Slashdot Mirror


China Upgrades from Microsoft Office

Badgerman writes "According to this Forbes article, fifteen Chinese ministries have started using a homegrown office software suite instead of Microsoft Office. The article also notes the Chinese government's encouragment of homegrown software and of a national Linux standard."

385 comments

  1. How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Tpenta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When Telstra in Australia started walking down the path towards replacing Microsoft Office with Star Office, Steve Ballmer made a uick trip out to make some incredible offers to the people concerned.

    I wonder if teh ticket to CHina is booked yet.

    Tp.

    1. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by grug0 · · Score: 0

      I don't think Ballmer would try to directly engage the Chinese Government. Instead the US government will probably drop hints about possible retaliative trade practices unless the Chinese Government gets back in the Microsoft fold. It could even become a WTO issue.

    2. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, isn't it great to have mates in power.

      Tp.

    3. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would pay to see that.

      There is no way that would become a WTO issue. The Chinese government is not outlawing Office, it is merely developing its own completely different product that does the exact same thing.

      China has stated and made good on the threat of developing their own processors, their own technology, their own IT industry. They are keeping the money where it belongs, in the country.

      You people bitch and moan about how communist China is a plague, yet bitch and moan when they start to develop the slightest glimmer of innovation and drive. You don't want the Chinese to be capitalists, you want the chinese to be your little boot-licking lackey dogs who turn out your cheap ass consumer goods in sweatshop like factories for a pittance. Wake up. There's a revolution going on in China, and it's only going to be for the better of Chinese society, and at the current rate, a detriment for the Western World. In ten years China's going to be as communist as Bush is going to be a personal privacy advocate wearing tye-dyed shirts and beads.

    4. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That's nothing to what the Thais have got after the governemnt push of cheap Linux computers.

      Win XP and Office XP for $35 each and NO product activation nonsense.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    5. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is a uick trip quicker than a quick trip because it lacks a q?

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    6. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a much better explanation than simply saying "Oops, typo". :)

      Tp.

    7. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Telstra never intended on using OpenOffice, but were simply 'evaluating' other products in order to get a better deal from Micrsoft. It worked.

      As Telstra doesn't even use Linux or Open Source software on servers, it would be quite strange indeed for them to start using Linux or OpenOffice on thousands of desktops.

    8. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      I DO believe that I saw in the Australian at some point that they DID make a big purchase of Star Office.

      Tp.

    9. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I had some mod points because this is exactly my feelings. I think all certain people see is in any story about China;

      "blah blah blah China... commie commie commie blah blah evil China commie commie evil blah blah".

      It's ridiculous and well done to China for developing their own IT infrastructure and industry.

    10. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if teh ticket to CHina is booked yet.

      I don't know if the plane ticket for Ballmer is there yet, but I'm certain that stadium and execution dates have already been arranged to accomodate for any such eventuality.

      Anonymous Cowards Unite

    11. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      It is kind of sad to see; especially when the good things that happen there get overshadowed by blind igorance.

      Tp.

    12. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh yeah cheap Thai WinXP without product activation story at the inquirer.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    13. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by archen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China isn't only developing their own infastructure, it looks like they're actually working on positioning themselves in competition with everything that's in place now.

      Using their own processor, their own linux distro, among other things they seem to be comming up with (DVD standard etc). I'm actually glad too. As the west ends up strangled by power struggles for control over the computer (MS) and control over your media (DRM), China may very well be the last hope feilding open technology. Sad to say, but because of our own short sightedness; it may very well be this openess that gives them the advantage.

    14. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. Hey, maybe they can sell their software to the people in the Western world. Maybe it's easier to convert software to speak English (or whatever Western language) from Chinese than vice versa.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 0


      You people...You...you want

      Please show me a link where I posted such a sentiment. My posting record is available for viewing.

      That's facetious, yes; then please post links to 10 comments rated above 3 that anyone on /. has made that expresses those sentiments.

      I don't believe this community is composed as you represent. That damages your argument, and rather makes you look like a radical wacko who believes he's persecuted when there's none to be had.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    16. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knew that a nation built on communism could really work out so great and be so self sufficeint. I for one see this as a cold day for democracy and the current world powers.

    17. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's $36 per PC for the *combo* of XP + Office.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    18. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is in an interesting position due to the low cost of labor. China seems to have wedged itself into the exact opposite position of traditional comunists states. Don't compete with capitalism, feed off of it. Due to the overwhelming greed that is pervasive in most capitalist countries now days, we play right into their hands.

      Truthfully I don't see this as such a cold day for democracy, mainly because we did it to ourselves in the 90's where simple businesses evolved corperate pigs - and even after that ended, the mentality is still very strong.

    19. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet they can spell better than you as well ...

    20. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by trompete · · Score: 1

      This may actually be good for the American IT worker when it comes to finding work. If the Chinese are using completely separate tools, they will not be able to work with American ones without a significant learning curve. If anybody has ever gone to a public college/university (the University of Minnesota comes to my mind), there are hundreds and hundreds of Chinese exchange students. If China develops their own line of products, they will have no reason to come here and learn American tools if they are going to return to their own homegrown products.
      I for one welcome the decrease in competition for jobs. Who really knows though.... :P

    21. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it is merely developing its own completely different product that does the exact same thing

      yeah, and in typical chinese fashion, "developing it's own" means "selling cracked version of the real thing"

    22. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 2, Funny
      "You don't want the Chinese to be capitalists, you want the chinese to be your little boot-licking lackey dogs who turn out your cheap ass consumer goods in sweatshop like factories for a pittance."

      You say that like there's something wrong with it.

    23. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. China just wants control. There's no openness about it. I'd also be willing to bet their office suite has lots of Microsoft source code. China is just one of the few countries that has disassembled MS and all their products to design their own.

    24. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with reverse engineering. Using the code obtained directly maybe, but nothing wrong with studying it to implement various features in the office suite. Our own technology thrives on this.

      What has me clueless is why someone would want to reverse engineer a Microsoft product. It's not like there is anything significant in them that can't be found in a better implementation elsewhere.

    25. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You people bitch and moan about how communist China is a plague, yet bitch and moan when they start to develop the slightest glimmer of innovation and drive. You don't want the Chinese to be capitalists, you want the chinese to be your little boot-licking lackey dogs who turn out your cheap ass consumer goods in sweatshop like factories for a pittance.


      I don't want them to be our boot-licking lackey dogs. It's not like we ordered them to make these products at these prices. They did it cheaper and better than anyone else, so their products are snapped up rather quickly by western consumers. Frankly, they could raise their prices a bit and still be competitive.

      Communism failed. About seventy years is the current record for a communist government's lifetime. Although I don't think communism is inherently "evil," it is inherently stupid. China obviously wants to allow gradual change so it doesn't collapse like the Soviet Union. China's technological "revolution" happened in spite of communism, not because of it. And it is further fueled by westerner's money, not because of some nonsense about a failed class-warfare experiment from the 19th century. China is going capitalist, and it's doing them some good. Hurrah for the Chinese! If only the US could stop subsidizing / whining about the fruitlessness of our 1930s era production techniques and move ahead to lead the world in 21st century manufacturing.
    26. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by vandan · · Score: 1

      I would advise extreme caution before sending someone like Ballmer. You know how much the Chinese like their pork.
      If he did go, I would certainly like to have a video of the meeting. I'm sure his monkey-dance antics would have a different affect on a Chinese audience.

    27. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      $35 more than they should have paid!!

      Go Open Office / Abi Word (and all other competitors that are free)

    28. Re:How long before Ballmer is on a plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were given the same deal cause we started switching all the desktop machines in a large organisation over to linux.

  2. International Competition for Microsoft by vbprgrmr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It does appear that the main driving force competing against Windows and associated applications is from other countries eager to save money. Once they show how it can be done, maybe the beancounters in American companies will follow their lead and take the linux plunge.

    1. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by grug0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wrong, wrong, wrong. WPS Office 2003 is for Windows, not linux. So this isn't a victory for Linux, as the Chinese Government will run the office suite on windows.

      And protectionist anti-competitive policies for buying software is hardly something to celebrate. Governments should buy the best tool for the job, not try to prop up local industries.

    2. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since China is so big the economics of locally written software make a lot of good sense.

      Writing programs is expensive, but given enough desktops the cost per unit can be quite small.

    3. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Writing programs is expensive

      Sorry, but no, it isn't.

      Micrsoft's revenues are mostly spent on shareholder's profits, expensive useless prestige projects like XBox and MSN and above all marketing.

      The costs to develop the stuff is quite low, especially in the case of Windows and Office where there isn't any real development anyway, just bugfixing, retheming and repackaging.

      Even smaller countries could easily afford it.

    4. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always wonder what MS spends their incredibly high R&D budget on. I never see new products from MS that justify these amounts. Hell, they can't even do simple things like basic security right, so what are they spending all that money on?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      so what are they spending all that money on?

      First Class seats on planes to various countries to convince them to keep buying their products...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    6. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Windows Media, for one, is the most advanced streaming video codec available. .NET took a lot of work, I use it on a daily basis, it is pretty cool to develop with under C#. It is their answer to the world of Java app servers, while supporting the development of Web services and maintaining legacy support of COM interfaces.

      So I think those are two places where a load of their money has been going - including the future of Windows being .NET driven, so that everything becomes an app server, is more virtualizable, etc.

    7. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Another reason appears to be security--and I don't mean the virus kind, I mean the "NSAKEY" kind. This was also mentioned in the article.

      The USA's aggrandizement of late has made a lot of our allies nervous, and a lot of our future enemies paranoid. If I was the Chief of IT in another superpower, I would indeed be very paranoid about the use of a product with which a) I ran all of my intelligence and administration tools, b) I couldn't see the internal workings of, c) had the capability of communication with a foreign power.

      Imagine if Mercedes was the only source for radio devices during WWII; the technology wasn't open enough for the US to build it themselves. Do you think the US would have happily accepted radio shipments from Germany, and depended upon them for their secure communications? Or would the US do their all to put in place a replacement that they could control themselves?

      The only way to make security guarantees that would satisfy me would to give me the code such that I can compile the app myself, which MSFT hasn't been willing to do, even with their Open program. There's nothing that Ballmer could say to me that would convince me otherwise--nothing that would let me sleep at night with my children in the Armed Service.

      I think the war in Iraq will prove to be very good for Linux.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    8. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by espo812 · · Score: 1
      expensive useless prestige projects like XBox and MSN and above all marketing.
      Let's see - game consoles seem to be moving to the general purpose computers and entertainment center of the household. With a dvd player, the coolest games, and internet access - this is all many Joe Users want or need. If this trend continues, Microsoft obviously wants to have a large stake in it to keep their company moving products.

      MSN is their attempt to get a hold in the Internet access market. Seeing as the Internet is pretty fucking popular, it makes sense to want a dog in that show. Does it make sense to be in dialup anymore? Maybe not, but if it really pisses you off buy some MS stock and sway the board away from the practice.
      The costs to develop the stuff is quite low, especially in the case of Windows and Office where there isn't any real development anyway, just bugfixing, retheming and repackaging. [Emphasis mine]
      So it is now clear you don't know much about software development as a cycle. Bugfixing and matinence can be upwords of half the development cost of a piece of software. How often do you hear about Windows and Office bugs? Every week at least? Those all have to be fixed. As well as the countless other bugs because MS likes to release its software fast to get to market.
      Even smaller countries could easily afford it.
      And certainly the largest country with a slave labor force.
      --

      espo
    9. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by stpats · · Score: 1

      Bob 2K4

    10. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 4, Funny

      the coolest games

      I'm sorry, you appear to have accidently added a "s" to "game". Halo is not plural.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    11. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      Wrong, wrong, wrong. WPS Office 2003 is for Windows, not linux. So this isn't a victory for Linux, as the Chinese Government will run the office suite on windows.

      Not the whole story, from your link:

      The three teams are developing three versions of WPS Office: one is WPS for Linux, another is WPS Office 2003 for Windows, and the other is WPS Office V6 for both Linux and Windows.
      So assuming that the original story is exactly true, even if the initial order is for the Win version, it would be much easier to transition to the Linux version from the same company in a year or so, perhaps in lieu of buying the next Windows upgrade, or when hardware is replaced. The same strategy as Sun in releasing Star Office for Windows as well as Linux and SunOS. First break the MSOffice umbilical, then changing OS isn't so hard. No need to mess around with Crossover and such.
    12. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by kyrre · · Score: 1

      Yeah thats funny and all, and I don't know about this Monkey Balmer character, but Bill Gates claims he travel by tourist class/coach when using planes around the states.

    13. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ummm media player the best streaming codec? I don't think i've ever seen a streaming codec that DOESN'T trump it, in quality and speed, and espcially in portability. As well know portability is the most important factor in streaming media. .net again it sucks, especially in terms of portablity. How can develope a language with the intention of competing with java, when java's only benefit is portablity, and NOT make it portable?

    14. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      ...maybe the beancounters in American companies will follow...

      I know at least two that have taken the OpenOffice plunge, both small businesses (50 staff) that were blunt about Microsoft Office costing too much for the little extra it does.

    15. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by timeOday · · Score: 1

      All software development is R&D (more D than R usually). What is there *besides* R&D for Microsoft? Just manufacturing plastic discs for 5 cents each and selling them for $300.

    16. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How arogant of you to assume that the Chinese developers couldn't build a tool that is better for them than the MS team. They live in China, know the people of China and their desires better, read/write and use Chinese keyboards constantly and have a far better understanding of their localised needs.

      Why is it that people cry out "protectionist" and anti-competitive at the first sign of some actual competetion. Yes that's right, for there to be competition there must be at *least* two companies and two products, not one. If anything, it is your attitude that is anti-competitive.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    17. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by KillerLoop · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Goverment should act in the interest of the people it represents. If globalization is in the firm grasp of people who give a damn about you, I'd think it's more than appropriate to take countermeasures.

    18. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But soon there will be a halo 2. And then that will be a plural number of cool games.

      Clearly the grandparent is a time traveler and got a bit confused about his location in the timestream.

    19. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that they stole halo from the mac addicts. >_

    20. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by csbruce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always wonder what MS spends their incredibly high R&D budget on.

      Wine and caviar. Microsoft Research is a black hole of irrelevance. If they had any brains for practical matters, they would solve their MS-Office interoperability problem by introducing a file siguature like the following:

      Roses are red,
      Violets are blue.
      This file-signature poem is copyrighted,
      So reverse engineers can munch my butt.
      Copyright (C) 2003 C. S. Bruce. All rights reserved.
      This poem may not be reproduced in any way by any means without express
      written permission.

    21. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by thelaw · · Score: 1
      --
      -- http://www.cerastes.org
    22. Re:International Competition for Microsoft by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Windows Media, for one, is the most advanced streaming video codec available.

      Bullshit. In terms of quality it is about equal to the current QT codec. The problem with the WMP codec is that one must use the retarded peice of shit Windows Media Player to view anything encoded with said codec.

  3. I wish... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The time when such stories won't be news is at hand!

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  4. I so wish... by JamesP · · Score: 5, Funny


    Chinese President in his office...
    Picks up phone...

    "Who's this?"

    "Er. My name is Daryl McBride, from SCO cororation...Is it true that there are 1 billion computers using Linux in China?"

    "Yes"

    "So that will be 699 billion dollars, please..."

    "Ok, we'll be sending the check any time soon"

    (hangs and calls defense minister)

    "Capture this McBride immediatly (ha,ha,ha)"

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:I so wish... by Tpenta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would be interesting to see SCO attempt to try this in China. I wonder just how far they would (or would not) get.

      Tp.

    2. Re:I so wish... by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Communist China, SCO gets billed by government! ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:I so wish... by Tpenta · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was Microsoft who "Bill"ed people :-)

      Tp.

