Domain: tammybruce.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to tammybruce.com.
Comments · 31
-
Re:Senator Al Franken
After seeing this, nope... not really.
-
Making America into "a Shining City on a Hill"If you care about this country, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy BruceO'Reilly cannot win even if he garners a majority of the votes because most states require even write-in candidates to register their candidacy. Nonetheless, O'Reilly can have a "Perot Effect". If he garners a large enough percentage of the vote, then the dominant political parties will adopt his ideas. After Perot lost the race for president, the Republicans adopted most of his ideas for the "Contract with America", of which most became law.
Here is what O'Reilly supports.
- affirmative action on the basis of economic status, not ethnicity
- putting the national guard on the border to defend it (note: many European countries use the military to defend the borders from illegal aliens)
- using air power to stop despots in countries where the population is hostile to Western culture (i.e. never again sacrifice American lives for ingrates like the Iraqis)
- allowing homosexual couples to adopt kids
- the minimum wage
- strong legislation to protect the environment
-
Let's Rebuild America: O'Reilly and BruceIf you care about this country, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
O'Reilly cannot win even if he garners a majority of the votes because most states require even write-in candidates to register their candidacy. Nonetheless, O'Reilly can have a "Perot Effect". If he garners a large enough percentage of the vote, then the dominant political parties will adopt his ideas. After Perot lost the race for president, the Republicans adopted most of his ideas for the "Contract with America", of which most became law.
Here is what O'Reilly supports.
- affirmative action on the basis of economic status, not ethnicity
- putting the national guard on the border to defend it (note: many European countries use the military to defend the borders from illegal aliens)
- using air power to stop despots in countries where the population is hostile to Western culture (i.e. never again sacrifice American lives for ingrates like the Iraqis)
- allowing homosexual couples to adopt kids
- the minimum wage
- strong legislation to protect the environment
-
Support a Write-in Candidate.If you care about this country, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce.O'Reilly cannot win even if he garners a majority of the votes because most states require even write-in candidates to register their candidacy. Nonetheless, O'Reilly can have a "Perot Effect". If he garners a large enough percentage of the vote, then the dominant political parties will adopt his ideas. After Perot lost the race for president, the Republicans adopted most of his ideas for the "Contract with America", of which most became law.
Here is what O'Reilly supports.
- affirmative action on the basis of economic status, not ethnicity
- putting the national guard on the border to defend it (note: many European countries use the military to defend the borders from illegal aliens)
- using air power to stop despots in countries where the population is hostile to Western culture (i.e. never again sacrifice American lives for ingrates like the Iraqs)
- allowing homosexual couples to adopt kids
- the minimum wage
- strong legislation to protect the environment
-
Foreign Fascination with American ElectionHas anyone noticed the fascination by foreigners in the American election?
Here is the tally of the fascination.
- The Chinese government has stated that it wants Kerry to win.
- The Australian government has stated that it wants Bush to win.
- The Russian government has stated that it was Bush to win.
- Osama Bin Laden has stated that it (yes, "it") wants Kerry to win.
Maybe, the time has come for a real change in power. Write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy BruceO'Reilly obviously cannot win even if he gets more than 50% of the vote because the rules of most states requires write-in candidates to register their candidacy. Nonetheless, if O'Reilly garners enough of the popular vote, he would have the "Perot Effect". Whoever is president would be forced to listen to O'Reilly and his supporters, altering the direction of the country for the better.
-
Cell Phones - Hazard on the RoadWe should ban anything that distracts the driver from the actual driving. The exception would be the radio.
Consider a study done by the American Automobile Association. Cell Phones are a distraction. Having prior experience with using such a phone during driving does not reduce the likelihood of distraction.
Some states now ban the use of a cell phone while driving.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
No Vote is Wasted if ...No vote is wasted if the person casting the vote has made an effort to learn about the issues.
Furthermore, voting for Bill O'Reilly will not be a wasted vote even if he cannot win. Indeed, he cannot win even if he receives more than 50% of the popular vote in all the states because, by the rules of most states, even a write-in candidate must register his candidacy.
