Domain: slappy.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to slappy.org.
Comments · 260
-
Re:This is absolutely a Great news and a Good ThinLinux on any platform is chock-full of memory leaks. You tend not to get that on OSes and software developed by professional programmers
Like Netscape? (possibly the biggest memory-sieve I've ever experienced)
Get lost, troll.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Re:Myth 2 for LinuxPPC
Also, I recently bought Civ:CTP, and there's a patch on Loki's web site that includes a PPC binary.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Re:Good/Bad?My only gripe about ext2 is its tendency to fragment. It's nearly as bad as NTFS in this regard. ufs and HPFS do a much better job at resisting fragmentation.
So, does anyone know if XFS is better at resisting fragmentation than ext2?
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
PRELOADS - Advantage: LinuxJoe User isn't going to switch to Linux on his own accord; he won't have to. He doesn't really choose Windows now, and when his machine is preloaded with Linux, it won't matter a whole lot to him, as long as the software he wants to run is there.
It's only a matter of time before Linux does to Windows what the PC did to the Mac. The Mac, in the late 80s/early 90s was a quite obviously superior piece of hardware to your run-of-the-mill PC. But it cost a lot more. The mass market went for the cheaper alternative, because the case for the Mac was not sufficiently compelling to make up for the higher cost.
The same thing is about to happen to Windows.
As soon as hardware vendors think they can get away with it (read: as soon as Linux will allow people to deal with Word documents and play some games), they will bundle Linux instead of Windows, to try to get that extra edge on the competition. It will save them $40-80 per unit, a not-inconsiderable sum in the razor-thin-margin PC market.
Think about the following trends:
- KDE moving to version 2.0 and including an office suite
- The beginnings of mainstream gaming support
- Corel's end-user Linux distribution
- Very-low-end clone vendors beginning to ship Linux as their default OS
The preloads are coming; it's just a matter of time.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Calm down, bud.Linux isn't ready for high end servers.
Who said it was? Jesse Berst? You're supposed to ignore him, anyhow. People love to rant and rave about things the "Linux community" is supposedly doing. 9 times out of 10, though, the "Linux community" is doing no such thing.
Linus has said he is interested in improving Linux's scalablity; he certainly hasn't said that Linux can be used on massive machines now. He also has said repeatedly that his core interest is the desktop.
Linux will be eventually scale up pretty far, but, yes, for the time being, Solaris is the way to go for relatively high-end stuff.
Of course, the Sun machines I work with run what would be more accrately described as GNU/Solaris...
:-)
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Re:Compared to MMRPGs...I'm wondering how this will do now that it will be competing for a part of the same audience that is now involved in MMRPGs like UO and EQ. I love the concept in both games, but there are times that both have frustrated the hell out of me.
I think you and I are not the only ones who have become frustrated by the shortcomings of MMRPGs. MMRPGs are far from ideal because:
- Anonymity encourages (or at least does not discourage) disruptive behavior. I'm part of a pen-and-paper AD&D group. If someone were disruptive to the group, we'd ask them to leave. There is no such incentive when people pay you to be on their server. Even putting aside the PKing (which is a real problem, especially on UO), UO and EQ seem to be largely devoid of role-playing, and are more like irc with pictures.
- Server lag seems to be an inevitable part of MMRPG-ing. I have friends who took a liking to Everquest. They felt that the massive scale of EQ would prevent the kind of lag seen in Ultima Online. Still, they play sometimes at 2 AM to avoid server lag.
- Campaigns/plots do not really exist in MMRPGs, because there is not a DM available to run such a campaign. When you pay to spend 4 hours/day fishing, I'd say there's a plot problem.
- Monthly fees, even if they're low, is still a drag.
This will allow me to play AD&D with gaming friends who have moved away. For this reason alone, I am anxiously awaiting this game. I hope they announce a ship date soon.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Re:Why does Windows bomb out so much? (Off topic)OS/2 1.x was developed jointly by IBM and Microsoft. It was to be the "next big thing" back in the late 80s/early 90s, and could preemptively multitask. Microsoft contributed things like HPFS, a not-half-bad filesystem that resists fragmentation pretty well, and has a MacOS-like implementation of custom resources in the filesystem ("Extended Attributes").
Unfortunately for IBM, what they didn't know was that Microsoft was working *heavily* on Windows in the meantime, and was using OS/2 as a decoy, to throw everyone off, so that they could use their preload power to dominate the OS *and* applications markets.
Some more OS/2 info (subject to the limitations of my memory): OS/2 1.0 was CLI-only, and was released in 1987. OS/2 1.x, released in 1989(?), introduced the Presentation Manager GUI, which was similar to the Windows 3.x interface. Early versions of OS/2 had a 16-bit architecture, and were released in two versions: one specifically for PS/2-based machines, and one for standard PC-compatibles.
OS/2 2.0, introduced in 1992, was partially 32-bit, and was the first IBM-only release of OS/2. It introduced the Workplace Shell, the object-oriented GUI you often hear old OS/2 users (like me) rave about. It also introduced the Win-OS/2 subsystem, which allowed the use of 16-bit Windows programs under OS/2.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
SOLD!I will be buying one, probably two (for my wife and I) copies of this game.
I've been waiting for a game like this for a long, long time. Particularly one that lets you run your own server and DM your own campaign.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
Re:Libertarians are "cool" Republicans.
Oh, knock off the trolling. Republicans have practically nothing in common with Libertarians, as their philosophy is completely different. As for the handful of Libertarians who have run as Republicans, well, there are about as many who have run as Democrats.
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page -
The voters have spoken, and they're wrongCAUTION: Political advocacy below. (Sorry, but the constant attacks on our freedoms are just getting too out of hand to stay silent)
By repeatedly voting for Republicans and Democrats, the American people have advocated this kind of war on the Constitution. And everyone here that has continued to vote for members of these two parties is a co-conspirator.
The *only* way you're going to stop this rush towards fascism is to stop voting for these fools, and to start voting Libertarian, and to get your friends to do the same. Even if you don't support every Libertarian position, you will at least begin to counter-balance the always-pro-regulation fascists who infest our governments.
As one prominent Libertarian likes to say:
If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got.
Insanity is defined as expecting different results from the same actions. Currently, the voting public is displaying insanity.
Stop it now. Start the change.
Thank you for this opportunity to advocate. Now back to your regular
/. discussion
--
Interested in XFMail? New XFMail home page