    4. Re:I so wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mr McBride,

      Never charge more then it will cost to have you killed.
      ~Ancient Chinese Secret

      See You Soon,
      Hu Jintao

    5. Re:I so wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr McBride,

      Never charge more then it will cost to have you killed.
      ~Ancient Chinese Secret


      That is... one bullet!

    6. Re:I so wish... by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Funny

      "So that will be 699 billion dollars, please..."

      "Ok, we'll be sending the check any time soon"


      The proper response to SCO's demands is "We've already written you the check, but we can't tell you where it is unless you sign this NDA."

    7. Re:I so wish... by archen · · Score: 1

      I donno about that. I think a lot of people would pich in the bullet if you asked.

    8. Re:I so wish... by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "One of the conditions is that you can't show it to people. Especially bank tellers"

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    9. Re:I so wish... by Doomdark · · Score: 1

      Ah! So that's mr. "Unexpected Bill" that those TV commercials talk about...

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    10. Re:I so wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      than

  5. "Linux-based"? by Empiric · · Score: 5, Funny

    This brings to mind an idea relating to SCO's continuing absurdities in trying to own and/or destroy Linux.

    With a major communist government becoming increasingly invested in Linux, everyone can be assured there will be at least one completely unassailable source of Linux distribution and development, like:

    SCO: We'd like you to pay us, oh... [spins wheel-o-pricing] $1499 for each processor you're running Linux on...

    People's Republic of China: Did we mention our extensive nuclear arsenal, deployable to Utah within an hour?

    SCO: Oh... yes... nevermind.

    Given this, maybe Linux users can play the same game of arbitrary definition that SCO has been playing. If worse comes to worse, one could just say, "Oh, Linux? We're not running Linux here. We're running a non-infringing, custom, Linux-based operating system. Feel free to prove otherwise." And with a perpetual source of FTP servers to obtain the "Linux-based operating system", SCO would have a truly daunting task of stopping it or charging their hoped-for extortion fees.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:"Linux-based"? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      chinese cant hit utah.. best they can do is the north west coastline

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:"Linux-based"? by aled · · Score: 1

      Bush can hit anywhere, anytime...

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    3. Re:"Linux-based"? by ihummel · · Score: 1

      All the need to do is hit the northwest coastline when the wind is just right and the fallout will take care of the rest.

      Failing that, a team of professional Chinese assassins is a more practical way of bringing down the SCO leadership than nuclear ordinance.

    4. Re:"Linux-based"? by slugstone · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I live in the north west.

      I will sleep great tonight.

    5. Re:"Linux-based"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean Chinese can't hit Utah....
      a Suitcase and a bomb. Case close.

      Besides, It's not like Chinese doesn't have Sub-launching Nuke capability.

    6. Re:"Linux-based"? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      chinese cant hit utah.. best they can do is the north west coastline

      Chinese submarines that can launch nukes can reach just about anywhere in the world (just like the US, Russia and Britain).

    7. Re:"Linux-based"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what YOU think. Well, whatever makes you sleep better I guess.

    8. Re:"Linux-based"? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Actually I think in china they'll partially rule in favor of SCO. I think they'll let SCO license them to keep the source to themselves attempt to use that in order to save public face.

    9. Re:"Linux-based"? by atam · · Score: 1

      The Deng Fong (East Wind) 31 and Julang (Great Wave) ICBM both have range of 7500 miles. The distance between Beijing and Lindon, Utah is about 6100 miles. So Utah is definitely within range of the Chinese nuclear arsenals. In addition, the Julang is designed to be launched in 'boomer'. So all of the continental US is under the Chinese nuclear threat.

  6. Chinese Distros by spoonist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are some example Chinese distros:

    Red Flag

    Cosix

    Magic Linux

    XTeam

    1. Re:Chinese Distros by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      If you only know English, then basically only the Red Flag site is usable. And the XTeam site has to go and use Flash. Arrgh.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Chinese Distros by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1
      Here are some example Chinese distros:

      Does any American (or Non-Chinese) trust a Chinese distro anymore than a Chinese trusts an American one? How would I ever know if they didn't add their own NSA style backdoor?

      I'm not the paranoid type, but I certainly wouldn't want backdoors of anykind on my machine...

    3. Re:Chinese Distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OPEN SOURCE!! FOOL!

    4. Re:Chinese Distros by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1
      OPEN SOURCE!! FOOL!

      Is a binary of the distro open? Who is to say that the binaries you download are compiled from the open source code you are looking at?

      This is by far the biggest issue I find with open source from untrustworthy sources. Redhat, Debian, etc... fine, they have reputations to uphold, as far as I know the Chinese distros are all made by the same company and is funded by the Party in China...

  7. All documents report! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Order given by central server: "By order of Chinese government all documents must report".

    Document1: "My commerade has been typing naughty things".

    Document2: "My commerade has been typing treasonous things". ....

    Recent Chinense secret indeed ...

    1. Re:All documents report! by KillerLoop · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's a great business opportunity for China!

      I bet the Office of Homeland Security would give an arm and a leg for this software. I wonder if there are open source Echelon drivers available.

  8. Re:Good example by k-zed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [offtopic] I can't see the problem with Osama using Linux. First day I see him using Debian, i'll say "way to go, man"... BTW, China sure has a repressive, dictatorial government, but they've come a long way in the last couple of (perhaps ten) years. I'm pretty convinved that eventually (with more bills like the DMCA or the Patriot Act) China might be a lot more free nation than the United States. (Hell, the time will come when we'll all migrate to China and ask for political asylum. Imagine the irony in that.) [/offtopic]

    --
    we discovered a new way to think.
  9. Screenshots here by illtud · · Score: 5, Informative

    Courtesy of Google (loads of hits on WPS Office):

    http://www.pconline.com.cn/pcedu/soft/office/wps/1 0307/199035.html

    1. Re:Screenshots here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until the Chinese export an English version of this to the USA!

    2. Re:Screenshots here by mAineAc · · Score: 1

      Would be nice if they had at least one site in English. Can you get this product in English?

    3. Re:Screenshots here by DuctTape · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but when I linked to this site, there was a Microsoft ad at the top of the page. Looks like they've started the counterattack.

      The ad was in Chinese, of course.

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    4. Re:Screenshots here by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Looking at the screenshot, it appears there is a Times New Roman version of chinese characters, seems to be slightly different to what I'm used to.

    5. Re:Screenshots here by HiThere · · Score: 1

      How long 'til the fish will handle this kind of data?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Screenshots here by Bauhinian · · Score: 1

      Here are some screenshots of their latest version. (For those who can't read Chinese, click on the coloured buttons near the top of the page to see shots of the different apps.)

      I'm amazed the length these people go to to clone the look of MS Office... just look at those tubular looking toolbars!

    7. Re:Screenshots here by Urthpaw · · Score: 1

      404 in Chinese :D

  10. Reinventing the wheel? by caluml · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But why are they writing their own, rather than taking the already very good OpenOffice.org, and working on that?

    1. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 5, Informative

      But why are they writing their own, rather than taking the already very good OpenOffice.org, and working on that?

      Perhaps because the office suite they're talking about has been around since 1988?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the WPS office suite, the word processor, was being sold in 1988, way earlier than Open Office first appeared.

    3. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Gherald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find it very humorous when people wonder why [someone mentioned in a /. story] is not using OppenOffice.

      OOo really is a very recent development and hasn't had much of a chance to enter the mainstream yet.

    4. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      That's what they used to say about Communism.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    5. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't follow.

    6. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they use *ANY* software that comes from or has been made in the US? Is it necessary to run US software?

    7. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's just a sort of a stupid off-the-cuff joke, which in retrospect doesn't go well with your post very well.

      But I suppose that at some point shortly after the Communist Manifesto was written, that that statement could be considered correct. Thusly, people could in theory have said that same thing about Communism.

      Uhh... just pretend I never posted that. You made a kind of valid point, and lets leave it at that.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    8. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually StarOffice was originally written in Germany. Later StarDivision was bought out by sun.

    9. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Ah, ic. I was just confused over whether you were cross referencing with my other post

    10. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what they started with. Would make sense, wouldn't it? But maybe there's something peculiar enough about their needs that it was easier to start from scratch. They also might have just reverse engineered Office. When you have legions of low-paid programmers working for the state, the level of effort is a non-factor. And it's not like China is worried about an IP infringement charge. And what a motivational management style, too. Get that code done by Wednesday or we'll ship you off to "re-education" camp!

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    11. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      What kind of support for Chinese does OpenOffice have????

      This would be a keen time to ensure that Chinese and Hindi area handled well by GNU/Linux/OpenOffice...

    12. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      Well, OO as a _project_ is fairly recent development in same way as Mozilla is, but both have much longer history regarding application itself. And in case of OpenOffice, it's not even a rewrite of StarOffice, but a cleaned-up (ie. proprietary components refactored out) subset of functionality.

      Anyone know when first version of StarOffice was released? It has been around for a while (think I used it in 1997 or so, but I know it's been around for much longer). It's just that it's become more widely known after Sun purchased it from its creating company (german co).

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    13. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Star office never really was a good contender. People used it because it was pretty much the only thing availeable for Linux.

    14. Re:Reinventing the wheel? by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      Not really the only one; the one I preferred was Applixware (is that still around?)... and there was (is?) also WordPerfect port. But it definitely had most complete feature set (to the point many considered it bloated).

      StarOffice probably was also available on other Unixes, Linux wasn't (at least originally) its primary target platform, for whatever that's worth.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  11. Axis of evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems that Billy-Boy gotta call George-Boy to get this axis of evil expanded a bit..

  12. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let me guess - you're American, and you think you're so free.

  13. Ah memories by segment · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some may remember some time ago when Germany also was going to yank MS products from being used by the German government. March 19th, 2001 - Two German government agencies have announced that they will discontinue the use of software made by Microsoft and other American companies. According to the German news publication Der Spiegel, both the German foreign office and the Bundeswehr (German Federal Armed Forces) have banned American software, saying that there are security concerns in using programs developed by other countries in sensitive applications. Instead, German companies such as Siemens and Deutsche Telekom will provide solutions (src: WinPlanet)

    And now China... The government has been pushing the development of a homegrown software industry and a national standard for open-source Linux software to counter the spread of Microsoft in the last few years.

    This is not a bad idea, and if others took the same route, MS could feel it down the road. Considering the problems associated with MS nowadays (even though it has actually been rampant for some time), with worms, and all sorts of security issues, how long will it be before some huge class action lawsuit based on MS negligently releasing shoddy products. Think about it... It's the kind of stuff that makes the NSA want to place backdoors on software, excuse being they're trying to secure products where vendors are failing.

    I say, good for China on making that move, hopefully others will take cues from China, and send MS a message. No more shoddy work!!! Just imagine what will hapen if some investigation pointed to an MS product being at fault for the power failure. Oh boy would that be some crazy stuff to deal with for MS.

    1. Re:Ah memories by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Siemens? That's funny, Siemens is an MS-shop, I had a job interview once and they were thinking of developing on .NET ..

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:Ah memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Just imagine what will hapen if some investigation pointed to an MS product being at fault for the power failure. Oh boy would that be some crazy stuff to deal with for MS. "

      Perhaps, but MS could always point to the EULA where it explicitly states that NONE of their software is to be relied upon for ANY purpose that is important. (you know, nuclear facilities, power grids, yada blada blah).. However, it could bring the issue of whether EULAs are legally binding into greater light, which isn't a bad thing at all. Of course, I have no idea what I'm talking about.

  14. The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    as European countries in the 18th century: Ensuring that only raw materials are imported and swamp the whole world with cheap manufractured goods. This lead Europe to the world power it's today, so it will probably work the same for China.
    However this has some not so nice side-effects. Such gain cause a disbalance in world's economics. Like the colonial system ruined the countries belonging to the 3rd world today, Chinas politics will ruin the economics of their mains markets, too.

    However, the situation is a little different these days. In the 18th century Europe was also a military hyperpower without any opponents of the same strength. This is very different know. China has at least 3 opponents of the same military power: US, Europe, Russia. Even more the existence of weapons of mass destruction prevents China from turning the situation towards their favour. No matter how much weapons they produce, they'll be always extinguished in the case of a military conflict.

    So, I wonder were this will lead in the long term. We all know the problem China has with accepting the illectual or economic property rights of forgein people. However, the superpowers of the world will not accept this forever. Bush already demanded that China ceases the artificial devaluation of the Yong. There are GATT investigations against China and their Red Linux products. Perhaps something will change in the future.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Question: what relevance does military strength have in this situation? China is trying to boost its own economy by using domestic products. Good for them. Can't blame them.

      Do you really expect this would cause a war?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right, all the power to those who can handle it w/o raging from one war into the another... europe and china rule!!!

    3. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by tehanu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I really don't follow this. There was no such thing as a cohesive entity called "Europe" in the 18th century. In fact the very idea of a unified Europe is new and came out of the utter devastation of two world wars. For hundreds of years, the countries of Europe have been competing very fiercely against each *other*. Especially in the colonial age. In fact if one looks at the EU *today* many of the countries still don't really see eye to eye on many things.

      China may have the US, Europe and Russia as rival military powers. But in the 18th century *all* of the major European countries were rival military and economic powers. There would be Britain, France, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Prussia, Spain, Italy, Poland, Portugal etc. etc. Then of course there was China and India. In 1700 China at that time had 23% of the World's GDP and India had 23% (Europe was 23%, Japan 5% and the US 0%). And of course they were no small military powers either. This leads some historians to describe the "real" Asian crisis to be from 1820 to 1950 when Asia dropped from 58% of the world's GDP to 17% in 1952. I believe the Ottoman Empire was still going strong in the 18th century and that dominated the Middle East.

      The figures are from a British historian called Angus Maddison in 1998. Calculations are based on purchasing power parity.

    4. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by eugene_t00ms · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to get down to the nitty gritty and compare numbers, the Chinese have no competition when it comes to military strength. I remember reading a press release from NATO a few years back (no google hits otherwise i'd post a link) that stated even if EVERY NATO MEMBER COUNTRY provided EVERY able-bodied man and woman within the ages of 16 and 25 to a war effort against China, the most optimistic estimates of actual gains that could be made in taking chinese territory would be a handful of coastal cities at best...that doesn't exactly sound like military parity to me... As far as Bush's blustering...what in all honesty can the United States do? Commit all of its troops to a suicide manuever against China? Nuke Beijing? In this political climate the Chinese Gov could make any kind of aggressive move it wanted and there would be only economic consequences. Which is exactly what they wish to avoid. The Chinese Military is mearly there for a deterrent and a physical show of Chinese Power. The political strategists of China are thinking LONG TERM. They know the pitfalls of military conquest. They don't want to just crush the western world under military oppression. They want to buy/sell (0wnz0r if you like) the World Market and knock America's complacent decadent ass of the top of the heap. Its called World Socio-Economic Domination. Take American-style economic aggressiveness and combine it with the oldest school of strategic thinkers in the history of the world...what do you get? China being the number 1 superpower in the world and America wondering what happened? (Ask the Distinguished Mister Hatch) End of Rant...

      --
      Belief that Perspectives matter more than Facts = Mark of the Truly Ignorant
    5. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about about holding territory in China, of course there probably aren't enough able bodied men in the Western world to hold China. But in terms of armies going head to head, China isn't much better than Iraq. I'm Chinese myself, but in reality modern warfare numbers don't really count that much. Going up against a brigade of M1 Abrahms, it doesn't matter how many soldiers the Chinese have. Even if you gave every Chinese soldier a tank or jet fighter, the Western world is so much more experienced in fighting wars.

    6. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by mikapc · · Score: 1

      Just you wait. As soon as we get over this North Korea Crisis where we need China's assistance expect that in some time in the not so distant future the U.S. will pressure the World Trade Center to get China to change it illegal ways of artificially holding low it's foreign currency.

