Domain: ndirect.co.uk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to ndirect.co.uk.
Comments · 61
-
Re:Chickens?
- A theory circulating is that dinosaurs had feathers
A nice speculative rendition of feathered raptors can be found here:
http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~luisrey/html/custom.htmThere's also some nice work (by Greg Paul I think) that shows deinonychus as a giant wattled killer turkey. Challenging, but fun. It starts from the premise of "So, why do you think dinosaurs didn't have feathers?"
-
Re:Not going to cut it...OT:
An interesting writeup on digital music can be found here
Moderators - follow the link before twiddling your buttons...
Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.
-
Re:Katz's epic stugglethe katz bashing for this article should be on a lack of frickin' links or detail. All blurry no slurry.
other than that..
"Corporate Republic" WTF??? "Yahoo Serious"?? These words don't really make sense together...Such a thing doesn't exist.
Republic = "a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law"
A "corporate republic" would be one in which the representatives are elected by corporations and not people (although corporations are often considered people, so that's how you jump over the line). This is very much the type of government that is growing in the world. This is why the media (The fourth estate,the public press)....
hrmmmm, since I got a minute...
Carlyle's definition of the fourth estate
However, from the perspective of those researchers who see the media as situated within the model of a pluralist liberal democracy, the mass media are often seen as fulfilling the vitally important rôle of fourth estate, the guardians of democracy, defenders of the public interest.
....is so important. Now, if you move into the corporate republic example, you see that, yup most mass media supports the "public" (read corporate) interest. Often this is because they are or at least part of, the corporations in question. A bit of a media rant, but that's where a lot of the corporate republic get's it's basis, and where it is most evident.
Most of it does lead to conspiracy theory, and when you talk (conspiracy theory+government/industry)*$$$ you get lots of hits and comments.
He is comparing Capitalism to the Measles in the fourth paragraph!! How many people died from the measles worldwide! Measles is a horrifying desease... This type of emotion-evoking yet utterly meaningless comparison has no place in a technology journal.
"Technology journal"??!?!?! You need to set your threshhold to -1 and read some trolls for a while. If anything, /. has a become a technological society cultural journal (that'll raise the Katz index of this thread a bit), in that it is more about the culture, or maybe it is a culture, reproducing madly in CT's petri server. And everyone uses fear tactics, and every form of government has a price.
To top things off with a cherry, he includes hackers and programmers in with his list of "threatened" individualists.
"What in this country isn't for sale?" Certainly Katz's own book would be included in the "for sale" category?
Rights and markets are what's for sale. The reason hackers and programmers are involved is both because of Katz, and because they share the plight of having their territory overrun by corporations and the laws they require to function. Virtual farmers seeing tremendous roadblacks to the viability of independant business being erected at a scary pace. The right to figure out how something works, or god forbid, fix it. Those are the rights that are being "sold" (or bought, if you prefer) That's the link.
Anyway, just a bit of Independance Day rant. Time to barbecue and start forest fires. (note: this is a joke about the fact that where I live, it is both hot, dry, wooded, and the day of the year when fireworks are real popular. And we had a fire about two weeks ago that nearly burned down a few friends' houses. Happy 4th!!!)
-- -
Re:Client side perl? Got itI note your email domain (netscape.net) but I don't think you're intentionally FUD'ing. PerlScript is not to Perl what JavaScript is to Java. (I like JavaScript, BTW, but I recognize that it has nothing to do with Java, except share some latin-based characters). This articl e gives an excellent introduction to PerlScript. Here's an excerpt...this doesn't sound like emasculated Perl to me...
Of course not everyone reading this article will be coming from a VBScript background. Perhaps you've come from a Perl background, and have used CGI, or mod_perl or some such solution. What can PerlScript offer you? I'll cover exactly what it can offer in detail, but the key thing is the object model. This is the built in system that allows access to: Inter-process communication, session management, form and query string values, cookies, timeouts, and many more things. Hopefully you will be used to CGI.pm handling all these things for you, but as you'll see there are some things that ASP does that even CGI.pm doesn't do (and probably shouldn't)
-
Re:Terminus == updated Privateer
But of course the great old classic in this category of games is Elite...
