.

    17. Re:Really bad in Canada by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      In my experience, car nav systems ARE badly flawed at the level of the errors Apple is being criticised for. But TomTom gets compared to Garmin, not to Google. Google has had the benefit of years of massive usage and millions of people contributing corrections. Apple will catch up, but not without getting that user participation.

      Google still makes mistakes too. The other day I was trying to find an address and Apple maps sent me eight blocks in the wrong direction, apparently because it didn't know about addresses that have an "east" or "west" in them. Google sent me several blocks in the wrong direction the OTHER way, for no apparent reason.

    18. Re:Really bad in Canada by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple bought bargain basement 5 year old data?

    19. Re:Really bad in Canada by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Honest Question: after perusing your site, the findings indicate that the underlying mapping data is seriously flawed. Apple gets its mapping data from third parties, primarily Tom Tom. I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist--they still need to take responsibility for the performance of the final product, data used and all--but wouldn't this suggest that Tom Tom's dataset is largely to blame? Or am I missing something deeper here?

      Wouldn't the same apply if Apple had chosen to stop using Samsung to supply Flash RAM for the iPhone, so they found a different (but inferior) source, which sometimes has memory corruption problems. Apple doesn't make the Flash themselves, all they do is choose the manufacturer and integrate it into their phone. The did some testing, found a few faults but figured that it was "good enough" so they shipped it...or maybe Apple didn't even test it, they just assumed it would work. Would it be Apple's fault that the Flash sucks or is it the Flash manufacturer's?

      I think they just bit off more than they could chew. Apple has done it before, for example the 10.2 and 10.3 OS X releases were prone to kernel panics. At some point Apple then decided to dedicate a OS release (the 10.5 release IIRC) to stability improvements and the problem went away. If you want to provide a viable alternative to a product like Google Maps you need a large team of qualified experts in cartography and a whole lot of pretty high quality coders, especially if yo are planning to merge mapping data from many different sources. You can't just throw a team of developers at a problem like this and expect a result in record time.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    20. Re:Really bad in Canada by JonJ · · Score: 1

      10.5 was not it. Maybe you are thinking of 10.6, but 10.5 was a major overhaul of everything.

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
    21. Re:Really bad in Canada by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Apple was using Google's data with their own UI. I don't think the issue was that they couldn't code a turn-by-turn feature, but the license they had from google did not allow it.

      Which is probably why they rejected google's terms - they probably considered the lack of turn-by-turn license to be an oversight in the original license, rather than an extra feature that should be a significant extra cost - google wouldn't have provided anything but permission in this scenario.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    22. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It finds a number of them if you simply add Canada to the search string. Which means that their search query engine needs some tweaks - which is something that they really could not do until people start using the engine so they can see how people are searching (which is something Google has had years and billions of searches to build their optimizations from.)

    23. Re:Really bad in Canada by Trashcan+Romeo · · Score: 1

      Incorrect + No Results: 61%

      61%

      Tim Cook doesn't owe his customers an apology. He owes them a hand job.

    24. Re:Really bad in Canada by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      I mean why didn't Apple just use Google Maps data but build their own skin over it? Apple claimed yesterday they dropped Google Maps because Google didn't want to provide voice navigation, but Google is also simply a repository of a rich dataset of map data you can license sans UI.

      First of all, that's exactly what Apple has *always* done. The old iOS maps app was written by Apple, and merely used data licensed from Google.

      Second, the terms under which Apple was licensing the map data did not permit turn-by-turn voice navigation. That's a pretty common thing to leave out of such licensing deals, apparently; there's an entire industry built around that particular use of map data.

      Third, you might then ask why Apple didn't renegotiate with Google when they wanted to add this feature. Well, here's the thing: they tried. The problem was that Google wanted a bit more presence in the app in return. In particular, they either wanted Google branding in the app, or they wanted it to integrate their FourSquare competitor, whatever the hell it's called.

      Apple said no. I don't know what terms they offered Google instead, but apparently they were unwilling to meet Google's terms. Incidentally, this was all covered on Slashdot within the last 24 hours: http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/09/27/1737202/why-apple-replaced-ios-maps

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    25. Re:Really bad in Canada by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      All I can say is "oh, f***".

      doogal.co.uk has a complete list of UK postcodes (For those not in the UK: There 1,751,390 postcodes according to the site, so one postcode is for less than 40 people. Good enough to find most people). I just used their site for half a dozen postcodes; my home, nearby, and some far away, and all agreed one hundred percent with iOS maps. In the UK, the street data seems fine. Some of the satellite images are rubbish. Would be worth checking their complete data set.

      What they should do is write a little app that finds your location using GPS, then lets you enter the name of your location, and send it to Apple. They can cross reference it (in case someone thinks it's clever to send rubbish data), and you get one song credit in the iTunes store. At an average cost of $0.70, they would get 14 million data points for $10 million. And lots of happy customers.

    26. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone is using their iPhone in Canada and searching for a town in Ontario it doesn't take rocket science to realize that you should probably list Ontario results first - and they shouldn't have to type Canada every time. The Map App already knows where you are. Basic algorithm optimizations like this don't seem to be happening in many areas like rural Canada.

    27. Re:Really bad in Canada by raygundan · · Score: 1

      I agree-- it would be nice to see a full comparison. I manually spot-checked a couple of the not-founds, and they were all on Google's map-- but a complete comparison would be much, much more informative and useful.

    28. Re:Really bad in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah .... and outside the continental US Apple's new Maps is diabolically bad.

      Sorry ... did I say 'new'? The Australian version includes train stations that were decommissioned/destroyed 30 years ago, businesses that went out of business between 10 an 15 years ago (and even they have been sited in the wrong locations), landmarks that no longer exists, a real lack of double lane indicators, traffic directional indicators, and other niceties that can be useful for plotting a trip. Coastal towns and suburbs have been re-sited 15 kilometres inland, there are mysterious breaks in routes that make it impossible to get directions between many locations

      Asia is very poor. Hong Kong and China detail is bad in the extreme ... you could very easily get lost on a trip across the street from your hotel.

      I haven't checked out other locations, but have no reason to believe Africa, India and South America are an improvement. Europe? Well, I don't travel there much, but the complaints I've seen indicate that things aren't good there either.

      Outside the US, calling this app 'Maps' is basically a contradiction in terms, false advertising, a foul canard, a Cupertino fantasy, and Apple exec's delusionary excuse for useful. It is all style and no substance. I can't rely on it for a trip outside my front door.

      If Cook wants to make amends, then I want to see something concrete from Apple to remedy the situation. I want a maps product that actually works. One that is reliable, consistent across regions, one that I can have some confidence in. I want a maps service that can pass useful data to other maps/location dependent Apps.

      Have today ordered an Samsung Galaxy S3 to use as my travelling phone, because I've lost confidence in the iPhone as an adjunct for travelling. In future I will review all my Apple purchases with a view to transferring to a ecosphere that 'just works', that I have some confidence in, and that provides useful core services for other Apps ... and that ecosphere looks like being Android.

    29. Re:Really bad in Canada by zxsqkty · · Score: 1

      Run your own you lazy git. He posted a link to the methodology he used... :p

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
    30. Re:Really bad in Canada by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Asia is very poor. Hong Kong and China detail is bad in the extreme ... you could very easily get lost on a trip across the street from your hotel.

      http://anthonydrendel.com/blog/2012/9/24/ios-maps-and-china.html

      "Check out the difference yourself. The first map is Google Maps on iOS 5. The second is Apple's iOS Maps on iOS 6. This shows the same location just outside of Lijiang, Yunnan. Lijiang is one of the most popular tourist destinations in China. Both Google Maps and iOS Maps covers the center of the city pretty well. As you can see, though, if you move a couple of miles out of the city center, Google Maps becomes pretty useless pretty quickly."

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    31. Re:Really bad in Canada by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      http://vore.cc/post/32503374905/old-maps-vs-new-maps

      Via Gruber comes a link to some interesting research by Jason Matheson that—on the surface—shows how poor the data provided by iOS 6’s Maps app for the Canadian province of Ontario.

      This caught my attention for two reasons; the first is that I also live in Ontario, and my experience with the new Maps has, so far, been generally quite good. The second its that Matheson uses a reasonably objective test to see how good (or bad) Maps actually is at finding places in Ontario, which opens up a few interesting possibilities.

      The highlights

      This is a really long post, although it was fun to write, so here are the important points upfront:

      Google data isn’t much better than Apple data, at least as far as this test is concerned

      Google always returns a result, while Apple only seems to return results when they are a precise match, possibly explaining why the latter’s data appears to be less complete

      This test doesn’t really tell us anything about how accurate the maps are, however, both because of the small data set, and because of the test’s nature

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  5. Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything would mean allowing Google Maps to run on iOS 6. Google maps is so far ahead. No one cares about your stupid crappy in house maps, Apple. We just want something that actually WORKS.

    1. Re:Everything? by alen · · Score: 1

      google maps on iOS was only good for single people who don't have cars. for the car owners the lack of turn by turn directions and real time traffic means we've been using something else for years and don't care about the lack of google maps

    2. Re:Everything? by Chas · · Score: 1

      The lack of turn by turn was APPLE'S problem, not Google's.

      Google has had turn by turn working for a while now.

      Apple's existing license was simply for mapping data without turn by turn.
      So they went to Google to renegotiate.
      Apple just threw a fit when Google asked for better branding in their app, got pigheaded and figured "We're Apple, we can do it BETTER! This shouldn't take long!"

      Basically this attitude is going to stretch Apple thin trying to do everything and doing none of it excellently.
      In short, they're going to become Microsoft.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:Everything? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      you mean voice turn by turn. Turn by turn was in the software from day 1.

      And of course, the iphone 4 apparently doesn't have the ability to do voice turn by turn. You need a better phone than that if you want it to talk to you....

    4. Re:Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "google maps on iOS was only good for single people who don't have cars"

      What about married people who don't have cars?
      (Yes I realize that in most states marriage is limited to heterosexual couples which I guess rules out most apple users)

    5. Re:Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lack of turn by turn was APPLE'S problem, not Google's.

      Google has had turn by turn working for a while now.