      Another point, right now the U.S. holds complete military supremacy over every country including China. If we engaged in a conventional war with China let there be no doubt that we would defeat them quite quickly. There numerical superiority is clearly offset today by the superior training and technology of our military which makes every one of our soldiers more then likely worth more then 10 or 100 of theirs. Things can change but I really think this China is going to be the World's next overlord mentality rather foolish. They'll become more influential in the world but then so will India in the future.

    7. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Deemz · · Score: 0

      Europe is a world power? I thought that they were former world powers.

    8. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by A+Naughty+Moose · · Score: 1

      The relevance of military strength (or lack there-of) is that in the 16, 17 and 1800's, various powers of Europe ruled the seas (and by extention, all trade to and from wherever they decieded was profitable at the time), and no country had the technology to wipe out all of humanity in minutes.

      If you tried something like today (IE: Parking your warships outside the US Virgin Islands, preventing the US from trading with its "colony", for example), your navy would be destroyed. Unless you have a military that is strong enough to challenge the US's (like China). In which case, everybody's navy would be destroyed, ruining any chance of economic development for quite some time.

      The point the original poster was trying to make (I think), was that, in the past, this could have caused war. Today, it would be suicidal to go to war over something mundane, like software. Something useful, like oil on the other hand...

    9. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Nuclear Weapons aside (since nobody will use them unless somebody else does first, even in the event of a war) china does NOT have ANY competition in terms of military power. Not the US, certainly not Europe (which united doesn't even begin to compare with the military or economic power of the US) and certainly not Russia anymore. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to face the chinese if they were wielding sticks.

      The chinese certainly are NOT wielding sticks however, they have manditory military service by far the largest population of any nation in the world. And they definately have arms for their vast military.

    10. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      No, the technology the chinese are wielding in warfare is not exactly sticks. This is where your wrong, this is not the equivelent of peasants with sticks fighting knights in plate armor (even in that case the peasants eventually won).

      The chinese are only slightly behind us in terms of military technology, not drastically behind us. And there are enough of them that every one of our solidiers COULD take 100 of them and it wouldn't even make them blink.

      Iraq was one of the weakest nations in the world our whole "invasion" of iraq was never anything more than a joke.

    11. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 0, Troll

      nah, the brits were once a super power, EUROPE was never a super power. And neither the brits nor europe combined are super powers today.

    12. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't fight them in China. The US has a huge advantage in that the technologically-deficient Chinese army simply can't reach them via land, and they don't have nearly enough transportation to reach the US. So basically, they can only fight the US on their own land.

      Russia, well... you'd end up fighting them in the frozen north. Then we'd find out which is the lesser idea: fighting a land war in Asia or fighting in a Russian winter.

    13. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy, really. You throw India at them. China is concerned about a nuclear-capable India, because India has a grudge and the man-power to the fight the Chinese 1:1. More, both nations have unfriendly neighbors. The difference is that the Indians have Pakistan across a small, high mountain border whereas the Chinese have the Russians across a long plain.

      Moreso, you don't fight an infantry war w/ China. That's foolhardy unless you're India or Russia, who's crazy enough to do it. You fight a command and control war, where you wipeout [re: nuke, fire-bomb] their major ports, infrastructure centers, and launch facilities, beheading their leadership and returning them to an 1800s army. If you really want to be nasty, you bomb their dams -- removing their power facilities, as well as large chunks ofs agriculture and population.

      Then you let them starve.

      You may not take the country in a traditional sense, but you sure have made it irrelevant. With luck, it would Balkanize and you would only have to deal w/ the little, self-warring pieces.

    14. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by mikapc · · Score: 1

      Ok it's not simply technology that makes U.S. better militarily then China at this point in time. It's also training which I mentioned but you seem to have wholly forgotten in your response. I'm not saying China have sticks for weapons but nevertheless they're still very much outgunned by the U.S. We have complete air superiority, naval superiority, and land superiority. This last invasion of Iraq I wouldn't call a joke but it was obviously extremely one sided. Nevertheless the one sideness wasn't due to just Iraq's military weakness but also to the U.S. strength. This war would have had far more military & civilian casulties and would have lasted far longer had another country other then U.S. invaded Iraq such as China. The fact is the U.S. military accomplished unprecedented military achievements in the invasion of Iraq this past march and in 1991 in terms of speed, organization, and professionalism. Now I'm not saying that the U.S. military will always be able to maintain this military edge over everyone else but it seems pretty clear to me that no other military force can take us on and win right now. I'm not claiming to be a military expert but I think I've learned enough not to judge a military force simply by it's level of technology and the number of troops it has. Judging by how smoothly the invasion in Iraq went it's clear the U.S. military is not lacking in any of the essentials I've listed above including experience. I can't say the same for China.

    15. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... There's a chance you're just a troll but I'm replying in case you're just young and naive.

      First, for the last 15 years, even though China did some pretty bad things, the US didn't do anything serious against China. Know why? Simple : american corporations need China. They want to have access to China's market but they also want to be able to manufacture products at a low cost (to be competitive with European and Japanese companies). In fact, YOU need China to keep your way of life. Without China you would end up paying a lot more for most of the stuff you buy... meaning : forget about buying a new computer because you won't be able to afford it!

      Second, since when it's illegal to maintain parity with the US dollar? Sure it pisses off the US gov who try to keep its money artificially low to help exportations but if the US can play that game why not China?

      Third, the US could not win a war against a small country like France. The loosing side WILL use it's nuclear arsenal and anyway there's is something called diplomacy. If the US decide to attack an important country you can bet it will be WW3 with the US playing the part of Germany.

      As for your comment about american soldiers being able to kill 10 ou 100 of chinese... You obviously have no idea what you're talking about! I did two years of military service and I can assure you that technology is worth shit on a battlefield. I remember one time, after two days in the jungle most of our "waterproof" flashlights were just dead weight! A GPS is fun but I'd rather have a compass and a map thank you! The only important things are who control the sky and if someone is able to block enemy communications. As for american soldiers having a better training... Sorry to burst your bubble but they are far from being the best soldiers in the world. They are certainly the best at cleaning up their vehicle but for a lot of them that's about it (and I'm not saying that just for the fun of it).

    16. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that US military is FAR ahead of anyone else and probably ended the Iraq war a bit sooner. But come on... Iraq WAS a joke. It was totally bankrupt due to the sanctions. I don't think they even had a functional airforce (and their navy was nonexistent). Iraq was nothing more than a 3rd world military at that time. In fact, Iraq was so weak than none of thier neighbours feared it... FYI, Iraq during Gulf War I was much stronger than now.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    17. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ...in the not so distant future the U.S. will pressure the World Trade Center to get China to change it illegal ways of artificially holding low it's foreign currency.

      I'm no capitalist and if anything I hate the WTO. But in any case, I don't think the WTO has control over currencies. You can do whatever you want with your currency. For example, you can print as much money as you want. My understanding is that the WTO only handles trade agreements ALREADY SIGNED. They don't really go around enforcing anything other than on paper...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    18. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Actually many European countries were superpowers. France was a superpower. Spain was a superpower. And depending on how far back you go, Portugal was one tooo...

      I don't think anyone calls Europe a superpower right now but it definitely is one. Europe has the economic power and can ramp up its military to required levels if needed. The only reason Europe isn't a superpower in reality is because they are not unified, contrary to popular belief. The are trying to unify via EU but a lot of countries still aren't part of it.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    19. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Advanced Training is a result of advanced technology, and since our training and their training are both classified it's sort of a mute point debating how effective techniques that neither of us know are.

      Both invasions of iraq were basically the same. What kind of amazing organization does it take to send in one seal team to knock out their communications? (persian gulf) Or to simply bomb and keep bombing until their all dead and then walk in basically unchallenged? (this time).

      Iraq isn't large enough to qualify as a war, it never was, it was a joke when we violated UN Orders and invaded iraq the first time (he did have permission to invade kuwait by why on earth should he have to ask permission?) and it was a joke when we did it this time. Us fighting any nation in the middle east is simply bullying those who are two week to defend. It doesn't matter if it's us, russia, or china, they would fall in a week or less if the fight were taken seriously.

      The biggest hole in your statement though is China, the truth is that for the most part we are guessing. China hasn't truely cracked out their guns yet and we don't know what they have... What we do know is that the US government has sure as hell pussyfooted around them thus far and when we are making threats freely everywhere else to get what we want.

    20. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      All of Europe combined doesn't come close to the GDP of the United States alone. In terms of military strength... well the last time we saw it was in WWII and it wasn't much, the germans overran most of europe with little opposition and the Europeans weren't really that big a player in taking them out either. Brit's played some part (even if your willing to ignore the fact that their military actually stopped marching for TEA TIME!!!) but for the most part it was the US and Russia.

      Russia could probably clobber anyone but the US and China if military strength were the only issue, but tanks, jets, and ships, all use gas. And Russia can't cough up the cash. So they could only launch an effective fight if the US fiananced it... which would be a good idea, cheap military reserves for hire.. cheaper than our own because they have the equiptment and they suffer the losses in equiptment.

    21. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by mikapc · · Score: 1

      From my understanding the whole point is when China and everyone signed into the WTO with trade agreements they also agreed not to artificially hold low their currencies or anything else that goes against free trade. For example the U.S. imposed tariffs on foreign steel not too long ago to protect our home industry but other countries brought this to the WTO legal court or something along those lines and they indeed found that that action wasn't acceptable. The U.S. I heard was in the process of appealing the decision but that should go to show you that WTO has some major clout. What China goes against what they agreed to when entering the WTO. The WTO is essential for China's economic growth so the WTO does hold enough power to force China to play by the rules. China technically just as any other sovereign nation can do what it wants with it's currency but this whole idea of free trade they signed onto when they became a member of the WTO prohibits this because it goes against the idea of free trade because by undervaluing your currency industries in China gain an unfair and unnatural advantage over their foreign competitors.

    22. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by gusilu · · Score: 1

      Europe is a world power?

      Europe has the potential to be a world power... as soon as we stop quarelling and dissing each other; and as soon as there's a real sense of unity - when I can say I'm European before saying I'm Spanish. So, apparantly, that won't happen in the near future. :)

      --
      Don't try to fix me. I'm not broken.
    23. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      GDP of Europe is close to USA's. Here are some stats for 1999:

      Western Europe (not counting Eastern Europe): $8.6trillion

      North AMerica (includes Canada): $8.7trillion

      So the economic power is there. As far as military power is concerned, Europe is peaceful so it doesn't have a big military but that doesn't mean that it can't. Going back to WWII, Germany MAY have taken out USA (not counting WMD) if it didn't fight the rest of Europe and Russia. And Germany back then was supposed to poor (industrial and capable, but poor)...

      As far as modern day Russia is concerned, I think Europe can defeat Russia (assuming no WMD and that Europe ramps up its military)...

      BTW, Team Time can be important ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    24. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      USA has been abusing many of the weak poor countries for a while (eg. tariffs, subsidies, etc). In any case, I don't think currency manipulation is part of "free trade". I think free trade only deals with trade across borders.

      I'm not saying it is right or wrong... just saying that is how it is...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    25. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by mikapc · · Score: 1

      What do you mean our training and their training are classified? Maybe in the sense that the military doesn't reveal in detail the directions on how to fire a stinger missle or whatever but there has been plenty of coverage of the training that goes into becoming a marine, or military officer etc. Surely we can also judge the training by the results. Look at Top Gun which was an air-to-air combat school that began during the Vietnam War that resulted in huge improvement of kill to loss ratio from something around (approximating) 3 to 1 to 10 or 15 to 1. Let me make this clear that this huge improvement in kills wasn't the result of some new technology (they were still using the same fighter aircraft) which is one example that renders false your statement that advanced training is a result of advanced technology. Again I'm not a military expert so I can't specify what exactly enabled those who were in top gun to so greatly improve their kill ratio but it's clear that it had nothing to do with a step in the level of technology those pilots flew. It's true that most of our modern day warriors do train with advanced technology and that it does play a role in how we conduct war but one cannot forgot the essential human element and culture in all this. Just because a country can produce advanced military weapons does not mean necessarily that they will or can produce a good military. As an institution our military has far more experience both in terms of years it has been in existence as well as the number of wars it has been part of. After bad experiences in Vietnam our military adapted and now it is an all volunteer professional army which performs much better than an army filled with draftees who don't necessarily want to fight. I don't know much about the Chinese army but China being communist and all I doubt their army is volunteer based. It's true given we don't have recent examples how China's army performs it's hard to really know their true strength and ability but I don't believe a military can be that effective unless it has been engaged in at least a couple of wars to see how it's strategies and tactics hold up in reality. China hasn't been engaged in any major conflict since the Korean war and that army is from a different time in history and not of much use to guage the effectivness of their current military. The U.S. on the other hand has the experience of Vietnam, Kosovo, Gulf war 1, and 2. Another interesting fact about China is given it's one child policy it's inevitable that as the main population now ages and becomes old they will have a hard time continuing to grow as they are now which might also be said of the U.S. but to lesser extent I think. All said, it's highly unlikely the U.S. and China will ever engage in a conventional war since both are nuclear powers. "Iraq isn't large enough to qualify as a war, it never was, it was a joke when we violated UN Orders and invaded iraq the first time (he did have permission to invade kuwait by why on earth should he have to ask permission?) --- WTF are you talking about, we didn't violate any UN orders in Gulf War 1 or 2. Gulf War 1 never technically ended it was just suspended with a ceasfire just like between South Korea and North Korea. and it was a joke when we did it this time. Us fighting any nation in the middle east is simply bullying those who are two week to defend. It doesn't matter if it's us, russia, or china, they would fall in a week or less if the fight were taken seriously." ------ Well let's just say that if Russia or China invaded Iraq there would be a hell of a lot more casulties especially civilians and that no it would very likely take them longer then two weeks to take all of Iraq. You also shouldn't discount the amount of organization and planning required to conduct any war and considering how smoothly this one ran the U.S. military deserves plenty of praise for the invasion part of the war.

    26. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Tea, not Team ;) The bastards stopped marching to have a bit of tea!

      Actually germany lost over 100 times as many troops in it's march on russia than it lost in europe (including when the allies stormed back through to germany) total. They were sitting outside the capital, if the US hadn't gotten involved they would have successfully taken Russia and Europe. I agree, they could have taken on the US instead of Russia.

      Europe still couldn't take Russia today (assuming both sides had finances to maintain their existing military and keep up the war... which russia doesn't) and I'll tell you why, WMD aside the real strength of both the US and Russia is their Naval Power, air power is secondary since the navy has airpower of their own, ground is secondary, the naval ground forces are more elite than regular grounds troups and by no means small. Russia built up a massive navy during the cold war and Europe's nations all have one thing in common... they right by the water. They could sweep in the english channel and from there could launch missles anywhere in europe and send airpower anywhere in europe, At the same time they can send ground forces from the other side.

      It's all talk though, since they don't have the funds to keep the war going at all, their massive naval might is worthless if they can't afford to fuel the ships.

    27. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Damn, don't you know how to throw in blank line now and then? Format as text if need be otherwise toss in a couple breaks.

      Advanced Training is a result of multi-million dollar reasearch into training, it's a technology of it's own. Advanced craft is one form of technology, advanced training is another form a technology. So no that doesn't render anything false.

      What you see in news coverage and TV isn't a 10th of what goes on just in boot camp, if you haven't been in the military then don't think you know about military training. If you think what you've seen in movies qualifies as advanced training you are mistaken, if you think what you've seen isn't matched by every nation in the world your nuts. It's in a movie, for every military in the world to replicate and glean from... that is WHY advanced military training IS classified.

      "As an institution our military has far more experience both in terms of years it has been in existence as well as the number of wars it has been part of"

      Our military has been around longer than China's military? What are you smoking boy? China has been around for a few thousand years and they've pretty much always had a military. There aren't many nations around that have NOT had a military longer than we've had a country...As for being in wars, that's fine and dandy (China has us trumped there too but ours are more recent so I'll give) but since 99% of our troops weren't in any of them (unless you count iraq lol) it doesn't amount to much.

