Domain: palamida.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to palamida.com.
Comments · 6
-
Palamida has nothing to do with the FSF/GPL.
And they feel they have to do these "studies" for marketing reasons.
Palamida is a security company. They're not the FSF, who, unlike MS do not have reams of cash to promote the GPL.
GPLv3 = IPv6 = Vista = "wfc";
Uh-huh. Uptake of the GPLv3 (as a percentage of GPLv2 instances) is far higher than Vista (compared to Windows installs) or IPV6 vs IPV4
Iditot.
-
Graph
A simple linear interpretation of the data isn't that useful - maybe I should RTFA to see if there's a graph or something?
The original source has a graph, kind of, and the increase seems pretty much linear to me. -
This has already been around for years
A friend of mine in SF started a company a few years back called Palamida that provides a very similar service. I don't think their code is GPLed though.
LS -
Re:"3110 known GPLv2 projects"?
According to this which I saw from this post, there are 2884 GPLv2 projects still and 235 have already moved to GPLv3.
So 2884+235=3119 total projects I trailed a few off for new projects and such. But the gist is right.
Maybe freshmeat doesn't list them all? -
Re:GPL Converts.
Considering that about 235 projects have moved to GPLv3 and we haven't seen that many articles I'd say no, there won't be a story for every switch.
But I'm gald to know we will get an article when a project that used a license that barely qualified as OSS but uses all the latest buzzwords and marketing to look like OSS switches to the GPLv3. -
Re:who do you want to sue today?