However, if O'Reilly receives a sufficiently large percentage of the vote, then he can alter politics for the next decade. Consider Ross Perot. He lost the election, but because he received a large percentage of the popular vote, his ideas won. The Republican party adopted most of his ideas in "The Contract with America", and most of them became law. A good example is "workfare".
So, let's rebuild America into the "shining city on the hill". Write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Chinese Agents Cross Mexican Border into USAYou gave me two references for your first two assertions, but left me blind on the last. Got any links to authoritative info?
Thanks for the lead into my next comment. Next time, just use Yahoo Search to find the article.
Indeed, Chinese agents are enterin the USA from Mexico.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then join me in writing the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
West = #1 on Environment and Worker's RightsThe clothing industry actually established something like this in the 1930's. My father worked in the garment district in Manhattan and he said it made a big difference.
The West has always been on the forefront of human rights and worker's rights. Ditto for the environment.
Check out the last study by the Silicon Valley Toxics coalition. The study evaluates each computer companies' commitment to the environment. The top-ranked companies were all companies based in Western countries (e.g. Japan and the USA) and run on Western principles.
In the study, Dell received a failing grade. That Dell is finally cleaning up its act is good news.
Note that all the Korean and Chinese (including Taiwanese and Hong Kong) companies received failing grades. Interestingly, Korean and Chinese clothing factories in South America and Southeast Asia are notorious for abusing garment workers. Abuse includes beatings and rape.
The companies that treat garment workers best are American and Japanese.
If you hate the state of world affairs, join me in writing the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Let's Fight BackI understand how you feel. Too many moderators mod an article based on the viewpoint in the article. For example, if there is an article condemning the Chinese for occupying Tibet, then you can be sure that someone will mod that article down as a "Troll" or "Flamebait". The phenomenon also occurs when you write an article opposing H-1Bs.
Often, race politics is rearing its ugly head. A Hispanic moderator will mod down articles supporting the deportation of illegal aliens. Indian moderators will mod down articles opposing H-1Bs.
These moderators hate people like Bill O'Reilly because he calls the situation for what it is (most of the time). Don't allow the moderators on Slashdot to bother you. Do what I do. I call talk shows and write letters to journals. These moderators cannot shut you up in those forums.
If you hate[1] what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce[1] The best way to fight race politics is to vote against any politician who brings his "ethnic" identity into the race. You often hear Indian politicians start by saying, "As a person with a proud Indian heritage..."
-
Setting Legal Precedent for Howard Stern and IlkI applaud the EFF for fighting the FCC. If the EFF can establish that the FCC only has powers specifically prescribed by Congress (as opposed to having any power unless it is specifically circumscribed by Congress), then the EFF will establish an awesome legal precedent that will pave the way for folks like Howard Stern in the digial era. He and others like him need not fear the FCC again -- at least in the domain of digital communication.
Remember that Stern, himself, paved the way for Bill O'Reilly. Before Stern, people like Bill O'Reilly really could not say "outrageous" things like "let's use the national guard to defend the borders from illegal aliens." Stern pushed the limit of being outrageous, and O'Reilly lives within that limit.
The point is not that O'Reilly's comments are outrageous. They are not. Rather, some people who hate O'Reilly are bigots and accuse him of being outrageous. In the past, these bigots would use the "outrageous" label to convince the FCC to shut O'Reilly down. However, thanks to Stern, these bigots can no longer use the "outrageous" label to shut down folks like O'Reilly. After all, even the bigots note that O'Reilly's comments are not more outrageous than Stern's comments about anal sex, transvestites, and heroine addiction.
Let's support the EFF, Howard Stern, and
... Bill O'Reilly.If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then please the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Ralph Nader?Why is Ralph Nader not participating in this debate? He is a "third-party" candidate since he is hardly mainstream.