      China's one child policy is because there are too many damn kids and the population is growing through the roof even with it. If lack of youth were a problem I think it's safe to say they'd recend the one child thing.

      Iraq legitimately conquered kuwait AFAIK they weren't even an ally. As for casualties, we sure as shit killed our own troops in Saudi Arabia. Yes, it's classified, but there is no doubt, we had a ship sitting in the gulf firing cruise missles. Wouldn't take ALL of iraq? ALL OF IRAQ, that's like saying they couldn't take all of UTAH!

      Hell we didn't take ALL of iraq either, we just stormed the capital and tada, we had all of iraq.

      We indiscreminately bombed the city which contains the largest portion of iraqs population, we did so indescriminately. Do you have any idea how many civilians that had to of REALLY killed? I don't mean the propaganda numbers claimed by the victor, I mean the reality numbers? Are you really that snowed?

    28. Re:The Chinese use the same economic tactics by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      lol I meant to say tea time but team time sounds funny too... Are you referring to Gallipoli when they were having a tea break while the Australians were being slaughtered? Wasn't that WWI?

      You are right about the navy. Russia does have strong navy. In fact, I don't think any European country even has an aircraft carrier?? Maybe Britain has one--not sure. As far as fuel is concerned, Russia SHOULD be able to manage. They do have oil fields. Well, at least they had it during the Soviet days. I"m not sure if the oil fields are part of Russia or part of one of the independent states?

      Even with all that, wouldn't the war be a ground war. Sure the navy helps and will hurt the enemy. But I'm thinking the war will be carried on the ground, with either Russia trying to invade Europe, or Germany, France, etc trying to invade Russia by land.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  15. microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    why else would Bill and Steve sell most of their holdings , its not like they need the money

    Gates has sold over 6 million shares in August alone

    http://biz.yahoo.com/t/m/msft.html

  16. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, this doesn't suprise me in the least.

    Microsoft, a huge capitalist company, and China, a huge communist country, are direct opposites from each other.

    The fact that China is dictatorial and repressive is besides the point. If you think about it, Linux and communism have a lot in common with each other, in terms of their ideals of shared ownership.

    China and M$ may both be tyrants, but that is about all they have in common.

  17. Re: Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1, Funny

    > Let me guess - you're American, and you think you're so free.

    Before the DMCA, you mean... ;-]

  18. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless the oppression is blatant and backed by swift violence, it is not an opression. Who cares if the Americans don't own anything anymore because of the republican manifesto of rights to the big corporations. Who cares if they can't buy a DVD, but can get a license to keep a single copy of it on media that may or may not last as long as the technology. Who cares if they no longer have the freedom to travel, the freedom to choose, the freedom to think. At least they aren't run over by tanks in Tienamen Square!

  19. Re:Good example by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    One of the last repressive, dictatorial governments on the planet is using Linux. Yay. I hear that Osama Bin Laden uses Linux too, but I haven't seen a story there.

    Please mod this obvious troll into oblivion. The story doesn't have a thing to do with Linux, for one thing.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  20. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  21. Re:Good example by Chexum · · Score: 0

    Actually, Microsoft may have much more control over the world than the "rest of us" likes, but the US government seemingly does.

    That's why the antitrust has gone apparently nowhere, and the sane world keeps replacing this MS-centric mess with something else, one by one. Have you had the luck to work with BIOS code and the associated junk-repository even some Linux code needs to work around? Many BIOS-es from few years old, but perfectly good working motherboards hang with hard disks larger than 32GB, is this silliness?

    Starting this replacement with the operating system seems to be the hardest, but the most visible, and most effective for reorganizing these invisible power lines, I for one welcome our... Oh, this effort to commoditize the computer industry as it always was.

    --
    "Ten years from now, they could do it in a few seconds." -- The Racketeer of the Hellfire Club, 1993, Phrack 42
  22. And don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No list of Chinese Linux distributions would be complete without a link to Thiz Linux, the wonderful Chinese distro being sold on machines at Fry's ;)

    --
    Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! (Not work-safe)

  23. Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Ah well at least he will rake up his frequent flyer miles.

    The company kingsoft in chinese only with no option to change to english it seems. Found a dictionary type program that is sold in an english version but no english pages.

    However a few keyword sprung out. Linux for one. You see it seems this office suit runs on linux, this is significant because it is only hinted at in the forbes article. It means that they are not only replacing the office suite but the OS itself as well, since MS office doesn't run on linux they must have been using windows, and since this product seems only to run on linux and not on windows.

    Can anyone with an understanding of chinese or with better googling skills confirm this (that wps office2003 runs only on linux)?

    Also is this office product opensource or closed source?

    And finally, is it any good?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      Since when does open source == good and closed source == evil?

      I would have thought that the real questions should be based around functionality, fitness for purpose and value for expenditure (all expenditure, not just up front).

      Obviously the Chinese Govenrment believes that using a different product gives them the above benefits. Open or closed source really shouldn't enter in to it. When it does, things rapidly deteriorate into a religious argument.

      Tp.

    2. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by grug0 · · Score: 0
      Can anyone with an understanding of chinese or with better googling skills confirm this (that wps office2003 runs only on linux)?

      I've said it once and I'll say it again - no it doesn't, in fact it appears to only run on windows.

    3. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
      mmm, but I didn't say anything about open/closed being good or evil. I just asked in the interest of completness. Why do I ask? Perhaps I should have explained. Openoffice and projects like it have trouble competing with MS because of installed userbase, support, and mainstream awareness. A huge orginasation like the chinese goverment, you don't get much bigger then the chinese on this planet, could be a nice boost to an open document format.

      Maybe if this product becomes widespread enough in china it might even force MS to include support for its document format into office (to allow MS office users to read chinese documents) instead of the way it is now that everyone making an office suite has to figure out how to read and write the closed MS office document format. And yes I do know that RTF is a full widely supported open document format, ever tried sending someone an rtf one? They think it is a virus and please send a .doc version instead so they open it in word.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    4. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      That's a fair comment. I guess I may have read stuff into your words that wasn't there.

      I'm all in favour of open standards as that is something that encourages competition.

      Tp.

    5. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      It runs on Windows, sucks at importing MS Word documents (silently removed all of the footnotes from one paper of mine), and installs an obnoxious screensaver whose only purpose seems announcing to the world what office productivity suite you run. Go Kingsoft!

      But the Chinese language support is decent, and I'm going to guess that it saves its documents using the Guobiao standard -- which can be pretty useful if you want your documents to use the character-encoding standard mandated by the government.

    6. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Since when does open source == good and closed source == evil?

      Hmmm. To me progress == good and supression of competition and new ideas == evil. In the world of software Microsoft is the supressor and is therefore the evil. The fact that Bill Gates invented the idea of closed source, software licensing and copyrights for microcomputer software may only be a side effect and we may be associating closed source with evil unfairly.

      Nah.

    7. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Since always, there are alot of reasons why open source == good and closed source == bad.

      In and of itself, closing off source is a bad thing for humanity. If something has functionality and an improved fitness for a purpose, that functionality should be opened up and given back.

      From a business perspective closed source is a nightmare, it puts your most critical business functions (no medium or larger sized business could last long without computers) at the mercy of a third party which can cut it off at any time for any reason. Which can collapse and go out of business if they don't decide you annoy them. For all intensive purposes your business is only allowed to exist at their mercy and whim.

      With open source they say shut down, you give them the finger and continue operating. With open souce they go belly up, you hire in a couple coders of your own.

    8. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      and you've been countered time and time again. Yes "wps office2003" is the title of the version of thise officesuite that runs on windows. So technically wps office2003 only runs on windows. However THE PORTS TO LINUX ARE NOT NAMED "wps office2003", there is wps (which only runs on linux) and a third version wps v6 which runs on both.

    9. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      Openoffice and projects like it have trouble competing with MS because of installed userbase, support, and mainstream awareness.

      You probably just forgot to mention it, but surely there is a fairly big company that has a supported office suite based on OOo. So should someone choose to pay for the product and support, there is a viable option. Now, OOo and SO are reasonably compatible (Mozilla vs. Netscape 7 kind of situation), most importantly of course having same file format and core codebase... so switching between the two is fairly painless.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    10. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about their office software but it doesn't seem to be Free Software. For Free Software fans, this is still proprietary... NOTE: I don't know anything about the software and simply basing my opinions on few opinions...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    11. Re:Awh, poor gates, off on another trip. by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      Get real, software licensing, closed source and software copyright (along with many other protections) were around for a long time before Bill hit the scene.

      He may have done many things that I disagree with, but let's not start blaming him for stuff that he is not responsible for.

      Tp.

  24. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1

    > The story doesn't have a thing to do with Linux, for one thing.

    Well, from the story:

    > The article also notes the Chinese government's encouragment of homegrown software and of a national Linux standard."

    And, from the article:

    > The government has been pushing the development of a homegrown software industry and a national standard for open-source Linux software to counter the spread of Microsoft in the last few years.

  25. Re:MS Office and Linux by Tpenta · · Score: 1

    It is not beyond the realms of belief the MS Office could be run under WINE. All kinds of things already do.

    Tp.

  26. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by grug0 · · Score: 0

    How on earth is 6 million shares "most of Bill and Steve's holdings"? If Bill sold most of his holdings, MSFT stock price would plummet and it'd be all over the news. It might even have ripple-on effects on the economy.

  27. Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by gellenburg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether it be Star Office, Open Office, Word Perfect, ABI Word, Apple Works, etc.

    At a time when a lot of US Companies are looking at China as a smorgesboard of potential opportunity as it slowly evolves from a Communistic to Capitalistic society, no doubt Microsoft has looked there as well.

    Personally, I don't have a problem with China inventing their own CPU, or word processing software, but if they'd like to play nicely with others in this global economy, here's hoping that they at least stick to open and published standards.

    1. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't have a problem with China inventing their own CPU, or word processing software, but if they'd like to play nicely with others in this global economy, here's hoping that they at least stick to open and published standards.
      Do you mean play nicely as MS the American company has? Why does another nation have to trust its national security to closed source virus/exploit prone software that is put out by MS? There will always be an international market. It just doesn't have to be software. Infact, the global market has done very well for many years without software being involved. Also, there currently is NO global software market. The only global market is MS. Why should the 95% of the world that is NOT American have to support an nasty monopoly that has abused our system of capitalism? I am all for a healthy global economy, just not with software. Stick to open standars and open protocols and each nation can do fine on their own. When you have a completely one sided IT economy such as the case with MS, then the other 95% of the worlds population suffers while the small 5% gets to hoarde it all. That is not a balanced economy IMO.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by gellenburg · · Score: 1

      I think you misinterpreted the tone of my post.

      China is an emerging market in the global economy. Should China continue to use Microsoft's Products, they perpetuate the illegal Monopoly has in this World.

      Same goes for using Intel microprocessors for their PCs.

      By creating their own versions of CPUs and Software, they are helping the World's economy, and hurting the Microsoft regime.

      I agree with everything you've said, but by open and published standards, I'm referring to XML document formats, SVG graphic formats, and the like.

      Of course though, if China's Office Suite cares to interoperate in a Microsoft world (which it is one today) then they'll have to introduce some symmetric filters to facilitate import and export of their documents, which also means there will be more eyes looking at the closed Microsoft formats.

      Now, nothing is indicated that China will release any of their efforts open-source, but if there's enough interest they just might.

      As I said in my original post, "Any competition to Microsoft Office is Good," and I still stand by that.

    3. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that China using its own software instead of pirating Microsoft's will hurt indeed... Let us not forget why China started the move in the first place.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    4. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did misinterpret your post, sorry about that : )

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by csbruce · · Score: 1

      At a time when a lot of US Companies are looking at China as a smorgesboard of potential opportunity as it slowly evolves from a Communistic to Capitalistic society, no doubt Microsoft has looked there as well.

      It already is Captialistic to a degree. So, by definition, it's not Communistic. It's Fascistic.

    6. Re:Any Competition to Microsoft Office is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I don't have a problem with China inventing their own CPU, or word processing software, but if they'd like to play nicely with others in this global economy, here's hoping that they at least stick to open and published standards.

      I'd like the US to play nicely with others in the global economy, instead of being an imperialist dictator, forcing others to beg on their knees for trade opportunities, or making US companies imperialist fiefdoms in other countries.

      The US is a protectionist country that doesn't believe in true capitalism, with massive subsidies and a BUY AMERICAN attitude while forcing small countries to abandon the same practices the US uses every day.

      Europe is the same way.

  28. Misread this as by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Li Xue, a spokeswoman for Kingsoft, told Reuters the government bought 50,000 copies of WPS software in 2002, but declined to give a value for the purchase.

    Li Nux, a spokesperson for Kingsoft told Reuters the government bought 50,000 copies of WPS software in 2002, but declined to give a value for the purchase.

    I propose she change her last name to Nux, good for business. But in the long haul, Nix may be better....more names to choose from for the kids: Sco Yu Nix come here, you deserve a good spanking for that you naughty boy..take that *slap**slap*.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Misread this as by confundido · · Score: 1

      Actually his/her family name/ Last Name is Li

      So she would have to marry into the Fmily Sco and change her name from Nux to Yu Nix.

      thought I would clarify.

      --
      Wenn Fliegen hinter Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen nach.
  29. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Quaida uses (presumably pirated) Windows 95, I saw it on CNN.

  30. Upgrades by florin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'upgrades' is nicely put. It's all about semantics. I always enjoy the unabashed way the MS propaganda department calls competing solutions 'legacy applications'. I think we should try to consistently refer to installing OpenOffice and Mozilla as upgrading and precede words like MS-Office and IE with the sentence 'legacy apps such as'

    1. Re:Upgrades by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      I've been doing that for a couple years now. It's a good marketing idea (or ms wouldn't use it) and it's an easy way for linux users to increase the idea that linux really is ready for mainstream use. Use it in day to day conversation around the office, user group meetings (not just LUGs..), presentations to the PHBs about Linux and so on.

      Give it a try sometime.

    2. Re:Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > precede words like MS-Office and IE with the sentence 'legacy apps such as'

      I guess it sounds better than 'pile-of-poo apps such as'.....

    3. Re:Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we should refer to SCO's actions as "IP terrorism"

  31. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Tpenta · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also according to yahoo.com, Bill still owns 1,168,499,336 shares in MSFT. 6 million is neither here nor there,

    Tp.

  32. Simpsons by CGP314 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    And I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords!

    No, for real. They will be running the world soon enough.

    1. Re:Simpsons by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      And I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords!
      No, for real. They will be running the world soon enough.

      No kidding. We send all the IT jobs to India and all the manufacturing jobs to China. Now the trade gap with China is $10 billion, with a 6:1 (and widening) imbalance. But I have to look at the bright side -- American CEOs are still getting bonuses, and some of that is bound to trickle down. I think it's time to open a shoe shine stand. Let 'em try to offshore that.

  33. In Beijing Linux is everywhere by clueless123 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I happen to be in Beijing right now (just visiting). This week I've gone to a lot of shopping malls and computer stores looking arround, and I can say there is a *whole* lot of Linux out here. I Guess that M$softs antipiracy efforts here have backfired bigtime, now PHB's (at least in the corporate environment I am working at) are thinking twice before using pirated copies of MS. Considering that a copy of Windoze cost as much as 1/2 a months salary for a full-time programer, it is now very appealing to move to linux.

    1. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, WOW, I admire you, Mr. Windoze user you. You must have a big penis.

    2. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      If you're on vacation, WTF are you doing on slashdot?!?!

      :-)

      (Thanx for info!)

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      Now to hope that 'we' in the west get some of the (linux) goodies developed in China. This sort of exchange has always been difficult because of the language barrier. In both ways. Hope they used i18n etc.

      btw, I see people from China trickling in from time to time in the Knoppix forums. Too bad for them that the Simplified Chinese support is missing in vanilla Knoppix. There are Chinese remasters though, AFAIK.

