Domain: secunia.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to secunia.com.
Comments · 2,642
-
Best U had was an effete "moddown"?
To that I post stats from a respected source 4 unpatched security vulnerabilities (SECUNIA.COM), & a study done that backs the LAMP statements I made (that phishers & spammers prefer victiming it then (putting your rather WEAK hit-N-run moddown into the dirt)):
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/14/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/14/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/14/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
OR
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories
Unpatched 3% (4 of 142
-
Best U had was an effete "moddown"?
To that I post stats from a respected source 4 unpatched security vulnerabilities (SECUNIA.COM), & a study done that backs the LAMP statements I made (that phishers & spammers prefer victiming it then (putting your rather WEAK hit-N-run moddown into the dirt)):
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/14/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/14/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/14/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
OR
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Server 2008: (07/14/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/18255/?task=advisories
Unpatched 3% (4 of 142
-
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
The military's gets "security-hardened"
Versions of Windows, for 1 thing, since around 2004 or so.
Secondly, Linux 2.6 in its KERNEL ALONE has 4x++ the amount of unpatched security vulnerabilities than Windows Server 2008 does (& yes, remote vulnerabilities too in Linux still are open as well), & the Windows Server ones (Windows7's too) have valid + easy workarounds as well!
In fact, All of what MS gives you for business & development has LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES than does Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel alone... AND, LAMP setups are the MOST EXPLOITED BY PHISHERS!
Proof of my statements? Ok, here goes:
Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/10/2011) -
Time 2 blow UR "forums 'Illogic-logic'" away
Using documented FACTS: 1st - Linux is sense 4 router maker CO$T$ WISE its ONLY ADVANTAGE! You can build routers that work using it, cheaper... the ONLY advantage it has, IS this.
Hence, why Linux HAS to find "alternate markets" other than the PC-Server world, where it's outnumber 94++% to what? 1-2% marketshare for Linux, & the rest goes to MacOS X?? Explain that, minus your "forums 'illogic-logic'" spinmaster unrealistic b.s. - you GIVE stuff away & still don't run the show overall! LMAO... pretty funny!
(Read on, it only gets better & STRONGER!)
LOL, it's almost funny (& yes, I use KUbuntu 10.10 myself here to "see how the other 1/2 lives)!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
2nd - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
3rd: Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either... this is mostly the home market in fact!)
"The market share argument of malware infection proved to be far too simplistic for reality probably about a decade ago. Why are you wasting everyone's time by pushing it now?" - by dbIII (701233) on Sunday July 10, @09:02AM (#36710686)
Because ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE throws your utter b.s. "spin master propoganda" into the waste bin is why!
---
4th: Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 3.5x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
5th: Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability
-
Time 2 blow UR "forums 'Illogic-logic'" away
Using documented FACTS: 1st - Linux is sense 4 router maker CO$T$ WISE its ONLY ADVANTAGE! You can build routers that work using it, cheaper... the ONLY advantage it has, IS this.
Hence, why Linux HAS to find "alternate markets" other than the PC-Server world, where it's outnumber 94++% to what? 1-2% marketshare for Linux, & the rest goes to MacOS X?? Explain that, minus your "forums 'illogic-logic'" spinmaster unrealistic b.s. - you GIVE stuff away & still don't run the show overall! LMAO... pretty funny!
(Read on, it only gets better & STRONGER!)
LOL, it's almost funny (& yes, I use KUbuntu 10.10 myself here to "see how the other 1/2 lives)!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
2nd - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
3rd: Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either... this is mostly the home market in fact!)
"The market share argument of malware infection proved to be far too simplistic for reality probably about a decade ago. Why are you wasting everyone's time by pushing it now?" - by dbIII (701233) on Sunday July 10, @09:02AM (#36710686)
Because ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE throws your utter b.s. "spin master propoganda" into the waste bin is why!
---
4th: Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 3.5x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
5th: Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability
-
Time 2 blow UR "forums 'Illogic-logic'" away
Using documented FACTS: 1st - Linux is sense 4 router maker CO$T$ WISE its ONLY ADVANTAGE! You can build routers that work using it, cheaper... the ONLY advantage it has, IS this.
Hence, why Linux HAS to find "alternate markets" other than the PC-Server world, where it's outnumber 94++% to what? 1-2% marketshare for Linux, & the rest goes to MacOS X?? Explain that, minus your "forums 'illogic-logic'" spinmaster unrealistic b.s. - you GIVE stuff away & still don't run the show overall! LMAO... pretty funny!
(Read on, it only gets better & STRONGER!)