In order for this debate to have credibility and in order to raise the profile of this debate, we need a "star" to give the questions to the candidates. Let's ask Bill O'Reilly to be the questioner.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
"New York Times" owns the "Boston Globe"The "Boston Globe" is part of the "New York Times" (NYT). As we all know, the NYT unabashedly supports Kerry.
I am no fan of Bush. Nonetheless, the incredible bias of the media in favor of Kerry should cause us to re-think what we read.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Re:H1-B not so badBut what you're saying sounds like intentionally preventing other not-hidden geniuses to enter because you personally feel threatened.
You talk like an Indian, Chinese, or Hispanic.
I have no hidden motive. I support the inscription on the Statue of Liberty. Immigration should only be for the direly impoverished, not for H-1Bs. The history of American immigration shows that people from the impoverished class appreciate the change to enter the USA and to assimilate. H-1B's are the elite of their nations and, once they are here in the USA, they decline to assimilate, and they start spouting crap about how great the "motherland culture" is.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Let's Fight BackI understand how you feel. Too many moderators mod an article based on the viewpoint in the article. For example, if there is an article condemning the Chinese for occupying Tibet, then you can be sure that someone will mod that article down as a "Troll" or "Flamebait". The phenomenon also occurs when you write an article opposing H-1Bs.
Often, race politics is rearing its ugly head. A Hispanic moderator will mod down articles supporting the deportation of illegal aliens. Indian moderators will mod down articles opposing H-1Bs.
These moderators hate people like Bill O'Reilly because he calls the situation for what it is (most of the time). Don't allow the moderators on Slashdot to bother you. Do what I do. I call talk shows and write letters to journals. These moderators cannot shut you up in those forums.
If you hate[1] what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce[1] The best way to fight race politics is to vote against any politician who brings his "ethnic" identity into the race. You often hear Indian politicians start by saying, "As a person with a proud Indian heritage..."
-
Moderators are biased.I understand how you feel. Too many moderators mod an article based on the viewpoint in the article. For example, if there is an article condemning the Chinese for occupying Tibet, then you can be sure that someone will mod that article down as a "Troll" or "Flamebait". The phenomenon also occurs when you write an article opposing H-1Bs.
Often, race politics is rearing its ugly head. A Hispanic moderator will mod down articles supporting the deportation of illegal aliens. Indian moderators will mod down articles opposing H-1Bs.
These moderators hate people like Bill O'Reilly because he calls the situation for what it is (most of the time). Don't allow the moderators on Slashdot to bother you. Do what I do. I call talk shows and write letters to journals. These moderators cannot shut you up in those forums.
If you hate[1] what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce[1] The best way to fight race politics is to vote against any politician who brings his "ethnic" identity into the race. You often hear Indian politicians start by saying, "As a person with a proud Indian heritage,
..." -
Soros, the freak, funds http://www.moveon.orgSoros is not near the center. Soros funds the following web site.
This web site claims that Bush is worse than Hitler. This web site also claims that Bush deliberately lied about the presence of WMDs in Iraq. This web site also claims that Bush allowed Arab bigots to board an airplane within days after 9/11.
Reputable newspapers like the "Washington Post" have indicated that all these claims are lies. Soros is a lunatic. Only a lunatic would claim that Bush is worse than Hitler. Furthermore, the CIA gave flawed intelligence data to both Bush and Clinton, and both men concluded that Iraq had WMDs. Finally, no airplanes were allowed to fly to Saudia Arabia in the days after 9/11.
Soros is a certifiable freak -- just like some of the nuts who moderate articles in this forum.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Biased Moderators on SlashdotWell, it has been been pretty much pro-kerry, pro-liberal, pro-democratic non-geek news foisted on slashdotters of all persuasions.
If you support any of the following positions, then your article will be modded down as "flamebait" or "troll".
1. deporting illegal aliens
2. banning H-1B workers from India, China, and Korea
3. praising Bill O'Reilly
There is a remedy. Take your views to the radio. Call radio talk shows and write letters to the editor of magazines. I have expressed all my views in those forums.
