Slashdot Mirror


Monkey's Thoughts Make Robot Walk

geekbits writes "For all those who have at one time or another been too lazy to get up off the couch and go to the fridge and get a beer, heat up some pizza, or change the channel when the remote is missing, we may be one step closer to being able to keep our tushes parked just a little while longer. There may also be some slightly more noble implications here. According to an article in The New York Times, in an experiment at Duke University, a 12-pound, 32-inch monkey made a 200-pound, 5-foot humanoid robot walk on a treadmill using only her brain activity. She was in North Carolina, and the robot was in Japan."

146 comments

  1. monkey business by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being able to read the monkey's brain sounds like the only innovation here, not making the robot walk. Reading between the lines, it doesn't sound like the monkey is really controlling the robot in any real sense at all.

    Several things make me question that. One, why is the robot in north Carolina and the monkey in Japan? It's just for show. Nothing of scientific significance is being demonstrated by that. We all know that internet can connect two gizmos across large distances. The experiment could have been conducted much more simply at one location and made no less effective a point (except to clueless investors maybe).

    Secondly, because of the distance, there is a significant delay (TFA says 250ms, about what I might have guessed.) This would seem to preclude the monkey being able to control the robots actuators in any direct sense. I.e. lift thigh, swing lower leg forward, position foot, lower thigh, positioning body over front leg. Walking is a "controlled fall". No way you could issue all those commands 250ms ahead of seeing or feeling their effect. You'd trip and fall.

    So, what is the monkey really doing? I doubt if he is even thinking "left, right, left, right" because even that would be hard to coordinate with so much lag.

    Finally, why is there a damn robot in the first place? Wouldn't it be much easier to have the commands control a computer animation? You could do that in such a way that the model would look much more interesting to the monkey... it could look like another monkey, a giant walking banana, whatever.

    My guess is that they are simply getting a binary command value from the monkey: "walk" or "don't walk". And the whole robot thing is just for effect. I hate to be such a cynic but this looks like showmanship, not science. If that is the case then this is equivalent to the simple video games that have been demonstrated using brain control.

    However, I could certainly imagine that the journalist totally failed to understand the experiment and maybe something important was lost in his explanation of it.

    1. Re:monkey business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is the robot in north Carolina and the monkey in Japan? because monkeys don't carry passports ?, duh

    2. Re:monkey business by Macrosoft0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, what is the monkey really doing? I doubt if he is even thinking "left, right, left, right" because even that would be hard to coordinate with so much lag. actually, he was most likely thinking "up up down down left right left right B A select start"
      --
      stuff
    3. Re:monkey business by Reivec · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the distance is easy to explain, and I doubt it was for show. The research seems to originate from Duke. They likely decided they wanted to see if a monkey could control a humanoid robot but making a robot to see so was outside of the scope of what they were trying to do, they are just making the interface. So they searched out some other team making humanoid robots (which Japan seems to have a lot of). It was likely much easier to setup an internet link to connect the two groups as opposed to meeting in the same location. To meet you would have to move a lot of people and a lot of equipment, all of which would be a customs nightmare. Moving monkeys back and forth over international borders probably requires a lot of checks and paperwork and what not, just as I am sure moving research technology does as well, especially something that large.

      To sum up, it was a hell of a lot cheaper and faster that way.

    4. Re:monkey business by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 4, Funny

      why is the robot in north Carolina and the monkey in Japan?
      First of all, the robot was in Japan and the monkey in North Carolina. Because as everyone knows, Japan is the only country with an abundant supply of giant robots.
    5. Re:monkey business by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article is not claiming that the Monkey is directly controling actuators. The monkey is walking, and the signals from it's brain (several hundred neurons), are being used to control the walking motion of the robot. Obviously the processing of monkey neurons response -> robot control is being performed in software specifically tuned to this one monkey with implants. The interesting thing about this experiment is not that they trained a monkey to walk a robot (they didn't), but rather that the monkey was able to keep the robot walking after it had stopped moving itself. This means that all those neurons that the researches are triggering the walking motions from are still going when the monkey thinks about walking but doesn't actually do it. We've known the brain is capable of this for some time, but this is the first experiment I have seen that appears to involve more than a simple "go stop" form of response. If they have tapped enough neurons to control all the actuators required for a robot to walk, then this is news indeed.

    6. Re:monkey business by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFA is not very clear about the most important part of this, but other reports spell it out more clearly: "The most stunning finding is that when we stopped the treadmill and the monkey ceased to move its legs, it was able to sustain the locomotion of the robot for a few minutes -- just by thinking -- using only the visual feedback of the robot in Japan."

      The reason for using a robot rather than an animation is that they wanted to prove that neural signals could actually be used to drive real motors. I also think it's interesting that they worked out how to interpret neural signals in the brain by correlating neural impulses with the monkey's own leg motions, this was not a case of intercepting signals traveling along muscle-control nerves. I agree there seems to be no particular reason other than showmanship to do this intercontinentally, though! And in fact the monkey was able to keep the system working through a 250 ms delay, which is an interesting finding because it means that such systems don't need to respond to controls instantly but can tolerate some delay. However, they didn't really need to be on different continents to test that.

    7. Re:monkey business by LaskoVortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Several things make me question that. One, why is the robot in north Carolina and the monkey in Japan? It's just for show. Nothing of scientific significance is being demonstrated by that. We all know that internet can connect two gizmos across large distances. The experiment could have been conducted much more simply at one location and made no less effective a point (except to clueless investors maybe).

