Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: multexinvestor.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to multexinvestor.com.

Comments · 14

  1. Re:Rebooting the voting machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative · on Touch-Screen Voting Snags Continue

    Why not? Because they're nearly different companies... That is, Diebold bought the firm that makes the voting machines, and I doubt that Diebold the ATM guys made any sweeping changes to the new Diebold Election guys (DESI), especially since they made the purchase in January 2002..... yahoo .com link for more info

  2. Re:Please! by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1 · on SCO: Code Proof Analyzed, Linus Interviewed


    Here is a list of the insiders of SCO.

    Here is a list of the most recent transactions by that group, and presented here:

    06.20.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP Sell 5,000 $11.08 - $11.10
    06.25.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SREXVP NA 5,000 $10.00 - $0.00
    07.08.2003 Bench, Robert K. CFO NA 7,000 $10.91 - $11.12
    07.08.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $10.90 - $10.95
    07.09.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP Sell 5,000 $11.76 - $11.81
    07.09.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP NA 5,000 $11.76 - $11.81
    07.11.2003 Olson, Michael P VP NA 8,000 $10.40 - $10.99
    07.14.2003 Wilson, Michael SRVP NA 6,000 $0.66 - $0.00
    07.14.2003 Wilson, Michael SRVP Sell 6,000 $10.77 - $10.87
    07.15.2003 Wilson, Michael Sean SRVP Sell 6,000 $10.66 - $10.80
    07.15.2003 Wilson, Michael Sean SRVP NA 6,000 $0.66 - $0.00
    07.22.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 20,000 $12.91 - $13.20
    07.23.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP NA 5,000 $13.30 - $13.44
    07.30.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $12.80 - $12.81
    08.05.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $12.56 - $12.57
    08.08.2003 Bench, Robert K. CFO NA 7,000 $10.90 - $0.00

  3. Re:Please! by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1 · on SCO: Code Proof Analyzed, Linus Interviewed


    Here is a list of the insiders of SCO.

    Here is a list of the most recent transactions by that group, and presented here:

    06.20.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP Sell 5,000 $11.08 - $11.10
    06.25.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SREXVP NA 5,000 $10.00 - $0.00
    07.08.2003 Bench, Robert K. CFO NA 7,000 $10.91 - $11.12
    07.08.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $10.90 - $10.95
    07.09.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP Sell 5,000 $11.76 - $11.81
    07.09.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP NA 5,000 $11.76 - $11.81
    07.11.2003 Olson, Michael P VP NA 8,000 $10.40 - $10.99
    07.14.2003 Wilson, Michael SRVP NA 6,000 $0.66 - $0.00
    07.14.2003 Wilson, Michael SRVP Sell 6,000 $10.77 - $10.87
    07.15.2003 Wilson, Michael Sean SRVP Sell 6,000 $10.66 - $10.80
    07.15.2003 Wilson, Michael Sean SRVP NA 6,000 $0.66 - $0.00
    07.22.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 20,000 $12.91 - $13.20
    07.23.2003 Hunsaker, Jeff F. VP NA 5,000 $13.30 - $13.44
    07.30.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $12.80 - $12.81
    08.05.2003 Broughton, Reginald C. SRVP NA 5,000 $12.56 - $12.57
    08.08.2003 Bench, Robert K. CFO NA 7,000 $10.90 - $0.00

  4. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by thelaw · · Score: 1 · on China Upgrades from Microsoft Office

    hold it right there, bud.

    MSFT had never paid a dividend until this year. and even then, it was a miniscule fraction of their actual profits, despite the accounting-foo.

    jon

  5. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  6. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  7. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  8. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  9. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  10. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  11. Re:Don't like it? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1 · on Working Hard?
    Very, very few corporations have CEO's raking in multimillion dollar bonuses.
    You are right, there aren't that many.
  12. Settle? IBM could crush them for a tenth of that by jACL · · Score: 1 · on SCO Gives Friday Deadline To IBM

    SCO's market cap is only $110 million, and they want to settle for a billion? IBM could eat them for lunch, save 89%, and GPL the Unix source so it could never happen again. I'm not sweating one bit over this.

  13. Stock prices: by Ohmsee · · Score: 1 · on Case to Step Down from AOLTW

    In light of his decision:

    Shares of AOL Time Warner (AOL: Research, Estimates), the parent of CNN/Money, rose 4 percent in European trading Monday.

  14. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL operating system. by hype7 · · Score: 1 · on OpenGL Presentation at Siggraph Available
    Since $1600 worth of mac hardware will be outperformed on any given application by $800 worth of x86 hardware, You are paying $800 for the privlage of using OS X.

    The problem scales badly too. The top end Dual G4 get's it's clock cleaned by $1500 worth of commodity x86 hardware. So on the high end, you end up paying a $2000 Apple$oft tax for OS X.

    As long as you keep slobbering after each new shiny mac, reguardless of how outdated the hardware is, Jobs will continue to sell you crap and charge you extra for the "privlage".
    What I want to know is if you have such a powerful machine, how coming it doesn't have a damn spellchecker?

    There will always be people like you out there that just don't get it. You think that BMWs, Mercs and Audis are overpriced, because you can buy a Chrysler Neon and drop two stinking big turbos into it and "have a better car".

    Go read that quoted journalist above - or take a look at ANY research on total cost of ownership. You pay more at first, but the machine is much cheaper and much easier to maintain.

    My friend just spent 3 days at work trying to fix a Win2k a box he didn't want to have to format because it had certain server functions that he didn't want to have to replicate. Why? Because he needed to install a modem in it, and Win2k didn't want to play.

    You save your $x up front. You pay later in time troubleshooting, grey hair and stress. Personally, I'd rather pay a little more up front and get a computer that works as advertised.
    For the good of apple, there needs to be a groundswell of dissent among the apple loyalists. When apple's fanatic user base stops shining Jobs' knob, he will decide to put some hardware reaserch and developement dollars into something besides a circuit to give the white LED power indicator 300 levels of fade.
    like the rest of your article, you're speaking out of your ass. http://money.cnn.com/2002/07/31/pf/investing/q_tec hsurvivors/index.htm: "Apple spent about 7.5 percent of its revenue in the last quarter on research and development, a higher percentage than Dell, Gateway, and Hewlett-Packard."
    Or you can predict apple's demise as their hardware becomes 3 years obsolete then 4. At this rate, in 5 years there will be a better processor in your microwave than in your computer.
    uh huh.

    That CNN article above called Apple a "Tech Survivor", or http://int.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA. asp?target=/stocks/tia/stockfeatures&ForumID=39&Do cID=9931&nd=0801:For the growth crowd, there's well, growth. Wall Street is still not sure how earnings will ramp in the coming years (the company is always tight-lipped about product plans). But this company has been counted out several times before, only to make a Phoenix-like rebound. Merrill Lynch's Steve Fortuna expects a new round of hot products to appear in time for the holidays. At that point, the Apple story "should get more interesting" he notes.

    There's a good chance that the stock will start trading back up in coming months as investors anticipate Apple's next wave of products. And the current entry point, right above cash, looks mighty enticing.

    You either don't understand, or you're trolling. Either way, go post your FUD somewhere else.

    -- james