I succeeded in putting several Taiwanese politicians on the spot. Unlike Slashdot, the Chinese and the Indians cannot shut you up in those other forums.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
H-1B's Feeding the Internet BubbleThe article starting this thread of discussion omits the Internet bubble's key element: H-1B engineers from India and China (which includes Taiwan province and Hong Kong). Here is what happened.
When the Internet frenzy began in 1998, the labor market encountered shortages. Consider what would have happened in two scenarios: (1) no H-1B's and (2) plenty of H-1B's. Consider scenario #1. The dire labor shortages would have done 2 things: (1) improved working conditions for engineers and (2) raised salaries. "Improved working conditions" could, for example, mean that the average working hours is reduced so that the engineers can return home somewhat earlier to be with their families and to build better relationships with their children. When companies cannot raise salaries to attract more workers, the companies could improve working conditions.
As salaries rise and working conditions improve, more people enter the engineering profession. However, the labor market does not grow fast enough, so some ideas are delayed and are not turned into startup companies. There is no problem here, since there are already plenty of jobs. Some companies close due to labor shortages. Consequently, venture capitalists are more prudent and do not fund hokey, idiotic ideas.
During the downtown in 2003 to 2005, there is a surplus in the labor market, and the ideas previously delayed due to a labor shortage are now converted into companies, hiring the newly unemployed Americans. The downtown is not severe. All is well.
Now, consider scenario #2, which actually happened. Into the picture enters the H-1B engineers from India and China. Instead of allowing market forces to work in the labor market for high-tech employees, the American government chose to intervene aggressively -- in much the same fashion that the government has intervened in the low-tech labor market. The government "fixed" the labor shortage and flooded the market with H-1B engineers (in the same fashion that the government floods the low-tech labor market with Mexican illegal aliens).
Companies demand that engineers work 57 hours per week. Since the Indians work 57 hours per week, the other engineers better work 57 hours per week. Otherwise, they are "out" of the company.
Almost every idea is converted into a startup company since there is plenty of H-1B labor. Many hokey, idiotic ideas are funded by venture capitalists.
The shortage of labor does increase wages, but wages do not rise as rapidly as they would in scenario #1.
Rents increase rapidly. The flood of H-1B engineers create a housing shortage. The Chinese engineers and the Indian engineers come from the elite of their nations, and expensive housing is no problem. They lived as elites in their own nations, and they have the money to pour into high rents and high mortgates.
Then, the downturn arrives in 2001-2003. All the companies based on hokey, idiotic ideas crash. Massive numbers of people are fired. Unemployment in Silicon Valley reaches 9%. The downturn is deep and long.
There are very few new delayed ideas because most of them were implemented as new startup companies during the Internet craze. The H-1B hordes facilitated this situation.
Which scenario is better? Scenario #1 is better. Allow the free market to work. The government should not intervene in the high-tech labor market. If the government did not intervene, the downturn in the Silicon Valley would have been much milder than it actually was. We should not allow any more H-1B workers into this country unless that country has a free market. In other words, H-1B workers from Canada and Europe are okay. However, foreign workers from Mexico, China, and India should be banned.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Kyoto Treaty, anyone?Clearly, the Bush administration has failed on the environment. It refused to sign the Kyoto Treaty to prevent global warming.
Guess what? President Putin, of all people, has solidly supported the treaty and intends to sign it.
Want another example? The Bush administration refused to enact tough standards for automotive emissions and claims that they are unfeasible. Yet, the California government has just enacted such legislation. Furthermore, the technology is quite feasible. Both Honda and Mazda make ULEVs (ultra low emission vehicles).
The issue is not one of whether government should be funding or subsidizing research and development. We all have our opinions on such government intervention.
The issue is one of the Bush administration (and also previous Democratic administrations) simply making false statements about science and technology and then using those false statements to pursue policies that damage the environment.
The best example is nuclear power. It is clean and efficient and could substantially reduce our dependence on oil from Islamic thugs. Yet, science frauds in the government have effectively stopped the construction of any more nuclear power plants since the 1970s.