      If you had built a robot in Japan and your friend figured out a way to read a monkeys thoughts in NC, why would you ship one operation to the other location when you can link everything up with wires. Sounds like they saved a lot of money here.

      > Secondly, because of the distance, there is a significant delay (TFA says 250ms, about what I might have guessed.) This would seem to preclude the monkey being able to control the robots actuators in any direct sense. I.e. lift thigh, swing lower leg forward, position foot, lower thigh, positioning body over front leg. Walking is a "controlled fall". No way you could issue all those commands 250ms ahead of seeing or feeling their effect. You'd trip and fall.

      The conscious information required to generate human walk is tiny in comparison to its complexity at the physical scale. Most movements required for walk are processed between the muscle and the spinal chord and never involve the brain at all. This is called "reflex". It is legitimate to locate the reflex action in the robot when one considers the actual physiology of walking.

      > My guess is that they are simply getting a binary command value from the monkey: "walk" or "don't walk". And the whole robot thing is just for effect. I hate to be such a cynic but this looks like showmanship, not science. If that is the case then this is equivalent to the simple video games that have been demonstrated using brain control.

      The use of a robot is *proof* of principle. You can not simply model a phenomenon on a computer screen and claim success. We live in a physical world and so we need to perform physical experiments to validate our theories or test our systems. This is why Nobel prizes go to experimentalists as a rule (or at least to the people who acquire funding for the experiments).

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    8. Re:monkey business by yet+another+coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being able to read the monkey's brain sounds like the only innovation here, not making the robot walk.

      No, reading the monkey's brain has been done many times before. This report is gee-whiz, but nothing in it is very innovative.

      So, what is the monkey really doing? I doubt if he is even thinking "left, right, left, right" because even that would be hard to coordinate with so much lag.

      When you walk, you don't think "left, right, left, right." A lot of the rhythm generator is accomplished by central pattern generators, many of the ones involved are in the spinal cord. The same way the brain engages the walk routine built into downstream parts of the nervous system, the brain can engage the walk routine built into a Japanese robot.

      Finally, why is there a damn robot in the first place?

      There is a robot because this group's ultimately goal is to develop neural prosthetics. They have done experiments controlling computer animations, as have quite a few other research groups.

      My guess is that they are simply getting a binary command value from the monkey: "walk" or "don't walk".

      You have a good point here. How finely grained is the monkey's control of the robot? The article does not tell us. I looked unsuccessfully for a corresponding scientific publication. I hope this study is published soon with more details about how specific and how precise the control really is.
    9. Re:monkey business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else notice that the robot's feet weren't actually touching the treadmill? What's the point in having a treadmill for the robot? This is all highly suspect.

    10. Re:monkey business by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      "select start"? How kind of you to share.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:monkey business by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 1

      Nah, real monkeys do it in three.

    12. Re:monkey business by unbug · · Score: 3, Funny

      One, why is the robot in north Carolina and the monkey in Japan? Ah, a new joke. I'll have a go. They prefer intelligent design in Carolina and evolution in Japan?
    13. Re:monkey business by jellie · · Score: 1

      Just to add a few points:

      Electrophysiology in the monkey (or other animals like cats) has been done for decades. I doubt Miguel Nicolelis was the first to create a neural prosthetic, but he has been very successful at doing so. Some of his publications are listed in that article, and a link to his lab website is there too.

      I first heard about him on a rerun of the PBS show "Innovations" that discussed several prosthetics, including Dobelle's vision prosthetic. The episode aired in 2004, which meant it was produced even earlier than that. At that time, Nicolelis was already able to use a monkey to control a mechanical arm in his lab. To train the monkey to do so, they had him move a joystick into a circle repeatedly. An electrode array was implanted in the monkey's motor cortex, so they could record neural signals. After the monkey was trained, they took away the joystick and the monkey only had to think of making the arm motion to move the joystick into the circle.

    14. Re:monkey business by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i recall reading about a similar experiment using a robot arm, a joystick and a monkey.

      at first the monkey controlled the arm using the joystick while a computer did brain reads.

      then they turned of the joystick, but let the monkey still have it, and used only the brain signals for control.

      iirc, at some point the monkey let go of the joystick and just sat there while the arm kept moving, something that was not planed by the researchers at all. basically the monkey was controlling the arm by thought alone.

      now, the real big trick will be for them to get sensory signals back into the brain, as the body feeds a incredible amount of data to the brain on each step taken.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    15. Re:monkey business by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Walking is a "controlled fall"

      Not necessarily; depends how much you lean forward and where you (thus) have your center of gravity.

      While I agree that the model is considered 'normal' within so called 'Western' societies, it is not the most efficient (IMHO).

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    16. Re:monkey business by Xiph · · Score: 1

      let me fix that for ya...
      Nah, real monkeys do it in a tree

      --
      Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    17. Re:monkey business by dintech · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Remember also that North Carolina has an abundant supply of primates.

    18. Re:monkey business by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it was one of those new-fangled Maglev robots :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    19. Re:monkey business by kalirion · · Score: 1

      You have a good point here. How finely grained is the monkey's control of the robot? The article does not tell us.

      Actually the article does mention that they mapped the neurons firing during each portion of the motion.

    20. Re:monkey business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No good can come of this. When that monkey learns how to throw chairs with his mind, boy, is Google in trouble...