      Apple's existing license was simply for mapping data without turn by turn.
      So they went to Google to renegotiate.
      Apple just threw a fit when Google asked for better branding in their app, got pigheaded and figured "We're Apple, we can do it BETTER! This shouldn't take long!"

      Basically this attitude is going to stretch Apple thin trying to do everything and doing none of it excellently.
      In short, they're going to become Microsoft.

      Dude... You have issues...

    6. Re:Everything? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Apple just threw a fit when Google asked for better branding in their app, got pigheaded and figured "We're Apple, we can do it BETTER! This shouldn't take long!"

      Since the very first iPhone Apple has denied the big players from getting their branding on the phone in any significant way. That's why you don't see AT&T, Verizon, or any other carrier's logo on either the physical phone or startup screens, like you did on most phones at the time.

      Interesting how you paint Apple as a kid (threw a fit / pigheaded / melodramatic whining) while Google "asked" for better branding. It's not asking, it's negotiating 101, and if the the other side's demands are unacceptable for whatever reason, you walk away.

      Apple's reasoning had a lot of business logic behind it. Their decision to release Maps in this state without slapping a beta label on it, did not. Add it to the recent "Genius" ads disaster, and you have to wonder if Apple's marketing and PR managers all took summer vacation at the same time.

    7. Re:Everything? by vakuona · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you don't see much of Apple's own branding on the device either! Yes, everything is Apple's visual identity, but they don't have Apple this and Apple that all over the place.

    8. Re:Everything? by toriver · · Score: 1

      The iOS app had the manual turn-by-turn you have in the web version of Google Maps. Apple chose to open the market to Navigon, TomTom and others to make commercial navigation apps for the platform, with great success: Both of them floated to the top in the "most grossing" category in iTunes.

      If you do not like platforms that cater to third parties, stick to friend-less platforms like Linux.

  6. I'll just say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve would never had apologised.

  7. I miss Steve Jobs by hawks5999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He would have just told us all that we are using the maps wrong, and we'd all apologize to him.

    1. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      He would have just told us all that we are using the maps wrong, and we'd all apologize to him.

      If you were heading toward anywhere cool enough to be worth going, Apple Maps would have gotten you there. If you want to navigate to places that are the geographical equivalent of the crappy ERP software that keeps you using XP at work, well, you'll just have to use something else...

    2. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by yotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You live in a really obscure town, I've probably never heard of it."
                                                    --Apple

    3. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL probably Steve Jobs was a great guy I miss him :'( RIP.

    4. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You may actually be on to something.

      Think about how excited all the hipsters will be when they discover the new Maps application has either never heard of, or cannot find, their favorite stores/bars/locations!

      "I'm heading out to this new oxygen bar. You've probably never heard of it. Even my iPhone hasn't."

    5. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You live in a really obscure town, I've probably never heard of it."

                                                    --Apple

      I pictured it more like "That town in New York is actually ten miles east of where we marked it? Come ON already. So one's 2,590 miles from Cupertino and the other one's 2,580 miles. Big deal. It's not THAT much of a difference. Put on your big-boy iPants and deal with it."

    6. Re:I miss Steve Jobs by plankrwf · · Score: 1
  8. Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uh oh, Apple just admitted failure. How will the zealots take that?

    1. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh oh, Apple just admitted failure. How will the zealots take that?

      Probably the same thing Google fanboys do when Google does something evil... go into denial!

    2. Re:Admitted Failure by alen · · Score: 1

      like the Moto #ilost ad using a fake and non-existent address. there is no 315 e 15st in manhattan. even the NYC GIS app has it as a fake placeholder address in the middle of the street

      but all the fandroids swear its real because its on google maps.

      try getting a bank loan for it. "but it's on Google Maps. the banks are idiots"

    3. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a self-proclaimed Apple fan, I find it refreshing. A company that is willing to publicly admit a major mistake like this one and recommend third-party alternatives is a company trying to to be responsive to its customers' wants and needs, and remains deeply concerned about the customer experience. That can only be a Good Thing (tm).

      But it would be interesting to learn whether Tim Cook called together the Apple Maps team and cussed them out the way Steve Jobs did when MobileMe cratered.

    4. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... mental facilities occupation rate and suicidal attempts will skyrocket.

    5. Re:Admitted Failure by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just because it doesn't have a building exactly there doesn't mean it isn't valid to search for it. There is a 300 block on E 15th street, and searching for 315 on any mapping app other than iOS 6 maps will at least take you to a location interpolated between the two nearest real buildings on the odd side of the street.

      In this case, looking at the maps, it's a public park. It's perfectly valid to reference the park as "3xx E 15th street" where xx is odd. If you search for this, you should get some point along the street on the edge of the park.

      Also, someone could be searching for a valid address and typo the number. Easy to do - Any SANE mapping app will degrade gracefully in this case and take you to a location that's within visual range of your actual desired destination. Only iOS 6 maps won't.

      iOS 6 maps is the only one that will take you to A COMPLETELY WRONG ROAD.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    6. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh oh, Apple just admitted failure. How will the zealots take that?

      The Android zealots hardly need an admission to gloat about how everything Apple does is a total failure.

      Oh, wait, did you mean some other zealots?

    7. Re:Admitted Failure by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      While I do agree with you, it should have never come to this.

      It would've been as easy as having ~20 people do some spot checks of Apple's maps vs. Google's (which tend to be accurate). They'd compile a nice list of places to double check (say, with Nokia/Navteq maps). Have a similar group do the same for the turn-by-turn navigation.

      After a week of doing this, they could've had a decent analysis of the quality of their maps.

    8. Re:Admitted Failure by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple does show you a location which can be accurately described 315 E 15th- elsewhere in the city, on a different 15th Street. This location most closely matches the search term in that there is actually a building numbered 315 there, it just isn't in Manhattan.

      If you force it to look only in Manhattan by searching for "315 E 15th St Manhattan", it does interpolate the building numbers as you describe and returns a location in the park.

      http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/09/27/googles-ilost-motorola-ad-faked-an-address-to-lose-ios-6-maps

    9. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any SANE mapping app will degrade gracefully..."

      I don't see what Google does and what iOS does as being any worst or better. I would rather know that I entered an address incorrect instead of sending to a location I was not looking for.

      As for finding a public park...I have yet to reference any park by street number...usually park name and/or cross street...

    10. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame that idiot commenters like you are getting modded "Insightful" when there isn't even a vague hint of insight in your entire post. It's filled with stereotypical anti-Apple moronic commentary that lacks any basis in facts. But, hey, it's anti-Apple so it must be insightful, right?

    11. Re:Admitted Failure by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs should've cussed out the MobileMe team when it was created. Since it was obvious it was going to crater. It provided all the services that Google (mail, picasa, etc) and others had been providing for free for years, for the low annual price of $99 for the lowest tier.

      Well, except for one thing. Prior to mobileme, they also had a program called iSync that would sync your contacts with your cell phone over bluetooth if you had one of the, iirc 3, cellphone models that they supported when they created iSync. Additional cell phone models never materialized and this service was folded into MobileMe where it continued to not support very many cell phone models, but instead of being part of the OS, you had to pay the annual fee for this.

      It was doomed to failure by being completely lackluster. There was a photo sharing bit, but you still had to provide your own bandwidth and any photos you didn't actually have in your phone/pda/laptop would take forever to download (even over wifi, for some reason...), so it was pretty pointless.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Admitted Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple does show you a location which can be accurately described 315 E 15th- elsewhere in the city, on a different 15th Street. This location most closely matches the search term in that there is actually a building numbered 315 there, it just isn't in Manhattan.

      If you force it to look only in Manhattan by searching for "315 E 15th St Manhattan", it does interpolate the building numbers as you describe and returns a location in the park.

      http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/09/27/googles-ilost-motorola-ad-faked-an-address-to-lose-ios-6-maps

      Let me get this straight, It could be accurately described as the 15th when it was changed from that name around 1915 or something (nearly a century ago)???

      Funny how Bing, Yahoo, and Google all correctly approximate it to the CURRENT 15th street when given the exact same search terms and only Apple needs further clarification to correctly approximate it.

    13. Re:Admitted Failure by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there is nothing wrong with Android 2.3, the leading platform.

      Google fans also deny there was ever anything called Buzz or Wave.

    14. Re:Admitted Failure by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Just because it doesn't have a building exactly there doesn't mean it isn't valid to search for it.

      Yes it does mean exactly that. The address doesn't exist and no map should say it does.

      will at least take you to a location interpolated between the two nearest real buildings on the odd side of the street.

      Then they are wrong. They are using an algorithm that is in this case producing an incorrect result.

      In this case, looking at the maps, it's a public park. It's perfectly valid to reference the park as "3xx E 15th street" where xx is odd. If you search for this, you should get some point along the street on the edge of the park.

      No. That might be what you have come to expect from apps that get t wrong. But it's still incorrect.

      Also, someone could be searching for a valid address and typo the number. Easy to do - Any SANE mapping app will degrade gracefully in this case and take you to a location that's within visual range of your actual desired destination.

      It should give you choices of the nearest matches to what you typed in. Which is not necessarily near to the place you intended, if some other address match better.

  9. Wait, What? by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the whole No Google Maps on iOS was a plan, didn't they use their app for 5 minutes, and realize the HUGE outcry when they removed it? Further, due to the massive amounts of money (which apple has in spades) and time (which apple doesn't have at this point) what can they hope to do to fix it? And why didn't they pull the plug before it got to release state? Somebody really dropped the ball, or lied out of their ass during the status meetings. I'm wondering when the firings will start.

    1. Re:Wait, What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their app works perfectly in Cupertino and San Francisco....

    2. Re:Wait, What? by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the plan was never "no google maps on iOS" the plan was "we need turn-by-turn navigation in iOS and our existing deal with Google does not enable that and we can't agree on licensing terms so we will have to roll our own".

      There's no conspiracy to exorcise Google from iOS - they still have several apps on iOS, it's just that the native maps app is no longer one of them (an app written by Apple in the first place).

      You've always been able to use google maps from Safari (or make an icon for it so you can launch it like an app), and many people did it this way because it had more features then the built in app which hadn't been updated in a long time. The same thing was true of Youtube - the version provided by Google on the web was better than the built in one (which Apple wrote back in 2007 and didn't see the need to update for this reason).