    4. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by PorscheDriver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whaddya mean?! I live in the UK, I am a programmer, and a "Fully Legitimate, Shrink Wrapped edition of Windows XP, complete with Product Activation" [he says, carefully avoid the word 'copy' - watch what you say clueless123...], still costs me half a months salary :-)

      --
      "This is your life, and it's ending one second at a time."
    5. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS doesn't even sell their software to china. Most of the Microsoft software in China is pirated. So I don't *think* they are losing out on anything.

    6. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Even in that case they are loosing "market share". So it's all to the good.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:In Beijing Linux is everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >a copy of Windoze cost as much as 1/2 a months
      >salary

      Hell, my MSDN license cost me about half a month's salary, and I'm in the $105K range, in the USA!

  34. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to say that whoever modded this flamebait is a fuckwit. Its actually quite insightful.

  35. Is Office Fragmentation really good ?? by leoaugust · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just noticed that they have a homegrown version for the Office Software ...

    No comments on whether that is Open Source or Open Formats or not .... And no idea of whether it is going to be compatible with Open Office and MS Office ....

    Unless the chinese are adopting the "Linux Mindset" I don't think that this is necessarily a good thing .... If they are forcing an almost failed software on more than a billion people just by regulatory fiat, how could it be good ?? ....

    What they should be adopting is not something that is NOT Microsoft, but something that is "effectively" BETTER than MS Products .... I don't know that WPS Office even approaches there ...

    and the chinese can't get there by rejecting the linux mindset and copying the Microsoft strategy of denying free choice ....

    just my two cents worth ...

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
    1. Re:Is Office Fragmentation really good ?? by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      2c worth of nothing IM not so HO

      are you trolling or what?

      why are you assuming that PWS is an "almost failed software"? this isn't about power to the people, this is about a replacement in government departments. if WPS does the job, and is a good enough copy of M$ office for the chinese government, they should switch. hurray for competition: a similar product for less money, and no/hardly any retraining needed!!!

      it's not like every citizen is forced to use WPS. and hey, what is the choice you are talking about? do you *really* think that the average chinese can afford M$s license fees? WPS vs. pirated office, i know what i would prefer... especially since M$ is trying harder and harder to fight piracy.

      and last, but not least: "the linux mindset" is something different than *your* mindset. open your eyes, man. don't be an elitist. you better choose pragmatism instead. it makes the world go round.

  36. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Gates has sold over 6 million shares in August alone
    You should probably look at the link before posting it. Yes, Gates has sold 6 million shares in August, big deal. Bill owns more than a billion shares of the company; to him, 6 million shares is a drop in the bucket. If he continues to sell 6 million shares a month, it would take him more than 16 years to divest himself of all his shares. He ain't exactly pulling a McBride.

    If you scroll down the list, you'll note that he's sold that many shares or more most months dating back to October 2001. He sold more than 10 million shares in both June and August of last year. The fact that he's sold 6 million shares this month is hardly an indication that he's "leaving the ship."

    --
    Rate NAKED People at Fuck Meter! (Not work safe)
  37. Phear my leet googling skillz... by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Phear my leet googling skillz... by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      Okay, added this article's factoid to the Wikipedia.

  38. Re:Good example by mikolas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you mix up communism and socialism. They have about as much in common as the US of A and capitalism. One should not mix up ideologies and their actual implementations as they really, really, rarely meet.

  39. Re:Good example by GeekDork · · Score: 1

    If you think about it, Linux and communism have a lot in common with each other, in terms of their ideals of shared ownership.

    Now if only someone could tell the communists the difference (i.e. what's making Linux work), communism could be the next big thing. Ahhh, Dreams.

    Perhaps it's the fact that while each communist party has fallen prey to corruption while Linux/OSS refuses to do so.

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  40. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your facts strait, although communist in name, China is more fascist than communist at the present.

  41. No, they're locked in. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Active Directory, SMS, Exchange, Fileservers, MS Office all rolled up into large bundled licenses for the corporations.

    If they try to switch, they'll lose their bundled corporate licenses and have to start paying for the lot separately which is far more expensive *and* they'll have to pay for licenses for the new software at the same time.

    You have to give it to the CIOs of US multinational corps, when they take the bait, they have your arm off with it.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:No, they're locked in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We can do A/D
      We can do SMS
      We've almost got Exchange
      We're really close on Office too.

      Now with Novell on board (the creator of Active Directory), be certain that you'll see NT replacement versions of linux. Distributions will be tailored for specific tasks. You'll see a Linux Messaging Server, Linux Database Server, Linux file and Print Server, and anything else you will need, with very polished, centrally managed tools which will make Microsoft's MMC cry for mommy.

    2. Re:No, they're locked in. by aled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry but Novell didn't invent Active Directory. They didn't invented the directory service concept either. They did invented their own directory service a couple of year before Microsoft did AD (called NDS or something).

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    3. Re:No, they're locked in. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      unless they get rid of ALL of those things. And if the new software is open source the licenses are nil.

    4. Re:No, they're locked in. by Snaller · · Score: 1

      they'll have to pay for licenses for the new software at the same time.


      So get software without amoral licenses - ie, free.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    5. Re:No, they're locked in. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Microsoft didn't invent active directory either, actually active directory is a rip off of LDAP, if you dig you'll find ldap tools for mass importing and exporting of data from your trees. Active Directory is just LDAP, altered to be proprietary... like everything else released by microsoft it's a knock off of someone elses innovation. They've never innovated anything.

    6. Re:No, they're locked in. by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I guess that's why it's called vendor lock. It's probably better in these cases to extricate yourself one step at a time. Start with the browser then the office, then the servers, then finally activedirectory and exchange.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    7. Re:No, they're locked in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is... 99% corporations do not need any of this. There are free equivalents that are all better than the Microsoft Offering.

      The main tools that people complain about are

      1. Outlook. I am not sure why because this product is a poor email client and a poor organiser.

      2. Access. Now I agree, a free, flexible equivalent to Access would be very handy.

      Now here's the solution. Create 1 kiosk machine per area for Access usage. Ditch all of the rest. Install Linux and you're already millions ahead of Microsoft's super bundled discount.

    8. Re:No, they're locked in. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Microsoft- "You owe us x amount for our products. Pay up." China- "Make us." No, China is not locked in, they are simply playing along until they have what they need, and then MS goes out the window (oooh that was a good one)

  42. Re:Good example by karit · · Score: 1

    Don't opposites attract?

    --
    http://blog.karit.geek.nz/
  43. Competition helps open source software by dwheeler · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If China continues down this path, this could be very helpful to Open Office and other open source software office suites.

    Because "nearly everyone" uses Microsoft Office, it's extremely difficult for any competitor to enter the market - even if the competitor was always cheaper and manifestly superior. However, if large countries increasingly use products other than Microsoft Office, then countries will have to depend on something else than "everyone uses Microsoft Office" to exchange documents. I expect that "something else" to be either a standard document format, or to eventually standardize on some "other product".

    A marketplace where there are many competing office products, but a need to exchange office documents, strongly favors open source products. That's especially true if the open source product can run on any operating system, as Open Office can. It's no big deal to say "everyone, let's install Open Office for this project so we can safely exchange documents", since Open Office is free to download. I wouldn't be surprised to see countries other than the U.S. adopt other office suites first, such as Open Office, and then U.S. companies will be forced to support those products to communicate with their international partners, suppliers, offshore sites, and so on.

    I love to see real competition in any market. Perhaps this will be the start of real competition in office suites.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
    1. Re:Competition helps open source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt no such competitors ever turned up just because of the widespread use of Word, but clearly because there is no such superior product out yet. You first need competitive product to compete, not just the desire.

    2. Re:Competition helps open source software by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I love to see real competition in any market. Perhaps this will be the start of real competition in office suites.

      What do you consider "REAL"? We already have StarOffice, OpenOffice, KOffice, this WPS Office, Corel's stuff (not terribly viable anymore, but...), etc.
      There already IS a "REAL" competition. Have you not tried the other things that are already out there?

      I'm not trying to take the thunder away from your posting, but, there has been other stuff out there for a while now. This is not a "start", this is just more fuel for the fire.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:Competition helps open source software by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised to see countries other than the U.S. adopt other office suites first, such as Open Office, and then U.S. companies will be forced to support those products to communicate with their international partners, suppliers, offshore sites, and so on.

      Let's call this new office product suite "UN Ware". Of course it will be free of national priorities, inter-agency conflict, and shifting alliances, just the the real UN...

      Seems pretty obvious to me software is now thought of as a "strategic asset" by many countries, just as steel, oil, shipping, autos, etc are or have been. This also means software is now going to be shaped by industrial policy in a big way. I'm fairly skeptical that this is a good thing. It certainly will be interesting to watch China and India slug it out trying to undermine each other in the software arena. They are not exactly best of friends...

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    4. Re:Competition helps open source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't have the illusion that I'm in the majority, but I have yet to find a case when OpenOffice hasn't had what I needed in order to do my work. I support MS Office and use it to keep up on answering end-user questions and the like, I just use OO for *my* work, at work and at home. Haven't missed a beat yet with it. We have the licensing and it even covers me if I wanted to take the office copy home to install. I've just grown to like using OO better.

      Maybe its something to *grow* into :), but it works fine for me. One BIG driving force for me is that I use Linux mainly. Windows users have the OS tie-in with MS Office to feel happy about using MS Office (Its a 'feature', not just a lock-in, from an end-user's and a tech support perspective), and have no percieved need nor desire to look at the outcomes if any of this lock-in for themselves down the road.

    5. Re:Competition helps open source software by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      This also means software is now going to be shaped by industrial policy in a big way.

      What you are saying is inevitable. As software becomes more and more critical to societies, they will become important assets. It wouldn't surprise me if some worm that shuts down e-mail in 20 years will cause more damage than a major storm.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    6. Re:Competition helps open source software by dwheeler · · Score: 1
      Clearly there are products which at least attempt to compete in the office suite space. But I think that mere existence of a product is not enough to be a "real" competitor.

      In my mind, there is "real" competition if the existence of some competitors (and their products) constrain the behavior of the lead competitor(s). By constrain, I mean reduce prices, innovate new features that they think customers really want, and so on. Is Microsoft reducing their general prices, or creating real innovations, because Open Office exists? Not yet in the general case. This pricing differentiation is already happening in specific cases, such as in Munich, but as of yet it's not trying to compete for Joe Average. By the way, I think their new DRM features don't count as innovation - they appear to me to be a new way to lock in users and constrain competition, not to really help end users.

      As a practical matter, for "real" competition, there should be a significant fragment (say 30%+) of the potential users who will seriously consider using it, and some number of users (say 20-30%) who actually use something else. The exact numbers aren't as critical as the fact that the existance of a competitor changes the behavior of the lead competitor.

      Oh, to answer your question, I've used many different office-related products, including Microsoft Office, Star Office, Open Office, Abiword, Gnumeric, KOffice, Word Perfect (I've also used WordStar, Apple Writer I and ][, and Lotus 1-2-3, but those are only historical now). So yes, I've used a number of products.

      The biggest trouble with many of the open source programs cannot properly open common Microsoft Office files. This is an absolute bare MINIMUM requirement for real use. Eric Raymond's DRAG.NET gets this right on:

      We booked KWord on a 305: being kind of pointless. Even if you only read in the text and lose all the formatting, the ability to at least view the file format in which 95% of all business documents are currently being produced (ugly or not) is essential to any serious word processor.

      A second problem with many of the open source programs is that they don't run on all the major platforms. No one will want to risk running an office suite if they can't trade data with their cohorts. If the application runs on everything, their risk is reduced.

      This is why I'm particularly impressed with Open Office: it seems to import/export Microsoft Office files better than anyone else, including more of its sophisticated features, and it runs on LOTS of different platforms. I like Abiword's speedy startup and clean approach, but it just doesn't have the functionality and import/export capability. Last I saw, KOffice didn't run everywhere.

      Anyway, I hope that helps.

      --
      - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  44. Marry me! by Tirel · · Score: 0, Troll

    we can wank eachother off whilst playing AD&D and watching FOX news.

  45. Re:Good example by mikolas · · Score: 1

    I meant democracy, not capitalism, sorry about that.

  46. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1

    Communism's implementation has historically been very corrupt. But Communism does have an ideology to it (no, its not simply socialism) that in theory is ok. It just fails to account for humanities failings.

  47. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1

    > Perhaps it's the fact that while each communist party has fallen prey to corruption while Linux/OSS refuses to do so.

    That is true. But perhaps Linux/OSS not only refuses, but is incapable of falling prey to corruption, because of the GPL.

    Maybe I am just being naive, but I really don't see how it would be possible for OSS to become corrupt.

  48. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the last repressive, dictatorial governments on the planet is using Linux.

    There are plenty of repressive, dictatorial governments around. The Chinese one is possibly the most significant but it's far from being alone.

  49. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1

    Maybe you could go back and ask Soviet Russia and the US that, during the cold war...

  50. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the last repressive, dictatorial governments on the planet is using Linux.

    Really ? I thought the Bush administration is running MS Windows.

  51. Re:Good example by gusilu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does this have to do with the fact that they've stopped using Word? I'm not saying that the Chinese government is great, far from it, but I think you are mixing things up and maybe missing the point.

    The fact that you (and a lot of people, myself included) don't agree with what's going on in China doesn't mean that we can't recognize when it does something right, which I think is the aim of the article.

    As I far as I can see, it is always a good thing when governments, no matter what country or political system, begin considering alternatives to M$, and even better when they actually decide to adopt them because they've seen how it can be "better" (lots of reasons for that which I'm sure have been posted on Slashdot thousands of times, so I'm not going to go into that).

    This is even more significant when we're talking about one of the most important countries in Asia, and that this only shows a trend amongst siginficative countries and cities which are beginning to seriously consider OSS.

    OTOH, China's government is repressive and dicatorial, which is certainly no good thing; but that doesn't mean that they can't do something right (or which some people, a lot of which hang out on Slashdot :)) and get recognition for it.

    All I hope is that more countries/governments start getting the message and move away from the "M$ is our salvation" dogma that is so common amongst not so technical people.

    --
    Don't try to fix me. I'm not broken.
  52. reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Office by dangermouse · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article does not say that the government upgraded from Microsoft Office. It says that they upgraded from an earlier version of the same software:
    The Ministry of Commerce, the Foreign Ministry and the National Security Bureau and other governmwent departments had upgraded to WPS Office2003 from an earlier version developed by domestic software maker Kingsoft Co, the People's Daily newspaper reported.
    The big story seems to be that "it was the first large-scale software upgrade in government offices," which is really just not very interesting.
  53. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah that was fine, I understood the point you were making.

  54. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ooh your gonna piss off the MS astroturfers

  55. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of the last repressive, dictatorial governments on the planet is using Linux.

    Georgie Jr signed up for LINUX?? When did this happen?? When he was stealing your election??

  56. Re:Good example by gusilu · · Score: 1

    Ok, some of this didn't make any sense, my fault for not previewing - ingnore the "(or which some people, a lot of which hang out on Slashdot :))". Now that I see I don't even know what it was supossed to mean!

    --
    Don't try to fix me. I'm not broken.
  57. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except the share price is worth half of what it was last year

    the markets work on trends, can you spot any ?

    like the price is worth 30% of what it was in 2000

  58. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by Tpenta · · Score: 1

    Even so, it is a major missed sales opportunity for Microsoft. Just think of the press they would have got and the money in license fees if they had managed to pull off a conversion to MS Office.

    Tp.

  59. It isn't whether you can do it by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's how you pay for it. Microsoft is already paid for with large discounts *if you take the lot*.

    If you don't take the lot, it gets expensive, and you already have the stuff in place so it's not as if you can stop paying.