    21. Re:monkey business by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      How long is a portion? How sensitive is the control to temporal resolution? How many neurons were recorded? What was the decoding strategy? What was the information rate of the recorded neural signal in bits per second?

      These questions are some of the ones I had in mind. The article does not go into this level of detail.

    22. Re:monkey business by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      When you walk, you don't think "left, right, left, right."

      Perhaps not, but I understand that when monkeys walk, they think, "Developers, developers, developers."

    23. Re:monkey business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      much easier to setup an internet link

      "set up". ("Setup" is a noun.)

    24. Re:monkey business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      signals from it's brain

      "its".

  2. The control was great... by FalconZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but the feedback was lousy.

    Monkey : Move Foot Forward
    600ms later...
    Robot : OK....Oh no, I'm falling over, quick move the other foot
    600ms later...
    Monkey : Move Other Foot Forward
    600ms later...
    Robot : I can't do that dave, I've fallen over

    Although I assume in actuallity they left most of the balance control to the robot end of things; either that or the Monkey was psychic.
    (Or more likely they've got a nice low-latency academic link)

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:The control was great... by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      Looking at the video on the nytimes page, it appeared that the robot was holding no weight with its legs. They were almost swinging loose and being propelled by the tredmil. Also, the damn monkey in the video was animated. I call BS.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    2. Re:The control was great... by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's BS, it's just that they've barely figured out how to interpret brain activity (this is very different from tapping in to signals traveling along nerves that lead to muscles) and translate that into signals that can control motors. The robot's legs were just hanging freely, and yes they will have a lot more to do before they can demonstrate balance control.

      It's interesting that no actual pictures of the monkey seem to have been published... my theory is that the monkey is in such a wired-up state that pictures would be likely to shock people and the lab would be picketed by animal rights activists.

    3. Re:The control was great... by ezzthetic · · Score: 1

      But just imagine how funny it would be if it were narrated by Pete Smith.

      --
      You know what they say about opinions. They're all fabulous!
    4. Re:The control was great... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Not BS, and yes, it's being run in real time.

      But first, you don't show the actual experimental animal, especially when it's in the US. For security as well as PR reasons, few labs accept filming experiments directly. Second, no, the robot isn't balancing. Just getting the actual motor responses is plenty for now (as you guess, the actual feedback can't be done directly since the body and configuration isn't the same; you need to "translate" intention).

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:The control was great... by nanjundi · · Score: 1
      From the article:

      These experiments, Dr. Nicolelis said, are the first steps toward a brain machine interface that might permit paralyzed people to walk by directing devices with their thoughts. Electrodes in the person's brain would send signals to a device worn on the hip, like a cell phone or pager, that would relay those signals to a pair of braces, a kind of external skeleton, worn on the legs.

      "When that person thinks about walking," he said, "walking happens."

      There will be a day, when I start thinking of walking, the person next to me starts walking.!!

      -N
    6. Re:The control was great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that no actual pictures of the monkey seem to have been published... my theory is that the monkey is in such a wired-up state that pictures would be likely to shock people and the lab would be picketed by animal rights activists.
      Bingo! You are totally correct.
    7. Re:The control was great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Or more likely they've got a nice low-latency academic link)"

      Faster than the speed of light? That would be pretty nice.

  3. Reminds me of the usual... by JazzyMusicMan · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, monkey control you!

    1. Re:Reminds me of the usual... by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 0

      On Slashdot, soviet Russia jokes control YOU!

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    2. Re:Reminds me of the usual... by Sandb · · Score: 1

      I just love the picture next to the article. Because it shows a monkey on a treadmill. And because it spells out "MONKEY" above the monkey. Just in case anyone got confused...

      http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/01/14/science/0115-sci-ROBOT_190.jpg

  4. What's newsworth about this? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    What the article fails to stress properly, is that the robot had no other power supply other than the monkeys supercharged thoughts.

    SUre controlling the robot with your brain is kind of cool, but when it has no power supply - now that's cool!

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  5. yet another... by youthoftoday · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    -1 not first post
    1. Re:yet another... by evil+agent · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'm envisioning a movie combining Planet of the Apes and The Terminator. *shivers*

      --
      End transmission.
    2. Re:yet another... by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly, real news more and more seems to resemble The Onion these days.

      Perhaps even more alarmingly, quite a few of their more outlandish stories have actually come true several years later.

      (This being one of the funniest such stories...)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  6. It would be interesting to know how they mapped it by kcbanner · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see how they mapped the neurons -> robot. Something like this:

    Neuron Mapping Factor Adjustment(TM):
    Direct Neuron Mapping |-------||---| "Thinking about walking patterns" triggers robot walking code.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  7. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new monkey-controlled robot overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new monkey-controlled robot overlords.

      In 2000 and again in 2004 they were welcomed.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Jannie+Ogg · · Score: 1

      Um, I haven't read all the posts, so someone may already have suggested this, but I don't really care if a monkey did it, or that the robot was in Japan. The ability to control a robot in the same room using only one's thoughts has larger implications for the disabled or the elderly (the probable reason for designing that robot in the first place).

  8. In the year 5555 by xirtap · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your arms are hanging limp at your sides, your legs got nothing to do. Some machine, doing that for you.

    1. Re:In the year 5555 by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer the Cleopatra 2525 version - the video is more interesting ;-)

  9. But, but... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I thought monkey hates technology...

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:But, but... by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      No, you not know monkey talk.