    3. Re:Wait, What? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The same thing was true of Youtube - the version provided by Google on the web was better than the built in one (which Apple wrote back in 2007 and didn't see the need to update for this reason).

      The new (Google provided) YouTube app is bare bones and much lower functionality than the old one. There may not be a 'conspiracy to exorcise Google from iOS', but with the new YouTube app and Google's announcement that they're in no hurry to provide a new Maps apps... there may be a 'conspiracy to not participate in iOS'.

    4. Re:Wait, What? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about the native app though, I'm talking about going directly to youtube via Safari, or making it into a quicklaunched app. There's really no need for Google to go all out on a native app when the web experience already works extremely well.

    5. Re:Wait, What? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Are you smoking crack? The new Google-provided YouTube app is leagues better than the old app. I can actually get my channel subscriptions there, just for one thing: The old one supported a fraction of the site's added functionality and was only useful for opening the occasional YouTube link.

  10. Somewhere, Google is Smiling by kstatefan40 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve Jobs must be turning in his grave. It sounds like Mr. Cook failed to learn from Mr. Job's demand for perfection before release. I guess this could be like iPhone v1 not having the copy and paste feature at product launch. Eventually, I wonder if people will get sick of dealing with this kind of attitude from Apple? I did - a long time ago.

    1. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by dopaz · · Score: 2

      A solution to both the iOS 6 map problem and iPhone V1 copy/paste problem is to simple: skip the first revision of a significant iteration. An iPhone 4S with iOS 5 has great maps. Early adopters have been treated as beta testers for years, and not just by Apple.

    2. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " An iPhone 4S with iOS 5 has great maps"
      No it doesn't... It doesn't even do basic turn-by-turn routing. Something standalone GPS units and Google Maps have had for years.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by kiriath · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, now it won't announce it to you - but the Maps App on iOS 5 gave you turn by turn directions with multiple route choices.

    4. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by alen · · Score: 2

      and that's useless while driving

      i'm not stupid enough to look at my phone every 2 seconds to make sure i didn't miss a turn. between apple maps, waze and navigon i have no need of google maps and have a lot more features than with android

    5. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by dopaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Maps app does indeed do basic turn-by-turn routing. What it doesn't do is text-to-voice, to announce the upcoming turns. Until Google released "Google Maps Navigation", Maps on Android didn't announce turns either.

    6. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      turn-by-turn routing... Something standalone GPS units and Google Maps have had for years.

      Which is exactly why Apple chose to invest in their own map data and software: they could not come to an acceptable agreement with their direct competitor to allow them to offer this feature. Apple made the right decision. When they catch up in a year they will be in a better place and consumers will have more choice. Win, win.

    7. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by kiriath · · Score: 1

      Some people are capable of looking at something and reading it quickly. Some people don't travel alone...

      Some people figure out where they're going before they leave so they don't have to rely on something to give them directions the entire time.

    8. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Or recalculation, or automatic advance. The old maps app didn't really do anymore turn by turn navigation than a desktop with map quest and a printer did.

    9. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by flatrock · · Score: 1

      I understand dumping Google maps. However, Google is hardly the only company out there that Apple could partner with to provide a mapping solution for iOS. An in house solution would have been great if it were ready, but it wasn't. You can't tell me that there weren't other mapping companies with quality products that would have offered Apple reasonable term to replace Google maps in iOS.

      Dumping Google maps may have been the right decision. Replacing it with their own solution that wasn't ready was an awful solution.

    10. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      When they catch up in a year they will be in a better place and consumers will have more choice. Win, win.

      and 100 new obvious patents (most probably already existing) for their war chest.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    11. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even following that logic, they've launched something that is clearly not ready for show time. It's the equivalent of launching a "public beta" as a finished product.

      Ultimately, the narrative seems to go like this:
      1) Apple wanted a feature that they did not yet have.
      2) Despite being the single richest company in the world, they did not want to pay the going rate to one of the mature players in that market.
      3) Instead they took the cheap option, and loaded their premium product with software that is inferior to what users had before.

      They might instead have considered the same method that Google used- they could have launched their mapping app as an actual, optional, public beta. Some people would still have used it in order to get the extra functionality, while others will have used the more mature (but less feature rich) Google alternative. Apple could have gathered lots of mapping corrections and bug reports, and then banished the Google product only when the time is right.

      Whatever way you look at it, if the end user has cause to complain about your decisions in making your product, you as a company have probably made a serious mistake somewhere.

      -Anon for modding purposes
      -Patch86

    12. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why Apple chose to invest in their own map data and software: they could not come to an acceptable agreement with their direct competitor to allow them to offer this feature. Apple made the right decision.

      That is a good reason to invest in their own solution. However, switching to their own solution before it was competitive was not the right decision. The right decision would have been to invest in customer satisfaction by doing what it would have taken to come to an interim agreement with the map solution that sets the standard for acceptable performance.

      Isn't that what Apple is supposed to be about? Sterling user experience?

      In a year, when (if) they catch up, they will still have no credibility WRT the supposed rationale behind their elevated prices.

      "I paid extra for this IThing and they can't use some of that money to deliver best of breed features?"

    13. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by toriver · · Score: 1

      There are "mapping solutions for iOS" if you are willing to pay, and has been for years. The only problem is that Siri will not open them but will use the builtin.

    14. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, it gave road by road directions. Turn by turn directions tells you what to do at the next junction, and zooms in to the junction as you approach it so you can navigate it sucessfully. The old Google Maps on iOS5 zoomed to the entirety of the next road, leaving you mostly clueless about the junction.

      It was also manually advanced, and didn't recalculate when you made a detour. And didn't rotate to match the direction of travel.

      For in car navigation, it was a non-starter.

    15. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Some people don't seem to understand what a real sat-nav does.

    16. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I see you are trying to out-shill other shills today. Multiple times. I'm just curious, is there so new incentive program that is encouraging you to do this?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    17. Re:Somewhere, Google is Smiling by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      A solution to both the iOS 6 map problem and iPhone V1 copy/paste problem is to simple: skip the first revision of a significant iteration.

      http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/what-android-can-learn-from-the-iphone-os-updated/6991

      6. Copy & paste. Apple took forever to deliver it, but it works really well. Android has had it forever but it's a kludge to the point that I don't use it.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  11. Where's Steve? by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Steve Jobs never would have apologized. While he was certainly one to recognize errors and correct them expeditiously, he'd never own up to it in public. His sometimes boisterous show of unwillingness to compromise is partly what has created Apple's entire image as a "no compromise" company.

    Tim Cook is certainly a different guy, with a different approach. I feel he has somehow cheapened the iGadgets with this move - first by releasing a product that never should have made it through validation, and second by apologizing for it in public.

    1. Re:Where's Steve? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

      Steve never would have allowed the product out the door in the first place not after the Mobile Me fiasco.

      I think Tim Cook should step down (or perhaps fired) as with nearly a year under his belt as CEO he is proven to be a major fuck up.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    2. Re:Where's Steve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really? That's funny, because when Cook started, AAPL was trading at ~$400; now it's trading at ~$700. If you think a 75% stock value increase in 12 months qualifies as a "major fuck up", then I'd like to know what stocks you're investing in.

    3. Re:Where's Steve? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      when Cook started, AAPL was trading at ~$400; now it's trading at ~$700.

      It shows that Tim Cook is good at milking the cow, but the cow is getting old.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Where's Steve? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Actually this explains quite a lot. If you don't spend money on R&D you make a bundle and produce iCrap.

      --
      Deleted
    5. Re:Where's Steve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >then I'd like to know what stocks you're investing in.
      He would've been investing in the stock that didn't give a dividend.

      The one you're talking about does, hence two different stocks, see?

    6. Re:Where's Steve? by toriver · · Score: 1

      30 years ago wants its "Apple is dying" back.

  12. I knew it by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha I knew Apple would blame then end user for everything and spin it as just another fea... wait what?

    This is actually quite a dramatic about face from the usual way Apple deals with problems. Where's the blame, then the spin, and instead of an apology I was expecting Tim Cook holding up a competitor's product going "see it has problems too!"

    I'm impressed.

    1. Re:I knew it by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      I suspect the different approach is because Apple has finally figured out that this is a very different problem from any they've faced in the past. They can't put coders or engineers on overtime and issue a patch or change the design and offer to exchange bad phones within a few days or a few weeks.

      This is a problem that's going to persist for months, possibly years - as they scramble to build what amounts to an entirely new division producing an new product line (one that existing companies have already built high expectations for) in an entirely new market. Yes, I know they're hiring folks as fast as they can get them through the line... but it still takes time to build the organization and the processes and to integrate the vast amounts of data involved. Essentially they have to re-invent the wheel (both in maps and Google's core competency in data handling) and catch up with the years of experience Google has.

      Worse yet for Apple, not only do competing phones (I.E. Android) have this feature nailed flat - Google has tacitly announced they're in no hurry to return to the iPhone.

    2. Re:I knew it by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but they *need* the users to correct the data. Map data keeps changing and there no map source is accurate enough. Just like people corrected Google Maps for over 10 years, Apple wants it's users to correct Apple maps. Without acknowledging the problem, you can hardly expect the users to contribute.

  13. in Yoda's words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    not ready the apprentice is
    more than just fancy presentations he must learn
    much too soon master has left

  14. Maps sure, but what about the OS? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want an apology for the fact that they've decided my 2.5 year old iPad isn't getting an iOS upgrade.

    That's way too short of a life to decide to abandon it. Telling your early adopters "tough luck" isn't a great idea.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    2. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Shut the fuck up and go buy a brand new Android device that doesn't have the latest operating system from day 1 and likely is two generations old and will never see an update for the life of the device.

    3. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, for expecting an OS update that's supported on the iPhone 3GS (released 2009) to work on an original iPad (released 2010)? I suspect your threshold for idiocy is a little out of whack.

      Moron.

    4. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by partyguerrilla · · Score: 2

      Hahahah, he bought an iPad. Look at him, look at him and laugh!

    5. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're complaining that you don't get the new, worse map app? Does your iPad not still work? Whiner.

