Slashdot Mirror

dave-fu writes "This just in: webcasters can breathe a sigh of relief as common sense and good taste has won out over stuffed suits and greased pockets--CARP has been rejected. If you weren't aware of it, CARP would have imposed exorbitant fees on webcasters, effectively killing webcasting radiostations, or at least preventing them from playing all (American) copyrighted music." See our previous story, or saveinternetradio.org, or read through the Copyright Office page linked above for background information. I wouldn't rejoice just yet - while webcasters argued that the proposed rates were way too high, the RIAA argued that they were way too low. There will still be royalty rates set by the Copyright Office, and the final rates may not be anything to cheer about.

Anonymous Cowards rule writes: "RAIN is reporting that the fuss raised by save Internet radio, Save Our Streams and the recent webcaster's march on Washington has caught the attention of some in Congress. Specifically, the Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday entitled, 'Copyright Royalties: Where is the Right Spot On The Dial For Webcasting.' The list of those who will testify (which is not yet complete) seems heavily weighted toward the RIAA and large content providers ... but it will still be interesting to see how this pans out. (Is Congress completely controlled by big business or just slightly?) Remember to mark your calendars for 21 May when the Librarian of Congress has to choose whether to accept, reject or ammend the current royalty rules (the NPRM which was a result of the CARP)."