God only knows how much I've wanted multiplayer Elite with modern grafix...
What's up with David Braben nowadays anyway?
Dunno, but IIRC he is kind of a prick. Check here and here for more prickery.. Or just check out Ian Bell's Elite pages...
Your Working Boy, -
Re:Just think what Perl could do...
It's called PerlScript.
:) -
Re:Why not create a new, free, culture?
Yeah! The philosophy behind Open Source should not remain merely in the realm of computers. There should be all kinds of equivalents of "open source", like in music, movies, novels, you-name-it.
On the other side, people who aren't creating stuff and putting it under open-source-like licenses should at least support the people who are doing this. As far as music is concerned, people should definitely support GAMH and read the Free Music Philosophy.
Also check out the CZR Public License
The people who want to control the entertainment industry wants to make you a couch potato. If you don't want to be one, do something about it! Go create something new and put an open-source-like license on it. Or at least, go support the people who are doing this. Sitting there on your desk typing messages on Slashdot won't accomplish that much. Save some of that energy and accomplish something.
-
Re:Music licenses
A few months ago I was inspired to write a GPL style license for my own music. It can be found at http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~s.rob ertson/music/license. Since I've edited it myself, and since I'm not a lawyer, I can't guarantee that it's 100% watertight, so I'd really appreciate a few more pairs of eyes going over it to see if there's anything I've missed.
Self-promotion: If you're interested in the music it was written for, that can be found at http://mp3.com/czr.
- colin
-
Re:Music licenses
A few months ago I was inspired to write a kind of GPL for my music. Since I edited it myself and since I'm not a lawyer I don't really know how safe it is, and I'd really appreciate a few more eyes going over it to see if I've missed anything.
It's at http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~s.robertson/music/licen
s eSelf-promotion: If you're interested in the music that inspired it, that can be found at http://mp3.com/czr
-- colin
-
Well deserved?? So WHAT? I don't like it anyway.Although I don't think that the cloning patent is as ridiculous as one of those from amazon-click-once-dpt., I am quite sure that you don't have the full picture here, basically due to huge media coverage Wilmut got with his Dolly.
First, he was "sitting on the back of the giants" - there was huge research in this field going for years. He didn't start with nothing: he definitely was the first one to get to the point of having a clone of a mammal not derived from embryo cells, but there are still some important issues. I wonder whether this patent is going to stop the scientific community from doing further research.
This patent is much more disturbing then the one from Amazon (after all, one click, two clicks, who cares, how much time you spend on reading the book you've bought with this marvellous technology?). It will hamper some of the most important research fields in modern medicine, like getting finally xenotransplants work.
If everyone patented every scientific discovery the way Wilmut did you wouldn't be reading slashdot now. And Wilmut wouldn't have had even the chance of starting his research. On the other hand - yes, I agree, the team at Roslin Institute is responsible for the breakthrough - namely, choosing the right cell cycle stage for nuclear transfer. Remember, he did not invent the nuclear transfer, which has been conducted for the first time in 1952.
Regards,
January
P.S. Two links for you:
The Cloning of Dolly, a nice and easy explanation what is this nuclear transfer all about and how cloning works, and
A brief history of nuclear transfer, a nice essay at the Roslin Institute.
-
Re:Computisation != Freedom.
Actually, I *was* a 'freakled 16yo antisocialite', and I did spend most of my time in dark rooms with only computers for company, and from my perspective people like me do have considerable power today. We are some of the most highly sought-after professionals in the world. I'm only 27 and my salary is higher than I thought it ever would be. So if money makes the world go round, hard-core computer geeks can be counted among the elite ruler class.
As for "the next step in human evolution", this is at best a simplification of the truth. qv the Transhumanism home page for more information on the relationship between computers and human evolution.
One thing we agree on: The G4 is little more than a stepping stone between less-powerful processors and more-powerful processors, part of the natural flow the technological progress.
-- Guges --