    6. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, for expecting an upgrade from Apple (a hardware company who have every interest in selling you a new iPhone)

    7. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      You dont have the hardware for the new OS...Too bad

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    8. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Apple world! This has always been the way. Back in 1995, I was dumb enough to buy a Mac Quadra 660AV from a friend, and it ran on a 68000 processor. Then Apple moved over to PowerPC, all the while reassuring 68K owners that it would be fine and applications would be delivered as "fat apps" with code for both processors for a long time. Not so much. A short while later, my sweet 68K box was pretty much obsolete. I've never owned an Apple computer since.

    9. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful
    10. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      What is an acceptable life to you? For many Android devices, they don't even get the latest OS when launched. Some never get an update during the lifetime. You can install you own updates but that depends on the device whether you can do that. And then there's the big middle finger that MS gave to all the WP7 customers. Oh they can upgrade to 7.8 but that has minor updates and they can never upgrade to WP8 even if they bought a WP7 device today. 2.5 years is not what I would consider an early adopter.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS6 will install on the 3GS. Why wouldn't they allow it on the iPad 1?

    12. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so harsh! The updated Xcode tools aren't even ABLE to compile for older iPhone 3G or iPod touch, despite being perfectly usable devices! Your 1st gen ipad will likely pick up dust the next year when it is left out of the xcode tools... and that, kids, is what we call PROGRESS.

    13. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to talk product lifecycles, check the fragmentation of the Android platform. In fairness, I like Android better, but their device updates aren't very solid.

    14. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Kind of like how most Android users feel when they get abandoned mere months after buying the new stuff?

      I'm not defending Apple here, but putting it in perspective: Unless you're willing and able to root your android handset/tablet it's very unlikely that your carrier will bother trying to push you an OS upgrade in a timely manner or at all. And if you do root your handset/tablet you're going to void the warranty.

      All other things being equal, I would take the length of time Apple supports their customers' devices over most any other maker of comparable devices.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    15. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      To be fair, until recently it was almost unheard-of for a mobile device to ever get updates more than two years after its release, and it's still relatively uncommon. The iPhone 3GS and the first-generation Windows phones are getting that, and it's possible there's some Android phones that will receive such updates officially (though I somewhat doubt it), but it's not really the common state of affairs.

      With that said, it is a somewhat odd decision on Apple's part, especially since the iPad has both better specs and a display resolution that is still supported in another iOS product.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    16. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by gbrandt · · Score: 1

      I logged in just for this!

      Did your 2.5 year old device stop working. Has it become a brick because you can't load iOS 6 onto it.

      I don't think so, it still has ALL of the functionality that you paid for originally.

      Apple did not promise extra functionality when you purchased it and is not required to supply extra functionality.

    17. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      Having upgraded my iPad 2 to iOS6, trust me, you don't want it. Forget maps, it's an unstable pile of garbage, Safari routinely locks up and occasionally crashes, as does the app store. I would hope that the iPhone 5 isn't experiencing the same problems.

      Nevertheless, your argument does stand. My Intel iMac can't be updated to the latest OSX because of a 32-bit EFI. That means no further support for the OS I'm stuck running. I also expect that Apple will never patch the issues in iOS6 for older devices. They seem to believe that we should all always be migrating to the latest and greatest. Consumers are only exacerbating the problem; in only a few years time they have acquired a very disposable attitude towards their electronics.

    18. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want an apology for the fact that they've decided my 2.5 year old iPad isn't getting an iOS upgrade.

      I imagine that was an easy decision to make, given that the device has only 256MB RAM... And before anyone wants to chime in about the 3GS retaining support with only 256MB of RAM, let me point out that its screen size means that every single image used on the iPad 1 takes up over five times as much space in memory than on the 3GS.

    19. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Well, if one really puts their mind to it, they can upgrade it to cynogenmod. How much ever I try, I cannot upgrade my iPad.

    20. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean iDiot.

    21. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    22. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, you still have access to a working app store and you still get security updates and fixes.

      Just because you can't run the latest and greatest iOS it doesn't mean your device becomes immediately worthless.

    23. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    24. Re:Maps sure, but what about the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets just ignore the fact that 75% of Android phones are on versions of Android that are (almost) 2 years old.

      But hey, fuck Apple! Right?

      As long as someone is doing worse then everything is okay, right?

  15. they are not too bad in NYC by alen · · Score: 2

    i've used them here. the parsing is screwy. you have to input the address exactly or it will screw it up. but it wasn't too much trouble to do it for a few contacts.

    otherwise the routing works very nicely. previous maps app didn't have turn by turn and this is a pretty big improvement. especially the real time traffic from waze that's built in

    1. Re:they are not too bad in NYC by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I am actually well pleased, so far. Routing is good, the roads between my place and my parents' house are a bit goofy, and unlike my other nav software (Navigon) it gave the two most sensible routes. It also has traffic info even on crappy little roads here in the Netherlands, marked more clearly than it was on Google's map app. The parsing is not as good as Google's, but I found that typing in part of the street name resulted in a list of suggestions sorted on proximity, which allows me to quickly fill in the complete address. I haven't found any errors in the maps thus far.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  16. It really is the House of Steve by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1/ When Apple fired him (for being an egomaniac), the company went in the toilet.

    2. When Apple rehired him, it became a trillion dollar juggernaut.

    3. When he died, it began it's slide into mediocrity (as the map app debacle illustrates).

    It really makes you wonder what one man's outsized ego can do to the performance of a company and/ or a product line.

    Perhaps Steve would have prevailed a month or two ago and said "our map app sucks, not ready for prime time." But now there is no such ego of equivalent standing in Apple.

    And the mediocrity of consensus, rather than the exacting standards of the dictator with the right aesthetic, means Apple is doomed?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:It really is the House of Steve by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      plenty of crap released under steve jobs

    2. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're a football fan, I'd compare Steve Jobs & Apple to Peyton Manning & the Indianapolis Colts.

      The Colts were built around Manning, and when the team was all there, it worked perfectly. However, with Manning gone, they couldn't play the way they were designed to. Both the offense & defense were picked to complement Manning, and with any other quarterback, they are a poor team.

      I'd say the same with Apple. I think Cook can be a great change for Apple, but the team that has been built has been built for another quarterback. Either Cook needs to act like Jobs (which I think is a bad idea) or Cook needs to change the mindset and likely many of the staff at Apple.

      Either they keep going the same way or make a drastic shift, they can't work on a middle ground.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      The magic was he was usually right, AND he had the balls to tell the c levels suits, and the board of directors, to go shove it their ass if necessary. Cook is a supply chain guy, MBA, a cost cutter. No balls.

    4. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but when it was Steve's crap it was a stunning shade of UPS brown, shined like the top of the Chrysler building, and the smell was described as "earthy and inviting, like a forest floor on a spring morning" by all the bloggers.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, but he also had the complete devotion of an oddly fanatical portion of the population. Since his death, that population is slowly shrinking either due to loss of devotion of loss of enthusiasm. This is bad news for Apple, but it does make Slashdot more tolerable.

      I don't expect Apple to go under anytime soon, they have near perfect brand recognition for a few popular types of trinkets. (also I know better than the Slashdotters who would say that any one slipup by a big company would be their doom) Despite that, I think Apple will have to actually work to maintain market share and to have some grab into new niches that will become apparent in the future. They might be required to actually have specs that match their prices, but I expect they'll get by with just a massive advertising budget.

    6. Re:It really is the House of Steve by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Are you really a fan of ogling cheerleaders on the sidelines, or a football fan? We're talking about one incomplete app on the iPhone that works reasonably well for lots of people. The Colts had a perfect 0-16 season after Manning was injured. That would be like your iPhone bursting into flames every time you got an incoming call and sending shards of gorilla glass into your eyes.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      They're only 0-1 right now. That's hardly exploding phones.

      Lets give them 15 more releases & look for explosions, or a team change.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    8. Re:It really is the House of Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it crap that tried to copy already existing and polished products, or was it pioneering crap? I'm more forgiving to pioneers, who turn out crap than to copycats that produce turds.

    9. Re:It really is the House of Steve by toriver · · Score: 1

      So picking other products than you do is being fanatical. It cannot possibly be because we actually like the products or due to good marketing to the general population.No, it is all witchcraft and Reality Distortion Fields and whatnot.

      If anyone are fanatical it's the "you are dumb if you do not get a Samsung GS3" freaks that flood all over the Internet with their mythmaking about Apple, decrying any positive press as "bias" and insulting the users of Apple hardware whenever they can. One would think we were infidels and iPhone was haram or something...

  17. They will sue everyone who uses another app by gelfling · · Score: 1

    As well they should. It's Tim Cook's world, we just live in it.

  18. Apple employee handbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny, after reading about that article somewhere on the interent where they break down the handbook for geniuses, even the top head seems to be following it.

    It says somewhere, "never apologize for the problem, apologize it's frustrating them" and here he comes after delivering buggy, incomplete apps and says "We are extremely sorry for the frustration..."

  19. Failure in reporting by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good job driving ad traffic to BGR, who didn't even bother to link to the original source:

    http://www.apple.com/letter-from-tim-cook-on-maps/

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Failure in reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot -- Failure in reporting

    2. Re:Failure in reporting by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      slashdot isn't a report site as such - it reports on reports(ask slashdot and such don't apply to that), so the fashion is to link to a report rather than sources.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Failure in reporting by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      BGR took the time to post to Slashdot and gets rewarded with clicks. May be, when Apple takes the time to submit stories on slashdot, we can link to them directly?
       
      You dont realize that Slashdot depends on these news gathers and others rarely post stories anymore.

  20. Or... instead of apologize... release the old Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than apologize Apple and Tim Cook in this instance would have been better served to release an update of the old Maps app that allows the user to CHOOSE between the two, and then talk about how insanely great the new version is and why no one should want to use the old one... except in those cases where the new one's features aren't fully ready yet. Like public transit directions. Or accuracy.

  21. It's a Shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame that he didn't use the opportunity to say something to the effect "While our competitors have taken to lying in an attempt to make Maps look worse than it really is, we do acknowledge it could be better than it is for which we're sorry."