Really, we can blame only ourselves. We elect these idiots.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Most Democrats/Republicans Are Not PopulistsWhy should the behavior of the Republicans surprise anyone? They do not care about the average American. Ditto for Democrats.
[The following is worth repeating and is comments that I submitted in another thread of discussion.]
Any high-tech job that can be outsourced will be outsourced. You will see a continuous shrinking of the high-tech labor force.
Both political parties claim that free markets require the free exchange of goods and services (which includes labor) between the USA and other members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and fusing the American market with the Chinese/Indian/Mexican market maintains the free market in the USA. Unfortunately, the politicians are just playing a verbal game with economics.
Allow me to explain. The USA, in isolation, is a relatively free market -- with relatively little government intervention (compare to, say, China). So is Japan, Canada, and the rest of the West. However, Mexico, China, and India are not free markets. Excessive government intervention has damaged the markets in those economies, and they cannot provide jobs for millions of underemployed persons.
When the USA interacts with, say, China, we have the interaction of a free market and a non-free market. The by-product (i.e. millions of underemployed Chinese) of non-market forces now affects the market dynamics in the USA. The underemployed Chinese are a continuing stream of cheap slave labor; jobs are then transferred from the USA to China.
The USA is no longer a free market because non-market forces (in this case, Chinese government intervention) is altering the dynamics of the labor market in the USA. The verbal game that politicians play is to simply define the USA to be a "free market", ignoring the fact that the Chinese government is now grossly affecting the labor market of the USA.
Similar comments apply to both India and Mexico.
Similar comments apply to H-1B workers and illegal aliens from Mexico: the American government has, in effect, actively used H-1B workers and illegal aliens to intervene in the labor markets in both high tech and low tech. Illegal aliens have destroyed the upward pressure on wages in the market for unskilled labor. H-1B have hurt salaries for engineers. Shortages are a normal part of any labor market, and they are an upward force on salaries/wages and working conditions. When the government actively works to wipe out such shortages in the low-tech market and the high-tech market, the government is damaging market forces.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Answer: Anyone Who Supports Free MarketsThe best politician for information technology or the rest of the economy is a politician who supports genuine free markets. A free market is one where market forces are allowed to operate normally except for certain caveats: government intervention to protect the environment, worker's rights, etc.
Note that when we combine a free market like the USA and a non-free market like Mexico, we damage the free market in the USA. For example, the influx of illegal aliens is created by horrible intervention by the Mexican government in the Mexican economy. This influx then destroys the normal market forces in the labor market for unskilled labor in the USA. Ultimately, the USA no longer has a free market.
Note that before the influx of illegal aliens, the free market worked fine in the USA. Unskilled laborers earned enough money to support their families.
Similar comments apply to H-1B workers from India, China (which includes Taiwan province and Hong Kong), etc. They destroy the normal market forces in the market for high-tech labor.
Supporting free markets means that the USA engages in trade (which includes the exchange of labor like engineers, farmers, vegetable pickers, etc.) only with other free markets like that in Canada, Europe, Japan, etc. Supporting free markets means that we defend the border against the influx of illegal aliens and canceling the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
Supporting free markets means that H-1B engineers from Europe, Japan, and Canada are allowed into the USA. H-1B engineers from India and China are banned.
Supporting free markets means that we terminate unfettered trade with China and India until both societies commit to free market principles. They go hand in hand with democracy. Note the presence of Chinese soldiers in Tibet, and the large number of Taiwanese who have spied for Beijing.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
"Football Fans..." is joke, but Kerry is dishonestKerry testified, in Congress, that American soldiers regularly committed atrocities in Vietnam.
In 1971, Kerry declared, in Congress, "I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.
It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit, the emotions in the room, the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam, but they did. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.
They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, tape wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country."
Kerry lied in order to advance his own career. His words endangered the lives of American soldiers in Vietnam.
Even after 30 years, some disgusting acts should never be forgotten. Achieving a political career by lying about the acts of American soldiers in Vietnam is absolutely disgusting.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Sean Hannity and Race-Baiting CommercialsMonitering the elections is good news for honest people like Michael Savage, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, etc.