    With the new MS pay as you go licensing deals that may change, I don't know but the Linux vendors need to find a way round the license bundling.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:It isn't whether you can do it by shaitand · · Score: 1

      my understanding is there is nothing that actually requires you to deploy everything in the bundle... in fact you can deploy none of it and still pay for the licenses... these are licenses that are already paid for. Even if those licenses were bought yesterday, they would be wasted money boo hoo, but since the licensing for linux is NOTHING, then you can easily drop those and transition ALL of the things in that bundle to open source solutions and NOT have to pay for any piece of it from MS next time payment is due. You simply never buy an upgrade to the bundle.

  60. Re:Good example by Gherald · · Score: 1

    > although communist in name, China is more fascist than communist at the present.

    Intriguing. Here are a couple relevant blogs, for those who are interested:

    Scroll down to April 22, 2003

    From Communism to Fascism?

  61. Drivers by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Outside of China, there's an excellent benefit from China swarming all over Linux: This means there will be Linux support out of the gate for those strange, cheap, no-name peripherals you see in plain little boxes all over the computer stores. This means less reverse-engineering Windows drivers, and less hair pulling at trying to get specs from engineers all the way across the globe.

    1. Re:Drivers by Idealius · · Score: 1

      A-frickin'-men!

  62. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! This is big news!

    If they were using Microsoft, they would have been upgrading every year or so!

  63. Re:Good example by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 2, Informative
    One of the last repressive, dictatorial governments on the planet is using Linux. Yay. I hear that Osama Bin Laden uses Linux too, but I haven't seen a story there.
    What a bloody awful first post.

    Moving on, the real way to look at this is that the two most populous countries on the planet (China and India) are both seriously looking at open source, free software and other non-MS software organisations for their governmental and other agencies.

    Whatever you, me or anyone else thinks about MS, Linux, FreeBSD, MSOffice, and whatever else is really irrelevant. It's great to see people now having the choice which really hasn't been around (excepting other even more expensive options *cough* Apple *cough*).
  64. Will the Chineese respect the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will all this work with GPL'ed software be lost because the Chineese govenment maynot respect the GPL license? They have shown in the past they don't have much consideration for others copyright laws. I hope this isn't the case.

    1. Re:Will the Chineese respect the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the "good republican americans" respect it. Listen mate, if any company out there could disrespect GPL and make a profit it most CERTAINLY would. They haven't found a way to compete "free as in beer" yet though. Why would they steal and sell something that already exists freely and is developed faster and by more people?

      Same thing applies to china.

    2. Re:Will the Chineese respect the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People keep posting on how China does not respect intellectual property, but I think this is overblown and exagerated.

      I'm sure there's been mass piracy in Asia (and Latin America and Europe and the US). The incentive to pirate may be greater in countries where the cost is ridiculously prohibitive, but the truth of the matter is that China has been forced (and a lot of 3rd world countries) to prove they are enforcing international ip in order to play in the international market.

      I can't think of a good reason they would violate the GPL -- just the opposite, switching to Linux makes a hell of a lot of sense. Stay legal, and avoid paying for extremely expensive software. Hell, the homepage for Extremadure (for example), has "Be legal, dowload Linex" as an "ad" at the top. I think it's primarily the same motivation in China. Being able to audit the code you use internally (a healthy dose of paranoia, esp. with regards to a company like MS) has to be another huge motivating factor (I'm honestly surprised, as many other people here are, that foreign governments haven't moved more quickly away from MS just for this reason).

      Additionally, as someone mentioned, if they promote OSS -- they can be sure that there will be some software that will work well with their hardware products (if, for instance, there is an American DRM hardware w/ MS support vs. Chinese hardware w/o DRM and MS support, only Linux drivers).

      I'm sure the Chinese government (I'd imagine, any government) would prefer to have its nascent hardware industry not be under the thumb of MS -- as the hardware industry has been in the US, and is pretty much to this day.

      I'm not arguing on principles here -- I think respecting the GPL (which means, really, respecting international IP) is in the best interests of the Chinese hardware makers.

    3. Re:Will the Chineese respect the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will all this work with GPL'ed software be lost because the Chineese govenment maynot respect the GPL license? They have shown in the past they don't have much consideration for others copyright laws. I hope this isn't the case.

      It doesn't really matter. The GPL is a US Specific implementation. It actually is in parts incompatible with several countries' laws. Every product that ships with a US centric software licence does this.

      Properly done, you'd need to craft a license that conforms to each country's laws.

      The IP issue only means that piracy should be controlled.

  65. Re:Good example by unoengborg · · Score: 1

    Are we really sure that its pirated?
    This is something for homeland security to look into. Perhaps Bill & Steve needs a long free vacation in Cuba.

    --
    God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
  66. Re:ChinkOffice by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is this post a misplaced attempt at humour, or misplaced racism? Very poor.

  67. Last? by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Your post cracked me up. China's government is relatively benign compared to the dozens and dozens of horrible South American, African, and East Asian governments. When was the last time you heard about genocide in China?

    "One of the last"? There's still plenty of repressive dictatorial governments, don't you worry about that.

    1. Re:Last? by siddhartha03 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Every day, they force abortions do they not? Isn't that basically genocide?

      --
      Sock puppets stole my sig.
  68. Re:Chinese office by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

    Er? The Chinese have no alphabet like Western languages. Their system of language is based on ideograms where one ideogram represents a word or part of a word. It's the same with Korean, Japanese, Mayan, Egyptian, etc.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  69. Ironic by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ironic, isn't it? A communist nation is doing more to protect the free market (by fighting a monopoly) than any of the supposedly capitalistic nations.

    Seriously, when did we all hand our collective balls over to the monopolies and give up the whole idea of a "free market" and "encouraging competition"?

    1. Re:Ironic by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      The PRC has been shifting to a more capitalist economy for years. They realize pure communism can't work, so they are shifting, if slowly. They have been on that path for years.

    2. Re:Ironic by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pure communism -- much like pure capitalism -- isn't really a feasible economy. But hey, it's hard to do much better than the welfare state -- combining the best features of capitalism and communism.

    3. Re:Ironic by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Since when did we encourage competition and the free market?

      There have always been monopolies. And when there's two we can argue that we have choice and thus freedom.

      Can anyone tell me the exact date America stopped being a free country and started creating black markets and monopolies to ensure the employment of all people, except those that get laid off? I don't even think it happened last century, I think we changed very shortly after winning our independance, maybe one or two generations. Now we're no different than Britain or whereever. Simply capitalist.

    4. Re:Ironic by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1

      You're a little confused. In a 100% free market, the government does not regulate business. That's why it's a free market.

      A free market doesn't have, or need, need "protecting" from monopolies. Historically, monopolies have been positive boons to consumer; for instance, Standard Oil brought down the price of oil dramatically. Who needs protection from that?

      Similarly, the government doesn't "encourage competition" in a free market. A free market encourages competition all by itself, by allowing competitors to blossom on their own. In a free market, competitors compete solely based on the quality of their goods and services. They aren't able to compete via litigation, suing other companies out of business. And they aren't able to compete based on being subsidized by government.

      All that said, we don't have a 100% free market here in America, nor am I aware of any large-scale free markets anywhwere else in the world.

    5. Re:Ironic by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Either system in its pure form requires far too much faith in the inherent goodness of humanity.

      I'd edge towards communism as an ideal if people could be trusted to work together, but a primarily capitalist system with some controls like the US has is far less vulnerable to abuses by evil, greedy assholes.(note that I said *less* vulnerable, I realize that we do have our problems)

    6. Re:Ironic by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      The US isn't really primarily capitalist at all -- although it is more so than most other industrialized nations. Think about it -- the US has anti-trust laws; a welfare system; a public education system; if not a public health care system, then at least a great deal of regulation to ensure that basic medical is available to everyone; and so one. The US is a welfare state -- a very different thing than a capitalist state. Imagine all schools being private schools, and having no guarantee of the poor getting ANY education. Imagine is the jobless simply starved and died with no support. Imagine if the poor couldn't even get emergency medical services, and were turned away from hospitals. Sound strange? That's what true capitalism looks like.

  70. directories... by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    i believe that the directories that we are talking about are based on the x.500 spec.

    novell was first with NDS, Netware Directory Services sometimes called ediretory. very close to the x.500 spec including some stuff that they put into it but recommended that you don't use (r/o partitions come to mind).

    ms was *very* late to the dirctory part with ads, Active Directory Services. this is an expansion of the MS domain model. it appears to not be as x.500 complient as it should.

    if you want a comparision of these, there is no beter experiment than hooking up 4 or 5 servers and building something out of directory services. if you can't do that, look to the microsoft annoucement that they put 2.5 million objects in an ads network. then compare to the brainshare demo where novell put over a *billion* objects into nds.

    eric

  71. Too late for Microsoft: biz dies because of change by nozpamming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think microsoft is right on the ball with cheap software for thailand, but perhaps already too late. Let's see if china is just strong-arming for a similar deal...or really going for linux.

    Microsoft is facing a looming battle from local (asian) programmers that are used to linux. In the end it's always these kind of social choices that dictate if a business lives or dies. Combine government choices (germany, brazil, now china) with small clusters of companies like Red Hat and breeding schools like MIT and some Indian institutes and Microsoft is facing a real struggle with a strong product backed-up by dedicated companies, customers, workforce and policy.

    It usually takes ten years or so for these find of impacts to unfold...every signal right now points to a slow corruption of the windows OS.

  72. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanted to know whether opposites attract it'd make more sense to ask the US and some minor repressive dictatorial regime during the cold war than to ask the US and another super power. Whatever the relationship between the USA and the USSR, they certainly weren't opposites.

  73. Microsoft Piracy and Linux by synergy3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While Microsoft has been on an anti-piracy tirade for some time, I think they tolerated it in China. Why you ask? To allow for the entrenchment of their products. Once China became hooked and beholden to Microsoft products and as they became more integrated with the world economy, China would be pressured to enforce copyright laws because they want others to do the same. But of course we find China not wanting to become beholden to anyone. So what do they start doing? Making their own CPUs which will soon start selling worldwide (IMO). They also move towards linux as their operating system thus locking Microsoft (and the US) out of their computer loop. Any encryption needs are not crippled by the US government. China can home grow them. Software needs are the same. While India is outsourcing support, programming and more for other countries, China is also developing their highly educated middle class as well in all things computers. Will probably be a few years before they start realizing the value in making and selling software on the cheap to the rest of the world. In the end it may be globalization that really undoes Microsoft and smacks them down to a more modest company.

    1. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, CPU's that are on par with a Cyrix from two years ago, yes that is just what I want to run. In other words...whoopdeefuckingdo.

    2. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah CPUs on par with Cyrix from 2 years ago. How long did it take the Chinese to get to that point? How long did it take Intel and Cyrix?

    3. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just what they said about Japanese cars in the 70s, now who wants an american car?

    4. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft took a tip from the Opium Wars. :P

    5. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're American I'd wager? If not, that's pretty standard American arrogance.

      Just give them time -- they're working on it. First, of course, you start out "small" or "simple".

      Like someone else has said, Japan was once known for cheapo stuff of little quality and cheap price (not just cars -- all kinds of products). And yes, Japanese cars at the start of their industry sucked (they learned how to build cars from the US -- before they started doing things their own way. Well, or Deming's way).

      China too, has an interesting advantage: it's sheer size means that national industries can achieve massive economies of scale before they launch their international technology push. This will come, I'm sure, at prices completely untouchable by any wealthy country -- it's just a matter of them developing the tech.

      Put it another way (also ripped off from another /. post): even if you're so smart that you're one in a million, there's a thousand people just like you in China. Give them time (and given the, IMHO, greed in the US corporate culture -- I'd wager it won't take them long to catch up and surpass us technologically).

      The've done the hardest part already too; establishing a national tech sector. They started late, and so "license IP", but they have themselves stated that the goal is to be IP owners. they're working on bringing (and owning) the next tech revolution.

      By no means it's a given that the US/Western World will maintain its technological lead. We'll see.

    6. Re:Microsoft Piracy and Linux by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      If you were replying to me you missed my point. My point is very similar to yours. Intel and Cyrix took quite a while to get to chips speeds which were to be had 2 years ago. Whereas the Chinese did all that in a much shorter time. Yes I am american. But I also agree with you. So who is the arrogant one talking about standard american ignorance? If our points were the same does that make you ignorant too?

  74. Officially we run free software. unofficially... by blastedtokyo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In China the reality is that software is considered free (as in beer). The lone exception is the government, who in its quest to join the WTO, look like a good citizen, etc. needs to look like they support international copyright standards to a reasonable degree. That's why they finally started buying licenses just a few years ago.

    With this move, they can stop paying Microsoft licenses and look like they're legit. Heck, they even look trendy by supporting open source. Then someone can just go to the any subway station and pick up for $1US a copy of Windows, a copy of VMWare and a copy of Office.

    Voila...They no longer need to pay MSFT. gain support from the open source community, and still run the software they're used to using.

  75. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by Bushcat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Kingsoft is a major player in China, and also known elsewhere in the world for its Chinese dictionary solutions. See dictionaries here and Kingsoft here.

    Microsoft's perpetual problem in Asian markets is its inability to develop a character conversion system that people actually want to use. In Japanese, this is called Henkan and is the shim that converts typing on a QWERTY keyboard to Japanese (and, in the Chinese market, Chinese {traditional or Big-5]). MS has totally failed to come up with an acceptable system after years of effort, yet the local companies such as Just Systems (ATOK, et al) have no problem coming up with sophisticated predictive conversion systems whilst Microsoft blunders around with what it THINKS these markets need. MS will struggle in China because it is a US company attempting to place a Chinese veneer over its operations. Other US companies do vastly better operating overseas. Similarly, overseas companies do much better operating in the US (every Japanese company you can think of, for example).

    As a sensible publishing solution, MS is handicapped by having project leaders that hav no idea what good Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese typography look like. They want a minimum-cost conversion of a US-centric package, that's what they pay for and that's what they get.

    This isn't an anti-MS diatribe, it's more of a frustrated comment on how MS operates in the world. I happen to know that their internal double-byte-enabled translation tools are outstanding, for example, yet they simply don't trust the quality their translators deliver them using this tool. It's like having an agressively arrogant version of Teletubbies as clients.

  76. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    except the share price is worth half of what it was last year [...] like the price is worth 30% of what it was in 2000
    In other words, Gates selling 6 million shares this month is the equivalent of Gates selling 2 million shares in Aug 2000. Like I said, it's nothing to him, a drop in the bucket.
  77. Re:Good example by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linux and communism have a lot in common with each other, in terms of their ideals of shared ownership.

    Bullshit, unlike communism, Linux actually works.

    --
    In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
  78. I don't know why it hasn't happend yet by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Years before Linux businesses were looking at public domain software as an easy way to cut costs.
    It just seammed a no-brainner to go to an open sourced operatining system like Linux but somewhere along the way Microsoft convenced the business secter that free software was dangerous and evil full of back doors and bugs and such things could bring a business to a crushing hault.
    Businesses got the idea that the needed secure and reliable software and the only way to get that was to buy it from Microsoft. I guess it's a zen thing... if it get's crappy enough it'll actually be good.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:I don't know why it hasn't happend yet by tsa · · Score: 1

      ...dangerous and evil full of back doors and bugs and such things could bring a business to a crushing hault....

      MSBlaster anyone?

      Sorry, couldn't resist

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:I don't know why it hasn't happend yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a good example. About 70% of web servers are UNIX/Linux running Apache. 99% of DOS attacks come from Windows machines, due to faulty security. MSBlaster is one example, of many.

    3. Re:I don't know why it hasn't happend yet by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Years before Linux was the 1980s. During the 1980s business were transitioning from mainframe / dumb terminal apps (which were commercial) to individual PCs. They were convinced by microsoft to use:

      a) commodity hardware
      b) be in sinc with small business
      c) reduce custom development time
      d) cheap software
      etc...