LOL, it's almost funny (& yes, I use KUbuntu 10.10 myself here to "see how the other 1/2 lives)!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
2nd - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
3rd: Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either... this is mostly the home market in fact!)
"The market share argument of malware infection proved to be far too simplistic for reality probably about a decade ago. Why are you wasting everyone's time by pushing it now?" - by dbIII (701233) on Sunday July 10, @09:02AM (#36710686)
Because ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE throws your utter b.s. "spin master propoganda" into the waste bin is why!
---
4th: Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 3.5x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
5th: Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability
-
Time 2 blow UR "forums 'Illogic-logic'" away
Using documented FACTS: 1st - Linux is sense 4 router maker CO$T$ WISE its ONLY ADVANTAGE! You can build routers that work using it, cheaper... the ONLY advantage it has, IS this.
Hence, why Linux HAS to find "alternate markets" other than the PC-Server world, where it's outnumber 94++% to what? 1-2% marketshare for Linux, & the rest goes to MacOS X?? Explain that, minus your "forums 'illogic-logic'" spinmaster unrealistic b.s. - you GIVE stuff away & still don't run the show overall! LMAO... pretty funny!
(Read on, it only gets better & STRONGER!)
LOL, it's almost funny (& yes, I use KUbuntu 10.10 myself here to "see how the other 1/2 lives)!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
2nd - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
3rd: Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either... this is mostly the home market in fact!)
"The market share argument of malware infection proved to be far too simplistic for reality probably about a decade ago. Why are you wasting everyone's time by pushing it now?" - by dbIII (701233) on Sunday July 10, @09:02AM (#36710686)
Because ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE throws your utter b.s. "spin master propoganda" into the waste bin is why!
---
4th: Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 3.5x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
5th: Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability
-
Time 2 blow UR "forums 'Illogic-logic'" away
Using documented FACTS: 1st - Linux is sense 4 router maker CO$T$ WISE its ONLY ADVANTAGE! You can build routers that work using it, cheaper... the ONLY advantage it has, IS this.
Hence, why Linux HAS to find "alternate markets" other than the PC-Server world, where it's outnumber 94++% to what? 1-2% marketshare for Linux, & the rest goes to MacOS X?? Explain that, minus your "forums 'illogic-logic'" spinmaster unrealistic b.s. - you GIVE stuff away & still don't run the show overall! LMAO... pretty funny!
(Read on, it only gets better & STRONGER!)
LOL, it's almost funny (& yes, I use KUbuntu 10.10 myself here to "see how the other 1/2 lives)!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
2nd - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
3rd: Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either... this is mostly the home market in fact!)
"The market share argument of malware infection proved to be far too simplistic for reality probably about a decade ago. Why are you wasting everyone's time by pushing it now?" - by dbIII (701233) on Sunday July 10, @09:02AM (#36710686)
Because ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE throws your utter b.s. "spin master propoganda" into the waste bin is why!
---
4th: Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 3.5x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
5th: Yes - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 3.5x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/10/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/10/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
Why I show MS business stack vs. WAMP
or LAMP, w/ ZERO KNOWN UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
"You also tried to sidestep the fact that MySQL and PHP run on Windows servers and can be compromised on those systems just as well as they can on Linux systems" - by gottabeme (590848) on Wednesday July 06, @12:30AM (#36668926)
So much for "Open 'SORES'" then, eh? See proof thereof below:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/05/2011))
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
---
* No "side stepping" involved - I compare software of LIKE TYPES & then some above from Microsoft, vs. LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)... period!
Or, was this a lie?
---
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey. Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers"
---
* LMAO! It's certainly more current than your b.s. from the same site that was from 2004, "super-stale & OLD" which had its roots on a report that showed Linux was LESS SECURE THAN WINDOWS WAS THAT YEAR TOO, no less... more "spin-master b.s." from the "Open 'SORES'" world!
(Wonder WHY your stuff is in "dead last place"? Don't!)
APK
P.S.=> You also run from & failed to produce proof of the Linux security vulnerabilities unpatched that YOU SAID are patched?
Back this up & show us proofs of it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
FROM -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2282088&cid=36649602
You run from proving that above? That makes you nothing more than a trolling liar then... period!
(
... & a sneaky little bastard too, coming & posting back here days later (didn't think I'd see it?))You're also a fool then too!
That - along with your posting STALE OLD DATA from 2004 from the Register, & I put out more current data showing that LAMP setups are RAMPANTLY EXPLOIT
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
"A kernel alone doth not an OS make"
See subject-line. Android's proof Linux can be made insecure by what's on top of a kernel. A kernel with more unpatched security vulnerabilities in it than Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 has by 3.5x in fact, (and that's an entire OS distro on the Microsoft stuff, not just a kernel only). Proofs are below, and in far more than comparing the Operating Systems alone.
