Domain: sefora.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to sefora.org.
Comments · 14
-
Re:Not like it matters much ...
Scientists are not voting Republican. Among serious contenders with a chance, that pretty much leaves the Democrats. Scientists have never been so united in opposition to a party. Science should be apolitical, but it can't be this election.
The reasons are easy. Republicans have no respect for and little understanding of science. Science is all about the truth. Let me emphasize that-- truth. We have our Scientific Method, dedicated wholly to asking all the questions we can think of, leaving no stone uncovered, and getting the best, most accurate answers we can. But these jokers haven't hesitated to throw science under the bus and whip up obviously wrong, flawed, and outright lying studies time and time again to support positions they had already unreasoningly decided they like. As Colbert said, they make facts based on decisions. They have exploited public misunderstandings of what science is to push their agendas another few steps, and haven't troubled themselves about the costs of the public confusion they've created. So we hear people saying that science is just another religion, and they say that like they really believe it. We have the wretched, unfair catch phrase "flip-flop" which was supposed to describe a person who doesn't stick to their principles, but has instead been perverted to smear anyone who changes their approach thanks to new information. Bush Administration regard for science is extremely backhanded-- the fact that they trot out manure and bother to dress it up as science shows that they do recognize that science has a good reputation. They don't seem to get that this abuse of science is detrimental to that very reputation they're trying to use. The Republican Party, once the party of fiscal responsibility and prudence, has degenerated to this. To being an unholy alliance between liars with industrial agendas and liars with religious agendas. They're united only in the lying. They use the same dishonest techniques to push their very different agendas. Remember, Exxon wanted scientists to say Global Warming wasn't real, was just a big liberal conspiracy. "Doubt is our product". Social conservatives absolutely love "evidence" of liberal conspiracies, and are willing and ready to run with that idea anytime, and also take a leaf from that playbook and commission studies to answer such leading questions as "Is abortion detrimental to women's health?" Don't forget that lying Bush administration flunky, George Deutsch, who dared to censor scientific research. Everyone has heard how the administration cooked the evidence on Iraq, but there's far more abuse than that. Cheney bears most of the responsibility for the Klamath River Fish Kill. We're suffering myriad health problems that could be directly attributed to pollution, but we don't know as much as we should because research in those areas has been strongly discouraged. And we can only speculate on what medical advances we could be benefiting from right now if only stem cell research hadn't been suppressed. McCain seemed like he might break away from this terrible direction and take the Republican Party towards a more honest stance, but his pick of a social conservative global warming skeptic for running mate shows that he's given that up. I'd like the Republicans to be a reasonable choice again some day, but it won't be today, not by a country mile.
That's why scientists don't seem to have credibility. I sadly suspect "Joe 6 Pack" isn't going to be in the least impressed by the endorsements of scientists. How is Joe supposed to tell which science is real, and which is a pack of self-serving lies that shouldn't be called science? And why should he care? Thanks to this vicious campaign of misuse and abuse, he has serious doubts about the relevance and trustworthiness of science itself, which in any case, he just doesn't understand. He gets no help in understanding science, quite the opposite. No help from those liars with agendas who want to use Joe's confusion and anything else readily usable to manipulate Joe's opinions.
-
Re:Politics out of science? what about religion?
I wonder if each candidate is willing to tell the religious groups to grow up and let science be?
...Obama made it pretty clear that he believes in the independence of religion and education:
"I'm a Christian, and I believe in parents being able to provide children with religious instruction without interference from the state. But I also believe our schools are there to teach worldly knowledge and science. I believe in evolution, and I believe there's a difference between science and faith. That doesn't make faith any less important than science. It just means they're two different things. And I think it's a mistake to try to cloud the teaching of science with theories that frankly don't hold up to scientific inquiry."[7] http://sharp.sefora.org/people/presidential-candidates/barack-obama-presidential-candidate/url
-
Science Debate 2008
Scientists & Engineers for America: http://sefora.org/
Sciencedebate 2008: http://sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php
Space exploration and the sciences needs better representation in the lawyer-heavy political system. We need more math and science in the schools and people in office who understand the importance of such for the future of our country. Support your local (or state or fed) science-minded candidates. Thank you. -
Re: Smart people running for officeTrouble is....the people with brains rarely make it to the leadership roles...especially on the national level.
One group trying to change that is Scientists and Engineers for America.
-
Know-Something Party
"Science" is completely "apolitical". It's a-everything, because it's an abstract systematic behavior, not a person.