      "Monkey hate technology"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_QsCXm1vrk

      James Kochalka Superstar

      Look article. Now monkey control robot. Robot walk for monkey, even when monkey stop walk. Monkey p0wn robot. Monkey win!

  10. Finally... by xannash · · Score: 0

    A way for all those addicted to MMOs to be even more incapable of doing anything else...

  11. Pretty Pictures by ServerIrv · · Score: 1

    I like how the NYT article includes a video of the robot, but not of the monkey. What they don't want everyone to see is some heavily drugged up monkey with all manner of electrodes protruding out of its brain (possibly exposed). Way to sanitize reality so most people will find it palatable. What's the point of the robot anyway? This essentially seems like a brain mapping exercise. So the the monkey brain could have been mapped to anything, including a simple animation.

    1. Re:Pretty Pictures by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a different monkey, but same concept... he doesn't look particularly drugged nor do I see any exposed brain.
      http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2007/02/20/video-monkey-controls-robotic-arm-with-mind-beware-of-robot-monkeys/

      The point? Proof of concept for investors I would suspect. Tele presence is now much more closer to reality. There will be big money in this stuff down the line. I remember reading a forward looking military report that planned on mind controlled planes in 2020 or something like that, and that's just one application.

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    2. Re:Pretty Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know you've got to shock the monkey?

    3. Re:Pretty Pictures by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There are no nerve endings in your brain so your brain won't feel probes sticking in it. The only pain you (or the monkey) might feel is when the skin on the head gets pierced and the vibrations of the drill into the skull and for that there are local anesthetics available.

      Yes, I work in brain research.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Pretty Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading a forward looking military report that planned on mind controlled planes in 2020 or something like that

      Google "IMDB Firefox". The idea's been around in pop culture since 1982, so you can imagine how much further back it's been researched by the .mil folks...

      Good Clint Eastwood flick. With 25 years of hindsight, it's amazing how much more like the Brezhnev-era USSR our airports and subways have become.

    5. Re:Pretty Pictures by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      The book on which the film was based dates from 1977, so the idea's been in popular culture (I'd describe Craig Thomas as an exponent of the popular novel) since at least then.

      You're right, though - a good film and the parallels between Soviet Russia and modern US/UK are striking.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    6. Re:Pretty Pictures by AP2005 · · Score: 1
      This point should be modded up. I am ambivalent about the ethics of animal testing. When I see photographs of animals, especially ones that are quite similar to us such as monkeys, drugged, confined, with probes all over its body, I do shudder. On the other hand, scientists seem to have a good idea of the amount of pain these procedures cause (as remarked by one of the posters) and can minimize it to a small level.

      It is clear that we are going to see increasing amounts of research into brain-machine interfaces. Hence it best that the issue of animal testing ethics is brought up during such news reports. We could all learn more about animal testing practices. We could then form an informed opinion about what is acceptable and not feel guilty every time we benefit from such research.

  12. Don't put your robot under control of a monkey! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want my robot to do my house work and fetch me beer and food, not hang from the light fitting and throw faeces at me.

    1. Re:Don't put your robot under control of a monkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the homework robot you're using is similar to this one, you'll still have to do the thinking yourself!

    2. Re:Don't put your robot under control of a monkey! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it isn't a problem. I often think about cleaning the house, actually getting up of my butt and doing it is what I want to avoid.

  13. A banana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fetch me a banana now or I will destroy your planet!!!

  14. This is just the prototype... by virtigex · · Score: 1

    .. for the 500 ft, fire breathing, radioactive robot due to be terrorizing Tokyo in the next Japanese B-Movie.

    1. Re:This is just the prototype... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      That is being run by the thoughts of King Kong!

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  15. Re:It would be interesting to know how they mapped by megaditto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The basic idea is quite simple: start by sampling a whole bunch of neurons (usually a local EEG or fMRI of some sort). Then,

    In humans, obtain two recordings (one blank and one while thinking about doing X), then diff the two and map to X'.
    In monkeys, also get two recordings (one blank and one while doing X), then diff the two and also map to X', hoping that doing X reads the same as thinking about doing X.

    You'd need to repeat these steps a bunch of times to get good signal to noise, and also need several controls (thinking about Y, Z) to make sure the mapping is specific enough. Normally, the technique is just good enough to allow quadriplegics to click buttons and such, but takes lots of effort and patience (and lots of costly equipment).

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  16. I hope they wore helmets by esocid · · Score: 1

    Those scientists might have gotten hit with whatever could be robot poop.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  17. Movie plot by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

    Planet-of-the-Apes-in-a-Matrix-world movie plot. Anyone ?

    1. Re:Movie plot by Facetious · · Score: 1

      Rock me, Dr. Morpheus. Oh, never mind.

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
  18. Monkeys Thoughts Make Robot Walk... You see, by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I didn't see "Monkey's". Even if I'd seen "Monkeys'", I'd think several monkeys in series, but not in unison/parallel/hive/collective. I'm thinking BORG VINCULUM. As described by one 7of9 (oh, I wish she were mine...)... anyway...

    I see an infinite number of monkeys (chimpanzees) and an infinite number of T9-alloy exoskeletons, and I STILL don't see War and Peace. I see WAR and PIECES (of battle-wrecked exoskeletons...

    NO, I not am on durgs.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:Monkeys Thoughts Make Robot Walk... You see, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you are

    2. Re:Monkeys Thoughts Make Robot Walk... You see, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if you aren't thnen you should be.