    After all, you know, Google/Motorola is lying in their advertising in an attempt to make Apple look bad. Because, you know, the truth is Google is freaking out that they just lost over a hundred million Maps users in an instant...

    http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/09/27/googles-ilost-motorola-ad-faked-an-address-to-lose-ios-6-maps

  22. Slavishly copying Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We launched Maps initially with the first version of iOS. As time progressed, we wanted to provide our customers with even better Maps including features such as turn-by-turn directions, voice integration, Flyover and vector-based maps. In order to do this, we had to create a new version of Maps from the ground up."

    In other words: "We didn't like what Google wanted to charge us to use these features, so we're going to copy them and call it 'innovation' "

    Does Steve have a Hari Seldon generator? Maybe he'll appear and solve this.

    1. Re:Slavishly copying Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, look at the Google Maps API license terms. They explicitly *disallow* turn-by-turn. Also, the public Google Maps API doesn't serve up vector-based maps. If the Google Maps API doesn't supply a wanted feature, and the license terms specifically disallow adding a feature, then Apple couldn't do those things without moving to a different back end.

    2. Re:Slavishly copying Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A customer as big as Apple would most certainly be able to negotiate a different set of terms with Google.

    3. Re:Slavishly copying Google by toriver · · Score: 1

      Hello? They tried. And Google wanted more than Apple wanted to give so the negotiations stranded. "Most certainly" is easy to shout from the sideline.

  23. Built in excuse by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    So for a while, anyone who's late for work or an appointment can just use the, "Sorry, I was using Apple Maps to get here." excuse, and they'll be forgiven. Thanks Apple!

  24. Remove GMaps, Suggest GMaps Website? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 2, Funny

    Suggesting the Google Maps website is really thick. If Apple really wanted to fix the situation ASAP, why don't they re-release the Google Maps app?

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Remove GMaps, Suggest GMaps Website? by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe because it doesn't run on iOS6 and is many years old and has less function than using Google maps in the browser?

      Just a (well known, well reported) thought.

    2. Re:Remove GMaps, Suggest GMaps Website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they terminated their maps contract with Google. If they tried to renew now, Google would probably charge more money or set stricter terms (I know I sure as fuck would if I was running the place).

  25. iApologize by WilyCoder · · Score: 2

    Never thought I would see the day where Apple would introduce the iApologize...

  26. Strategic alternatives by HobbesAtPlay · · Score: 1

    I read more into the recommended alternatives than the apology. Bing, really? Nokia has maps? Politics makes strange bedfellows.

  27. Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by Picass0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple screwed up (although they are haldly unique) is pushing the concept that an Operating system is a bunch of personal and productivity applications. Road Navigation software is not part of the operating system.

    The OS is the core environment, utility, houskeeping software, and desktop. Marketing idiots have confused the common consumer into thinking an OS also has programs for adding glitter to ponies.

    As seen here, when an app breaks the perception becomes the who OS is flawed.

    1. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one outside the IT industry cares about the boundary between OS and applications. That's purely inside baseball. End users want their product to work in a user-friendly, integrated fashion.

    2. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple screwed up (although they are haldly unique) is pushing the concept that an Operating system is a bunch of personal and productivity applications.

      Remember fifteen years ago when Microsoft decided that a IE was a fundamental part of the OS, and everygeek and the DOJ all cried foul? Yeah? How'd that work out?

      Mapping and geolocation is as much a fundamental part of a mobile OS as a browser is of a desktop OS. Fortunately in both cases, you're not stuck with what the vendor gives you.

    3. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programmers want the operating system to provide basic services and stay out of their way otherwise. The Apple walled garden is the antithesis of this. For example, you can't just write an app that runs in the background and pops up when needed in context. Instead Apple provides an API that provides hooks for background execution in certain contexts (music playing, notifications, etc.).

      The Apple way in many ways stifles programmers, but, in its defense, it ensures that separate apps play along nicely and don't shit all over the operating environment. I remember seeing a Lifehacker article asking for tips on how to figure out which app is messing up a user's jail broken iPhone.

      That's a subtle problem in user interaction. The user may like what a program does, but issues with borderline hacks used in its implementation may make it more trouble than its worth, and further you may not be able to keep track of what is causing which problem.

      And if you can't see why this is a problem or why people might view Apple's approach as a reasonable approach to this problem, I think you have blinders on.

    4. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      No, the maps really are part of the operating system and not just an app. Assuming you define "operating system" to include the UI toolkit.

      Keep in mind iOS 6 replaces the maps in every application that uses the built-in iOS map widget. So your mobile realty app will all of a sudden think that house you want to look at is across town, and your Starbucks app will direct you to drive through a couple of houses to get to a Starbucks that's three blocks down from where it really is. Basically any app that uses the existing maps widget now has bad maps.

      So, yeah: it really is a part of the OS changing for the worse. Assuming you think of an OS as including the basic UI toolkit, which most people do.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're thinking too desktop... the iOS is still "core environment, utility, houskeeping software", the marketed iOS though includes these apps... i don't see a reason why it shouldn't, since the vast majority of users don't know what the technical term OS is

    6. Re:Danger of confusing Apps with Operating System by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Yes, no one outside electrical industry cares about colour coding one's internal hidden connectors. But they do notice that if qualified electricians have more trouble than usual to fix issues, and rightly conclude that the electric connection design is screwed up.

      Similarly, no one outside the software industry cares about the boundary between the OS and the applications, they do notice that in competing smartphones, maps issues are just an update away from the idiotically named play store. Such updates also regularly bring new features. So they can rightly conclude that the phone software design is screwed up.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  28. Next Apologize to Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the focus becomes the legal department the product suffers. Nobody buys the product based on court rulings

    If Apple can't deliver "it just works" then where's the real appeal?

    The new "it just sues" message isn't going to inspire people to queue all night for a half-baked, Zune-like fail-phone

  29. Not doing quite everything they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... since they already had a map application which worked tremendously well-- Google maps-- and the whole problem is that they ditched it to screw Google.

  30. Re:Or... instead of apologize... release the old M by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    That would require that Apple get a new license to use Google's maps in their old app. They only have a year left so it's going to have to go away eventually. As it stands, you can get the same function by doing as Tim Cook suggested (and that many people already did), by going to google maps via the browser and making a quick launch icon on the Springboard.

    The old maps app does not run on iOS6, so it's not as simple as just releasing it on iOS6 when you already know it's a dead end.

  31. Yes, but is it time to go short by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Can we expect AAPL below 500 by Christmas?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  32. A correction by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Informative

    The idea that Steve Jobs never apologized for anything seems to be starting to become a common Slashdot misconception.

    I'm sure people can think of times when they wish he did apologize for something, but to say he never did would be inaccurate.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  33. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple isn't cool any more.

  34. Apple's choice, Apple's responsibility by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Apple gets its mapping data from third parties, primarily Tom Tom. I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist--they still need to take responsibility for the performance of the final product, data used and all--but wouldn't this suggest that Tom Tom's dataset is largely to blame?

    Apple actively chose to replace its existing maps data supplier (Google) with new suppliers (including TomTom). If there are problems with the new version of Maps resulting from that choice of data suppliers, the blame is 100% with Apple. The map data is the heart of the Maps app, so its a pretty key decision in the app. Not insisting on -- and verifying -- quality on that piece is not a minor issue.

    1. Re:Apple's choice, Apple's responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Hence my statement that Apple still has to take responsibility for the performance of the final product. I'm trying not to be fanboy-ish about this.

      I'm trying to figure out whether Tom Tom's data is faulty or whether Apple did something beyond just picking a bad data provider. There's a meme to some of the criticisms that the underlying data is bad, but the data comes largely from Tom Tom, but Tom Tom has a pretty good rep. If Tom Tom's data is that faulty, shouldn't we also be hearing stories about Tom Tom products suffering from the same issues as the iOS 6 maps app? We don't hear those stories (at least I haven't heard them), so did Apple do something else to screw things up, like write crappy algorithms that mishandled otherwise sound data?

      Or is it both, bad data *and* bad algorithms?

  35. Because we didn't know it sucked by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Thanks Tim. I'm sure you had no idea how much fail was in the ios Map application before you shrink-wrapped the 5. It's not like you have endless developers to work on these things and go through each bundled feature to make sure it works correctly, or even works at all. We understand you needed to get the phone on the shelves in time for the holidays, and especially to keep people from jumping ship over your recent litigation.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  36. The reality disortion filed by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    To paraphrase the AC.

    I don't think Steve would have allowed such as shitty product to completely be release.

    Well you nailed it. Like Paul Mason, jobs would release no wine before its time. Moreover, someone would get fired. Like it or not his process worked. It could be that this is just going to be the learning experience they need to get back their Wu.

    But in a way we are lucky. In the case of these maps, the Jobs reality distortion filed probably would have convinced us that the maps were right and the earth was wrong. If it was strong he might have just distorted the reality to match.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  37. As I have been saying by geekoid · · Score: 1, Funny

    1 years after his death, Apple will start to loose it's way. Tim Cook didn't learn anything from Jobs.
    Now all the fan boys can't stand behind contrived excuse and apologies; which is critical to Apple vocal customer base. Much of which is cult like thinking when dealing with Apple.
    Seriously, I'm thinking about writing a paper on it. Please note, I said their vocal customer base. i.e. the apologists.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:As I have been saying by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I'll be glad when the fanboys start getting disillusioned with Apple. I like their hardware, but I'm sick of how everything even remotely associated with Apple gets it's price jacked up to exploit the fanboy crowd.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  38. Re:Or... instead of apologize... release the old M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No reason they couldn't do as the GP suggested, re-release with some kind of switcher, and when the year is up after warning the user a few times in the days leading up to it, then FORCE the user over the new Apple Maps, hopefully in that time they'll be able to work out the bugs and flaws in the data.

  39. Cook and Ives should be fired... by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

    or at least step down.

    Ive's should appologize next for designing a phone in the 21st century that scratches when it goes into its retail packaging when most of their cometition seemed to have firgured out how to create pretty durable products.

    In less then one year after Job's died they ruined any legacy Steve hoped to leave behind. They took the last few products Steve had involvement in and turned them into mediocre jokes.

