Domain: openproxies.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to openproxies.com.
Comments · 10
-
plenty of (mostly) free proxies out there
Anonymouse surfing: http://www.anonymization.net/ http://www.anonymizer.com/ http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/ians/ http://www.guardster.com/ http://www.antiproxy.com/ http://www.attackcensorship.com/ http://proxify.com/ http://www.anonymous.as/ http://www.mezzy.com/s-index.php http://anonymouse.ws/anonwww.html http://unipeak.com/ http://www.urlencoded.com/ http://www.behidden.com/ Full system proxy systems: http://tor.eff.org/ http://freenet.sourceforge.net/ http://internet.flashback.se/ http://anon.inf.tu-dresden.de/index_en.html http://www.privoxy.org/ http://www.silentsurf.com/ http://www.peacefire.org/circumventor/simple-circ
u mventor-instructions.html Ordinary proxies: http://www.atomintersoft.com/products/firewall/cou ntry.aspx/Sweden-se http://www.proxy4free.com/page1.html http://www.publicproxyservers.com/page1.html http://www.proxz.com/ http://www.digitalcybersoft.com/ProxyList/ http://www.freeproxy.ru/ http://www.samair.ru/proxy/ http://www.multiproxy.org/anon_proxy.htm http://www.rrdb.org/ http://www.free-proxy-servers.com/ http://www.proxylists.net/ http://www.proxywhois.com/anonymous-proxy-list.htm http://www.openproxies.com/ Plenty, as said. -
Proxy Scan
They're making sure that your computer isn't an open HTTP proxy. If it is, the post is rejected. It helps to prevent crapfloods.
-
Anonymous Proxies
Here is a list of open proxies you can use to get to Bush's reelection site.
-
Overseas? Find an open HTTP relay...
You can google for open HTTP proxies, or even just visit this site. Pick one in the US, set up your browser, and away you go. Paraphrasing John Gilmore, the Net interprets regionalization as damage and routes around it.
I use this technique to visit Japanese idol sites that disallow non .jp addresses. Slower, but better than not getting any, er, "eye-candy." -
Re:Visit a spammer message board - see the felonie
I only take one issue with your post: I don't believe that offering proxy lists for sale is necessarily a bad thing. There are any number of reasons why someone may want to use a proxy to visit a certain site. Concealing sexual preferences when visiting a gay or lesbian porn site, trying to read up at the English version of Al-Jazeera without leaving digital footprints, etc.
Proxies are generally web only in nature. Of the more than 100,000 wide-open proxies that I've cataloged over the past several years, only a slight percentage of them were able to relay arbitrary connections (e.g. HTTP CONNECT protocol). The vast majority of proxies only relay standard web requests, and are harmless as far as spam is concerned. In fact when Joe Jared's Osirusoft RBL was running, my proxy database fed directly into its RBL (proxy.relays.osirusoft.com), just to prevent any possibility of the proxies being used to spam those who subscribed to RBLs/DNSBLs.
It's unfortunate that the media, as of late, has taken to calling infected/trojanned Windows machines which relay spam "proxies," instead of "zombies," a term widely attributed to Steve Gibson at GRC. When GRC was DDoS'd a couple of years ago, he took to calling the trojanned machines "zombies," and the media went with it full force. More recently, the media has been calling them "proxies," which creates negative connotations that aren't necessarily deserved. Yes, there is the occasional proxy which leaves itself wide open to HTTP CONNECT, but most proxies have nothing to do with spam.
Of course, if some idiot is spamming spammer message boards trying to sell proxies, he deserves whatever he gets. There have been clear cases where alleged spammers such as Jamie Baillie have attempted to buy proxies that they can spam through. However, I chalk this up as the exception to the norm, and in most of these cases the spammer was clearly foiled anyway. The above link is an extreme example of how spammers get "victimized" themselves, and start bitching holy hell, trying to buy proxy lists.
Please, don't equate proxies with spam. Most of them are simply being used to facilitate anonymous browsing, and this is an ability which needs to be maintained as long as possible. -
Re:open proxy listDoes anyone have a good list of verified open proxies?
-
Re:Read ^UP^ stupid
Blocking all ports but 80 is hardly going to stop spammers from going nuts at Starbucks or other intentionally public WAPs. There are thousands of proxies out there which run on port 80 and would be happy to connect you to port 25 on any mail server in the world...
-
Re:Paypal does work
Now on top of this people do use open proxies and these are harder to find
Not necessarily. We use that proxy list to deny transactions at many of our sites, and with reasonable success. We've coded our signup and purchase pages in such a way that if your REMOTE_ADDR is in that proxy database, you can't sign up.
Of course the OpenProxies.com list isn't all-encompassing, occasionally someone uses a proxy not in the list, but it catches plenty of carding attempts automatically. -
Re:Proxies
Its much easier to block a proxy than to create a new one (on an IP) once it's blocked. Unless you own the ISP and have a zillion to rotate through.
But you don't have to be an ISP to have a zillion proxies... -
Re:The simple and intelligent solution
Any system or forum administrator worth his salt could easily block a range of IP addresses as well as some of the more popular proxy servers that allow deviant trolls to sneak through and continue posting.
Which does nothing to stop a persistent troll. There are plenty of proxies out there, and not all of them are "popular" enough to have been noticed.
One thing that's helped me is to actually test the REMOTE_ADDR on the usual proxy ports and see whether or not it's a proxy before allowing a visitor to place an order on my site. If their host tests positive, they get an error page. This has cut back on fraud in a major way; where I used to get 2 or 3 carders ordering through proxies each day, I might get one a week now that slips through on a nonstandard proxy port.
Maybe the same technique could be used on message boards. Sure, it would suck for users to have to endure the lag of a proxy test each time they post, but by tracking each user's last IP and its proxy status (yes or no) you could limit the scans to once per user per IP, or once per user per netblock, or only to accounts flagged as "abusers" etc. I just figure there's gotta be a way to do it as transparently and painlessly as possible while still being effective.