Today, the local radio station aired "The Best of Sean Hannity". Sean Hannity repeatedly demanded to know why Jamal, an African-American, created an anti-Bush ad that accuses Republicans of disenfranchising Black voters in Florida 2000. Hannity challenged Jamal to name one Black voter who was disenfranchised. Jamal could not do so despite his race-baiting commercial.
Allowing the Europeans to moniter the elections will ensure that we prove Jamal and his ilk to be liars. I applaud the Europeans helping us out.
If you hate what is happening to our nation, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Analysis of Outsourcing, H-1Bs, and Illegal Aliens[The following is worth repeating and is comments that I submitted in another thread of discussion.]
Any high-tech job that can be outsourced will be outsourced. You will see a continuous shrinking of the high-tech labor force.
Both political parties claim that free markets require the free exchange of goods and services (which includes labor) between the USA and other members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and fusing the American market with the Chinese/Indian/Mexican market maintains the free market in the USA. Unfortunately, the politicians are just playing a verbal game with economics.
Allow me to explain. The USA, in isolation, is a relatively free market -- with relatively little government intervention (compare to, say, China). So is Japan, Canada, and the rest of the West. However, Mexico, China, and India are not free markets. Excessive government intervention has damaged the markets in those economies, and they cannot provide jobs for millions of underemployed persons.
When the USA interacts with, say, China, we have the interaction of a free market and a non-free market. The by-product (i.e. millions of underemployed Chinese) of non-market forces now affects the market dynamics in the USA. The underemployed Chinese are a continuing stream of cheap slave labor; jobs are then transferred from the USA to China.
The USA is no longer a free market because non-market forces (in this case, Chinese government intervention) is altering the dynamics of the labor market in the USA. The verbal game that politicians play is to simply define the USA to be a "free market", ignoring the fact that the Chinese government is now grossly affecting the labor market of the USA.
Similar comments apply to both India and Mexico.
Similar comments apply to H-1B workers and illegal aliens from Mexico: the American government has, in effect, actively used H-1B workers and illegal aliens to intervene in the labor markets in both high tech and low tech. Illegal aliens have destroyed the upward pressure on wages in the market for unskilled labor. H-1B have hurt salaries for engineers. Shortages are a normal part of any labor market, and they are an upward force on salaries/wages and working conditions. When the government actively works to wipe out such shortages in the low-tech market and the high-tech market, the government is damaging market forces.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Will you protect the US-Mexican border?My question is "How and when will you protect the US-Mexican border if you win the election?"
The flood of illegal aliens has destroyed the normal upward force on wages and working conditions in the market for unskilled labor. Americans who are in this market cannot earn enough money to buy basic necessities like housing and food. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats care about Americans in this market. The Republicans and the Democrats care only about catering to racists in LaRaza, the Hispanic equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
How and when will you protect US-Mexican border?My question is "How and when will you protect the US-Mexican border if you win the election?"
The flood of illegal aliens has destroyed the normal upward force on wages and working conditions in the market for unskilled labor. Americans who are in this market cannot earn enough money to buy basic necessities like housing and food. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats care about Americans in this market. The Republicans and the Democrats care only about catering to racists in LaRaza, the Hispanic equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Debates are Show, not SubstanceWhen we evaluate politicians, we should not use the words that they utter during a campaign. Politicians alter/spin their positions to attract the most voters.
Debates are simply a forum for politicians to read their scripted lines: all show and no substance. The handlers have told the politicians what to emphasize and what to avoid at the debates. For the same reason, interviews with politicians during the campaign season are pointless.
If you want to know how the politicians will act once they are elected, then study their votes in the years prior to the election. What were their positions on the major issues?
Look at the border with Mexico. Both Kerry and Bush claim that they oppose illegal immigration. Yet, neither has done anything to enforce the borders.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA (which is firmly grounded in Western culture), then join me in writing the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy BruceThey cannot win in the upcoming election since they have not formally registered as candidates, according to the rules of most states. However, if they garner a sizeable portion of the votes, then they can have a "Perot Effect". Although Perot lost the election, the Republicans incorporated most of his ideas in the "Contract with America", of which most was enacted into law.