    How can anyone take anything Cook and Ives say seriously now when they hold their hat's in their hands, kick a few rocks by their feet and say "Gosh sorry folks, the product sucks, we really didn't see this coming". I mean the next time Cook takes a jab at their competition in a keynote address it should be met with overt snickering. The next Ives white background video going on about how perfect his product is should be taken offline as an overt lie.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Cook and Ives should be fired... by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry folks, I made a spelling error.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    2. Re:Cook and Ives should be fired... by toriver · · Score: 1

      Well, there were a lot of other errors there as well... hard to notice the spelling error when you call immensely successful products "mediocre jokes".

  40. So then let people go back to 5.X by RossR · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think what we (the consumers and people concerned with lock-in) should be pushing for is the ability to go back to older versions of iOS on devices that we own. If every story about this failure mentioned that people who try the new version are locked in without the ability to go back to a working version, maybe Apple would cave.

  41. Actually, Nokia is smiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bing, MapQuest and Waze, or use Google or Nokia maps "

    *Three* of the five companies Cook mentioned are at least using Nokia data.

  42. Reality distortion field failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Clearly Steve Job's reality distortion field dissipated after he died. Otherwise the real world would have magically adapted to Apple's maps.

    1. Re:Reality distortion field failure by toriver · · Score: 1

      It never existed other than in the minds of people who prefer to believe in sci-fi instead of marketing.

  43. Clever apologies by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first apology is for selling too much too quickly.
    The second apology is for lowering the price of the their product.

    This is like when in an interview, the interviewer asks "What are your weakness", you say "Sometimes I work too hard".

    1. Re:Clever apologies by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      This is like when in an interview, the interviewer asks "What are your weakness", you say "Sometimes I work too hard".

      Or "I'm not a sore loser, I just have no experience with it.".

    2. Re:Clever apologies by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      IOW he's apologizing for the discomfort his huge penis is causing his lover. That's not really apologizing my friend.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  44. Looks like the beginning of the end for Apple by epp_b · · Score: 1, Funny

    And I'm going to enjoy every minute of it.

    1. Re:Looks like the beginning of the end for Apple by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      I concur. Inaccurate mapping data will obviously be Apple's downfall. Nobody saw it coming.

    2. Re:Looks like the beginning of the end for Apple by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris said that inaccurate map data would lead to "a thousand years of darkness".

    3. Re:Looks like the beginning of the end for Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yes, the same way the Buzz failure doomed Google. Dead in a year I tell ya. Better switch your browser back to Yahoo! before it is too late.

  45. I wonder... by knarf · · Score: 1

    ...if it is time for Google to introduce some judiciously placed non-existing place names in their maps. Something which would beyond a shadow of a doubt prove that wherever they show up, they're sure to have been scraped off Google Maps. They did this when they suspected Microsoft of scraping search results, and lo! those nonsensical results ended up on Bing in no time.

    What now is the non-existing place of 'Oosterbeekerswaard' suddenly shows up on an iDevice? Nobody would mind not finding anything there, the question is 'where did they get these data from'?...

    Of course those maps might be full of such random data already, who knows...

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
    1. Re:I wonder... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Since this seems to get mentioned a lot of /. recently...

      Google intentionally installed a tool that would submit browsing and search info to Microsoft explicitly for the purposes of improving Bing. They then deliberately poisoned their own search results and sent the poisoned results to Microsoft, Since that was the only data point MS had for the nonsense search query, yeah, it was the only response they could offer to that query.

      An much closer equivalent to what you propose would be to have Google mess with their map data like you suggest, then use the feedback mechanism in iOS 6 Maps to sumehow automatically submit that poisoned data. Of course, since iOS 6 Maps doesn't have any way to say "I'm navigating to Hahayousuckistan now" and have it follow you along the nonexistant route, that's not really possible.

      Apple may resort to scraping Google's maps for another data source (though part of their problem seems to be having too many sources, rather than too few) but I doubt it. Even Google never actually claimed Bing was doing that, they just gave a wink to the screaming moron fanboy legion who did it for them.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  46. I agree, weak sauce by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs would have never apologized

    I agree.

    He woudl've given it just the right spin that everyone would feel contrite over making jokes at Apple's expense. The next release would be perfect, as Steve would have demanded, and the kerfuffle would be consigned to largely forgotten history.

    And he might have even pointed out Apple Maps are working better than most people think, with people (and companies!) lying to demonstrate error.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I agree, weak sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must really suck for you right now. Apple's being dragged over the coals over what is (according to you) a non-issue, and you're not even willing to admit that, hey, maybe there is something to all these complaints, even if it is exaggerated. I know you have to really keep the cognitive dissonance/RDF going so that you don't have to think ill of your sacred cow, so it's tough to judge you too harshly. Kind of like I try not to judge religious folks too harshly, because they just don't know any better and can't help it.

      So sorry, man. It'll get better.

  47. Apple is not as far behind as you think. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've seen some humorous issues (though some of the things being stated as issues are actually made up).

    But for every day things, most searches work right now. And Apple is shipping 3D maps on mobile while Google is not.

    Lastly, already Apple finds some things Google does not. It's like everyone is blind to the fact that Google has plenty of errors still. Apple with Yelp integration, is going to find most things today that people actually want found when doing a general search on a map. The high-level issues people are seeing should be cleared out in short order, probably more a matter of months than years.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      True. Google STILL does not map out my old place. Every time I try, it puts the pin in the completely wrong spot. This, despite numerous attempts at "offer corrections".

      Hell, I think there's even Street View for it (there are certainly roads there on the map), but they're all unnamed and thus, unsearchable.

      NavTeq among others have properly routed to that address since the 2010 update. The satellite images and street view are dated, which is fine, but not having the street named (it was a new street ... back in 2008) or mappable for that long is inexcuasble.

      Of course, where I am now, both Google and Apple probably won't find it since it's a brand new street dating to last year.

      And heck, when Google switched map sources from Tele-Atlas to Google back around 2010, there was a lot of amusement going on as street names and entire towns were misspelled. It got so bad the only solution often was to use Bing or Mapquest.

      Of course, I do wonder how bad it was last week when iOS6 was released. Perhaps many of the issues got fixed in-between (such is common since the maps are "in the cloud").

    2. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by TrancePhreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have had this for a while, it's not the same, but it's better than you make it sound. http://www.google.com/mobile/maps/3d/

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    3. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And Apple is shipping 3D maps on mobile while Google is not.

      Android has had 3D maps for ages.

      They work really well, you can actually see what is inside buildings and it will navigate you (on foot) up escalators in shops to the right department or around a big train station.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by jmerlin · · Score: 2

      I just took this picture on my Android device: http://i.imgur.com/42oQd.png

      The reality distortion field is strong with this one! Also, not having textures just means I'm saving that much bandwidth. :)

    5. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by narcc · · Score: 1

      Really? The CEO says they screwed the pooch, apologizes, and recommends alternatives and you're still defending their app?

      It's like you're saying that "Apple is way better than they think they are" -- as though the company was a kid with low self-esteem.

      Bring it down. Even Bonch would have just let this one go...

    6. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Really? The CEO says they screwed the pooch, apologizes, and recommends alternatives and you're still defending their app?

      They are apologizing for it not being perfect. Which I've never said it was.

      But it is quite usable. You see, unlike you who has probably used the new maps never, I have been using it for a month or so, including a cross-country road trip across the united states. I didn't find any significant searching errors during that time.

      Does experience count for nothing at all any more? On Slashdot, the answer would appear to be NO.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by narcc · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Why? Because it's too damn easy to lie about "experience".

      Watch this: "I used Apple's new maps to take a 48 state tour and I barely survived! I had to fall back to paper maps and road signs so often that I might as well have not had a GPS at all."

      This isn't rocket science.

      BTW, Apple didn't apologize because their app wasn't perfect -- they apologized because it was total garbage. That's why they recommend alternative mapping apps; their app is practically useless.

    8. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Why? Because it's too damn easy to lie about "experience".

      However there are a number of other people posting the same thing. The fact is you are ignoring not just me but all the rest of them.

      Eventually you have to realize that truth is the truth.

      Meanwhile why are we supposed to trust your cherry-picked problems with maps - when some of them we KNOW to be fabrications? That's supposed to be a BETTER source of trust than many other people with real experience?

      Watch this: "I used Apple's new maps to take a 48 state tour and I barely survived!

      You have no foundation to base any claim of experience upon. You can look back through my posting history to find my claims are consistent, and that I have used Apple products before. What proof do you have that you would even touch an Apple product without screaming out in agony and cutting off your own hand?

      People who have used Apple Maps for more than an hour know I am correct. And they also know you are wrong.

      BTW, Apple didn't apologize because their app wasn't perfect -- they apologized because it was total garbage

      If it were total garbage it would not be usable. For many it is. But then I guess that's just the Hater in you speaking out again, uncontrollably.

      I'll let you have the last response because trolls just can't help but yack away even as they bury their own credibility into the dirt.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    9. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by immaterial · · Score: 1

      Consumer Reports finds it totally usable; though of course you can they could be lying, too. As you can claim I am too, when I say I find it better than the pre-iOS 6 Google Maps version (so far I've only had one issue finding something, and the smoothness of the new vector-based maps when scrolling and zooming is ten times better). Accept everything that supports your opinion, and call everything else a lie - it's a simple way to always be right.

      Apple's maps are definitely not perfect (particularly outside the US), but "total garbage" is total bullshit.

    10. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by narcc · · Score: 1

      However there are a number of other people posting the same thing. The fact is you are ignoring not just me but all the rest of them.

      And you're ignoring the even larger number of people posting about the terrible experience and many problems that they're having.

      Eventually you have to realize that truth is the truth.

      Even Apple's CEO recognized that their new mapping app is a massive failure.

      You shouldn't let brand loyalty define your personal identity.

    11. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by narcc · · Score: 1

      I say I find it better than the pre-iOS 6 Google Maps version

      Congratulations! You're in a tiny minority!

      I'll take accuracy over smooth scrolling any day. Scrolling and zooming is the least most important feature of a mapping app after all.

    12. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And you're ignoring the even larger number of people posting about the terrible experience and many problems that they're having.

      In the main they're coming from Fandroids like yourself that have never used Apple Maps.

      Even Apple's CEO recognized that their new mapping app is a massive failure.