  79. Hey.. by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    They might be commies, but at least they have the right idea with software. (eg, getting away from billy bob)

  80. Re:Good example by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, the problem is OSS can be suppported by a very few as there is no per copy cost of the code. In the real world, everything has a per unit cost so a few people can't support everyone else.

  81. Re:good, maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    i recommend forced self-termination if the parent post does not get at least +4, insightful.


    I hope you mean that you'll be forced to kill yourself if it doesn't reach +4, insightful. Please post to let us know when you are about to do it. The world will then be a little better place without an idiot like you in it.

  82. Not an upgrade from Microsoft by Cryogenes · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    ...upgraded to WPS Office2003 from an earlier version developed by domestic software maker Kingsoft Co,...


    Learn to read, people.
    1. Re:Not an upgrade from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be so stupid??

  83. Not Really by ComputarMastar · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised that communist countries would embrace open-source software. I think it fits well within the Communist philosophy (everyone has access to it and anyone can contribute to it).

    As has been mentioned before here on Slashdot, it really doesn't make sense anymore for any nation, regardless of its economic model, to base its computing infrastructure on closed-source software and proprietary document formats. Especially from a company known for locking in its customers.

  84. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

    What do you mean by double-byte enabled translation tools? We're talking character-conversion (jiantizi -> fantizi, etc.), not language translation, right?

  85. Ironic: Communism actually benefiting people?! by VEGx · · Score: 1

    Who would have thought that "communism" means "greater good for the greater number"!?!

  86. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by Bushcat · · Score: 1

    No, in the MS world you're translating pairs of single-byte characters, as generated by the keyboard, to double-byte pairs in a hopefully intelligent manner.

  87. Homegrown Office Suite by texaport · · Score: 1
    Maybe the Chinese will call this initial version of their homegrown product RICE 3.0 ?

    --
    Early 4 digit Slashdot IDs (819x and 38dd) available on Ebay.

  88. Re:MS Office and Linux by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, MS Office XP runs perfectly under Cross Over Office. It also runs Photoshop 7 perfectly. Disney actually paid to have Photoshop 7 working since many more movies are being done with Linux and most graphical artists have Photoshop training. I just set this up for my brother-in-law who is a photographer and said he "needed" photoshop, I switched him to Red Hat 9 with OOo 1.1 (very good startup times) and Photoshop 7. It runs great. There is no slow down since Wine is NOT an emulator, it runs at native speed. I personally use Gimp 1.3.x and OOo-1.1 for all my needs. However, if you "need" one of these bigger MS Windows only apps, Cross Over works great for many of them. There is also WineX-3.x that runs more then 500 of the top games.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  89. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by darekana · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually the Microsoft IME (Input method env) is fairly sophisticated for Japanese. It is getting competitive with ATOK. I think ATOK's market share is probably in the toilet these days. Their software is better, but not so much better that it is worth paying for. Well maybe if you have to transcribe tons of text, but certainly not necessary for the average person. Just like browsers, MS will control the IME on its own platform.

    The reason MS is having trouble in China is not because their software is bad, it's because China, like Japan and Korea don't want to hand their markets to a foreign company on a platter.

    As a sensible publishing solution, MS is handicapped by having project leaders that hav no idea what good Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese typography look like. They want a minimum-cost conversion of a US-centric package, that's what they pay for and that's what they get.

    MS is not handicapped, guess what!, they have Japanese and Chinese people working for them. They have large offices in both countries and have brought many Chinese and Japanese language experts to America to work in their research labs. They know about i18n and they know about typography. They have spent tons of money on buying people that know about it.

    MS does make mistakes and does do stupid things, but they aren't quite as ignorant as you seem to make them out to be.

  90. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would be tempted to chalk it up to one of the following:

    1) Diversification.

    B) The realization that, for years now, it hasn't been possible for Microsoft's stock to perform the way it did in the eighties.

    4) Bill needs some cash on hand for the purchase of one or more of the following:

    - Jet skis.
    - Tahitian slave girls.
    - A formidable nuclear arsenal.
    - Twizzlers.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  91. Re:Chinese office by Beowabbit · · Score: 5, Informative
    Their system of language is based on ideograms where one ideogram represents a word or part of a word. It's the same with
    • Korean
      Nope. Korean used to be written in Chinese characters, but now all writing in North Korea and almost all writing in South Korea is alphabetic. (Chinese characters are occasionally scattered into highbrow writing in South Korea, but it's still mostly alphabetic.) Korean writing arranges the letters into syllables in such a way that the syllables sort of look like Chinese characters, though -- quite pretty. (Link with examples)
    • Japanese
      Japanese writing is a mix of phonetic and ideographic writing (with the ideograms borrowed from Chinese; they're called kanji, which is just Japanese-borrowed-from-Chinese for "Chinese characters").
    • Mayan
      Unless there's recent news I've missed, Mayan hieroglyphs haven't been deciphered yet. (I guess people could still have an idea whether they're likely to be phonetic or likely to be ideographic based on the variety and distribution of symbols, though -- I don't know much about them.)
    • Egyptian
      Egyptian is a fascinating mix of ideographic and phonetic writing. There are symbols that are used only for their sound, and symbols that are used only for their meaning, and lots of symbols that can be used rebus-like for either. I found a neat page about it at http://www.friesian.com/egypt.htm .
    (The main point I wanted to make is that modern Korean isn't ideographic, and Japanese and Egyptian are only partly so.)
  92. Re:Officially we run free software. unofficially.. by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

    Anyone who thinks the largest nation in the world does anything to "gain support from the open source community" needs to step away from the monitor for a while.

  93. Re:stfu u gay furry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this might be too difficult for you to answer, but what is it like to be retarded?

  94. Actually by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    They're just creating their own monopoly.

    It has nothing to do with the "free market" or "encouraging competition." It's all about money. MS products cost way too much and don't do what they want, so they're comming up with singular solutions to get MS and other expensive companies out.

    Once MS is out of China and more OSes and whatnot are created then we can talk about their intent to create a free market.

    Ben

  95. The Chinese does NOT abide by GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "yet bitch and moan when they start to develop the slightest glimmer of innovation and drive."

    Don't ever expect to see any contributions to Linux by the Communist party. Certainly they will modify it, release it and sell it, but you will never see the source.

  96. Too bad for them by TuringTest · · Score: 1
    Don't ever expect to see any contributions to Linux by the Communist party. Certainly they will modify it, release it and sell it, but you will never see the source.

    I don't think that will happen, but if it does, it will be bad for them. By rejecting the GPL they would be creating an effective fork, and they would loss all support from the rest of the world community.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    1. Re:Too bad for them by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      I don't think that will happen, but if it does, it will be bad for them. By rejecting the GPL they would be creating an effective fork, and they would loss all support from the rest of the world community.

      Holy shit! I bet THAT threat has them just quaking in their boots.

      I mean, they would be totally FUCKED with a talent pool of only 2 billion people to recruit software engineers from.

    2. Re:Too bad for them by captainktainer · · Score: 1

      No, but the possibility of getting hefty fines and sanctions imposed by the WIPO, WTO, and various other trade organizations would. IBM actually holds some clout with the aforementioned organizations, and if they chose to get involved, China could suffer serious harm. The GPL isn't just enforced by the public will of the community; it's also enforced by international laws, laws that ironically were promoted and enforced by those who are oppposed to everything the GPL stands for.

  97. Mayan by Beowabbit · · Score: 1

    Whoops, looks like I was wrong about Mayan. http://www.omniglot.com/writing/mayan.htm says "Further progress in the decipherment was made during the 1970s and 1980s when more linguistics began to take an interest in the script. Today most Mayan texts can be read, though there are still some unknown glyphs" (and that it is in fact logographic rather than phonetic).

  98. Screenshots! by TheNarrator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well I don't read chinese but my clicking instincts are pretty good. Here are some screenshots of the software. Looks just like Office. Very Impressive.. It looks like it runs on KDE.

    Screenshots

    1. Re:Screenshots! by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      And this one sounds as good news for world widespread interoperability!

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    2. Re:Screenshots! by bogie · · Score: 1

      No wonder they picked them over MS. It's an exact MS Office Clone made from the ground up for Chinese by Chinese. If you literally can't tell the difference between the two and one is made locally why bother getting entangled with some foreign company with a trackrecord for breaking the law and abusing its customers? Smart move if you ask me.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:Screenshots! by csbruce · · Score: 1

      Here are some screenshots of the software. Looks just like Office. Very Impressive.

      I don't know about their marketing department, though. The logo looks more like a warning that says, "Caution: May cause your monitor to burst into flames".

  99. No we do not. by Population · · Score: 1

    With China, we are at the same point as with the old Soviet Union. We can nuke each other, but we cannot invade each other. While the US is busy dumping $1 billion per week into Iraq, China is busy building its internal markets. America already has record-breaking deficits. Check the Chinese economy. Then check how the Soviet Union finally fell. They went broke. Just as it seems that we are trying to do.

  100. It is good. by Population · · Score: 1

    If you have two suites with completely incompatible file formats, what happens when people need to send documents to the other side? People will learn to use neutral formats.

  101. another quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Snake Can Not Eat a Dragon.
    ~Ancient Chinese Secret

  102. I like competition, but... by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

    It seems like a *lot* of their graphical style is ripped off of MS Office 2000, see for an example.

  103. Not a comparison by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Abortions for a few reproductively irresponsible individuals are very different than wiping out entire ethnic groups.

  104. WHAHAHA! by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    Sorry I don't have mod points, folk.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  105. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    How can he own so many shares? O_o

    <br>Wouldn't his percentage of the company have steadily decreased since it went public?

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  106. Re:I have to respond to this by pmather · · Score: 5, Funny
    These are the exact same tactics Hitler used to keep his people focused



    Hitler developed an open source office suite?

  107. It's no surprise by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised to hear that Microsoft can't produce a sensibly-localised product for China, considering that after all these years their British releases of Windows say "Favorites" instead of "Favourites".

    They do have Britain-specific releases of Windows, but the only change seems to be that the installer defaults to the British locale and keymap.

  108. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    why else would Bill and Steve sell most of their holdings , its not like they need the money

    Well, Steve is opening a chain of dance schools, and Bill decided to stop the charades and just buy the DOJ outright.

  109. Import resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, what Microsoft will do to stop those cheap versions being exported over here and legally sold?

  110. Obvious reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obvious reason is that OpenOffice.org is a steaming pile of shit.

  111. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes but the bucket is getting smaller all the time. Gates is bored and terrified. Can no longer run the company and the rats are leaving the ship.

    ==========
    Why Login?

  112. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by symbolset · · Score: 1
    Eleven and a half percent is not "most of" Bill Gates' holdings. Sure, he sold 11.58% of his holdings in the last two years. Sure, he received proceeds of more than four billion dollars.

    You really didn't expect him to live on his $96 million dollar dividend, did you? The guy's got expenses.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  113. Re:I have to respond to this by shaitand · · Score: 1

    oh hell yeah, you mean you've never used a gestapospread?

  114. mod this fscker up!.. =) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  115. Perhaps the only reason why communism didn't by melted · · Score: 1

    Is because their rulers were all psychically unstable bone-headed morons from Stalin onward. I sometimes wonder how it lasted so long under such a poor guidance.

  116. Oh yeah, like by gotr00t · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice so does not do the same thing.

  117. This is why MS did not worry about piracy before by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why M$ did nothing serious about piracy in the past -- M$ wanted M$ software to be the defacto standard at the time that these countries could afford to pay for it. Standars are adopted much faster if they are effectively free.

    Looks like M$ has miscalculated by bringing in the activations schemes in XP and Office too soon.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  118. China has a local version for every software by chompyZ · · Score: 1

    China is promoting a local version for every software. It has it's own Instant Messenger, developing it's own Linux version, and any other popular software. In the long run, China is posed to surpass develop a counterpart for the Microsoft-Oracle-IBM treaty... but open-source will always prevail... :)

  119. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by shaitand · · Score: 1

    no, the company doesn't have to make all it's stock public.

    AFAIK a company can ensure that there is always 51% of it's stock which is never publically traded.

  120. Re:microsoft is dying and gates is leaving the shi by shaitand · · Score: 1

    I doubt gates is scared, if Microsoft crumbles to dust tommorow gates walks away a VERY VERY rich man.

  121. Re:MS Office and Linux by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Now I love linux, but lets not spread BS

    About winex actually is able to run about 50 top and not top games, their database is not all working games, it's games that are even under considering for making work.

    Also Cross over office is extremely buggy, it crashes every 5min in any office application. Personally I think both winex and COO should dump what they have come up with back into the true wine. Those two merged with the api ground they've made given back to wine would make for some serious advancement, seperate keepin all the true advancement to themselves it doesn't amount to much.

  122. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's explicitly stated in the article that the software maker had to clone, in great detail, MS Office to get people to comfortably switch.

  123. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um no. Communism *in theory* works well. Linux in theory works well. Communism however has been corrupted by it's leaders to the point where it doesn't work. Linux, save a few small examples, hasn't had that happen - yet.

  124. Runs on Windows, English version exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scroll to the bottom of the link you posted, and read it there.

    Oh, and have you really never seen Windows XP in action, or is it just "wishful thinking" that think of KDE when you see the standard Windows XP skin?

    Here's a very good babelfish.altavista.com translation:

    Operating system:
    * Chinese system: Win98, Win98se, WinMe, Win2000P, Win2000Server, WinXp
    * English system: Win2000P (E) + sinicizes the package, Win2000Server (E) + sinicizes the package, WincXp (E) + sinicizes the package

  125. "Office with Chinese Characteristics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they can incorporate accupuncture techniques into their new office suite along with a help file that includes the contents of that little red book.

  126. Regulated by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    In a 100% free market, NO ONE regulates business. But monopolies do exactly that -- they regulate business, and they do it to a far greater extent than any government ever could. By preventing anyone else from competing, they effectively have complete control over an industry. They can charge any price for any level of service that the market will bear. Historically, monopolies have been terrible. The American war of independence was fought primarily to escape the power of British monopolies. Many of the worst despotisms of the last few centuries were created by monopolies to protect their interests abroad.

    1. Re:Regulated by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1
      Well, yes, in a free market nobody regulates business. However, you're wrong about monopolies being able to regulate the market--they can't. Only governments can regulate; monopolies can only persuade. There is a world of difference.

      For more on this topic, let's turn to the dictionary.

      reg u late
      1 a : to govern or direct according to rule b : to bring under the control of law or constituted authority

      In other words, to set laws controlling how something is done. But creating laws is the sole domain of government.

      Government can force you to do things in a certain way, and if you refuse to do them that way, they can send men with guns to your house and take you away to jail. That's force. That's government.

      Monopolies cannot create laws. In a genuinely free market, the most they can do is persuade you to sign a contract. They cannot force other businesses to conduct themselves in a certain way, nor can they force prospective customers to buy their products. And most importantly, they cannot prevent competitors from selling competing products. So monopolies can only come into being, and perpetuate themselves, by persuading customers to buy their products and services. Usually, they do this by undercutting their competitors, which is good, not bad, for their customers.

      The greatest monopoly the world has ever seen was Standard Oil. However, Standard Oil still could not force anyone to use their products, or prevent competitors from competing. Standard Oil's monopoly was created and entrenched by providing the best product at the lowest price to its customers. In the heyday of Standard Oil, nobody could compete with them because their prices were so astonishingly low. This was wonderful for consumers.

      However, in a regulated market (such as we find ourselves in today), monopolies can persuade the government to create laws favorable to them--subsidising themselves or punishing their competitors. And that is why we consumers fear monopolies; because we fear that we will be forced, by government, to use their services, which would relieve the pressure to keep their prices low. In a genuinely free market, we would have no need to fear monopolies.


      As for the American war of independence, it was fought primarily to escape the British crown, i.e. Government. It was not British monopolies taxing the American settlers and ignoring their requests for legislative relief. I wouldn't be surprised if the early American settlers were required to do business with British monopolies, but Britain was not a free market. So those would have been ordained monopolies, regulated into existance by the British crown and enforced by law.