  19. monkey thoughts by dominious · · Score: 4, Informative

    i was looking at this today: http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/TK1WBA9Xl3c
    watch after 0:44, the monkey learnt how to control the robotic arm with its thoughts in order to feed itself:)

    1. Re:monkey thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when do I get my YF-21?

  20. Re:It would be interesting to know how they mapped by kcbanner · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah, a mind-diff. Thanks for the info :)

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  21. ROBOTIC MARCHING BAND by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    Just one actual guy with a Sousaphone can now control an entire robotic marching band. Won't that be spectacular on 5th Avenue in November?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  22. Feh. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Call me when you can get a monkey to make Supreme Court appointments.

    Oh wait...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  23. Re:It would be interesting to know how they mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So you mean they need to get a woman to do this then? Can you just see a man doing it?

    Step 1: Take reading "thinking of nothing" (in reality thinking of banging female researcher)
    Step 2: Take reading "thinking of walking" (thinking of banging female researcher on treadmill)
    Step 3: Lose funding when you can't explain why the robot keeps doing, ahem - what it is doing

  24. another stupid joke by themushroom · · Score: 1

    ...and the poo was flung as far as South Korea.

  25. Surrender is Imminent by Lane+Rendell · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new robot-controlling, monkey overlords. And on a serious note, I heard something similar being done about 10 years ago, people could be hooked up to a machine and would use a certain brain pulse or something to move a train around a track.

    --
    --Insert witty statement---
  26. Yes, but... by HtR · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a good concept, but I don't understand how to get a monkey on the other side of the world to think about getting me my beer and pizza?

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  27. Monkeys makes robot walk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this less impressive than George W Bush walking?
    He is certainly a monkey and he manages not only to walk but apparently dress himself too!

  28. Walking, Meh. by Ralphus+Maximus · · Score: 0

    Let's see those monkeys make the robots fling poo!

    Cheers,
    RM

    --
    Nobody's as dumb, as I appear to be
  29. Re:It would be interesting to know how they mapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, all it does is link brainwave A to Flag 1, wave B to Flag 2, and so on. It doesn't know what you are thinking about in reality as long as the waveform is reasonably unique and can be identified and flagged.

    Instead of walking and standing, you could think of goatse and tubgirl. As long as you are consistent, thoughts of goatse will always make the robot walk and tubgirl will make it stop.

  30. Corrected Title (How to Use Apostrophes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monkeys' Thoughts Make Robot Walk

  31. This isn't that surprising by davmoo · · Score: 1

    We've had a monkey running American government for 7 years now.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:This isn't that surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but who exacty owns that monkey, Cheney? Halibuton? or some secret cabal?.......

  32. Previous Research by oldmanpanda · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing about this information many many years ago, when they had managed to get the monkey to control a robot arm. It seems they are moving up in the world, or, as the poster above states, they are merely programming a robot to walk and a monkey to think "walk." Regardless, the six-year-old article, http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2000/monkeys-1206.html/ gives some context to what they have been doing.

  33. Obligatory Sealab... by VeteranNoob · · Score: 1

    Controversy continued on Monday as surgeons successfully transplanted little Jango's brain into a robot monkey body.

    Scientists now say human-to-robot brain transplants will be possible within ten years.

    On a sad note, however, Jango died late Tuesday after drinking his own urine.

    --
    Adapt, adopt, or get out of the way!
  34. This will have a number of uses by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    In particular, in dangerous areas, such as Nukes, police incursions, or even on the battle field. Perhaps one of the more interesting ones will be on the moon. THe delay is short enough that a group of ppl can be trained to slow down their reaction and then uses these for doing construction. I suspect that it might even be interesting in space. Want to fix some something on the outside of the ISS or bigelow? Just control the robot from inside.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. Give them a remote-controlled plane... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...and monkeys really could fly out of my ass.

  36. Finally settled! Monkey WINS! by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    Monkeys Thoughts Make Robot Walk.

    Well I guess that answered that. Now what about the "Ninja vs Pirate" question?
  37. The robot just wants to kill the monkey by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Robots always crave the blood of those who control them. Monkeys don't get a free ride.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  38. Bah! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Call me when the robot can control the monkey with its android thoughts.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  39. Where can i buy by oloron · · Score: 0

    an army of these robot monkeys..... :D

  40. Monkey in the Middle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is whether the link between North Carolina and Japan was compromised by a Monkey in the Middle attack.

  41. Robot Monkey... by Landshark17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    *Yawn* Robot Monkey overlords... something about welcoming... you know the drill. I don't feel like writing it all out.

    --
    This sig is false.
  42. Monkey Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A monkey made me type this response by controlling my fingers on the keyboard, so don't blame me.

    I for one welcome our new touch-typing simian overlords...

  43. Isn't this how Planet of the Apes started? by Grond · · Score: 1

    So, we already put weapons on robots, and now we're giving the robots to the monkeys. Logically, the next step will be monkey-controlled robots with weapons.

    And I thought the holodeck would be the last thing we ever invented...

  44. Sims was right by Nullav · · Score: 1

    And we are now one step closer to that robot monkey butler!

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  45. Monkey Mecha! by jon287 · · Score: 1

    The mind boggles.

    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  46. Enh by skelly33 · · Score: 1

    Five foot robots are so last year. Now, five assed robots...

    1. Re:Enh by Badgam · · Score: 1

      I'm on it.