APK
P.S.=> This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/05/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) 6.x: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6473/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/05/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
THAT'S 3.5x LESS UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERAB
-
Facebook's = implemented in JAVA right?
Mostly, correct? I ask that, because I can filter JAVA applets via my router (LinkSys/CISCO unit BEFSX41 NAT & true stateful packet inspecting model), & when I set that option? I can't even SEE what's on a facebook page... & this pertains to security too, read on:
* NOW, if I am "off/wrong" here, please correct me on it, but... it seems that my router tells me I am correct!
APK
P.S.=> Oh, & "Where are my Manners": Thanks in Advance for the information, because IF that's the case?
SECURITY-WISE - Then, fundamentally, due to JAVA problems in security issues that remain unpatched shown here??
http://secunia.com/advisories/43262/
(iirc, 21 of them still... could have changed, they list JAVA like they do MacOS X stuff - no vulns count! I hate that...)
Then, by default, it's possible Facebook's got "security-issues" right from the 'get-go', & @ the root of things, in the language it's implemented in!
(Don't get me wrong, I LIKE JAVA & code in it @ times (except for its file access routines, they're weird imo))
So "all that said & aside"? Well - I am just curious here mainly to see if my "theory" is right or not, on IF Facebook's mostly JAVA implementation...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
LAMP = nothing to do w/ Linux? Beg 2 differ
"nothing to do with Linux." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
LAMP = Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP... that's the 'business & development stack' from the Open SORES side of things... & it has even MORE bugs being actively exploited no less, in the Linux kernel alone unpatched, than does the ENTIRETY of what MS gives you for the same, period...
(Funny that, eh? I see "LINUX" in there!)
---
"In fact, there is even a comment on that article by a guy who runs a WAMP stack who says that his server was compromised" - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @11:17PM (#36649894)
AHEM: Which is WHY I showed that MS' stack for the same as LAMP has NO UNPATCHED SECURITY VULNERABILITIES KNOWN PRESENT CURRENTLY & for years now, see here:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows 7: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/27467/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (5 of 72 Secunia advisories)
---
vs. THE LIINUX KERNEL ALONE SHOWING 3.5x as many unpatched vulnerabilities BY ITSELF:
--
Vulnerability Report: Linux Kernel 2.6.x (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/2719/?task=advisories
Unpatched 7% (18 of 270 Secunia advisories)
--
(Mind you, again: That's NOT even counting what the other parts of a Linux distro have, & certainly not those being exploited in the LAMP stack as shown by the register ONTOP OF THOSE TOO)
Which, again, you used STALE OLD DATA from 2004, & FROM THE REGISTER TOO NO LESS, but mine's FAR MORE CURRENT from "The Reg", & shows LAMP being exploited RAMPANTLY by phishers/spammers as their fav. to exploit no less vs. my current data shown above!
APK
P.S.=> You also said that you saw Linux's vulnerabilities shown @ SECUNIA.COM ARE PATCHED... prove it:
"Secunia's statistics are incorrect and out-of-date. I checked some of the CVEs for Linux, and Secunia lists them as unpatched, while Googling the CVEs shows that they were patched a long time ago." - by gottabeme (590848) on Sunday July 03, @09:44PM (#36649602)
You said that, NOW PROVE IT, because I am genuinely interested in seeing it (and seeing you back your words (possibly lies, but... we'll see, shall we?))...
... apk
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of
-
Your data = STALE & The Reg shows diff. too
About LAMP stacks: LAMP setups are the favorite of spammers/phishers PER THE REGISTER no less (more recently):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/10/domains_lamped/
---PERTINENT QUOTE:
"Phishers compromise LAMP-based websites for days at a time and hit the same victims over and over again, according to an Anti-Phishing Working Group survey.
Sites built on Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP are the favoured targets of phishing attackers,"
---
* LMAO!
So much for your "years ago" stale data... my data below is FAR MORE CURRENT as well (today's date), & the ENTIRE MS stack for business & development has less bugs than the Linux 2.6x mainstream kernel ONLY, by itself, lol...
(Pitiful showing on YOUR part, as per usual)
APK
P.S.=> You've been "blown away", yet again... & this even MORE CURRENT DATA from a respected security site in SECUNIA.COM that I used before just puts more "icing on the cake":
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 7 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft
.NET Framework 4.x
(07/03/2011http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29592/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Silverlight 4.x: (07/03/2011
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28947/
Unpatched 0% (0 of