      I'm all for alternative views of history--these days, I think Lincoln was a jerk--but I've never heard this particular spin on the War Of Independence, and I just don't see the proof anywhere. The factual history we have from those days clearly shows it was government, and not British monopolies, that brought forth the ire of the colonists, which led to their revolt.

    2. Re:Regulated by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      Government can force you to do things in a certain way, and if you refuse to do them that way, they can send men with guns to your house and take you away to jail. That's force. That's government.

      Given the libertarian interpretation of the second amendment, why exactly can't corporations do the same thing? AT&T can show up at your front door in a tank promoting their new "Fifty Cents a Minute or Else" long distance plan. I don't think calling 911 will accomplish much.

    3. Re:Regulated by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1
      If that was a sound and workable business plan, why aren't they already doing it? In current American society, AT&T can buy tanks, and 911 still wouldn't accomplish much in the above scenario.

      In a Libertarian society, it would be just as illegal to force people to sign contracts under threat of violence as it is in current American society. (Perhaps more so, as the abolishment of force as a means of persuasion is one of the underpinnings of the Libertarian philosophy.) The contract would still be unenforcable, AT&T would still be punishable by law.

      Finally, how much "interpretation" can one make of the Second Amendment? "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It's hard to imagine how the Framers could have made their intention any clearer.

    4. Re:Regulated by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      If that was a sound and workable business plan, why aren't they already doing it? In current American society, AT&T can buy tanks, and 911 still wouldn't accomplish much in the above scenario.

      Okay, you've got me there. I still contend, though, that the difference between a tank and "slamming" is a question of degree. Corporations break the law all the time, and usually have no qualms about doing so because even as interventionist as our government is today, it still doesn't bother to punish corps. who do wrong.

      Finally, how much "interpretation" can one make of the Second Amendment? "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It's hard to imagine how the Framers could have made their intention any clearer.

      You know, I have to admit that "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" has only one interpretation that I can think of, but then again, you've omitted half the text:

      A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

      It's the "well-regulated militia" part that gives rise to most differences of opinion. You've already established that "to regulate" is "to set laws controlling how something is done." It is not, therefore, unreasonable for someone to conclude that the second amendment only applies to entities like the National Guard.

      Before you rebut, though, I should point out that I happen to lean toward your interpretation of things. I just understand that reasonable men may differ.

  127. Ahh by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Ahh, the oligopoly. The great lie of the twentieth century. They create the illusion of competition where it doesn't exist, and thus de-rail the free market.

  128. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > whilst Microsoft blunders around with what it THINKS these markets need

    Ah, so they use the same tactics as on this side of the pacific.

  129. Re:reading comprehension: not a switch from MS Off by zzztkf · · Score: 1
    Are you serious? MS-IME is sophisticated?

    It's still quite damn sutipid conversion engine which can be written by animal. I guess MS is employing monkeys to develop it. Using MS-IME is like pounding your nail with a hammer.

    I use it just because MS-IME comes with my office PC.

    It's the reason why I like to write docoments in English rather than in Japanese although my native language is Japanese, I have never lived outside of Japan.

  130. Re:Good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you please tell ATI that? Can't get my driver to work under RedHat 9 ;)

  131. What's good for China... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    While this may be good for China, think how it affects America. Instead of buying from Microsoft, they instead use open source software to help create their own government software. Microsoft loses money, the GDP goes down, and the American economy is hurt.

    When Americans create open source software and other Americans and American businesses use it, it can improve the software industry because it opens up competition and hinders one company from controlling everything. But when Americans write open source software and countries like China use it instead of buying from America, it's bad for Americans in the long run. There's nothing wrong with open source software, as long as other countries don't use it.

    Before you say, well if I don't have to pay for an operating system then it's money in my pocket; wouldn't you rather have a job that wasn't lost to open source clones of the software you worked hard to create?

    1. Re:What's good for China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you say, well if I don't have to pay for an operating system then it's money in my pocket; wouldn't you rather have a job that wasn't lost to open source clones of the software you worked hard to create?

      Or, it's a play by Americans to continue dominance in a field that it could be waining in, by using strong arm tactics...

      So... China develops its own software, so what? The Chinese marketplace is getting free marketized. The US product will have to compete with something... and if it comes back over to the US, it'll have to compete on home turf as well. Isn't that what you need? Competition? Or are you just in it to make the US the imperialist dictator of the world? Make another Boston Teaparty, where others rebel against US policy instead of British policy towards its colonies.

    2. Re:What's good for China... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. What I was trying to relate is that when Americans or American companies invest time and money into open source software such as linux and foreign countries such as China develop software based on linux, and do not pay America a dime for it, then the American economy is hurt. If instead China paid money for the product (software) that American companies made then the economy would not suffer, but grow.

      And really, any version of linux that China would make is not going to be revolutionary, but just a tweaked out version of one an American company has made. The first thing and usually the thing consumers think is important is the GUI. And don't just about all GUI's originate from the work American companies such as Apple and Microsoft have delveloped. It's hard to deny that Gnome and KDE are entirely original but really are sort of clones of microsoft which is a clone of apple which way back when was a clone of xerox.

      And there's no need for a tea party in china seeing how they pirate so much of our software. When you read about these asian countries selling pirated software on the streets by the thousands, think of it as it really is, stealing from America.

      Some may see this is complete irony, but I don't see piracy bad if done domestically, but once other countries do it, then it hurts us as a whole. If you're not American and are getting pissed off at what I have to say, then that's fine with me because you would do the same thing if you could.

  132. USA vs China will end VERY QUICKLY by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    Russia won't fight China. They are not major enemies. Europe won't fight China either. The only conflict I can see happening is USA vs China, or India vs China.

    I think if USA and China fight, the war will end VERY QUICKLY. And it will likely go nuclear (and possibly biological). I expect that to happen because each side will be taking heavy casulties and someone is not going to take it any longer (and hence revert to WMD). During WWII (the worst war so far), a typical jet was "primitive". Nowadays, even the cheapest jets can carry payloads that can wipe out small divisions of military. Also, now you have ballistic missiles, which really didn't exist in WWII (or at least were primitive). These don't even need to be nuclear armed, just a normal ballistic missile should be able to kill 500 soldiers with an average hit.

    When you have 1000 soldiers dying each month (or whatever), the govt can keep the population under control (at least the mass propaganda campaigns will brainwash the people). But if 10,000 people are dying in a month or something, no one is going to take it. The war will end quickly...

    War and death are interesting... when one guy dies per day, no one cares but if 30 people die at once (but just once in a month), people start caring... ah humans...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    1. Re:USA vs China will end VERY QUICKLY by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The public is our problem. China certainly has the public under control, in fact 1/3 of them are in the military! China could lose 10,000 each month and continue the war for years before it made a dent in their numbers. It's the US that couldn't keep it up, not China.

  133. chinese military sucks by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    China has huge number of infantry but their tech sucks. Even bankrupt Russia has more advanced technology than China. I don't think China can even shoot down more than 5 stealth fighters.

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  134. No, competition will increase by mangu · · Score: 1
    I for one welcome the decrease in competition for jobs


    How may IT jobs will be left in the USA after you start importing all your hardware and software from China?

    1. Re:No, competition will increase by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Tons. Well over 90% of all used in business is inhouse software. 90% of all developrs work on inhouse apps... IT jobs existed in large numbers long before there was a commercial software industry.

  135. Hi, Bill, how'ya doing? by mangu · · Score: 1

    Wow, 5291! How much did you pay for a four digit /. number?

  136. Mod down Parent! by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    How the hell can a rediculous mensa humping moron like this be considered insightfull.1. The bloody gatt is an American business organisation.2. Redhat does not count on selling product idiot! Military power has precious little to do with the real industrial value of a country per capita, take North Korea a GNP that is rediculous, and yet they have one of the worlds biggest standing armies that for the size of their economy is rediculous. China has every reason to be suspicious of Western economic policies and every reason not to trust large International American Corporations. The Chinese are very good business people and know that you do not listen to the western economic spin if you know what is really in your own best interest. Quit flogging at imaginary commies, the Chinese will change, it will not be over night and it will not come with huge American style World Bank sponsored mega dollar crap that handcuffs national economies. The days of total dollar dominance of the world economy are coming to an end, those who have a trade surplus will prosper. Those who think they can use cheap Chinese labour as a source of business advantage will die like the dinosaurs they are.Speak to any Chinese imigrant and they will tell you the Chinese will not be Coolies on our industrial railroads anymore. Get with the future dinosaur or the comet of truth will crush you!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  137. Re:I have to respond to this by Scooter · · Score: 1

    Not to mention SSWord, PowerMad and Axis - wasn't it called VolksOffice? :P

  138. As long as there are boots.... by ifwm · · Score: 1

    there will be someone to lick them. I don't care who it is, as long as I don't end up with shoe polish on my face.

  139. Moot not mute by ifwm · · Score: 1

    Like a cow "moo"-t

  140. Nice try but no by jbolden · · Score: 1

    They've have a problem. Software they create and distribute makes copies of that poem for other people. Further they have the rights to infinitely copy and distribute their word files. That is Microsoft has asserted tht anyone who owns Word has the rights to create and distribute copies of that poem. Sine the number of word owners is enermous the court would hold that the poem is in essense public domain....

    1. Re:Nice try but no by csbruce · · Score: 1

      They've have a problem. Software they create and distribute makes copies of that poem for other people.

      There's no problem; they can just create a license for MS-Office users to use and copy their files in whatever ways Microsoft deems suitable to Microsoft's interests. They could also ROT-13 the file content for DMCA protections. No non-licensed software would be allowed to read the files, and Microsoft could circumvent fair use, first-amendment rights, and due process in prosecuting interoperable software providers.

    2. Re:Nice try but no by jbolden · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. If every owner of Microsoft word has permission to infinitely copy, distribute and even bundle for sale the poem then the courts aren't going to see Microsoft has having authority to sue anybody. I.E. the copyright is worthless to avoid openoffice type exporters.

      Your point about DMCA is different and assuming the DMCA is upheld (which IMHO is highly doubtful) such a scheme might work.

  141. Re:I have to respond to this by chrisbord · · Score: 0

    now how is what I just said flame bait???

  142. Re:I have to respond to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up! ROFLFLL

  143. Re:I have to respond to this by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Hitler developed an open source office suite?

    Yeah. Adolf and Elvis are still coding up a storm in Argentina. On the weekends, they make crop circles together.

  144. Aren't the chinese pirates anyway? by zinkem · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong but doesnt the chinese government pirate all their versions of microsoft (or any other foreign company's) software?

    So if anything this just means less pirated MS stuff in China... Which I'm sure Microsoft would see as a good thing except this now means the Chinese will never pay or want to pay for MS products when they're using better stuff.

    Again, correct me if I'm wrong...

    --
    I can't think of a good sig...
    1. Re:Aren't the chinese pirates anyway? by Tpenta · · Score: 1

      There are pirates and even murderers in the US too.

      Does that make ALL Americans murderers and pirates. Be careful with your generalities lest they come back to bite you.

      Tp.

    2. Re:Aren't the chinese pirates anyway? by zinkem · · Score: 1

      Well in China's case, this is a little different. The government doesn't respect US copyright laws... it's a widely known fact that there are a few companies in china distributing copies of pirated movies, music, and even software and the government does really nothing to stop it.
      It says in the article the government has paid for alot of software, something like 200m in the past year... it would be interesting to compare that to the software expendatures of other countries (Microsoft wanted the city of Munich alone to pay something like $40m for just that one city, and China has a billion people, granted they probably don't use as many computers per person).

      I'm not an expert in this area, but theres a difference between a government not respecting copyright (China) and a large group of individuals not respecting copyright (United States). Ultimately, I wonder how much this truly affects Microsoft's profits (obviously it does at least a little) compared to a country that respects our copyright laws switching to open source.

      --
      I can't think of a good sig...
    3. Re:Aren't the chinese pirates anyway? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My, we're politically correct today, aren't we? Ever been to China? Didn't think so! I have. Let's just say that in a country where people make $4/day, thousand-dollar office suites aren't exactly going to fly off the shelves. I have yet to see an actual licensed copy of any software in any factory I've inspected so far. What I have seen is the markets that have CDs on sale for $1 each.

      But it has its good points, too...anyone want a copy of Gigli or Hulk on DVD?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Aren't the chinese pirates anyway? by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 1

      How is owning a copy of Gigli on DVD a good thing?

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  145. Re:I have to respond to this by Alsee · · Score: 1

    On the weekends, they make crop circles together.

    Yep, and no sticks-and-strings crop circles either. They make crop circles with trans-phasic party cruser UFO from Tau-Ceti. It's decked out with a rotating dance floor, quantum disco-balls, and weinershnitzel bar.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  146. Kingsoft? Wouldn't that be Wangsoft in Mandarin? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Isn't (or wasn't) Wang an major US computer manufacturer from way back?

    Oooh ooh I feel a conspiracy theory coming on!!

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  147. Absolutely ! by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

    You really have to be a non-english speaker (or even brittish/irish for that matter), to see just how US centric MS Office is.

    For instance (in windows as a whole infact, but it's a good example):
    There are different Keyboard settings, en-us, en-gb (us+pound sign), int-us (huh? I hear you say...), and then de (german), nl (dutch), etc.

    When using the dutch keymap, the way to write an " is by pressing the '-key + SHIFT, and then . This is HIGHLY irritating when typing, but, after numerous complaints, MS has just said: We think this is the best solution.
    That's why the most used keymap in holland is 'int-us'.. !

    And the euro sign () is made by CTRL + ALT + 5..argh ! Why not make the shift of 4 (dollar sign, $) the euro sign, and the dollar sign in some harder to reach one (such as CTRL + ALT + 5).

    Oh, and on a Linux note, SuSE had euro sign support () 2 years earlier than MS, who had it just in the nick of time...

  148. Re:MS Office and Linux by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
    Well, I am using the latest version of Cross Over Office and have not had ONE crash with Office XP or Photoshop 7. I think you are the one spreading BS. Have you purchased the latest version of Cross Over Office? It doesn't sound like it. Also, Disney funded support for getting Photoshop 7.0 working. I don't think they would have been happy with something that as you say:

    is extremely buggy, it crashes every 5min

    So maybe actaully USE the product before you bash it. I have Cross Over running on three boxes and none of them have crashed. Also, WineX and Cross Over DO put their stuff back into Wine. The only stuff that does not get back into Wine are a few proprietary Driect X DLL's that Transgamming is NOT ALLOWED to put back into Wine.
    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  149. Re:Chinese office by comandante+frito · · Score: 1

    The statement that the Chinese have no alphabet is just plain incorrect. A system called "pinyin" using the same alphabet as most European languages has existed for many years and has been taught in Chinese schools. In Chinese, tone (how high or low one's voice is) is important, almost as though it is sung rather than just spoken. Accents are placed over vowels to show rising, falling, rising-falling, high, and neutral tones. Tones are not unique to Chinese. They also play a role in some European languages, such as Swedish.

    I'm not sure why pinyin hasn't become the dominant way to write Chinese, since it is much more simple that the classical ideograms. Probably, it has something to do with being too closely associated with the Mandarin dialect (just one of many important dialects in China). Possibly, due to historical and cultural tradition, one is not considered "educated" unless one is fluent at reading and writing the old way. I would like to hear from someone who is actually from China as to why pinyin is not as popular as classical and simplified ideograms.

  150. Gets source then switches by AForwardMotion · · Score: 0

    Anyone find it interesting how China got some of the source to Microsoft's code then a year later switched away from their software. Sounds like they are in the intelligence biz.

  151. Re:Good example by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Is it that long since in Ohio some innocent students proved that we are no different? How easily you forget!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  152. Re:I have to respond to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from CyberdogX:

    sure, Nazix 1.0 :-)