-
Analysis of Outsourcing, H-1Bs, and Illegal AliensAny high-tech job that can be outsourced will be outsourced. You will see a continuous shrinking of the high-tech labor force.
Both political parties claim that free markets require the free exchange of goods and services (which includes labor) between the USA and other members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and fusing the American market with the Chinese/Indian/Mexican market maintains the free market in the USA. Unfortunately, the politicians are just playing a verbal game with economics.
Allow me to explain. The USA, in isolation, is a relatively free market -- with relatively little government intervention (compare to, say, China). So is Japan, Canada, and the rest of the West. However, Mexico, China, and India are not free markets. Excessive government intervention has damaged the markets in those economies, and they cannot provide jobs for millions of underemployed persons.
When the USA interacts with, say, China, we have the interaction of a free market and a non-free market. The by-product (i.e. millions of underemployed Chinese) of non-market forces now affects the market dynamics in the USA. The underemployed Chinese are a continuing stream of cheap slave labor; jobs are then transferred from the USA to China.
The USA is no longer a free market because non-market forces (in this case, Chinese government intervention) is altering the dynamics of the labor market in the USA. The verbal game that politicians play is to simply define the USA to be a "free market", ignoring the fact that the Chinese government is now grossly affecting the labor market of the USA.
Similar comments apply to both India and Mexico. Similar comments apply to H-1B workers and illegal aliens from Mexico: the American government has, in effect, actively used H-1B workers and illegal aliens to intervene in the labor markets in both high tech and low tech. Illegal aliens have destroyed the upward pressure on wages in the market for unskilled labor. H-1B have hurt salaries for engineers. Shortages are a normal part of any labor market, and they are an upward force on salaries/wages and working conditions. When the government actively works to wipe out such shortages, the government is damaging market forces.
If you hate what is happening to our country, the USA, then please write the following on the November ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Hispanic Politicians and VotersWithin the next 20 years, La Raza will become the 3rd political party in the USA. To understand the nature of La Raza, I offer the following quote from a speech by Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor at the University of Texas at Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida Party. He gave the speech at UC Riverside in 1/1995.
The border remains a military zone. We remain a hunted people. Now you think you have a destiny to fulfill in the land that historically has been ours for forty thousand years. And we're a new Mestizo nation. And they want us to discuss civil rights. Civil rights. What law made by white men to oppress all of us of color, female and male. This is our homeland. We cannot - we will not- and we must not be made illegal in our own homeland. We are not immigrants that came from another country to another country. We are migrants, free to travel the length and breadth of the Americas because we belong here. We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. It's a matter of time. The explosion is in our population.
You can also listen to the an actual audio clip of the quote above. There is an important web site with other quotes and audio clips.
Is anyone shocked by La Raza and the Hispanics who support La Raza? La Raza is the Hispanic equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan.
I am extremely concerned that La Raza will become the "one party" that controls America in 2025. Our refusal to control our borders has led to an explosive political dynamic that will be hostile to anyone who is not Hispanic.
Write the following candidates on the presidential ballot.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy Bruce -
Nader should run, but Bill O'Reilly is best choiceLike all other American citizens, Ralph is entitled to run for president. Anyone who demands that he quit is un-American and simply refuses to accept the great Western tradition of democracy.
By the way, none of the current candidates are worth a hoot.
I recommend that you write the following protest vote.
president: Bill O'Reilly
vice-president: Tammy BruceThough they cannot win because they have not registered for candidacy by the rules of most states, if enough people vote for O'Reilly and Bruce, they will have a profound "Perot Effect". Though Ross Perot did not win, he did force the Republicans to adopt most of his ideas in the "Contract with America".
If you support the ideas that O'Reilly and Bruce espouse, then please write them on the ballot.
Feel free to pass this message to as many people as possible.