      You really are a deluded individual. Sent mad by your worship of your smartphone choice. The exact words of Tim Cook are here, and everyone can see you are wrong. http://www.apple.com/letter-from-tim-cook-on-maps/

    13. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Apple's market is also larger than the United States. Over here it made the news because the location of Apple's Sydney store(which is their largest store in the country) was incorrect on their own mapping software. That's pretty damned unacceptable.

    14. Re:Apple is not as far behind as you think. by narcc · · Score: 1

      In the main they're coming from Fandroids like yourself that have never used Apple Maps.

      I neither use nor care for Android.

      You really are a deluded individual. Sent mad by your worship of your smartphone choice.

      What's it like living in your imaginary world? You know, with all of those projectors...

  48. "Just works" my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > What happened to "It Just Works"?

    You stopped believing in it. It was never true.

    A lot of things on Android or Windows "just work" - while the same never did on Apple products. But because Steve Jobs said so, the cult swallowed (!) it hook line and sinker. Media has never questioned Apple about this market-speak (until now, may be. or may be not.)

    1. Re:"Just works" my ass. by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 1

      You stopped believing in it. It was never true.

      Agree with you. However, it was their motto, and delivering an ugly, incomplete application like Apple Maps shows that they aren't even trying to fool people into think that "it just work".

      --
      -- --
    2. Re:"Just works" my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we come back to a major theme of this discussion: "It just works" depends on a degree of childlike faith that Tim Cook can't inspire. Saint Steve of Cupertino would have cranked the RDF up to "Whip" and convinced the Apple team to sacrifice their health, families, and souls to bring the product closer to "complete" before release. Then, in prepration for WWDC '12, he would have unlocked the safety and turned the RDF up to 11 ("Frappe") to unleash it on the public and press.

      It would be the Second Coming of mapping. No, screw that. It would be the FIrst Coming. All those unnamed "competitors" would be relegated to retroactive non-innovators, chronology and causality be damned.

      When the inevitable public complaints surfaced (in spite of the frantic efforts to supress them within the Apple forums and the veiled threats to the "tame" media), his reponse would be "You're mapping it wrong." And much of the congregation would believe him.

  49. I'd appreciate it ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... if Mr Cook could call my wife and explain how my car came to be seen in front of the local whorehouse.

    She can be reached at her mother's house, 555-8686.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  50. Valid search, but works on Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just because it doesn't have a building exactly there doesn't mean it isn't valid to search for it.

    In which case Apple still finds it.

    The Motorola ad was complete fabrication. But outright lies are OK as long as it's funny!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Valid search, but works on Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a complete fabrication that Bing, Yahoo, and Google all find it with the same search term but Apple sends you across town?

      Oh wait.. that's not the case at all.

      Even Google maps tells you it's an approximation when you look at it via streetview, you know because that's what *most* good mapping software DO based on how addresses provisioned.

      http://www.bing.com/maps/default.aspx?q=315+E+15th+St+NY
      http://maps.yahoo.com/#q=315+E+15th+St%2C+NY
      https://maps.google.com/maps?q=315+E+15th+St+NY

      It's telling that when you supply the zipcode to Apple, it then can correctly approximate it too..

      Pretty obvious they have a bug in Apple maps and the Apple Insider is just trying to justify it away as they are wont to do.

    2. Re:Valid search, but works on Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Also, the entire maps fiasco and the whole world is a complete fabrication. But it is OK as long as it's funny!

  51. In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Ballmer apologized for the following:

    1. Windows Vista
    2. Windows ME
    3. The Zune and Zune HD
    4. Microsoft's Car OS
    5. The Kin
    6. The XBox 360 RROD
    7. Throwing all those chairs

    Then I woke up.

  52. What would Steve Jobs do? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

    - My city is wrong on the map, the navigation is absolutely off.
    - Don't navigate there.

  53. It's a trap. by biodata · · Score: 2

    What makes you think they don't do this? In the UK, the main A-Z map makers have always done this - left out one or two small streets here or there to track imaginary property theft. Trap streets are a known thing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

    --
    Korma: Good
    1. Re:It's a trap. by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they don't do this? In the UK, the main A-Z map makers have always done this - left out one or two small streets here or there to track imaginary property theft. Trap streets are a known thing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

      So, Apple Maps doesn't have errors, just really, really strong DRM?

      I can certainly see people being deterred from copying it!

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  54. MobileMe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That product that Jobs allowed to be released that was so bad he replaced several executives and used Dr. Zoidberg words to the development team.

    What Jobs would not have done is make the public apology. He'd have focused on the positives of the new app or let the internal rant get leaked : the non-apology apology

  55. Skewed methodology by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    Granted, they're clearly missing a shit-tonne of places, but having grown up in Ontario and having traveled to quite a few places in the province, I was a bit surprised to realize that I've never been to ANY of the 688 "Error Code 8" locations. Yes, none of them. I suspect that most are simply intersections with a town name and unique postal code, which is pretty common in rural Ontario. Not that I'm some kind of Apple apologist -- as a comprehensive mapping app, they should have this stuff covered, but when a third of the places in your dataset would never be used by 99% of the population, I contend that you've skewed the reality of the situation a bit.

    1. Re:Skewed methodology by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Even more skewed is the definition of "accurate" as simply, "was found, somewhere", while ignoring the attributes being correct in every aspect.

      I once geocoded an address in FL and the result was 4 miles out to sea. GDT considered that "accurate" because the address query was resolved.

      It'll be interesting to see how many f*ups occur because of such misrepresentations of what "accuracy" is. Never mind the GPS inaccuracy on top of it.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    2. Re:Skewed methodology by jest3r · · Score: 1

      Just because you haven't been there doesn't it shouldn't be there.

      The whole reason this is an issue is because those small towns you have never been to are on all physical maps and on Google Maps. They are ALL ON the official Ministry of transportation Road Map: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/traveller/map/

      Furthermore people use Map Apps to find towns they haven't been to - not to find towns they have been to!!!

    3. Re:Skewed methodology by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's an excuse. Apple sucks, ok? I'm just saying that if you simply count one for every town/city, regardless of size, you're in a sense equating "Westmeath" Ontario with Toronto Ontario, which means you get a skewed view of the problem compared to a real-world perspective where 99.99% of the population will never visit Westmeath in their entire lives and Toronto probably comes up 1000 times an hour.

      People use maps apps far more often to find *places* they haven't been to in towns they *have* been to.

    4. Re:Skewed methodology by jest3r · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't suck. All my gear is Apple and that's the reason why this is disappointing.

      I did think of trying to cross reference population with the results because I am sure you are correct - it's the smaller towns in rural areas that have gotten the short end of the stick here. I also thought of using the Google Maps API to compare results but alas .. I've got better things to do really :-)

      I think we can both agree they went backwards on this update. I'm from a small town so when it's no longer on the Map App (even though it was on the map App before) it's disappointing. You lock into a 3-year contract with the new phone and never expect that an App you use every day would suddenly become unusable.

      - Port Perry Ontario pins you on an island about 5KM outside of town.
      - Bracebridge Ontario pins you in a forest about 10KM outside of town when you zoom in.
      - By my estimation 60% of towns in Ontario got relocated or completely wiped out.

    5. Re:Skewed methodology by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

      If you have problems locating a major hub of Muskoka cottage country, you clearly have serious problems on your hands. I think we agree it's generally not a good situation and is distinctly uncharacteristic of Apple. Whether it's a one time thing or a common theme for Apple under Tim Cook, the maps need to be improved big time.

    6. Re:Skewed methodology by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The whole reason this is an issue is because those small towns you have never been to are on all physical maps and on Google Maps. They are ALL ON the official Ministry of transportation Road Map: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/traveller/map/

      Wrong. First entry on list "Aberfoyle" is not on Map 2 like claimed - at least you can't see it. Just like on Google Maps it is identified as Puslinch. So much for "ALL".

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  56. Sorry enough to put transit back in? by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

    I feel like the decidedly suburban, car-centric approach to Maps in iOS 6 is something that can't be improved without a rethink. "Hard work" isn't enough if it's going in the wrong direction.

    Google Maps offered an elegant and seamless approach to providing transit directions in iOS 1 to 5.

    Apple Maps offers a clunky "solution" that kicks you out of the app, forces you to use whatever UI the 3rd party app maker uses for your local transit system and doesn't guarantee a minimum level of quality (a lot of the transit apps are pretty terrible). Traveling? Hope there's an app for that city and you feel like getting used to a new UI.

  57. Tim Cook is not Steve Jobs. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    For better or worse, Tim Cook has taken the big chair at Apple, and made the place his own. This is one more departure from the policies of the past, and I think it's a good one. People, by and large, will be much happier if you own a mistake. Especially if you correct the mistake in short order, showing that you actually do own it.

    Companies try to play the blame game all the time, and they usually take it right in the ass every time they do. When a company owns a fuckup like this, they usually get a bye from the public on it unless they continue to fuck up. With Apple's track record of successful execution over the last 15 years, they can afford a hit or two without massive exodus of users.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  58. Why would anyone take it personally? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It must really suck for you right now. Apple's being dragged over the coals over what is (according to you) a non-issue

    It would only "suck for me" if I took anything people said about a COMPUTER COMPANY personally, which obviously would be idiotic, it'd reduce me to the level of an Apple Hater like yourself that feel quivering pangs of hatred whenever Apple is mentioned.

    Also I've never said it's a non-issue. What I have said is that the issue is being blown out of proportion, which is true. What does it say when companies are making up errors to make fun of Apple?

    In the end the people it really hurts is not Apple or myself. It's people like you or websites that make fun of the issue to the degree that people wondering what kind of crack you are consuming when they actually start using Apple Maps in real life. You guys basically toss your credibility right out the window, especially the ones pointing out flaws that do not exist, because you didn't think possibly it was a good idea to verify an issue was real before touting to the world you found a problem.

    So sorry, man. It'll get better.

    For Apple? Yes it will. It already has as we see more and more people carefully looking over real map results and saying wait a moment, things are not as bad as you are making out. Or pointing out when people are fabricating flaws for monetary gain (*cough*Google*cough). I guess that's just fine by you though.