  47. GW is NOT a monkey ... by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    and it's insulting to monkeys to suggest that he is. He is (unfortunately, IMO) a member of the species arrogant enough to call itself "homo sapiens sapiens". In math, one counter-example is enough to disprove a hypothesis. Certainly GW is enough of a counter-example to disprove the intelligence (or wisdom) of the species (which doesn't prevent some, very few, apparently, instances of the species from being intelligent).

  48. Be sure to always mount your scratch monkey by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

    For some reason this reminds me of this story. Ah yes, the memories. You kids wouldn't understand.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  49. World Robot Dominations by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    one banana at a time.

  50. Typewriters by TheNucleon · · Score: 1

    A robot? The monkeys are supposed to control typewriters. Once an infinite number of them are thusly connected, and only then, can we finally determine if they will produce all the great books.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

    1. Clone infinite number of monkeys
    2. Use new monkey-brain interface to connect to typewriters
    3. Wait for all great books to be written
    4. ???
    5. Profit!!!

    --
    My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of my employer, my spouse, my children, or my cats.
    1. Re:Typewriters by Loibisch · · Score: 1

      Finally we have a chance to make this come true! A Beowulf cluster of Robot-monkeys should be so much more efficient than just running them individually!

    2. Re:Typewriters by simong · · Score: 1

      If you feed them grits, they'll write Natalie Portman's biography.

  51. Hmmmmm..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    If the robot weighs 200 lbs and is only 5 ft tall, I think the robot is the lazy one. It's about time it got on a treadmill.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  52. You mean swallowing my tongue isn't going to help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh noes. You mean swallowing my tongue isn't going to help anymore when the thought police come around??? Don't turn around... oh oh oh

  53. Combination of previous works by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a combination of previous works.

    Monkey mind reading has been done before.
    Monkey controlling a robotic arm has been done before too, and as far as I remember, the monkey even got it to the point of controlling the robotic arm without moving herself.
    Remote controlling of robots has been done before (trans-atlantic surgery operation, the surgeon operating the robot in the US and the patient being in Europe).
    And as pointed by other /.ers, research on walking robot seems so common in Japan that it's probably the second national sport (right after "girls in school uniform fetishism" ^_^ )

    What's the point of this study ? Combining all this together.

    - It's the first time brain waves are used to control a movement as complicated as walking.
    Thus, this is a technical demo that brings closer hopes for paralysed patients. (As a different solution than spinal nerves regrowth).
    --> (The previous experiments where robotic-arm only, thus potential application only to amputees).

    - It's the first time that brain-waves remote controlling is attempted.
    The inputs are much more complex and much more abundant compared to the current joystick-controlled robots.
    This technical demo proves that the latency and bandwidth can cope with brainwave-control, although with a lag that maybe won't be short enough for reflex based movements.
    But it is still opening interesting possibilities :
    Just replace the monkey with a scientist and the treadmill environment with either some dangerous environment or some miniaturised one or a remote place where the scientist expertise is not readily available.
    --> Current controls of robots (like the one used in surgery) are joystick based. Although there are still a lot of movement that can easily be performed with such controls, there are some limitation. Natural movement that are mapped to a robot through brainwave control could bring much more agility.
    Also a lot of additional things have to be controlled in a surgical robot (camera motions for example). For now they are still controller with the same pair of joystick (because, you see, a surgeon has only 2 hands to hold them) and using a combination of pedals to switch what the inputs are controlling.
    With such brainwave-control technology, other movement could be mapped to the camera control (I think head motions could be the most natural ones) leaving the hand motion free to continue controlling the instruments.

    So, no there are no revolutionary new technologies involved here.
    But its a new combination of technologies that represent a nice step toward very promising applications.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  54. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our remote monkey robot overlords!

  55. At the risk of being redundant by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    I for one would like to welcome our monkey-controlled cybernetic overlords.

    F_T

  56. All your banana are belong to us. by iapetus · · Score: 1

    How are you gentlemen!!
    All your banana are belong to us.
    You are on the way to the complete works of Shakespeare.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  57. I, for one... by bokane · · Score: 1

    I, for one -- banana banana want me banana give now banana -- Jojo, stop i -- GIVE NOW BANANA ME BANANA GIVE.

  58. ROLLOUT the ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY by posys · · Score: 1

    Thank You SLASHDOT for sharing this !!!

    This Monkey controlled robot is great news !!!

    Get excited, our Emancipation from the Machinery of Economy

    can occur in 5 years when you GET INVOLVED and CREATE the DEMAND

    for THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY ,

    when you, talk to others and MAKE IT AN ISSUE for our LEADERS...

    It just plain makes sense !!!

    http://RoboEco.com

    --
    The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
  59. Extreme tangential thread by hey! · · Score: 1

    This topic becomes a lot more interesting if you ignore both TFA and the summary.

    Then you can imagine that robots have been designed to think like monkeys, which I think we can all agree, would be the substance of the article, in a world better than the one we are currently living in.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  60. Stop picking on the monkey! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    It is not the monkey's fault he can't coordinate and plan several steps in advance to get many multiple commands a second out to its robot units. And with all the negative reinforcement, people on the internet "shocking the monkey" when he didn't do right, well who can blame the poor monkey.

    If they really wanted a good test, they would have used a champion Starcraft player from South Korea! Talk about reflexes and planning. These guys can issue so many commands a second it boggles the mind.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  61. It's using CPGs, just like the monkey's real legs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The signals in the brain are calling to learned motion patterns stored remotely in the ganglia (little brain-like things attached to the spine). A good computer analogy would be shader programs--the software makes very vague system calls (render these triangles), which cause separate (shader) programs to actually draw the graphics from inside the video card.

