Domain: sciencehack.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to sciencehack.com.
Comments · 10
-
Perhaps this will help
-
Re:Do a small scale pilot first
A smaller scale device was built in Spain in the 1980's: see http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/XCGVTYtJEFk for a video. However, these plants get more energy efficient the bigger they get, so a small one is not that interesting.
-
monkey thoughts
i was looking at this today: http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/TK1WBA9Xl3c
watch after 0:44, the monkey learnt how to control the robotic arm with its thoughts in order to feed itself:) -
ScienceHack
I guess nobody remembers ScienceHack. I'm not sure how successful it is yet(or how accurate), but the idea is interesting - an independent (and hopefully qualified) screening system for informational videos on the web. So, if you're looking for good information you don't have to wade through as much crap.
-
Darn tootin'
It's most definitely a good idea.
I wonder of they got the good idea from http://sciencehack.com/
Oh well, the more the merrier. Perhaps the new one will have videos from talks given. Not the nifty graphics oriented demonstration-type stuff, but that kind of stuff has been accumulating and not being used. -
Re:But....
Pistol shrimp are about as close as you'll get to laser wielding sea creatures. Video here
-
Does science hack endorse the aircar
Science hack has a video about a car that runs on compressed air. http://sciencehack.com/videos/category/13. Some people say that the companies' claims defy the laws of physics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_car#Criticism
-
Dr QuantumWhat makes ScienceHack unique is that every video is screened by a scientist or an engineer to verify the video's accuracy and quality. Like Dr Quantum: quantum physics
-
Something seems wrong
I search for "paris hilton" and got:
Size Comparison of Various Celestial Bodies
First of all, she doesn't have a Celestial Body. My girlfriend has, Hilton has not!
Second; size? What size???
What's going on?
-
Peer review?There's nothing on the site, as far as I can see, that gives any details about how they select the scientists who are going to moderate the videos. The closest I can find is their blog, which suggests that their criterion, however, they find them, is just that they be at least a current undergraduate student in a science-related discipline.
Given that Sciencehack is only really aiming to be a Youtube for science, maybe this doesn't really mean very much. Still, a little more openness about the process would have been encouraging.