    Lastly, it most certainly does not "suck for me" in one huge way - AAPL buying opportunity from suckers like yourself thinking this is a huge blow to Apple. Thanks for another cheap round of buy-in, is what I say!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  59. Now, how about the Retina MacBook Pros? by twilight30 · · Score: 0

    OK, us retina MacBook Pro buyers have been struggling for a couple of months now with the fact that Apple used two suppliers, LG and Samsung, to provide the screens for the rMBP. Unfortunately, the LG screens develop image retention or ghosting fairly quickly after purchase, and Apple has been all over the map in either replacing or refusing to replace these defective screens.

    Us being niche in comparison, I suspect we won't see anything like that letter ourselves.

    Apple discussions thread (you will need an Apple ID to access this, I think):
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4034848

    MacRumors
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1424416

    Apple Insider (post launch day)
    http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/06/25/retina_display_image_retention_reported_by_new_macbook_pro_owners.html

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  60. iCloud not good example... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    iCloud actually went pretty well and has been very useful, if for no other reason than device backup for all the people that never attach an iOS device to a computer (which is a lot of people now).

    The thing to mention there was the precursor, MobileMe. THAT was the thing that sucked.

    Ping is of course a worthy inclusion in that list, as witnessed by Apple just dropping it. Just horrible.

    The iPhone 4 antenna was actually a lot like the current map issue, something people made a huge deal of but didn't affect most people in daily use and in the end didn't really affect sales.

    In fact it humorously parallels the maps issue in another way. Just as Google Earth has the same kind of wacky 3D mapping flaws we've seen brought up against Apple, so to did most Android phones have the exact same "Death Grip" problem as the iPhone 4.

    But let's not hearken to the good old days where no wrongs were made. They never existed.

    That s 100% true, but in my experience only Apple Haters claim that by way of trying to claim that Apple is dying now because it is not perfect like it was in the past.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:iCloud not good example... by narcc · · Score: 1

      That s 100% true, but in my experience only Apple Haters claim that by way of trying to claim that Apple is dying now because it is not perfect like it was in the past.

      I'm an Apple Hater (apparently) and I've always seen Apple products as deeply flawed in various technical and ideological ways.

      One this is true: Apple is dying. Well, in the "RIM is dying" sense -- you know, still growing but sitting idle in a changing market.

      Fun fact: RIM was still the undisputed market leader until 2011, years after they were declared 'dead' by Slashdot. They're still doing amazingly well. They grew their customer base by another 2 million in their last reported quarter (the earlier /. article that claimed they lost users was bullshit). Not bad for going a year without a major new handset release, and their fan-base waiting for BB10 to upgrade.

      Apple is where RIM was in 2008. Pushing out minor improvements to their product line year after year while ignoring the changes in the market. They've got the momentum and the cash to keep going for years, but they're just a walking corpse. You can't play market leader with an outdated OS on yesterdays hardware forever. Just ask RIM.

  61. Rhetoric by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Nobody is asserting that Steve Jobs literally never apologized for anything. HTH.

  62. Bing and MapQuest are Nokia based by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    So what he effectively said was why not try Nokia, Nokia, Waze, Google and Nokia instead.
     

    --
    Deleted
  63. Not the same thing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Android has had 3D maps for ages.

    That's not what I was talking about though, that's not 3D satellite images (admittedly I should have specified).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not the same thing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Android has those too, via Google Earth, and they are launching for maps soon.

      The bottom line is that at best they existed long before Apple came along, and at worst they beat Google to it by a few months at the expense of releasing a half baked product.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Not the same thing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yes, I noted Google Earth had them... I have always specified as bundled in mobile maps, which Google Earth has not been.

      Google said they are launching for maps soon, but when? And how many cities?

      It will be an interesting race to map the globe in 3D.... and even more interesting in five years who is keeping current as cities change.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  64. You know how long it took Google and Nokia? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple users are saying, "we'll get that fixed next time."

    Apple iPhone users have no idea what they're talking about.

    Fixing a buggy application can be done in a point release of software. The app is irrelevant, everybody, their dog and their dog's fleas have map reading software. What they don't have is good data. Why? It's expensive.

    Fixing terabytes to petabytes of poor data is an entirely different matter from upgrading a map reading application. There are really only 2 companies with good data. Google and Nokia. Both have been buying, assembling, collecting POI data and updating and fixing base map data for years.

    To fix this Apple are probably going to have to spend a fortune on large amounts of data, infrastructure to handle it, thousands of people to manage and check it. Both, expensive and slow. Then there's the weird melting 3D world that's going to have to change entirely. They'll have to decide if it's worth doing it properly or if they still think they can do it on the cheap.

    Looking at what they have right now, it absolutely will not be "fixed next time".

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:You know how long it took Google and Nokia? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There are really only 2 companies with good data. Google and Nokia. Both have been buying, assembling, collecting POI data and updating and fixing base map data for years.

      One of the major sources of Apple's data is TomTom. They've been selling sat-navs for years, and are an established name, alongside Garmin and Magellan. They started collecting map data in the mid nineties, and they bought Tele Atlas who started collecting map data in the mid 1980s.

      They have lots of other quality sources of data too. My guess is that their problem is in consolidating all the data sources into a coherent whole. In what area and circumstance to trust one data source over another. That I think will be something they can make pretty fast progress on. They are not building this data from scratch, just as Google didn't.

  65. With no textures... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I just took this picture on my Android device: http://i.imgur.com/42oQd.png

    That's nice, but while I was not fully clear I was talking about this:

    http://i.imgur.com/iqTlW.jpg

    iOS does the outlines also in normal map mode, but I like being able to see the buildings from overhead at various angles.

    It is true I should not say Google has no 3D support though, just no 3D imagery in mobile maps (they have some kind of beta desktop version).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  66. Oddly real improvements not visible to Apple Hater by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Apple is where RIM was in 2008. Pushing out minor improvements to their product line year after year while ignoring the changes in the market

    Actually that's not at all true. Or at least less true of Apple than Google.

    How can you say Apple has been standing still when developers still have to target Android 2.3?

    Apple has been consistently delivering really nice new frameworks in each iOS release, to make building application for the iOS platform easier and to enable some applications that would have been impractical to write otherwise.

    Apple has understood the mobile application revolution far better than anyone - to the point where instead of going with the stodgy solution of offering a transit experience that is mediocre across all cities, they are allowing application developers to craft amazing custom transit apps tailored to each city, and then guiding users to them.

    Google you see simply doesn't want to lose that control, because they are all about collecting your data so they can't possibly imagine letting a third party app get in the way of that. Even though it's the thing that will lead to their eventual decline. Google still doesn't understand that it is the quality of applications on a platform that really matter to people, which is why they cannot make headway in the tablet market.

    Apple also has had the foresight to put a high-speed IO in newer mobile devices. Android? Still using USB 2.0. I was using that 15 years ago man.

    Apple standing still? As far as I can tell they are the only ones moving forward. If you would open your eyes to reality the truth of this would be obvious even to you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. Was that TomTom's end of season clearance sale? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Their 90% off, going out of business special?

    --
    Deleted
  68. Apple did this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google tried to squeeze apple with the only thing they have to leverage Apple: Youtube and Maps.
    Apple showed they don't need Google. Customers want google, for sure. But just like Youtube, Google needs users more than Apple needs google.
    So now google has to bear the cost of the Youtube app and the maps app.
      Google will rise up to the competition, and make a kickass iOS app and be hailed as saviors of iOS maps...
    and Apple will get satisfied customers, and not have to pay a dime for it, and be able to STILL have their preferred level of control over the analytics that google can obtain from iOS users.

    I think it's a brilliant strategy.

  69. Beginning with the icon by 101010_or_0x2A · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the Apple Maps icon itself seems to show a route involving driving off an overpass!

  70. You don't make 50% margin by spending money by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "They should have either been investing more on a better solution of their own"

    Look... Why do you think the iPhone 5 is identical to the iPhone 4?
    Why do you think Apple even had to talk about how the iPhone 5 was produced at all? Nobody cares how a phone is manufactured. They had to talk about how difficult and anal it was to produce because nothing else changed. The device is functionally and in design, identical to the iPhone 4.
    Why do you think iOS 6 is identical to previous version?

    Why do you think nothing changed? Nothing changed so that Apple can make 50% margin on their phones. You take more money in but don't spend money. It's how you get 100 billion in the bank. It's great business as long as nobody notices. The point being you are sacrificing the future at the expense of today and people do start to notice.

    They start to notice that Samsung have more power and a bigger brighter screen, Google have better maps, they notice that Nokia have wireless charging, next generation cameras, nfc, better screens, higher quality offline maps, better design and ironically, a better easier to use interface.

    Eventually people start asking if the 50% margin going to the hedge funds is worth what's being paid.

    --
    Deleted
  71. Re:Oddly real improvements not visible to Apple Ha by narcc · · Score: 1

    Yes, Apple is standing still. Their OS is long outdated. Their UI design wasn't forward-thinking, leaving the current suite of gestures an abominable mess. Notifications have improved, but still haven't caught up to Android, let alone BBOS. Multitasking is so far behind everyone else it's pitiful -- it's still not up to the level of BBOS 5!

    iOS is way behind the curve and it doesn't look like Apple can catch up without a major change. They haven't been keeping up -- they've been standing still.

    Take a look at new mobile operating systems from Microsoft and RIM and you'll see what I mean. It's pitiful how poorly iOS has evolved over the past few years. If anyone else released a product like iOS6 we'd all be laughing at it -- it's a bad joke.

    How can you say Apple has been standing still when developers still have to target Android 2.3?

    This doesn't make any sense. The version of Android that Android developers are targeting has absolutely nothing to do with Apple and iOS.

  72. No correction needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea that Steve Jobs never apologized for anything seems to be starting to become a common Slashdot misconception.

    Not really, no. Presenting Steve Jobs as an arrogant jerkass (I mean, more than he actually was...he was the CEO of a big company, after all) is a common Slashdot tradition.

  73. In other news... by bi$hop · · Score: 1

    ...Adobe has released a letter entitled "Thoughts on Apple Maps."

  74. iPhone 5 problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The list of reported iPhone 5 problems is growing dangerously: http://goo.gl/YNdJB

    Is it the most defective Apple product, ever?