    What these guys are doing is capturing the "system calls" from the brain, and sending them to *their own* central pattern generators in the robot. According to TFA, these CPGs were trained by data-mining a correlation between the monkey's motion (picked up with standard motion-capture methods) and the firing of its neurons. So, the first step is actually to train the robot to obey the monkey's brain.

    What happens next is the really interesting part, though. The monkey's brain quickly realizes that it is controlling two separate things (the monkey and the robot), and moves the control for the legs to different neurons so it can control them separately. This is why, when they stopped the monkey's treadmill, it was able to keep controlling the robot without moving its own legs.

    This research isn't all that new, though. Something similar was done a while back (maybe a year ago?) where they had a monkey controlling an extra arm through the same type of system. Before that, there was a study on epilepsy patients that involved the same brain sensors, where humans were able to control a mouse cursor after trying for about one minute. IMHO, this problem was completely solved long before this project; electronic control outputs from the brain just happened to be one of those things that are way easier than they look.

    What someone really needs to do now is get an electronic brain *input* that works this well, and doesn't cause seizures or degradation over time. Once that's done, then some really amazing stuff will start to be possible.

    Besides just being able to control machines with your thoughts, or having an in-head network connection, or some other such nonsense, this is one of the technologies that could truly make it possible to live forever, for people who are alive today. If one's whole cerebral cortex is wired to a computer that's emulating (get this) more brain, then it's going to do exactly what it does with the robot, and start using it. Since most of the brain naturally tries to maximize its redundancy, you'd get a hybrid digital-biological brain that could be trained over time to work both together and separately. Assuming that they're together when you "die", then that one thread of consciousness will simply continue to exist on the digital side, and you will survived death. At this point, you can get in your robot and go do stuff, or run around in some kind of digital world. Of course, computer hardware today would not be able to do this, but in 10-15 years it could very well be possible using just consumer stuff (and will definitely be possible using a server).

    As a side bonus, it will also cause a very entertaining political flamewar, when the fundies realize that there's a machine that traps your soul. Of course they will go insane trying to stop it, and there will be a big debate about the property rights of "dead" people...

  62. More on Promising Applications by Ted+Holmes · · Score: 1

    It's interesting how thought recognition is merging with machines. As mentioned earlier, a monkey's leg movement brain signals control a robot across the planet, http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=monkey+legs+%22brain+signals%22+control+robot&btnG=Search and another monkey mentally controls a robotic arm to feed itself. http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q=monkey+mentally+controls+a+robotic+arm+to+feed+itself+&btnG=Search Meanwhile, Eric Ramsay, completely conscious but paralyzed and only able to move his eyes Since 1999 is using a new computer/ brain interface to reads his brain signals. As he thinks about vocal sounds, they are translated in real time. The goal is conversation, by making it possible for him to literally think out loud. http://simplyted.blogspot.com/2007/11/as-speech-recognition-software-morphs.htm He may one day be searching Google, surfing the web, texting his friends, making new friends and maybe show up on Facebook. But as electrodes give way to a skull cap, things like wireless searching, texting, messaging, http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Twitter+is%22&btnG=Search Twitter, Facebook etc., could become a thumbless, mental exchange. I can hardly wait for the Blue-Toothers' http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q='BlueToothers'+&btnG=Search to discover this. I mean it's freaky to watch someone striding down a street, or sitting alone at a table having a conversation with the ether. (Chuckle at this short video.) http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Finally%2C+I+know+exactly+how+to+deal+with+bluetoothers%22&btnG=Search Simultaneously, some powerful new exoskeletons are about to overflow from military applications to consumer products. http://video.google.com/videosearch?num=100&so=4&hl=en&q=robotic+Exoskeleton+duration%3Ashort&start=0 My favorite is Sarcos exoskeleton. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Sarcos+Exoskeleton&search=Search No need for a joystick or hand controls. You just wear it, and it mirrors your actions. You can pump a couple hundred pounds, run, box, dance and carry heavy loads up stairs. It doubles as an autonomous robot. Soon they'll park in the garage next to the car or maybe take up a corner in the living room waiting for intruders. This technology is primed to make the link between thought and superhuman abilities as extensions of our bodies. Follow news on thought controlled exoskeletons here. http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q=thought+controlled+exoskeleton&btnG=Search

  63. Monkeys have standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when you can get a monkey to make Supreme Court appointments.

    That would be beneath any self-respecting monkey.

    Indeed, it's beneath any self-respecting human too, but lawyers being a sub-moronic class more related to vampires are of course an exception.

    1. Re:Monkeys have standards by jpellino · · Score: 1

      Like the old joke... a leading lab stopped using animals for testing and started using lawyers.

      Cuz there's some things the rats just won't do.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  64. The Monkey by slashdot4ever · · Score: 1

    Why didnt they show a picture of the monkey hooked up and walking, or there thinking? in the video they use a cgi monkey, where is the real one? Kevin

  65. Which... by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

    comment first?

    Mech Warriors?
    Monkey overlords?

    I give up.

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  66. Oblig. GitS by lonesome_coder · · Score: 1
    --
    If you'd just do what we tell you and quit yer gripin' everything would be chocolate sprinkles and rainbows! -AC
    1. Re:Oblig. GitS by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      The question is, will fundie christians get cyberbrain implants and then when their biological brains die but their electronic brains still live will they pray to Cyborg Jesus or Robot Jesus?