Scientists, on the other hand, can't be apolitical. They're humans, so they're going to be political to some degree, even if negligibly. More than two people in any society means politics. But apathy and disenfranchisement are political conditions, especially useful to those with power who make arbitrary decisions for their own reasons.
American politics does vast amounts of work according to decisions derived from facts about the way the world works. Especially the way that it works physically, as we know from physics, chemistry, biology, even astronomy. Those facts are supposed to determine the decisions we make, and the facts about those facts, to whatever degree of confidence we know we have.
Scientists are obligated to participate in politics. Not just like any other people in a democracy. But because they don't have the excuse that they don't know what will happen when the politicians do what they say.
Certainly scientists are much more appropriate to our Constitutional democratic republic than are, say, religious ministers. The Constitution specifically directs the government to "promote science", and specifically prohibits the government for "respecting an establishment of religion". Our government is crawling with religious establishment professionals. While its scientists increasingly get edited, silenced, ignored, fired, scapegoated. Scientists need to organize better to protect their interests in science. And we need them to do so, to protect our interests in science, and in them.
That's why I recommend people join SEA: Scientists and Engineers for America, even if you're not a scientist (it's free and open). Or join any more specific technical association in your discipline, then vigorously work to make policy hear your science. If you're a scientist, your work is already surely contributing to some corporate political action / lobbying industry. You should make sure that the facts you produce are being represented at least as much as the money you make for them.
Think of it as an experiment, in a lab made of people. Think of a political hypothesis to describe the way your country works best, then test it with the equipment. Share the results with the rest of us. -
Know-Something Party
"Science" is completely "apolitical". It's a-everything, because it's an abstract systematic behavior, not a person.
Scientists, on the other hand, can't be apolitical. They're humans, so they're going to be political to some degree, even if negligibly. More than two people in any society means politics. But apathy and disenfranchisement are political conditions, especially useful to those with power who make arbitrary decisions for their own reasons.
American politics does vast amounts of work according to decisions derived from facts about the way the world works. Especially the way that it works physically, as we know from physics, chemistry, biology, even astronomy. Those facts are supposed to determine the decisions we make, and the facts about those facts, to whatever degree of confidence we know we have.
Scientists are obligated to participate in politics. Not just like any other people in a democracy. But because they don't have the excuse that they don't know what will happen when the politicians do what they say.
Certainly scientists are much more appropriate to our Constitutional democratic republic than are, say, religious ministers. The Constitution specifically directs the government to "promote science", and specifically prohibits the government for "respecting an establishment of religion". Our government is crawling with religious establishment professionals. While its scientists increasingly get edited, silenced, ignored, fired, scapegoated. Scientists need to organize better to protect their interests in science. And we need them to do so, to protect our interests in science, and in them.
That's why I recommend people join SEA: Scientists and Engineers for America, even if you're not a scientist (it's free and open). Or join any more specific technical association in your discipline, then vigorously work to make policy hear your science. If you're a scientist, your work is already surely contributing to some corporate political action / lobbying industry. You should make sure that the facts you produce are being represented at least as much as the money you make for them.
Think of it as an experiment, in a lab made of people. Think of a political hypothesis to describe the way your country works best, then test it with the equipment. Share the results with the rest of us. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
SEA Grasps PoliticiansScientists and engineers now have a new org to help make sure that politicians and policymakers get the science/engineering info they need, "Scientists and Engineers for America". They recently appeared in an amusing Colbert Report episode, and on NPR's Talk of the Nation" show.
"Effective government depends on accurate, honest and timely advice from scientists and engineers. Science demands an open, transparent process of review and access to the best scholars from around the nation and the world. Mistakes dangerous to the nation's welfare and security have been made when governments prevent scientists from presenting the best evidence and analysis. Americans should demand that all candidates support the following Bill of Rights [...]"
They're a counterbalance to the "America for Religion" legion of "religious" political orgs - sort of a gnocracy, or maybe a "theocrat -> technocrat" transmogrifier. You can join, without any specific obligations, at http://www.sefora.org/ . You can "tell a friend", or contribute money to their operation. -
Scientists and Engineers too
There's a new group founded last month, with 14 Nobel Laureates on its board, that is advocating for "evidence-based debate and decision-making in politics". Sounds like a good goal.
-
Supported by Yoda?Looking at the list of SEA's supporters, I found this:
http://www.sefora.org/pages.php?submitted=1&id=93
What's up with this? Was it run through bablefish?