Domain: srijith.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to srijith.net.
Comments · 9
-
Another half-baked open soucred approach
Way back in 2003 I wrote some codes to do something similar. I called it Intelli-Aggie and the code is released under GPL. It remains a developmental prototype as I got side-tracked.
IA works, as noted in the readme, by computing a relevance factor, which in turn is based on four other 'relv' - category relevance, feed relevance, keyword relevance and item relevance. I used it as my reader for quiet some time before moving over to 'better' readers. -
Another half-baked open soucred approach
Way back in 2003 I wrote some codes to do something similar. I called it Intelli-Aggie and the code is released under GPL. It remains a developmental prototype as I got side-tracked.
IA works, as noted in the readme, by computing a relevance factor, which in turn is based on four other 'relv' - category relevance, feed relevance, keyword relevance and item relevance. I used it as my reader for quiet some time before moving over to 'better' readers. -
Another half-baked open soucred approach
Way back in 2003 I wrote some codes to do something similar. I called it Intelli-Aggie and the code is released under GPL. It remains a developmental prototype as I got side-tracked.
IA works, as noted in the readme, by computing a relevance factor, which in turn is based on four other 'relv' - category relevance, feed relevance, keyword relevance and item relevance. I used it as my reader for quiet some time before moving over to 'better' readers. -
Top 5 attackersHere is a list of top 5 attackers of Indian websites:
AIC - 166 defacements - 21.28%
GForce Pakistan - 116 defacements - 14.87%
Silver Lords - 101 defacements - 12.95%
WFD - 59 defacements - 7.56%
ISOTK - 17 defacements - 2.18% -
Top 5 attackersHere is a list of top 5 attackers of Indian websites:
AIC - 166 defacements - 21.28%
GForce Pakistan - 116 defacements - 14.87%
Silver Lords - 101 defacements - 12.95%
WFD - 59 defacements - 7.56%
ISOTK - 17 defacements - 2.18% -
Top 5 attackersHere is a list of top 5 attackers of Indian websites:
AIC - 166 defacements - 21.28%
GForce Pakistan - 116 defacements - 14.87%
Silver Lords - 101 defacements - 12.95%
WFD - 59 defacements - 7.56%
ISOTK - 17 defacements - 2.18% -
Top 5 attackersHere is a list of top 5 attackers of Indian websites:
AIC - 166 defacements - 21.28%
GForce Pakistan - 116 defacements - 14.87%
Silver Lords - 101 defacements - 12.95%
WFD - 59 defacements - 7.56%
ISOTK - 17 defacements - 2.18% -
Top 5 attackersHere is a list of top 5 attackers of Indian websites:
AIC - 166 defacements - 21.28%
GForce Pakistan - 116 defacements - 14.87%
Silver Lords - 101 defacements - 12.95%
WFD - 59 defacements - 7.56%
ISOTK - 17 defacements - 2.18% -
Re:New Scientist didn't put it very well...>>Caltech's Vegas looks great on pictures, however, there were papers pointing out that it's not exactly fair, especially with multiple bottlenecks of real-world topology.
Good God.. dont tell me more that 1 year of my MSc work had gone down the drain :) On a more serious note, I agree with what you have mentioned about Vegas. The pro-active and less agressive nature of TCP Vegas is one of the main reason why Vegas is not welcome in the real world. Even though there have been many soltions to the problem (including my own Vegas-A), there is always something left to be desired. I have not read the paper Stablized Vegas, but I have read lmlost all other important Vegas papers. From these, a list of problems with TCP Vegas would look like:- Unfair bandwidth sharing with NewReno
- Inability to distinguish between re-routing and delay caused by congestion
- Unfairness against higher bandwidth flows
- Unfairness against older flows
However there are also at the same time a lot of + points with respect to Vegas like:- Lesser number of packet drops
- Hence lesser retransmissions and higher goodput.
- Lesser buffer utlisation at the routers