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    2. Re:Oblig. GitS by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Fundie Christians would argue that the soul != conscious thought, and would declare the whole procedure as an abomination unto the Lord.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  67. Scratch Monkey by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
    I hope they are smart enough to keep around a "scratch" monkey for use during hardware maintenence. :-)

    From the jargon file:

    "Before testing or reconfiguring, always mount a scratch monkey", a proverb used to advise caution when dealing with irreplaceable data or devices. Used to refer to any scratch volume hooked to a computer during any risky operation as a replacement for some precious resource or data that might otherwise get trashed.

    This term preserves the memory of Mabel, the Swimming Wonder Monkey, star of a biological research program at the University of Toronto. Mabel was not (so the legend goes) your ordinary monkey; the university had spent years teaching her how to swim, breathing through a regulator, in order to study the effects of different gas mixtures on her physiology. Mabel suffered an untimely demise one day when a DEC field circus engineer troubleshooting a crash on the program's VAX inadvertently interfered with some custom hardware that was wired to Mabel.

    It is reported that, after calming down an understandably irate customer sufficiently to ascertain the facts of the matter, a DEC troubleshooter called up the field circus manager responsible and asked him sweetly, "Can you swim?" Not all the consequences to humans were so amusing; the sysop of the machine in question was nearly thrown in jail at the behest of certain clueless droids at the local 'humane' society. The moral is clear: When in doubt, always mount a scratch monkey.
  68. Uhm.. by asCii88 · · Score: 0

    I can move my arms with my thoughts already.

  69. The next logical step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next logical step is to put the monkey inside the robot, then stress test the motors by weighing it down with metal plates etc.

  70. Origins of the Great Clone War of 2012 by adharma · · Score: 1

    Scientists have now given the powers of the Robot to the Monkey. Now it is time for scientists to splice the DNA from Pirates and Ninjas. In the future, armies of Robot-Monkeys will battle the clone armies of the Ninja-Pirates for the fate of all mankind.

    --
    What word rhymes with buried alive?
  71. well that would explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the invading mechas obsession for bananas

  72. Future DARPA project by Serpentegena · · Score: 1

    Am I really the only one who instantly thought of the military sprouting a batallion of thought-controlled robotic troops? They are more resilient, stronger than human troops, and their speed can be enhanced over time. This not only prevents, it can effectively eliminate war casualties. Whoever can build both sides of the technology faster will end up with a strategic advantage and all you need(provided that the control interface is perfected to accept input from the human cortex) is a bunch of FPS enthusiasts.

    --
    Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
  73. Re:It's using CPGs, just like the monkey's real le by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1
    Assuming that they're together when you "die", then that one thread of consciousness will simply continue to exist on the digital side, and you will survived death


    On this subject, read Altered Carbon by Richard Morgan. A very interesting look at a future world where consciousness can be digitised, and installed in any body ("sleeve"). Highly recommend this book, it's excellent

    --
    "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

    Westly, The Princess Bride

  74. Is this because .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some parts of the world, it would be cheaper to use humans to control robots than to deploy computers to do the same job? Is this a new dimension of offshore outsourcing?

  75. "5-foot humanoid robot..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um... last I checked, humans only had 2 feet, not 5. ;)

  76. Replication rather than Telepresence by Evolt's+RonL. · · Score: 1

    Others have already pointed out the implications of the delay. So it's not 'telepresence'. In fact, I would suggest that the monkey received no feedback other than seeing a video of the robot.

    Sounds more like a replication application where one worker assembles parts at one workstation and 500 robots wired to the worker assemble identical items at their identically furnished stations ... a different kind of application.

    A 'marching army of monkeys' application!

  77. Mein Führer, I can walk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mein Führer, I can walk!

  78. Balance is the problem by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Outside from the completely crazy costs of the concept (you'll have to build one robot with tank-like resistance for each controller-soldier) and the material advantage an adversary may get by capturing one,
    the biggest draw back is the latency.

    For slow and controlled motions like in the context of scientists or doctors using remote controlled robots, there's not much problem. Just as long as they don't move to fast to be still able to control the motions even with the lag.

    For reflex based fast movement that have to be quickly corrected based on fast feed-back loops, like running, jumping or walking, and especially on irregular surfaces, the response won't be fast enough. All those motions are forms of "controlled fall" where the body isn't actually kept on balance on 2 feet, but thrown forward.

    So, for now, either the controller soldier aren't far way behind the robots (or even, inside the robots themselves, Evangelion plug/Japanese mecha-style) and you lose a lot of the advantage of the robots.
    Or the robots will have to rely on a more lag-resilient form of propulsion, and you basically end up with a bunch of Daleks which will fail at the first occurrence of steps.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  79. Turn about's fair play or a bridge too far? by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

    A system of imperial: manufacturing, banking and/or religious corporations have been controlling politicians for centuries; who, in turn, have been shoving around the little people.
    Not content with controlling the masses - the politicians finally get to control robots too.
    RR
    Copula eame se non posit acceptara jocularem.

  80. Robotic Monkey Death Squads by e_chiappone · · Score: 1

    I think the idea of helping paralyzed people walk is great and all, but we all know where this is going. When the monkeys rise up against humanity they will not be running around hitting people with sticks. No, they are going to be running around in armored robotic suits, swiftly enslaving the human race. Am I paranoid? Probably. Am I wrong? Probably not.