Domain: spam.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to spam.net.
Comments · 1
-
If you think Hormel is the bad guy here, think aga1. Hormel's policy. Its pretty clear, its coeherent,
http://spam.net/ci/ci_in.htm
We do not object to use of this slang term to describe UCE, although we do object to the use of the word "spam" as a trademark and to the use of our product image in association with that term. Also, if the term is to be used, it should be used in all lower-case letters to distinguish it from our trademark SPAM, which should be used with all uppercase letters.
Clueful folk in the industry recognize that Hormel is 'being nice'. I agree.
2. Some thoughts on SpamArrest:
http://tardigrade.net/challengeresponse.html
http://bre.klaki.net/dagbok/faerslur/1096220563.sh tml
http://www.nelson.monkey.org/~nelson/weblog/tech/b ad/spamarrest.html
These pretty much agree with my take on the issue.
I don't have much sympathy for SpamArrest. They are clueless as far as fighting spam properly, apparently so far as to not even be aware of Hormel's position noted above.